Anti-attachment mechanisms help carnivorous plants to survive

Transcription

Anti-attachment mechanisms help carnivorous plants to survive
Anti-attachment mechanisms help carnivorous plants to survive:
Nepenthes singalana
Some or the plants’ leaves meet in jug-like pitchers, which
function as pit traps. Figure 1 shows the design of the
pitcher, which consists of lid, collar, waxy area and
digestion area.
Catching insects is a survival advantage for carnivorous
plants. Insectivora try to catch their prey with mechanical
traps, with sticky liquids or with anti-adhesion surfaces.
The surface properties of the trap of a nepenthes species
(nepenthes singalana) have been examined in this atomic
force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) study.
Escape barriers on two levels
Natural occurring adhesive or anti-adhesive surfaces are of
great interest because nature can serve as a model for
artificially made surfaces with completely new properties.
One of the best known examples in this field called
biomimetics is the “lotus effect”, which lead to easy-toclean surfaces using surface structuring.
In addition to the shiny red color, the nectar’s flavor also
attracts insects. The nectar is produced mainly in the lid
and the collar region of the jar. Sometimes nectar-seeking
insects fall into the inside of the jar. The collar is convex
and bent. Its surface is not flat, but grooved. Between the
grooves there are step like protrusions with anisotropic
capabilities. They give foothold only in one direction.
Fig. 2 SEM-image of the pitcher’s collar region, scale bar 50 µm.
Fig. 1 Pitcher (pit trap) of a nepenthes species, after [2]
Carnivorous plants are widely spread, occurring both in
tropical and arctic regions. The round leaf sundew (drosera
rotundifolia), for example, belongs to the well-known
European carnivorous plants. It catches its prey with sticky
fluid drops on its leaves.
The tropical carnivore nepenthes singalana is found in
Sumatra’s humid mountain forests and lives on poor, not
too sunny and acidic grounds. Therefore the plant’s
survival depends on its ability to attract insects, and to
catch and digest them [1].
In the scanning electron microscopy image in Figure 2, the
surface looks like roof tiles [3]. The insect’s slipping is
mainly caused by this structure.
Wax glues adhesive hairs
If an insect tries to escape, its front legs are sliding
continuously. The fly’s feet are covered with hairy
structures (setae) on their attachment pads. The adhesion
of the setae is mainly due to van-der-Waals and capillary
forces [4].
page 1/3
© JPK Instruments AG - all rights reserved – www.jpk.com
This material shall not be used for an offer in:
 USA  China  Japan  Europe & other regions
NanoWizard, CellHesion, BioMAT, NanoTracker and ForceRobot are
trademarks or registered trademarks of JPK Instruments AG
If a fly tries to escape along the inner wall, it reaches the
waxy zone of the pitcher. It is assumed that the fly’s setae
are contaminated by the wax crystals [5], reducing the
adhesion. Hence, the fly falls into the base of the pitcher,
which is filled with liquid containing digestion enzymes.
Fig. 4 SEM-image of the pitcher’s wax region, bar 2 µm.
Distances and heights can very exactly be determined with
nanometer resolution by atomic force microscopy. The
height range in Figure 5 is 1.2 µm. For comparison, a
seta on the foot of the calliphora vicina fly has a diameter
of 1.7 µm, and the distance between 2 setae is typically 2
µm [6].
Fig. 3 AFM-image (topography) of the digestion region. Image
2
size 6 x 6 µm , height range 53 nm.
Figure 3 is an AFM image showing the surface of the
pitcher’s digestion zone. It has been imaged with a JPK
NanoWizard® AFM, combined with an optical inverted
microscope. During the experiment all the optical
capabilities of the microscope remained available. Hence,
it was possible to find a suitable area for AFM imaging
prior to scanning. Due to the conditions inside the pitcher
the AFM image was taken in air without further sample
preparation.
The surface structure of the wax crystallites are shown in
Figures 4 and 5. The SEM image in Figure 4 shows platelike crystallites of around 2 µm in size, but the wax can
also have a nodular shape. The sticky nodules shown in
the AFM image in Figure 5 could easily be moved around
with the AFM tip and have a diameter of 1 to 2 µm.
Fig. 5 AFM-image (topography) of the wax zone. Image size
10 x 10 µm2, height 1,2 µm.
Under normal circumstances the sticky fluid and hairy
structures keep the fly attached to nearly every surface.
The adhesion force of setae of a spider has been
measured by AFM and was found to be in the range of
nanonewtons [7]. In their experiment the authors used the
silicon AFM cantilever as a force sensor simulating the
spider’s foot is attached to a silicon surface. They attached
a group of setae to the tip of a cantilever and pulled it away
from the surface. The adhesion causes the cantilever to
page 2/3
© JPK Instruments AG - all rights reserved – www.jpk.com
This material shall not be used for an offer in:
 USA  China  Japan  Europe & other regions
NanoWizard, CellHesion, BioMAT, NanoTracker and ForceRobot are
trademarks or registered trademarks of JPK Instruments AG
deflect as it is retracted, and from the deflection of the
cantilever the adhesive force can be calculated. Scaled to
human dimensions, a man (75 kg body weight) equipped
with a fly’s adhesion system at his feet could keep himself
and another 400 kgs (equivalent to 2 pianos) attached to
the ceiling.
The question is, why the fly does not try to escape the
pitcher using its wings. Movies shot with a high-speed
camera show that the fly flaps with its wings when it falls.
But wing movement does not seem to be well coordinated
and not like the natural movements [8]. How the plant can
succeed in preventing the fly's escape is currently under
investigation.
Authors
Gerrit Huber
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung
Heisenbergstr. 3
70569 Stuttgart
This article has previously been published in German in
Biospektrum (Elsevier) No. 3/2004, p. 325f.
Literature
[1] B. Juniper, New Scientist 13: 75-77 (1962).
[2] G. Braem. "Fleischfressende Pflanzen – Arten und Kulturen.
Naturbuchverlag", Augsburg (2002).
[3] L. Gaume, S. Gorb and N. Rowe. "Function of epidermal
surfaces in the trapping efficiency of Nepenthes alata
pitchers". New Phytologist 156: 479-489 (2002).
[4] M. Langer, P. Ruppersberg and S. Gorb. "Capillary forces
dominate in the fly attachment system". Soc. London B, (in
press)
[5] L. Gaume, P. Perret, E. Gorb, S. Gorb, J.-J. Labat and N.
Rowe, "Arthropod Structure and Development" 33: 103-111
(2004).
[6] J. Schuppert, personal communication, MPI für
Metallforschung, Stuttgart
[7] A. B. Kesel, A. Martin and T. Seidl. "Adhesion measurements
on the attachment devices of the jumping spider Evarcha
arcuata", Journal of Experimental Biology 206: 2733-2738
(2003).
[8] O. Gorb, unpublished data, MPI für Metallforschung, Stuttgart
Christian Löbbe
JPK Instruments AG
Bouchéstr. 12
12435 Berlin
page 3/3
© JPK Instruments AG - all rights reserved – www.jpk.com
This material shall not be used for an offer in:
 USA  China  Japan  Europe & other regions
NanoWizard, CellHesion, BioMAT, NanoTracker and ForceRobot are
trademarks or registered trademarks of JPK Instruments AG