to the Club at Eaglebrooke for our monthly meetings
Transcription
to the Club at Eaglebrooke for our monthly meetings
September/ October 2013 2013-2014 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ALLMEMBERSHIP LUNCHEONS 12:00 noon At The Club at Eaglebrooke September 2013 6 Member Luncheon (Canady) 26 Board of Directors Meeting October 2013 4 Members Luncheon (Tuma) 5 Journal article deadline 24 Board of Directors Meeting November 2013 1 Member Luncheon (Wells) 21 Board of Directors Meeting December 2013 NO Membership Luncheon 5 Journal Article deadline 19 Board of Directors Meeting January 2014 3 Membership Luncheon 23 Board of Directors Meeting February 2014 7 Membership Luncheon (Allen) 5 Journal article deadline 27 Board of Directors Meeting March 2014 7 Membership Luncheon 27 Board of Directors Meeting April 2014 4 Membership JA Luncheon (Smith) 5 Journal article deadline 24 Board of Directors Meeting May 2014 Law day 9 Membership Luncheon (Pettis) CONTENTS 2 President’s Message 3 Court Administrator Administrator / Judicial Assignments 3 Bar Conference / Meet your President 5 Membership Application 6 Member from Past/ Minutes from Past 7 Attacking Attacking Experts/ Karla Wright Award 8 Board of Governors Report 9 Book Review 10 Immigration Article 11 Advertising Policies [email protected] Justice Charles T. Canady will be our Guest Speaker on September 6th Our first luncheon meeting of the year will be held at noon on Friday, September 6th at The Club at Eaglebrooke. Our guest speaker will be Justice Charles T. Canady. Justice Charles Canady was born in Lakeland, Florida and received his B.A. from Haverford College in 1976 and his J.D. from the Yale Law School in 1979. Justice Canady practiced law with the firm of Holland and Knight in Lakeland from 1979 through 1982. He practiced with the firm of Lane, Trohn, Bertrand, & Vreeland, P.A., from 1983 through 1992. From November 1984 to November 1990, Justice Canady served three terms in the Florida House of Representatives, and from January 1993 to January 2001, he served four terms in the United States House of Representatives. Throughout his service in Congress, Justice Canady was a member of the House Judiciary Committee. For three terms, from January 1995 to January 2001, Justice Canady was the Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution. Upon leaving Congress, Justice Canady became General Counsel to Governor Jeb Bush. He was appointed by Governor Bush to the Second District Court of Appeal for a term beginning November 20, 2002. On August 28, 2008, Justice Canady was appointed to the Florida Supreme Court by Governor Charlie Crist and took office on September 8, 2008. Reserve your spot by calling 619619-7160 or email us at [email protected] 1 Volume 8, 8, Number 1 Earn a CLE in October with guest speaker Sheila Tuma Join us at The Club at Eaglebrooke on October 4 with guest speaker Sheila Tuma. Her topic, Trust Accounting, will not only be informative, but also give each attendee the opportunity to earn 1 CLE ethics credit. Ms. Tuma earned her Juris Doctor degree in 1989 from the Chicago-Kent College of Law in Chicago, Illinois. She earned her Bachelor of Arts degree in Criminal Justice at Saint Xavier College in 1985. Ms. Tuma previously worked for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Illinois Supreme Court beginning in 1986 as a paralegal. In 1989, she became a member of the Illinois Bar and investigated and prosecuted allegations of attorney misconduct for the Disciplinary Commission. In 2000, Ms. Tuma became a member of The Florida Bar and works as Bar Counsel in the Orlando Branch. Ms. Tuma investigates and prosecutes allegations of attorney misconduct in the 19th Judicial Circuit and 17th Judicial Circuit. She also teaches Ethics School, Professionalism and Advertising workshops throughout the State of Florida. to the Club at Eaglebrooke for our monthly meetings September 6 October 4 November 1 January 3 February 7 March 7 April 4 May 9 Welcome back for another great year! Message from the President First, I’d like to take this opportunity to thank you for electing me to serve as your President. It is my absolute honor and privilege to serve you in this important role. I promise to devote my time and myself to the obligations and duties of this office. I will give my best efforts to make you proud you selected me. I’d also like to take a moment to thank our Immediate Past President Robert J. Stanz for a great 2012-2013 year. Rob, your hard work and dedication will not be appreciate his forgotten. I sincerely mentorship during my year as VicePresident/President-Elect; and I look forward to his wise counsel during