town of breckenridge valley brook childcare center final
Transcription
town of breckenridge valley brook childcare center final
town of breckenridge valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 project information project location table of contents Tract A-1, Block 11, Breckenridge, Colorado project information 1 Town of Breckenridge PO Box 168 Breckenridge, Colorado 80424 project summary 2 project priorities 3 Laurie Best, Peter Grosshuesch Tom Daugherty Jennifer McAtamney Kathy Grotemeyer Lucinda Burns Jo Copeland project program 4-7 sustainable design goals 8 preliminary design schedule 9-10 design narrative 11 RSMay & Associates, LLC Randy May PO Box 2011 Dillon, CO 80435 [email protected] preliminary site plan 12 preliminary floor plan 13 3D model 14-15 operator: TBD comparable facilities research 16-27 contractor: TCD, Inc. Keith Pitts, Vice President PO Box 4564 Breckenridge, CO 80424 [email protected] summit daily news article 28 architect: Matthew Stais Architects Matthew Stais, Principal Architect PO Box 135 Breckenridge, CO 80424 [email protected] advisory group: Buhler, John Dixon, Jill Egolf, Tracey Gagen, Tim Grassetti, Allison Holman, Rick Kellerman, Alison Kenady, Courtney Meir, Martha Morgan, Glen Patricelli, Alison Root, Craig Springer, Bill Thompson, Matt Westerhoff, Ann-Mari Zwaagstra, Lynn project team owner: steering committee: owner’s rep: valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] page: 1 project summary The Town of Breckenridge (Town) is a historic mining town located in the central Colorado mountains, approximately 75 miles west of Denver. It is a popular year-round tourist destination that is known for a variety of recreational opportunities. Local residents cherish these opportunities, but consequently face a lack of affordable housing as well as quality, affordable childcare. In early 2007, the Town hired a research consultant to complete a needs assessment study that looked at the current need for quality affordable childcare in the Town of Breckenridge. The needs assessment report was completed in April 2007 and confirmed the need for quality, affordable childcare for a significant number of families in Breckenridge. On March 26, 2007, the Town issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for interested firms to provide preliminary design, final design, engineering and specifications, and construction administration for a new childcare facility. Matthew Stais Architects was awarded the contract and started work in May 2007. This program document summarizes our work to date and will provide a basis for more detailed design decisions as the project moves forward. To meet a tight schedule set by the Town, the project program needed to be nailed down quickly. A “working group” and an “advisory group” were named. The working group consists of the owner’s representatives and the design team. The advisory group consists of local providers, neighbors of the project, and community members at-large. These groups met for two design charrettes in May 2007 to develop the project program. After compiling input from these charrettes, reviewing of the State of Colorado Rules and Regulations for childcare facilities, and upon approval from the Town Council, the working group defined the project program. The new facility, named the “Valley Brook Childcare Center (VBCC)”, will accommodate 60 full-time children: 20 infants, 20 toddlers, and 20 preschoolers. This will alleviate approximately ½ of the current need as described in the needs assessment report. The Town Council has directed the design team that they do not intend to expand this facility to meet the entire current need, but rather they will choose to build another facility or utilize existing buildings to accommodate the community’s need. Schedule, quality, safety and security, and designing a “green” building have been identified as the highest project priorities. The VBCC will be located at the north end of Town near the new Police Station, the Upper Blue Elementary School, and the Recreation Center. It is part of the Town’s Block 11 Master Plan which also includes the addition of affordable housing and the new Colorado Mountain College campus. The facility will be integrated with the existing infrastructure and future development to compliment the site. The VBCC will be designed in accordance with Qualistar requirements. Qualistar is a non-profit organization that operates in the state of Colorado to improve the quality early childhood education. Centers that earn a Qualistar rating have proven that they meet higher standards than the State Rules and Regulations. While the design of the building alone will not earn a Qualistar rating, it is a key component of the rating scale and the building will be designed to maximize the potential for the operator to earn a high rating. The project schedule is tight, with design completion projected for August 2007, construction beginning in October 2007 and occupancy expected in August 2008. The general contractor was named in July 2007, and the Town hopes to have an operator for the new facility selected by October 2007. