REPORT

REPORT
Mission to Georgia
December 21-24, 2014
REGULATORY GUILLOTINE PROJECT IN ARMENIA
Legislative process /Regulatory Framework/
Regulatory Reforms in Georgia
The Regulatory Guillotine project in Armenia - funded by the Austrian Development Agency,
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the World Bank - organized a study tour in
Tbilisi, Georgia for the purpose of getting familiarized with the legislative reforms of the country in
different sectors of economy, studying Georgian Legislative Procedures’ and Regulatory Framework
related policies, structures and practices, familiarizing themselves with the Georgian model of
Regulatory Decision making principles and the dialogue between the public and private sector, also
changing experience based on the economic reforms in Georgia moving to a relatively wellfunctioning market economy in 2014.
The delegation headed Armen Yeghiazaryan, Director of the National Centre for Legislative
Regulation and included experts reviewing different spheres of the Armenian legislation. The 3-day
mission included up to 10 meetings with heads/representatives of ministries and other state
agencies, international organizations, projects and parliamentarians.
DAY 1: December 22, 2014
Meeting #1, Public Service Hall - National Agency of Public Registry (NAPR) under the Ministry of
Justice of Georgia
Hosted by: Ekaterina Meskhiadze, Head of International
Relation Division
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Armen Yeghiazaryan
(Director), Heghine Manukyan (Deputy Director), Vahe
Chibukhchyan (Deputy Director), Sonya Hovsepyan, Lilit Gulkanyan, Nelli Harutyunyan, Lilit
Meshchyan, Karen Ghaltakhchyan, Lusine Tovmasyan,
Garri Kasparov and Tamar Minasyan
The customer-oriented
operating in Georgia.
registration
It involves:
“ONE-STOP-SHOP” principle;
system
is
o Centralized registration and cadastre
system & decentralized customer service
(delivering services by the authorized users),
o Simplified
property
registration
procedure, and;
o Voluntary notarization, electronic
application and receipt of the abstract,
cadastral plan and other documents,
availability of distance registration service and
cadastral map of Georgia.
The meeting was divided into two parts.
1. NCLR team was introduced the way the Public Service Hall was running in reality (tour and
case study).
2. NCLR team was provided by thorough presentation on procedure of property registration
and business registration methodology.
Property registration: During the meeting Ekaterina Meskhidze represented the property
registration procedure (Picture 1), registration terms and fees (Picture 2). Talking about cadastre in
Georgia, Mrs. Meskhidze stated that:
 The cadastral survey work is done by the
private sector,
 NAPR is responsible for the maintenance
of cadastral data,
 there is a centralized processing of
cadastral data via internet,
 data storing/processing is done by using
ESRI ARCGIS software,
 GIS operator inserts data in SDE server,
makes situational map, exports it in PDF
format and uploads it on PDF servers.
She also mentioned that there is a public access
to cadastral data
Picture 1:
2
Picture 2:
Business and Non-Commercial Entities registration: During the meeting Mrs. Meskhidze
represented also
1. the business registration procedure (Picture 3),
2. registration terms and fees (Picture 4),
3. the documents needed for registration of a business in Georgia (application; a copy of ID of
a person filing the application; registration application (Charter/Partners’
Agreement/Certificate of Incorporation) duly certified and signed by all partners/founders;
a document confirming payment of registration service fee).
She also told that in some cases additional documents can be needed.
Picture 3:
Starting Business
• Access to charter of all legal forms via NAPR website
• On-line access of Tax Department to NAPR database
• Reports about transactions sent to TD in every five
minutes
• Voluntary notarization of agreements
• Public access to any registration document
• Centralized system
Picture 4:
3
For NCLR, it was much informative and helpful to hear about Georgian practice and especially their
approach of solving such arduous problems.
Meeting #2, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia
Hosted by: Lali Gogoberidze, Head of Economic
Analysis and Policy Department and Mariam Gabunia,
Deputy Head of Department for Foreign Trade and
international Economic Relations
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Vahe Chibukhchyan (Deputy Director), Lilit Meshchyan and
Lusine Tovmasyan
The following topics were discussed during the meeting:
 Licenses and Permits: obtaining processes, necessary documentation, implemented and
ongoing reforms;
 Certificate of Origin;
 Implemented reforms to enhance economic activity;
 Regulatory impact assessment;
 The process of obtaining of the permit for
goods of dual-use on import, export, reexport, transit and it’s similarities between
the Armenian system.
Previously the permits were issued by the Ministry of
Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia.
Currently the permits are issued by the Revenue
Service of Georgia. The decision was made to make
the permit issuing process more effective. Permits
are issued within 20 days. When the imported or exported item belongs to the list of sensitive items,
a recommendation of the Inter-departmental Committee of Military and Technical Cooperation of
the Ministry of Defense is needed. The permit can be obtained at any border checkpoint, as well as
the Customs Department based on written or electronic application.
Since September 1, 2014, Certificate of Origin EUR.1 is issued by the Revenue Service of Georgia.
The changes were made in accordance with the Association Agreement between Georgia and the
EU, including the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. The Certificate of origin is issued
within 3 working days and can be obtained in the Customs Department, based on written or
electronic application.
During past 8 years Georgian Government
implemented a reform policy to enhance
economic activity. To achieve this purpose the
reforms were held in several directions. The
main directions were elimination of licenses
and permits, except the ones that were
necessary for healthcare, security and
environment protection purposes,
simplification of tax system and fight against
corruption. As a result now there are 100 licenses instead of previously existing 900. Natural and
legal entities can apply for the licenses and permits electronically and one-stop shop principle is
implemented.
4
The tax types were reduced to 6 flat taxes instead of previously existing 21. Tax rates were reduced
and now it is possible to pay all taxes electronically. Implemented reforms combined with the anticorruption policies in state agencies guaranteed increased economic activity and greater budget
revenues.
Georgian officials represented the current state of Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) process in
Georgia. RIA was implemented in Georgia in 2007. A unit within the Ministry of Economy and
Sustainable Development of Georgia was trained to undertake Regulatory Impact Assessment.
Presently International Organizations’ experts group is working on the design of the improved RIA
which will be implemented in Georgia.
Meeting #3, Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia
Hosted by: Valeri Kvaratskhelia, Deputy
Minister of Labour, Health and Social
Affairs of Georgia and representatives of
Lepl State Regulation Agency for Medical
Activities
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Armen Yeghiazaryan (Director), Heghine Manukyan (Deputy
Director), Karen Ghaltakhchyan, Nelli Harutyunyan, Lilit Gulkanyan and Tamar Minasyan