my term as President. for the 2013-2014 year! Please return your Membership Application & Membership Renewal Form and membership fee to Lisa Oliver as soon as possible. If you know of someone qualified and interested in becoming a new member, please reach out to that person and invite them to join our membership. Even better, invite them to attend our first meeting on September 6th as your guest, so that they can experience the benefits of membership first hand. There is so much to look forward to this year! Mark your calendars now for our monthly membership meetings. Be on the look out for our community service projects and social events. You won’t want to miss a thing! Sincerely, By now, everyone should have received a Membership Packet. This means we’ve officially started our Membership Drive Natalie R. Wilson President Editorial Committee Lakeland Bar Association Officers & Governors for 20132013-2014 Rick Nail, Editor….284-2280 Lisa Oliver, Layout / Graphic Design….619-7160 The Res Integra supports participation of the membership in production of the publications. We encourage you to submit articles and letters. However, we reserve the right to edit any submission and to publish only those articles that we, in our sole discretion, deem appropriate. Note: The comments, messages, statements, and opinions, legal or otherwise, expressed in the articles herein are exclusively those of the author and shall not be considered to be those of the Lakeland Bar Association, its officers, directors, agents, this publication, its editors or staff. Additionally, the comments, statements and articles contained herein are general in nature and should not be relied upon as a basis for any legal opinion, action or conclusion on the part of the reader with respect to any particular set of facts or circumstances. Res Integra “A whole thing; a new or unopened thing. The term is applied to those points of law which have not been decided, which are untouched by dictum or decision. 3 Mer. 269 President…………………………………...Natalie Wilson Vice President…………………….……. Braxton Wiggs Treasurer………………………….……………..Jean Henne Secretary……………………………….…………. Ali Wright Past President………………………………….. Rob Stanz Governor…….....................Julie Ball (13-15 term) Governor…………… Tina Balentine (13-15 term) Governor……………..Amanda Salcido (13-15 term) Governor……..…..….… Nick Troiano (12-14 term) Governor………..….Kevin Humphries (12-14 term) Governor………...……Charles Carlton (12-14 term) Executive Director….……....…..…………Lisa Oliver Phone: 863-619-7160 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lakelandbar.org 2 ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES TO SECTIONS COURT ADMINISTRATOR’S CORNER BY NICK SUDZINA Keeping Courts Relevant JULY 2, 2013 – JANUARY 5, 2014 It is important for court leaders to contemplate the relevancy of courts in today’s society. Since becoming the Trial Court Administrator for the Tenth Circuit in September, 1985, I have noticed (and experienced) many, many changes in the justice system in Florida, not all for the better. As the independent third branch of government, courts must keep up with trends in social change. Years ago, it was almost unheard of for litigants in a family law case to represent themselves. Now, with the proliferation of more self-help books than you can shake a stick at, more and more pro se individuals demand their day of justice in front of someone somewhere to have their dispute resolved. Just in the family division alone, in addition to the traditional court process that is heard by a judge, we now have an epidemic of “other” family courts, i.e., domestic violence court, unified family court (in which all cases involving a family are heard by one judge), model dependency court, juvenile drug court, family/dependency drug court, behavioral health court, veteran’s court, etc, etc. Courts change to be responsive to the executive and legislative branches, and to rules promulgated by the Supreme Court. Funding challenges for the courts require innovations and rethinking of strategies used in the past, but which have become less effective in today’s world. However, the new norm is doing more with less. For all citizens, justice must be accessible and affordable and courts need to ensure that due process rights are protected and laws are upheld and interpreted correctly, regardless of an individual’s socio-economic status. Indeed, courts are accessible with a judge now assigned twenty-four hours a day to hear emergency petitions and to provide the necessary relief, if appropriate. Circuit Judges Polk County No one can argue the point that more expectations are now placed on Florida’s trial courts. More