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 2 project priorities The establishment of project priorities is a key step in the programming and design process. The first, preliminary list of project priorities was developed at the second design charrette, on 31 May 2007 with the project’s advisory group. The rankings (in descending order with the most important first) and language were reviewed and confirmed by the project working group, also on 31 May 2007. 1. Qualistar Rated Facility for 60 children [based on needs assessment] 2. Safety and security of the site 3. Sustainable design [per Breckenridge Vision Plan] 4. Get the building design right: flexible design to accommodate changing needs of community/curriculum/security 5. Schedule [driven by Kinderhut closing, projected April 2008] 6. Budget – 1st costs/operating costs that meet Town requirements 7. Coordination with neighbors 8. Vehicular circulation and parking 9. Non-motorized circulation/trail connections to neighborhoods and river 10. Addition of community functions if other priorities not compromised Upon review by the Breckenridge Town Council, the rankings and language were changed to the following, which represent the final project priorities: 1. Schedule [driven by Kinderhut closing, projected April 2008] 2. Qualistar Rated Facility for 60 children [based on needs assessment] 3. Safety and security of the site 4. Sustainable design [per Breckenridge Vision Plan] 5. Get the building design right: flexible design to accommodate changing needs of community/curriculum/security 6. Budget – 1st costs/operating costs that meet Town requirements 7. Coordination with neighbors 8. Vehicular circulation and parking 9. Non-motorized circulation/trail connections to neighborhoods and river 10. Addition of community functions if other priorities not compromised valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 3 project program preliminary project program 31 may 2007 [after charrette input] 1. building program: a. Student Space [60 spots at 45 sq ft per student] [*] 2,700 b. Student Accessory Space [lockers, counters, etc in add’n to 45 sf] TBD c. Multi-Purpose/Community Room [racquetball court size] [**] 800 d. Multi-Purpose/Community Room Storage/Kitchen 330 e. Entry Vestibule/Lobby 400 f. Staff Offices 300 g. Staff Break Area/Restrooms/Storage/Misc 400 h. Parent Resource Area combine w/staff break area i. Sick Child/TLC Room use office area as needed j. Kitchen 75 k. Laundry 75 l. Classroom Storage [10% classroom floor space] 270 m. Circulation/Misc [10% above total] 500 n. Mechanical/Electrical Service Space [10% above total] 500 o. Total: 6,350 sf 2. site program: a. outdoor entry b. play areas: areas TBD based on qualistar c. on-site parking: 35-40 total spaces i. staff: 20-25 ii. drop-off/parents: 15 iii. overflow: at dumpster etc? TBD d. off-site/overflow/shared parking area[s]: not included e. service access [dumpster/recycling/maintenance] f. fire lane/RWB parking: TBD g. trail connections h. neighborhood connections [*] preliminary figure: will be broken down/detailed as we get further into the project. [**]preliminary figure: research lake Dillon preschool. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 4 research of classroom sizes to meet program needs to: project team via: email from: matt stais date: 23 july 2007 project: valley brook childcare center re: re-programming of classroom spaces I met with Kathy Grotemeyer this morning to review classroom sizes and program for VBCC. We had independently arrived at the same conclusion – that the classrooms needed to grow [she from her experience, me from re-reading the state regulations]. Further, once the rooms grow, we won’t need so many. A lot of our discussion centered around efficient staffing [i.e., #kids/room, #/teachers/room, state regulations for minimums vs. experience points out to be optimum, or at least better than minimum]. This memo will detail our discussions and conclusions. Please read it carefully and pick it apart – the future of the project will be based on this, and your comments. I think we are on the right track, because what will serve staffing needs more efficiently [i.e., bigger rooms, with fewer kitchens & baths] will also be more efficient to design & build. The trick will be to maintain the flexibility that has been prioritized. So then, the details: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. # kids per room: should be higher at infants/toddlers, more like 9 not 7. Makes no sense to staff for 7 kids [need 3 staff] when you can get 9 kids in there and it’s not too tight nor would the care suffer. In fact carriage house and little red both have 9-10 per room and they think it’s fine. Also if we were to drop down to 6 kids [2 teachers] that presents a different [and more stringent] set of problems as far as teachers leaving to leave the room during the day: eat lunch, visit the bathroom, etc. So 3 teachers, with class sizes that meet state minimums for 2 teachers, will allow flexibility for the workers to change diapers, have lunch, etc without having to worry about meeting licensing requirements, and without straining the remainder of the school staff [in other words, providing quality]. 