Makoto Fujimura Keynote: Notes
Transcription
Makoto Fujimura Keynote: Notes
I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y ART I N S PAC E AN D TI M E OC TO B ER 3 –5 , 2013 N E W YO R K CIT Y Makoto Fujimura Keynote: Notes “Time present and time past Are both perhaps present in time future, And time future contained in time past.” — T.S. Eliot, Four Quartets M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 1 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y “ TI M E PR E S E NT, TI M E PA ST. . .” “Time present and time past / Are both perhaps present in time future. And time future contained in time past” Thus T.S. Eliot begins his masterpiece, his last poem, “Four Quartets.” “Time present and time past / Are both perhaps present in time future.” Eliot alludes to the possibility of poetry to capture Time—past, present and future. Tim Keller, in a lecture in the late ’90s for IAM, called this poetic possibility “Time-Fulness.” Eliot reaches, in a single stretch of his poetic line, a magisterial sweep to define the Beginning, echoing John 1, “In the Beginning was the Word, and Word was with God.” Eliot finds in his “Four Quartets” Time-Fulness. I am going to open the conference by invoking three twentieth-century masters: T.S. Eliot, the Nobel laureate of “The Wasteland” and “Four Quartets”; Isak Dinesen, who according to Hemingway should have won the Nobel for her magical stories including “Babette’s Feast”; and Olivier Messiaen, whose composition “Quartet for the End of Time” inspired Chris Theofanidis, our featured composer tonight. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 2 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y If Eliot found his Time-Fulness—a journey from “The Wasteland” to “The Still Point” —in “Four Quartets,” Isak Dinesen finds her magic in “Babette’s Feast.” “In Norway there is a fjord, a long narrow arm of the sea between tall mountains.” She begins her story at the northern edge of the European continent. It is to this edge that Babette escapes, fleeing from the violent times in Paris. If Eliot finds his fulfillment at the edge of Time, Dinesen finds hers at the edge of a continent. It is an austere landscape, and the people on that edge are equally austere, protecting their scarce resources in a barren land. Babette enters, “haggard and wildeyed,” with a letter from Monsieur Papin saying that “Babette can cook.” Babette is pushed to the edge of her exile, escaping Paris in the turmoil of its civil wars, and becoming, unexpectedly, the catalyst for a feast of grace. These are voices from the edge, between time and space. These artists wrote and created toward the liminal. Great art invokes: it invites us into the presence, for a feast at the edge of time and space. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 3 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y What if this place, in the upper west side of New York—what if this time, October of 2013— what if this moment is also on the edge, the edge of Space and Time? What if artists who are intuiting more than what we can rationally analyze, could actually capture a grand story, sing a song, dance a movement, capture the theater of that moment? What if our conference captures the edge of time and space? If we are on that edge, standing over the abyss, looking into it, what shall we create? What painting will you paint? What poem will you write? What dance will you choreograph? What play will you perform? What music will you offer? It is said that as Franz Schubert, the composer whose life spanned the18th and 19th centuries, lay on his deathbed, his friends came to play Beethoven’s late Quartet. Opus 131 is a score that Eliot considered foundational in writing the “Four Quartets.” M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 4 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y Watch this moment from the film A Late Quartet, in which a character played by Philip Seymour Hoffman, a second violinist, struggles with his role, his marriage and his life. Yet, he tells his daughter, a budding musician, about this gift of music that friends offered to Schubert as he lay dying. In this film, the daughter is also a violinist who has great technical ability, but her music seems to lack resonance, about to quit. What would art look like? How do you play that score? What is Art, especially at the edge of Time and Space? How do we define Art, as we face traumas, disasters, our journeys into the dark—as we look straight into the abyss? What makes art endure is not the technical mastery. Art must transcend the utility, the machinery, the pragmatics of the moment. Art may seem to be much like a “wild-eyed” woman from Paris whose only purpose is to cook and serve something ordinary using limited resources. And yet, we know, as artists, that there is more to it; “A great artist, Mesdames, is never poor, We have something, Mesdames, of which other people know nothing.” So the artist keeps making art, and the band keeps playing. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 5 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y Why did the bandleader Wallace Hartley and his band keep playing their music aboard the sinking Titanic? What purpose did that serve? Why sacrifice their lives just to play on? Our friend Steve Turner researched this remarkable story and wrote a book called The Band that Played On: The Extraordinary Story of the Eight Musicians on the Titanic. Steve writes this: “Despite the awfulness of what was happening, the backdrop was a scene of beauty: a clear sky, a bright moon, clearly visible stars, flat undisturbed water, and an immense liner blazing with pinholes of light. The music would have carried farther than usual because for most of the time there were no competing sounds from engines or waves. Passengers who left from both port and starboard told similar stories of being able to hear the band as they were quickly rowed away to avoid the inevitable drag of the suction. Emily Rugg claimed she could hear the band from a mile away.” Music could be heard a mile away because of the silence of a machine gone dead. The prideful symbol of industrial prowess had been struck to silence by an iceberg. In that silence, Music and Art at the edge of Time and Space will have gratuitous potency beyond the utility. Human beings are not created to be machines, or mere animals. Human beings need music and art. I believe that is the message from that band that kept on playing. Art is the remnant of that indelible mark of our humanity. It is what makes us mysterious, indefinable and glorious. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 6 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y Human beings are not created to be machines, or mere animals. Human beings need music and art. I believe that is the message from that band that kept on playing. Art is the remnant of that indelible mark of our humanity. It is what makes us mysterious, indefinable and glorious. As the legendary clarinet player Charles Neidich will share at the concert tonight, Oliver Messiaen, a French composer, began to write “Quartet at the End of Time” on “an arduous forty-three mile march.” He and several of his musician friends had been captured by the Germans in France in 1940. His wife wrote: “They suffered for several days without water or food until finally they arrived at a place where water was distributed... Thousands of soldiers literally fought each other in order to get a drink of water. Messiaen was seated in a little courtyard and he began to take out of his pocket a score, some music, which he began to read.” M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 7 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y This score was called “Abyss of the Birds,” and it was written for Akoka, a clarinet player who was by his side. Akoka would end up playing the score. Instead of fighting for water and food, they created music. Messiaen wrote: “Conceived and composed during my captivity, the ‘Quartet for the End of Time’ was premiered in Stalag VIII A, in January 1941. It took place in Gorlitz, in Silesia, in a dreadful cold. Stalag was buried in snow. We were 30,000 prisoners (French for the most part, with a few Poles and Belgians). The four musicians played on broken instruments: Etienne Pasquier’s cello had only 3 strings; the key of my upright piano remained lowered when depressed... It’s on this piano, with my three fellow musicians, dressed in the oddest way...(our clothes were) completely tattered, and wooden clogs large enough for the blood to circulate despite the snow underfoot...(it was on this piano) that I played my ‘Quartet for the End of Time,’ before an audience of 5,000 people. The most diverse classes of society were mingled: farmers, factory workers, intellectuals, professional servicemen, doctors, (and) priests. Never before have I been listened to with such attention and understanding.” I suggest that tonight, when you hear the score of the “Quartet for the End of Time,” and as you listen to Theofanidis’ “At the Still Point,” try to place yourself in that snow-filled barren Wasteland of a P.O.W. camp—or on the rowboats a mile away from the ill-fated Titanic. We may hear, truly hear, music for the first time as it should be heard, at the edge of Time and Space. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 8 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y “Words move, music moves Only in time; but that which is only living Can only die. Words, after speech, reach Into the silence. Only by the form, the pattern, Can words or music reach The stillness, as a Chinese jar still Moves perpetually in its stillness. Not the stillness of the violin, while the note lasts, Not that only, but the co-existence, Or say that the end precedes the beginning, And the end and the beginning were always there Before the beginning and after the end. And all is always now, Words strain, Crack and sometimes break, under the burden, Under the tension, slip, slide, perish, Decay with imprecision, will not stay in place, Will not stay still. Shrieking voices Scolding, mocking, or merely chattering, Always assail them. The Word in the desert Is most attacked by voices of temptation, The crying shadow in the funeral dance, The loud lament of the disconsolate Chimera.” — “Burnt Norton,” T.S. Eliot M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 9 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y Enduring art presents to us an inhabited space in Time-fulness. “Words strain, Crack and sometimes break, under the burden, Under the tension, slip, slide, perish,” …because today that inhabited space is being forced out of our day-to-day lives, to surrender to the ideological gridlocks of our time. We compose our art in our P.O.W. camps of Culture Wars, a cultural Wasteland created by the ideology of utility, and our lust for control and certainty. Culture Wars dehumanize, by creating ideological polarities. They reduce human beings to practical labels. In this camp, art must be deemed useful to the utility of a particular war, or an institution, or a church. Art is easily dismissed in such Culture Wars mindset, because a true artist insists on writing songs that we can sing together. Because art resides in the heart of humanity, and because society has rejected the gratuitous nature of art, art is exiled into the vacant lots of abandoned postindustrial cities. Useless. Abandoned at the edge of Time and Space. But we must recall that even the Nazis soldiers recognized Messiaen’s music, and gave him a little space and time to create, and to even to have a concert for 5,000, at the edge of Time and Space. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 10 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y Recently The Brooklyn Rail, one of the most provocative art newspapers around, asked many artists and critics to define art in some way. Here is my answer to that question— “What is art?” This definition may only apply at the edge of Time and Space. Because in such a place, Art is an expression of our faith. This perhaps-transgressive definition of Art holds true in Eliot, in Dinesen and in Messiaen. I am going to push this further. What if Art = Faith?—and, therefore, Faith = Art? Let’s dance with this a little bit, defining some terms. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 11 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y As Christian Wiman notes in his remarkable book My Bright Abyss, there is a difference between faith and belief. Belief is a check-list of what we assent to—while faith is a journey of wrestling toward the mystery of the Divine. It is faith that moves mountains, not belief. Belief systems sometimes will do the opposite of faith; belief system will make us manageable, easy to control and manipulate, as Hitler knew so well. It is faith that moves us toward the edge of Time and Space, that cultivates in us the daring to play music instead of fighting for water and food, that draws us to insist that the Band play on. T.S. Eliot noted that we cannot define culture apart from religion. “No culture,” he said in his Notes Towards a Definition of Culture, “can appear or develop except in relation to a religion” Art is, and always has been, and always will be intrinsically religious. Art is a religious expression. Art is all about our reason for existence, which I define to be a religious journey. Now, I am using the word “religious” rather broadly. I posit here that everyone is “religious.” Atheists are just as faithful to their convictions, their creed, as Christians are—or perhaps even more so. Art has always been about our faith, and even in the most atheistic and “secular” of times, artists expressed what they saw at the edge of Time and Space—what they valued, what they longed for. They kept on playing. The art world itself is undeniably religious. It has its own high priests and shamans. We cannot escape these inclinations, nor our liturgies, especially at the edge of Time and Space. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 12 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y T.S. Eliot also noted that culture can be defined as “that which makes life worth living.” Art is the evidence of that search for the elusive path toward our thriving, toward “that which makes life worth living.” Art can therefore be defined as “the substance of things hoped for,” the visible thread of that worthiness of life revealed in culture. Of course, this is the term the writer of the Book of Hebrews used to describe faith: “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1). Art also is “the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” As I close, I want to suggest three perspectives and outcomes that we can wrestle with as we create toward our thriving. If art = faith, then three major paradigms of our time that force us toward the edge of Time and Space can create an opportunity, and can trigger a culture that moves toward “that which makes life worth living.” Those three paradigms are 9/11, 3/11 and 11/9. The question I’d like to pursue is how might we respond to them. 9/11 represents a disaster paradigm that leads to Ground Zero conditions. It represents a world of ideological, territorial and religious wars, and the hostile realities of terrorism at work. I have spent the last decade exploring a recovery of imagination in Ground Zero conditions. Messiaen wrote his music in conditions like these. Eliot wrote his poems, and Dinesen wrote her stories, under Ground Zero conditions. They serve as our guides toward the abyss. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 13 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y 3/11, the date of the cataclysmic tsunami that devastated northern Japan, is also a disaster paradigm, but one caused by nature, not by human beings. My recent works, in a series called Walking on Water, have been a response to the 3/11 disaster and its after-effects. While terrorism is a failure of imagination to foster toward our thrivings, natural disasters come as an inevitable intrusion into our fallen world. Artistic response to an intrusion like this may be simply an effort to build back to normality. But there is lament in the process, and we have not explored that well, as a culture. T.S. Eliot deals with this theme in “The Dry Salvages” as he describes the fear of fisherman’s wives as they wait for their husbands to get through the “perfect storms” of New England. 11/9 refers to the fall of the Berlin Wall. It was Thomas Friedman who contrasted the type of political action that led to 9/11, with the very different political action that produced the events of 11/9. 11/9 represents liberation. It is a celebration of freed people. What if we created from the perspective of liberation— of reunification, even beyond the abyss—from the perspective of a feast? M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 14 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y What if there is a feast for the end of time and space? Recent cleaning of “The Last Supper” revealed that da Vinci painted a full Renaissance feast at the table for the Last Supper. Isak Dinesen wrote about a feast. A feast requires a gratuitous, extravagant commitment. We are the recipients of a feast to which we do not deserve to be invited. If we enter a feast to which we know we do not deserve to be invited, what should our response be? Should we not go beyond the irony and cynicism of our time? If culture is a Feast beyond the abyss, should we not be expressing that reality? Christians believe this, but they do not live it. We do not live with the conviction of our faith. We do not proclaim that the Feast has already begun, and the invitations need to be sent out. We are still trapped in a P.O.W. camp of utilitarian pragmatism, a grey world in which beauty is easily dismissed as unnecessary. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 15 I A M I N H A B I T | A R T I N S PAC E A N D T I M E | O C TO B E R 3 – 5 , 2 0 1 3 | N E W YO R K C I T Y Standing, or sitting, at the Feast, what would the abyss look like? That is what I will be painting for the next decade, I hope. I call this approach Culture Care. Instead of fighting for resources, instead of mindlessly being caught up in a Culture Wars argument that assumes limited resources define our times, I want to cultivate a culture that is built on the unlimited resources of the Feast to come. Instead of defining our times and our vocations and our communities in utilitarian terms, I want to have faith to claim art as a way to enact generosity, as providing genesis moments for our creativity, as paving the way for the next generations. I want to “know the place for the first time.” I want to re-unify art and faith. I want to witness “the children in the apple tree” leading us into the mystery. Generative living does not begin with a Culture Wars mindset by defining your opponents and enemies. A generative journey begins at the Feast. In the P.O.W. barracks of German-occupied France, music rang out from a three-stringed cello with the aroma of the Feast to come. Messiaen was Catholic; he believed in such a paradigm. In a strange pitting of the sacred and the profane, Messiaen’s notes opposed the forces of the evil theatre of Hitler himself. Hitler’s “art,” his belief system, forced many into the Abyss, but Messiaen’s music looks beyond the Abyss and gives us a glimpse of our identities as participants in the Feast. Welcome to this Feast, at “The Still Point,” a homecoming for artists and friends. M A KOTO F U J I M U R A K E Y N OT E : N OT E S 16