citizens expect the courts to resolve all of their problems once they make their menu selection. Judges and court staff are always going to be held to the highest degree of accountability. Because of the expenditure of public funds necessary to operate the courts, and because courts operate in a fishbowl, its partners and various interest groups observe how well the courts are performing. Courts have always changed and will continue to do so. The internet, E-mail, websites, texting, Facebook, Twitter and other social media alone require changes in the way things get done. The courts have not been spared the profound impact of societal changes and expectations which require a pause and a deep breath to gauge how the courts are performing and what needs to be changed. There is never a shortage of opinions (solicited and not) on the way to run things. Felony What will the courts look like in twenty years? They must be able to attract and retain quality judges and competent court staff, all of whom must assure its stakeholders and society that courts are achieving their goals and objectives and remain relevant in the community. Albert Einstein said “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” An effective court system will be one that is ready for all challenges equipped with this heightened sense of consciousness. Chief Judge 30: F1: F2: F3: F4: F5: F6: F9: VP: Circuit Judges Highlands County A. Smith Stargel Alcott Combee Raiden (Adm. Judge) Shelby Jacobsen Curry Civil 04: 07: 08: 15: Masters Hofstad Radabaugh Durrance (Adm. Judge) 11: Durden Felony 06: Sites Civil & Probate 10: Estrada Family Shinholser 12: Juvenile/ Prob/ Prose/ Family Relief/ Domv JR : Cowden (Highlands Adm. Judge) Hardee County 03: Ezelle (Hardee Adm. Judge) County Judges Family 01: 02: 05: 09: 13: Harb Roddenbery (Adm. Judge) Spoto Harlan Selph Probate / Mental Health 14: Carpanini Appeals / Writs 30: County Civil M-0: J2: J4: Ojeda Smith County Small Claims M-2: Bennett Smith Juvenile J1: Florida Bar President, PolkEugene County K. Pettis, shares a moment with Executive County CriminalDirector, Lisa Oliver Past M-6: and Fegers President, Robert M-4: Williams StanzM-5: at thisGrode year’s M-7: Abdoney Voluntary Bar M-8: Green Conference Kornstein (Adm. Judge) McCarthy Yancey Behavioral Health Court / Self Help M-8: Flood (Adm. County) Lakeland L-1: Winter Haven W-3: Hardee County CC: Kirkland Griffin McKibben Highlands County CC: Ritenour 3 Lakeland Bar Association Attends Statewide Bar Conference Meet Our LBA President Natalie R. Wilson was born and raised in Lakeland, Florida. She graduated from Lakeland Christian School. She received a Bachelor of Science degree in Legal Studies (major), and a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (minor) from UCF. She earned her Juris Doctor at Stetson University College of Law. Natalie’s favorite colors are navy blue and purple; and her favorite book is To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. When not working tirelessly in her office, Natalie enjoys trips to all of the Walt Disney theme parks in Orlando. She is an Annual Passholder and loves anything and everything Disney. This summer, President Natalie Wilson, Past President, Robert J. Stanz, and Executive Director, Lisa Oliver represented the Lakeland Bar Association at the Florida Voluntary Bar Leaders Conference in Clearwater. The conference provided a wealth of ideas and opportunities for improving the effectiveness of voluntary bar associations. The breakout sessions offered chances to connect and learn the wonderful things happening in the voluntary bar associations around the state. Our Florida Bar President, Eugene K. Pettis, shared his goals and vision with those in attendance. We are pleased to announce that he will be our keynote speaker at our Law Day Luncheon on May 9, 2014. Like many other local bar associations, the LBA is continually striving to enhance the quality of the legal profession in our area. Sponsoring attendance at the annual Voluntary Bar Conference helps the LBA to keep moving forward with new ideas. When asked for a few of her favorite quotes or sayings, Natalie responded with three quotes, all of which, not surprisingly, are direct quotes from Walt Disney himself. They are… Florida Bar President, Eugene Pettis shares a moment with Lisa Oliver, Executive Director, and Robert Stanz, Past President during the Voluntary Bar Conference in July. “If you can dream it, you can do it.” “Whatever you do, do it well.” “The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing.” Natalie currently has her own private law firm, Wilson Law, P.L. in Lakeland. Natalie’s goal is… “to have a long successful