3 teachers is best. #1 allows us to drop from 3 infant rooms to 2, and 3 toddler rooms to 2. We will not go with state minimum sq ft areas, since with 9-10 kids we’ll want more space [to address the quality of service aspect]. But we will be saving on overall sq ft and will also be more efficient in terms of baths, changing & food prep areas, storage, and so on. Sharing will be easier with 6 rooms, broken into 3 groups of 2. The aspect of sharing service areas among 3 infant rooms, for instance, had been a problem for MSA to work into the design. So we’re thinking shared walls and services at the 2 infant rooms, the 2 toddler rooms, and the 2 preschool rooms. We reviewed my matrix and broke the rooms down further, getting to the next level of detail. Instead of ‘2 or 3 infant rooms’, we broke this into ‘early infant’ [1.5-12 months], and ‘late infant’ [12-18 months]. This was based on Kathy’s operational experience, cross referenced with valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 5 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. LRSH, CH, and state regulations. This will still allow operational flexibility – these labels are subject to ‘verification in the field’ [VIF]. State regulations include 6 months overlap between infants-toddlers and toddlers-preschoolers, for this reason. The idea that the needs assessment dictates that the 60 students will be broken down 20-20-20 has been a constraint, and one that I think is an artificial imposition. The idea that we can crystalball the enrollment, when it’s a moving target, over a year in the future, subject to change over time, and we don’t even have an operator yet, seems farfetched. So we decided to take the 2020-20 as a ‘plus or minus’ guideline. Again, VIF. We should strive to license the infant/early toddler rooms for 10, even though they could have 9 on a regular basis. We thought that the operator may want the flexibility to have 10 kids in there, although 9 would be better from a quality standpoint. It will all come down to the actual enrollment, per #6 above. If you have issues with this as it relates to the building program fulfilling the need assessment, please speak up now. Kathy and I discussed the possibility of 3 infant rooms, which she thought was excessive, and would create too much chaos within the facility on an operational level. Per #7 above, I want to make sure that the remainder of the design team is comfortable with this approach. Flexibility: we plan to design in the desired flexibility by increasing the room size to 500 sq ft net at the early toddler room, to match the infant room sizes, and by increasing the remaining 3 rooms to 600 sq ft each. This is based on Kathy’s input, and we think that these increases add value to the project in terms of potential for future flexibility, plus they’ll just be nicer, bigger rooms. Again, quality. Also, as stated at the outset of the project, we’re aiming a little higher than the minimums. ‘Late toddler’ room [2.5 to 3 years]: we are proposing 12 kids with 3 teachers, for an optimum class size of 12. 10 would also work, per needs assessment ‘20-20-20’ breakdown, but Kathy is comfortable with class size up to 12. Here we hope to take advantage of the increases in staff/child ratio and maximum class size, per state regulations. Kathy’s experience also indicates that a slightly larger group size will be acceptable. We will size room to be licensed for 12 [@ 45 sq ft each, that’s 540 sq ft]. If the Town prefers that we up the licensing capacity for this room to 14 kids, then we can add another 90 sq ft to the total. Preschool rooms: to be designed for 14 kids due to teacher ratio of 1:7. This exceeds the needs assessment but per Kathy makes sense on a staffing level. She suggested that we increase room sizes here in excess of state regulations based on her experience [refer to attached email]. Good luck digesting all this, and with the council meeting Tuesday. I will be out of the office for the remainder of the week, but will be checking my messages periodically. Please let me, or MSA office staff, know if you have questions or input regarding this memo. Otherwise, our office will proceed on this basis. encl: VBC classroom program 0717.xls valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 6 classroom program valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 7 sustainable design goals valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 8 preliminary design schedule to: project team via: hand delivery from: matt stais date: 20 july 2007 project: valley brook childcare center re: design schedule Project schedule got off to a good start, with 2 program development charrettes conducted in May. Project program and priorities were established, based on community stakeholders’ consensus. Site studies, and tie-in to larger Block 11 master Plan, took place in June. This included feedback from Town Council, staff and Block 11 master planners. Site was chosen mid June and surveyed by early July. Project team explored possibility of spring 2008 construction start, which would allow for more design time, less winter conditions during construction, and completion fall 2008. This idea was rejected due to Town Council prioritizing occupancy by start of fall 2008 school year at the latest. These developments affected design schedule to the extent that the current goal is to complete permit set by end August, to secure pricing, permits, and mobilize field crews in September 2007. May 2007 Program Development notice to proceed, contract negotiation, award of contract analysis of existing conditions, development of existing conditions site plan identify stakeholders, establish website, advisory group program development charrettes help owner define project program, priorities, sustainable design goals June 2007 Conceptual Design develop initial conceptual design develop options to conceptual site and building design [with DTJ] select project site [by Town Council/steering committee] select preferred conceptual design [by Town Council/steering committee] July 2007 Schematic Design/Design Development valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 9 receipt of topographical survey develop schematic design, based on owner approval of conceptual design incorporate sustainable design concepts; research options preapplication meeting with town planning staff review schematic design with stakeholders/neighbors courtesy review with RWB fire dept begin design development upon client approval of schematic design August 2007 Design Dev’t/Town Approvals/Working Drawings [Permit Set] Submit review set to town planning for upcoming worksession: august 1 Planning Commission worksession: August 7 conclude design development: aug 7 [that gives MSA & consultants 3 weeks for wkg dwgs to permit set level] submit to town planning department for courtesy review: August 8 submit to Sharon Kelly [state of Colorado] for feedback: August 8 Town Council review: August 14 Planning Commission courtesy review: August 21 Town Council approval of planning commission review: August 28 construction documents for permit [90% CDs]: august 31 [note: break out re-platting/site infrastructure; not included yet] Sept 2007 Permitting, Pricing, Mobilization GC: submit 90% CD set to town building dept for permitting GC: secure subcontractor pricing based on 90% set GC: begin site mobilization & infrastructure as permitted by local authorities Oct 2007 Construction GC: commence construction (8-10 months) complete 100% construction documents based on town/team/GC input [including feedback from September pricing] June-Aug 08 Occupancy GC: turn over facility to operations staff august 1 at latest allow 2 weeks for FFE/shakedown cruise by operator, by august 15 GC: complete punch list before kids occupy building post-occupancy evaluations valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 10 design narrative The design of the project is based on a combination of the external [site and contextual] parameters and internal parameters [driven by project program and priorities]. The chosen site is directly west of the new Breckenridge Police Station. It is relatively flat. Most of the site was filled with dredge rock at some time in the recent past. Some existing trees and grade survive on the western edge. The site is almost square, has excellent solar exposure, and is close to existing transit and trail connections. A large undeveloped parcel to the north is slated for affordable housing, as part of the Town’s Block 11 master plan. Utility connections and storm drainage have not been studied in detail to this point. Vehicular access will be shared with the Police station and the future development parcel to the north, in order to minimize additional curb cuts for each project. It is expected that staff will utilize the southerly portion of the parking area, with the western portion dedicated for student drop-off and pickup. Landscaping will screen these areas, and will also provide screening at the existing utility substation at the corner of Valley Brook and Airport Roads. The building will be oriented with the main axis running east-west, to maximize solar gain. Classrooms will be placed on the south side, for playgrounds and classrooms to take advantage of the sun, and also to have the building act as a wind