career practicing law and helping others.” It’s Time to Join Lakeland Bar Association The Lakeland Bar Association invites you to join. Membership fees include eight planned monthly membership luncheons with guest speakers. There will be at least two social events: the annual Judicial Reception event and the holiday social. Get involved with our philanthropic opportunities including Race the Bar and Habitat for Humanity. Send the enclosed application for membership by October 1, 2013 as well as your check for payment to : Lakeland Bar Association P. O. Box 2883 Lakeland, FL 33806. (see page 5 for dues amount) 4 Lakeland Bar Association Membership Application 2013-2014 Annual Dues … $100 gov’t employee less than 5 years $125 gov’t employee 5+ years $140 private attorney No cost to first year attorneys (firm or solo practitioners) Name ___________________________________________________________ Email (Provide this to receive LBA correspondence!) ___________________________ My information is the same as last year (check this and there is no need to complete the information below! Firm / employer ____________________________________________________ Business Address ___________________________________________________ City ____________________________ State _____________ Zip_____________ Business Phone __________________________ FAX (optional) _______________ Home Address ( optional) _____________________________________________ City_______________________ State_____________ Zip___________________ Please indicate other administrative / work related emails to which we can send correspondence: _________________________________________________ Title / name of person above _____________________________________________ Memberships to other local bar association(s) _______________________________ My area of specialty in the field of law is: ___________________________________ I am interested in serving on the LBA board yes no am interested in serving one of the following LBA committees: _____ Membership (Fall ’13) _____Annual Bench / Bar Reception (Fall ’13) _____ Holiday Social ( Winter ’13) _____ Programs & Guest Speakers _____ Law Week/ Race the Bar ( April/ May ‘14) _____ Spring Social ( May – June ‘14) _____ Res Integra Journal _____ LBA Web site _____ Continuing Legal Education (CLE) _____ Young Lawyers Division Please mail this completed Membership Application / Membership Renewal Form & your Membership Fee to : Lakeland Bar Association, Inc. c/o Lisa Oliver, Executive Director P.O. Box 2883 Lakeland, FL 33806-2883 Amount due: (check one) _____ ($100) Government employee less than 5 years _____ ($125) Government employee 5 or more years _____ ($140) Private practice attorney ______ ($0) First year attorney indicate firm or practice name ____________________ Please note... Your Membership Fee includes all luncheons and social events, and an annual subscription to our Res Integra Journal. All guests (or those who have not renewed memberships by October 2013) are invited to our luncheons and socials events for a cost of $25 per person per luncheon or event. 5 M_m\_r From Th_ P[st…. MINUTES FROM THE PAST Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Lakeland Bar Association At the regular meeting of the Lakeland Bar Association on February 2, 1977, at the Lakeland Yacht and Country Club, President Jan L. King presided. Jim Hahn presented the use of standary (sic) Contract for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and the same was approved by the Bar. Lon D. Oxfor^ Lon D. Oxfor^, \orn L_sli_, G[., 1897. @^mitt_^ to \[r 1928, G_orgi[; 1924, Flori^[. Pr[]ti]_^, L[k_l[n^, Fl[., sin]_ 1924. M_m\_r L[k_l[n^ [n^ Polk County B[r @sso]i[tions; I. O. O. F., W. O. W. M[rri_^, two sons [n^ two ^[ught_rs, offi]_, L[k_l[n^, Fl[. William Sweat introduced Mr. Steven Paul who spoke on physical fitness. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 1:00 PM Respectfully submitted, /s/ W. Ray Fortner Secretary Alpha Ad 6 ATTACKING EXPERTS By K.C. Bouchillion A long time ago, I heard a CLE seminar lecturer offer what he considered to be a brilliant idea for taking on an expert at trial. As any trial lawyer knows, most experts know each other and have squared off against each other (or even been on the same side in a case) on many occasions. Some of them are cordial to each other. Others despise their opposites. The seminar lecturer recommended getting an expert who despised the opposing expert. His brilliant idea: Ask your expert about the opposing expert’s reputation for having a character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 608(a). It was a national lecture, so it was not specific to Florida law – which I should not have overlooked. Instead, at my next trial, I asked that question, which drew an immediate objection, which was sustained, and a stern lecture from the judge (outside the 10th Circuit). The objection, of course, was that under Florida law, one expert cannot criticize another expert. Now thoroughly confused, I spoke with a more experienced attorney, who laid it all out for me – in small words that even I could understand. speed limit. On rebuttal, the plaintiff recalled his accident reconstructionist for the specific purpose of discussing how the two experts’ computations differed from each other. The trial court did not allow the testimony and was reversed. In reversing, the court of appeal stated: [A] comparison may show that defendant's witness failed to consider all proper factors, or considered improper factors, or erred in the weight or effect attributed to certain factors, in the selection or use of formulas or in actual calculations or in other reasoning processes and thus might tend to impeach defendant's witness, as in Hartstone Concrete Products Company, Inc. v. Ivancevich, 200 So.2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967), and King Pest Control v. Binger, 379 So.2d 660 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). However, we feel the real value of such a question and answer is in giving the jury a better insight into the bases supporting the two differing opinions so that the jury can better evaluate and weigh the testimony of the witnesses by understanding and comparing how, why and in what particulars, the two expert witnesses reached different conclusions. Mathis, 400 So. 2d at 796. It is true that in Florida, an expert may not “attack the opposing expert's ability, credibility, reputation or competence.” Caban v. State, 9 So. 3d 50, 53 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Also, an expert may not express an opinion on the validity of another expert’s opinion. Mathis v. O’Reilly, 400 So. 2d 795, 796 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). The flip side of this coin is the expert who, on direct examination, attempts to bolster his own opinion by claiming that other experts agree with him. This is entirely improper. Just as an expert cannot bolster his opinion on direct examination by citing to treatises, neither may an expert assert that other nonOn the other hand, there is much you can do in testifying experts corroborate his opinions. pitting one expert against another. For example, Schwarz v. State, 695 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 4th it is permissible for your expert to criticize the DCA 1997). methodology of an opposing expert. Network Publications, Inc. v. Bjorkman, 756 So. 2d While this may seem obvious and commonsensical, it can come up in subtle ways that 1028, 1030 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). you must be diligent to detect. For example, in one of my recent trials, a retained defense Furthermore, medical expert was set to testify that the it is not improper to pose a question in reports and findings of my client’s treaters a way to cause one expert to delineate were “consistent” with his own opinions (if, the factors used in forming the by “consistent,” he meant “completely opposing expert's opinion and then do opposite”). The judge, thankfully, sustained the same as to his own opinion, and my objection, but it does point out that we compare the predicates upon which the have to stay alert. If nothing else, trial two opinions are based. lawyers are dogged about finding new ways Caban, 9 So. 3d at 53-54 (emphasis added). to bypass the evidentiary blockades in their In fact, such comparisons are encouraged, and way. the failure to allow them can result in reversal. In Mathis, for example, the defendant’s accident reconstruction expert had testified that the defendant’s vehicle was traveling just under the KC Bouchillon Lilly, O’Toole & Brown Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer and Business Litigation Lawyer. 7 First Annual Karla Foreman Wright Award October 1, 2013 On October 1, 2013, the Polk County Trial Lawyers Association will present, at the Club at Eaglebrooke, the first annual Karla Foreman Wright Award to a Judge in recognition of his or her Professionalism, Courtesy and Leadership, both on and off the bench, which traits were exemplified by the life and service of Judge Wright. The speaker will be The Honorable Mark Bennett, U.S. District Court Judge from the Northern District of Iowa. The Karla Foreman Wright Award will be presented by Justice Peggy Quince of the Florida Supreme Court. More information forthcoming. will be NOMINATIONS NOW BEING ACCEPTED Please forward your nominations for a County or Circuit Judge, sitting or retired, who exemplifies the Professionalism, Courtesy and Leadership, both on and off the bench which Judge Wright exemplified in her life and service to: Howard Kay, Esquire 815 State Road 60 E Lake Wales, FL 33853-4241 [email protected] Please include in your communication to Howard a description of the reasons your nominee is deserving of the Karla Foreman Wright award. POLK COUNTY TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION Post Office Box 2836 LAKELAND, FL 33806-2836 August 2013 The Florida Bar Board of Governors met on July 26, 2013. Major actions of the board and reports received include: In response to a notice of intent to file a petition to amend Rule 1-3.1 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar to specify that no one who has complied with requirements for Bar admission be disqualified from membership solely because he or she is not a U.S. citizen, the board voted to respond to the petition after its filing by indicating that the board supports the concept contained in the petition, but that the board believes that the amendment is more appropriately placed in the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar, and that the board recommends to the Supreme Court of Florida that it seek input from the Board of Bar Examiners on the issue. The notice of intent to file the petition was submitted as per Rule 1-12.1(f) and (g). The Florida Bar has not taken a position on the case of Jose Godinez-Samperio, an undocumented immigrant seeking to become a member of the Bar. An ethics advisory opinion on cloud computing was approved. The opinion concludes that lawyers may use cloud computing if they take reasonable precautions to ensure that confidentiality of client information is maintained as well as other steps to ensure adequate security and access to the information and to back up the data. On the recommendation of the board's Program Evaluation Committee (PEC), a new Senior Lawyers Committee was approved. The committee's mission will be to serve the interests and needs of the profession by fostering an interchange of ideas, sharing the accumulated knowledge and experience of its members and addressing issues that are of particular significance to senior lawyers. For information about joining the committee, please watch for a website announcement and an article in an upcoming issue of The Florida Bar News. In the current bar year, 2013-2014, the Program Evaluation Committee will consider: whether the PEC chair should be an automatic member of the Executive Committee; changing the name of the Legislation Committee to the Governmental Affairs Committee; variations in certification criteria for different areas of law and evaluating a new anti-trust and trade regulation certification; evaluating the Bar’s Law Office Management Assistance Service (LOMAS); conducting the mandatory threeyear review of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section; and whether there should be an additional charge beyond the initial $150 fee when an ad submitted for Bar review is subsequently revised and must be re-reviewed. Based on a recommendation of the Citizens Forum and the Communications Committee, the board approved that upon receipt of an order of suspension or disbarment by the Florida Supreme Court that The Florida Bar change the status posted on the member's website profile to: Member in Good Standing/Suspension or Disbarment Pending and that a link be placed to the court order. This change would provide consumers with a notice during the 30-day period between the court order and the effective date of the suspension or disbarment. To learn more about members' needs for technology education and information, the board approved including questions on the upcoming Bar membership survey on use of technology and also approved conducting a separate electronic member survey on technology use in law practices. In addition, the board approved posting a weekly technology tip on the website homepage, a pilot project by the Leadership Academy to use Facebook and LinkedIn, and a Facebook page and Twitter feed for The Florida Bar President. Golf Anyone? After each LBA meeting at Eaglebrooke, a golf scramble will be scheduled at 1:30 sharp at the Eaglebrooke Golf Club for all interested persons. Four person teams are invited to participate or individual golfers will be connected to a team. Contact Lisa Oliver at 619-7160 if you are interested in playing. Legal Laughs Appointments to two-year terms to the ABA House of Delegates were confirmed for Herman Russomanno and Edith Osman, both of Miami. A list of special appointments to be made in 2013-14 and the application are on the website. Like The Florida Bar on Facebook and follow on Twitter for announcements and upcoming activities. ##www.floridabar.org## If you have questions or concerns, contact your Board of Governors representative(s): [email protected] C. Richard Nail, B.C.S. Florida Bar Board Certified Marital & Family Law GrayRobinson, P.A. Email: [email protected] 8 “That’s very creative…. 