break [the prevailing winds blow from the north-northwest]. We have learned that the building entry should be separated from the playground areas, for ease of operation, and have chosen to locate that on the west side of the building, adjacent to vehicular parking. Offices, staff areas, storage, and utility areas will be located north of the central corridor. Service access will be shared with the existing police facility, on the east side of the building. We have been asked to generate a dynamic building form, worthy of such a public project, and one that expresses the function of the building. We have varied the roof forms and exterior wall colors to identify the three primary classroom areas. Our design encompasses a series of roof forms optimized for active solar processes [7:12 pitch for PV panels, 12:12 pitch for solar hot water systems]. The 12:12 roof areas are located to the east, in the hopes that they will relate to the police station. The 7:12 south facing roof area is located in the middle of the building, with clerestory windows above to provide the main internal corridor with natural light. The western portion includes a curved roof form to delineate the infant area distinctly. Northerly portions of the building are meant to read as secondary areas. They present fewer windows and wall to the north winds and weather. The design includes berming the north side of the building, as an extension of the existing landscape berm at the police station, and will be punctuated by the multi-purpose room and north porch, which will relate to the future pocket park at the adjoining residential development. Exterior skin has not been developed in great detail at this time; however, we expect that the building will have a brick base, to relate to adjacent police and school buildings, with low maintenance siding above. Bright colors at the south classroom areas will announce the building’s function, and will hopefully make it more enjoyable for its tenants and the community as a whole. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 11 preliminary site plan valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 12 preliminary floor plan valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 13 3D model valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 14 3D model valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 15 comparable facility: carriage house I. general information a. facility name: Carriage House b. location: 890 Airport Road Breckenridge, Colorado c. contact: Martha Meir, Director [email protected] II. building/site information a. is parking private or multi-use? private b. aside from the front desk, there is one “office” that serves many purposes – sick kid room, parent/staff resource room, staff break room, director office, etc… III. ideas and thoughts a. what do you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Likes front door/front desk. Good visibility, it is impossible to miss the front desk when visitors come in, kids love smaller “kid doors” 2. Likes the compact floor plan and circulation. There is no chaos in the hallways, the children are easily contained. 3. Likes centrally located kitchen. 4. 3 year old and 4 year old room is a great size and shape. 5. Likes suns shades on playgrounds, but needs some relief from the wind too. 6. Likes window into baby room. It’s good for security and helps staff remember why they are there. b. what don’t you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Washer/Dryer is not adequate for the amount of washing they do. It is in a hallway closet, which is a poor location. Baskets of laundry sit out in the hall all day. 2. 1-year-old room is too small. Once you add the teachers to the room, there really isn’t enough space for everyone. 3. North playgrounds are not good. They do not get enough sun and they get a lot of wind. [The Carriage House is in a bit of a wind tunnel] 4. High ceilings make for really poor acoustics and wasted space. 5. Weird shapes of rooms make it very difficult to utilize the space. Corners that are not at 90 degrees are difficult to deal with. Nooks don’t work in younger rooms. In older rooms, they work better, but still create some areas where the teachers cannot see students. 6. Little, kid-sized toilets clog easily. 7. Changing station should be included in 3-year-old room. There are some 3year-olds that will not be potty trained. 8. 4-year-old room (facing West) is always cold in the morning, but warm in the afternoon. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 16 9. Building does not have sufficient storage or easily accessible storage – interior and exterior. c. what would you do differently? 1. ½ doors on all the children’s’ bathroom stalls. 2. More sinks in older kids’ rooms since they can wash their own hands. 3. Would have preferred carpeting instead of hard surfaces. 4. Install high security features at entryways – due to the changing times. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 17 carriage house floor plan building entry valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 18 comparable facility: lake dillon preschool I. general information a. facility name: Lake Dillon Preschool and Early Learning Center b. location: 200 Village Pl. Dillon, Colorado c. contact: Sherri Seirmarco, executive director 970.468.1606 II. building/site information a. year built: 1991 b. is parking private or multi-use? multi-use c. how many administrative offices do you have? one i. is this enough? yes (because they have separate staff room and parent/teacher resource room) d. do you have an employee locker room/lounge? yes i. is it heavily used? not really, because teachers are in classrooms most of the day. e. is there a community room in your building? no f. do you have a “parent/teacher resource room”? yes (in staff room) i. is it heavily used? no ii. is it open to the public when the childcare center is closed? no III. operational information a. is the facility qualistar rated? yes IV. ideas and thoughts a. what do you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Love the gross motor room. It is 29’ x 32’. It can hold maximum 24 4 yearolds at one time. 2. They have lots of storage (mostly in basement) and use all of it. 3. Likes having a “staff refrigerator” and a separate “kids refrigerator” in kitchen. Makes it easier to monitor temperature in “kids refrigerator”. 4. Likes gate between classrooms/gross motor room and entrance. This keeps kids from running out the door when they are excited to see their parents at pick-up time (security issue). valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 19 5. Likes window on infant room and doors. 6. Likes having doors between classrooms, not just from classroom to hallway. This gives them more options in an emergency. 7. Likes ceiling fan in infant room since temperature in infant room is so important. 8. Likes separate crib room for infants, but pay close attention to Qualistar requirements for crib space – they cannot fit as many cribs in the sleeping room as they are licensed for. 9. Likes large front counter. Can set out all the sign-in, sign-out sheets. b. what don’t you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Vaulted ceilings created very loud rooms (bad acoustics). They had to put drop ceilings in where the ceilings were too high. 2. Playgrounds are not directly off of classrooms. This creates problems when a class is out to play and someone needs to go potty. The teacher cannot leave an entire class on the playground to take a child to the restroom. If the playground were directly off of the classroom, the teacher should be able to stand in the doorway and keep an eye on everyone. 3. Diaper changing stations were not well thought out. Their location in the classroom requires the teachers to turn their back to the children. They have installed mirrors to deal with this, but think they could be better placed within the classroom so the teacher can still monitor other children. Outlets were installed directly above changing tables – don’t do this! Changing tables should be 2 ‘ away from sink for hand washing after diaper changing. Changing tables should not be separate from the classroom – it is illegal and will turn into a storage closet. 4. Heating system uses floor vents and they are disgusting. c. what would you do differently? 1. They would like an entry that has 2 doorways. The 1st (very exterior) would remain unlocked. Once someone came in that door and was out of the elements, they could access a security system and get buzzed in and a 2nd door that would remain locked. 2. Do not put microwaves in each classroom – this is a liability issue, especially if center does not have the required license to prepare food. 3. It would be very nice to have 2 dishwashers in kitchen. And they must have a sanitizing cycle. 4. Would like to have car seat storage. 5. Would like storage that is specifically designed for buggies. 6. Not sure how they feel about water fountains. The state and Qualistar regulations like them, but they get pretty gross when kids put their mouths all over them. 7. Put staff lockers in classrooms. 8. Would like more tile than carpeting for ease of cleaning. 9. 2 washer/dryers would be nice. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 20 d. what other suggestions do you have? 1. Once kids are 2, they can start to wash their own hands. They should have a sink and paper towels at their level. 2. Put childproof locks on all storage doors. 3. Each room should have cubbies for total number of children enrolled, not total that room is licensed for (because some kids are part-time, but it’s nice for them to have their own cubby so parents don’t have to pack all their stuff every day). 4. Likes corded phone system. It’s less complicated, phones don’t get lost, and teachers are less likely to make personal phone calls. 