20 years.” Printed by permission of copyright owner. Book Review / Report of MOB LAWYER Reviewer: Susan W. Roberts, Senior Circuit Judge, 10th Judicial Circuit, Florida Mob Lawyer, Lawyer by Frank Ragano and Selwyn Raab, Charles Scribner’s Sons New York, McMillian Publishing Co., 1994, 372 pages, Contents, Foreword by Nicholas Pileggi, Prologue, 29 Chapters, Epilogue, Index, $22.00 hardback. Frank Ragano worked as Santo Trafficante’s attorney for most of his legal career. He was introduced to him by Pat Whitaker. Whitaker was a Tampa criminal lawyer who also did legal work for Trafficante in Polk and Hillsborough Counties. Whitaker served as a Legislator in the Florida House, then as a Senator and as Senate President. Ragano clerked for the Florida Supreme Court while he attended Stetson University, College of Law, where he attracted Whitaker’s attention for his ‘legal acumen’. Whitaker encouraged him to practice law in Tampa, promising to refer him clients. The book tells of Ragano’s work as an attorney and details how his professional relationship with Trafficante grew into friendship. Ragano tells the reader that he lost his way and became involved in Trafficante’s business interests. He explains that he began his practice of law with high ethical standards. Trafficante’s business interests included hotel and gambling interests in Cuba in addition to Trafficante’s bolito enterprise in Tampa. He became a very rich man in need of a very good criminal attorney. The tale involves Florida and Cuban political history, including how Castro came to power and what happened to Trafficante’s business interests in Cuba. Ragano recounts his version of Jimmy Hoffa’s execution and the assassinations of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy 9 and his brother NY Senator Robert Kennedy. He tells how he thinks the Kennedys drew the ire of the Mob and how the Mob reacted. The book is a fast paced, gossipy read of Ragano’s story of a lawless time in Florida. It was recommended to me by none other than Judge Oliver Green. The moral of the story is: Do not become friends with those involved in organized crime unless you can handle consequences similar to those of Frank Ragano. He saw his law license revoked and his way of life destroyed. Ragano was ultimately sentenced to prison. Supreme Court Ruling on DOMA Opens Door to Immigration Benefits by Jean Pierre Espinoza On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, found that DOMA violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The court’s rejection of DOMA has wide-ranging implications and means that, under federal law, married samesex couples will be treated the same as traditional couples in areas such as income tax, estate tax, health privacy and other federally regulated issues such as immigration. The U.S. Supreme Court case, U.S v. Windsor, addressed the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA. Section 3 established a limitation on the definition of the terms marriage and spouse for purposes of U.S. federal law, to only recognize marriages between one man and one woman. While same-sex marriage is legal in certain foreign countries, as well as a growing list of states within the United States, DOMA prohibited the recognition of these marriages under federal law. This was a bar for the issuance of any marriage-based federal benefits, including immigration benefits, to gay and lesbian couples. options for relief in removal proceedings depend upon a demonstration of hardship to certain qualifying relatives, including spouses. There are also benefits for qualified stepchildren, who can apply for immigration benefits in the same way as biological children, subject to certain restrictions. Within hours of the Supreme Court’s decision, the White House issued a statement declaring support for marriage equality. Soon after, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano announced that the agencies within her department, including Citizenship and Immigration Services, would begin to implement the ruling. Within days, news came that the CIS, which had been holding same-sex cases in abeyance, had approved its first-ever marriage-based petition for a same-sex-couple. For the approval of the