5. Use weighted doors on doorways that kids should not be getting in and out of. 6. Don’t put doors on bathrooms – or use half doors. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 21 comparable facility: little red school house I. general information a. facility name: Little Red School House b. location: 600 Reilling Road Breckenridge, Colorado c. contact: Jill Dixon, Director [email protected] II. building/site information a. is parking private or multi-use? multi-use – this is a security concern and they do not have enough parking. teachers take up most of the spaces, so drop-off/pick-up times are chaotic. b. there is one front desk/office area III. ideas and thoughts a. what do you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Likes all the cubbies in the hallways – provides children with a feeling of independence. 2. Likes central kitchen. 3. They have several access options to playgrounds – through hallways and through classrooms. This is especially beneficial during winter because kids can go straight to cubby where the flooring is easy to clean. 4. Staff likes that the sleeping area in infant room is not a separate room from the play area because they feel that if the room is separate, infants will sleep too much. 5. Like the goal of making classrooms and hallways feel like home. 6. Kids seem to like having the option of a small toilet and an adult sized toilet – separation by gender is not needed. b. what don’t you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Interior and exterior storage space is inadequate. 2. Parking lot flow does not work well or safely at peak drop-off/pick-up times. 3. There is not enough shade on playgrounds. 4. One administrative office/front desk is not adequate. 5. Crawl space is not a good solution for storage – access is not reasonable. c. what would you do differently? 1. Include more storage. Each classroom should have a storage closet. Exterior storage for buggies should be included. 2. Design shade structures for playgrounds – permanent and movable depending on location. 3. A larger office or additional offices would be beneficial. 4. Install a security system. 5. Make sure that parking doesn’t cause children to be walking in front of traffic. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 22 6. Keep parking private. 7. Aim to meet Qualistar requirements, not just State regulation minimums. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 23 chool house floor plan building entry valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 24 comparable facility: miller ranch childcare center I. general information a. facility name: Miller Ranch Childcare Center b. location: 0025 Mill Loft Road Edwards, Colorado 81632 contact: Amy Drummet, Executive Director Pam Mattson, Center Director 970.926.2601 II. building/site information a. year opened: 2006 b. number of parking spaces: 36 c. is parking private or multi-use? multi-use i. do you have enough parking? no ii. if no, how much parking would you like? more drop-off/pick-up spots, or better drop-off/pick-up zone iii. if you have multi-use parking, do you like this? has cause a limited number of issues, but would prefer private parking d. how many administrative offices do you have? 2 i. is this enough? yes ii. does your office/do these offices serve any other purposes? i.e “sick kid room” yes – center director’s office is often “sick kid room”. executive director’s office is also a conference room. e. do you have an employee locker room/lounge? yes i. is it heavily used? yes ii. it the size adequate? yes, but they would have liked a stove in the kitchen area. f. is there a community room in your building? yes, but it is on a separate level and has a separate entrance/exit. i. who uses it? there are some office spaces, and large community rooms that can be used by community members. ii. does it have a kitchen? yes iii. is it available to the public during childcare operating hours? yes valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 25 III. IV. operational information a. number of full-time slots: 74 ideas and thoughts a. what do you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Like lobby. 2. Likes front desk, which includes a medical supply refrigerator, computer. 3. Security system is great. 4. Executive director’s office is great because it has a conference table. 5. Like carpet – carpet tile is awesome. Makes for easy/economical replacement. 6. Staff room is great. Photo dock/printer in staff room is great because Qualistar wants pictures of kids in action. 7. Storage room is big enough for 2 strollers. 8. Rooms designed to make kids feel like they are at home – really like the ceiling lights, compact fluorescent & little T8 bulbs. 9. Like having 2 adult co-ed restrooms in lobby. 10. Love car seat storage off of lobby. 11. Love all the storage in hallways. 12. Like having a refrigerator and dishwasher in each classroom. 