residency, USCIS evaluates whether the marriage is valid under the law of the place where it took place. It is not a requirement that the petitioner or beneficiary resides in that place. The process for petitioning a same-sex spouse is the same as the traditional application process. The U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) has to file a petition (USCIS Form I-130) and to submit ample evidence of the bonafides of the marriage. The changes brought by the DOMA decision will present challenges. Just as there were before the DOMA decision, there will be those who try to use fraudulent marriages to obtain immigration benefits. The USCIS has implemented procedures to investigate, prevent and punish that kind of Under the current system, twothirds of all legal immigration is family-sponsored, and roughly two-thirds of that involves applications for marriage-based permanent residence. Many immigration benefits are available based on a spousal relationship. In addition to marriage-based permanent resident status, there are dependent nonimmigrant benefits, such as H-4 and L-2 status, which are available to spouses. Certain waivers and 10 abuse. The sanction for attempt to obtain immigration benefits by fraud is a permanent bar from the United States. About Our Author Jean Pierre Espinoza practices Immigration Law & Deportation Defense. He is a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. [email protected] Lakeland Bar Association Res Integra Advertising Policies and Rates Res Integra, the Lakeland Bar Association’s newsletter is published five times annually with a current circulation of approximately 300 legal professionals in the Polk County area. Our first issue will be sent to over 1000 professionals. 1. 2. 3. 4. No more than 25% of newsletter will be ads. RATE SCHEDULE FOR No legal ads by lawyers promoting legal services offered. INDIVIDUAL ISSUE ONLY No political or social issue ads. 1/2 page = $300 All ads must be “camera ready” and submitted by deadline. (See calendar of events) Only electronically submitted display ads are accepted. 1/4 page = $250 No typesetting or art services are provided for display ads. 1/8 page = $200 5. Prepayment must be received by submission deadline. 6. The Lakeland Bar Association will determine placement position of all ads. Purchase 3 or more ad 7. LBA member lawyers and their firms may advertise. spaces for the year and (Non member lawyer ads will not be accepted.) save 20% Ads by member lawyers only include: a. Free address changes and professional announcements (no more than 25 words) Rates effective through b. Classified advertising (law related) May/June 2014 issue. ($25 for 50 words or less per issue) c. Non-legal services of members or their entities that are provided. ( i.e. mediation, arbitration, title insurance, etc. The non-lawyer Rate Schedule and Policies will apply). 8. Non-lawyer ads will be limited to entities that provide legal related supplies or services. (ie. Banks, title companies, court reporters, office supplies, expert witnesses, trial support services, mediation, arbitration, etc) 9. The Lakeland Bar Association does not assume responsibility for any errors or omissions in any advertising. 10. All ads subject to staff approval. The LBA reserves the right to reject, at its option, any advertising for any reason. 11. Any business sponsoring a luncheon will receive recognition on our meeting photo page only. Thank you to the firms who made this year’s social a success! Burnetti , P.A. The Law Offices of Carlton & Carlton Fulmer and Fulmer, P.A. Gray Robinson, P.A. Harris and Helwig, P.A. Lilly O’Toole and Brown LLP Lopez and Humphries., P.A. Peterson and Myers, P.A. The Law Office of Gregory M. Ruster P.L. Saunders Law Group Sessums Law Group Robert J. Stanz, P.A. Trakas Thornhill, P. A. Valenti, Campbell , Trohn, Tamayo, & Aranda Vecchio, Carrier , Feldman, and Johannassen _t~xÄtÇw eÉtÜ|Çz gãxÇà|xá UtÜ 11 Lakeland Bar Association PO Box 2883 Lakeland, FL 33806 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED This Complimentary issue of the Res Integra is sent to all Florida Bar members of the 10th Judicial Circuit. Please complete the enclosed membership form to continue receiving our journal. Law firms with two or more attorneys can now be part of the LBA 100% Club. All it takes is for every attorney in the firm to be a member of LBA! 100% Club member firms will be listed in future issues of the Res Integra. Show your firm’s support and pride in the Lakeland Bar by becoming a member of this club. It’s easy! Just complete the application form in this journal and send it along with $140 per member to PO Box 2883, Lakeland, FL 33806. 12