13. Like having a mudroom between classrooms and playground. 14. Playground – love astroturf, trail through play area, picnic tables, water fountain, and sun shades (from Kaplan Learning Company). b. what don’t you like about the design of the building you operate in? 1. Hallways are bigger than they need to be – maybe a waste of finished space. 2. In preschool room – the sink in the middle of the room is not practical. It’s low enough for the kids, but too far away for them to reach. 3. Not enough cubbies and not big enough – just buy the ones from the catalogs! c. what would you do differently? 1. Don’t install built-in soap dispenser. 2. Built-in fixtures (cubbies, benches, etc…) limit flexibility of classrooms. Would prefer movable fixtures. 3. Center is licensed for 20 infants, 16 toddlers, and 40 preschool students. This creates a “funneling problem”. 4. Would like better storage in classrooms – for staff and a spot for each enrolled child to have for food, medications, etc… 5. Would prefer that laundry and cleaning crew room were separate. valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 26 miller ranch floor plan building entry valley brook childcare center final programming document 31 july 2007 page: 27 summ mit daily y news article a B Breck Childcare Fac cility Nearing Grou undbreakin ng B LORY POUNDER BY a article reprin nted from Summit Daily News, N July 16 6, 2007 BRECKENRIDG B GE - Staff of a new childcare facility told the Breckenridge Town Counccil last week thhat constructio on on a n facility couuld begin in thee fall. new The town is alrready receivingg waiting list reequests to get into the new faacility, which iss planning to open T o Aug. 1, 20008. It will b about 6,5000 square-feet, lo be ocated immediiately west of the t Police Station on Valley Brook B Street. o accommodatte 64 children a day, or abouut 100 families, to address needs of local residents and em mployees Itt is designed to fo or affordable, quality q care. own completed d a needs assesssment and fouund an additionnal 56 to 69 sppaces are essenntial by the tim me build In April, the To o is reached in 2014. Howeever, as spacess are lost with next year's clo out osure of Kinderhut, the licenssed childcare and a ski s school facility at a Peak 9, that number will cllimb to about 127 spaces. a half of our neeed, with a "The Town envvisions the Vallley Brook facility as the first childcare facility to address approximately s second facility that t would com me online laterr," Kim DiLallo o, director of communication c ns, explained inn an e-mail. The Town's Blo T ock 11 Master Plan, which includes the chilldcare building and hundreds of units of affo ordable housinng, is e expected to bee complete in laate August, saiid Laurie Best, town planner.. At the end off June, she repo orted to the co ouncil that fiive sites for the childcare cen nter were anallyzed on Valleyy Brook Streett, and a cornerr site design sett back from the street s stood out for the t location. On the operatiion side, the Town is recruitiing a nonprofitt provider to run O r the facility, and contracto or interviews were w r recently conducted. Also, thee Town is provviding financial assistance to recruit r and rettain quality teacchers for the facility fa and t existing facilities in Breckkenridge, as weell as creating a scholarship program to helpp families who can't afford caare. the mney said at a June worksesssion about the progress being made. "It's huge," Couuncilmember Jeennifer McAtam After the impennding closure of A o Kinderhut leeft families worried about finnding a place fo or their childreen, childcare beecame one o the highest priorities of p for th he town counccil. And while the t Town fast-tracked plans for f the new faccility, the ski area a allowed Kinderrhut to stay op pen another year. Now, with Kind N derhut expecteed to close in spring, the foccus is to come up with a plan for the childreen who attend d that s school after it closes c and befo ore the summeer opening of the t new buildinng. w be a bit of o a gap," McAttamney said. "We've always know there would SSummer prograams and altern native options are a being explo ored to ease thhat transition, she added. They will be worrking with t Kinderhut families the f to com mmunicate whaat to do duringg that time. The issue of avvailable/ affordaable childcare is one many Suummit County families strugggle with. Accorrding to Early Childhood T C O Options, one inn 10 people wo orking ski induustry related jo obs quit becausse they can't finnd affordable childcare c and one o in four inn the public seector quit for the same reaso on. M More than 1000 children are on o waiting lists throughout thhe county, acco ording to Earlyy Childhood Options. O L Pounder can be reached att (970) 668-4628, or at [email protected]. Lory vvalley brook chhildcare centerr fiinal programm ming document 3 july 2007 31 page: 28