Issues discussed during the meeting were the
following:
 The mission and functions of the
Ministry in the drug regulation;
 Regulation of vaccines;
 Registration and import/export of
medical equipment;
 Procedures for sale of drugs in drug
stores, tools applied for supervision and control
of quality;
Georgian legislation on free medical assistance and service;
Budgetary allocations and their distribution;
Drug related licensing procedures; and,
Other preconditions for activities in this sphere.
The Deputy Minister asked to tell
more about the NCLR, particularly
motives for its establishment,
activity and the progress of the
reforms
in
Armenia.
Mr.
Yeghiazaryan, Director of the NCLR
told about NCLR main directions of
its activities, relations with other
Government
agencies,
local
authorities, businessmen and
citizens.
5



The NCLR representative presented NCLR’s recommendations in drug
related policies as well as the Armenian legislation on healthcare and
particularly, the new draft law “On drugs” and procedures required for
its implementation.
Numerous inquiries were made by the NCLR representatives during the
meeting, including:
 Implementation of GMP, GLP, GDP, GSP, GCP standards,
 Supervision of the production,
 Import/export
 And sanitary rules for the preservation of drugs,
 The procedure for implementing parallel import and its results,
 Reduction of prices and stimulation of competition.
Availability of competitive markets,
Expert laboratories for drugs and their certification,
Reference laboratories for dealing with disputes.
Meeting #4, Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia
Hosted by: Irakli Margvelashvili, Executive
Director
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Karen
Ghaltakhchyan and Garry Kasparov
Irakli Margvelashvili described the current conditions of drug
market during the meeting. Since he was familiar with NCLR's
activities and its proposed reforms (Mr. Margvelashvili has
visited RA MOH as well as the "Drug and Medical Technology
Expertise Centre’ and was in connection with the NCLR
representatives and MPI Union), he explained the nature of
the 2005-2015 reforms and their impact on the inflation rate
in the industry.
Issues discussed during the meeting were as follows:
• Import-export customs procedures of medication;
• licensing mechanisms of pharmaceutical industry
The NCLR representative briefly presented the new draft law
on drugs and other related legal amendments.
The following issues were raised during the discussions:
o Implementation of GMP, GLP, GDP, GSP, GCP
standards process,
o The process of drugs manufacture,
o Import, export,
o Sanitary standards of storage; and,
o Control mechanisms.
Mr. Margvelashvili mentioned that the legislation should be amended in order to allow foreign
companies to take advantage of Armenian organizations providing laboratory testing, he stressed
6
that , "Liquor" Local company was equipped with the latest technologies and had the ability to
provide services not only for resident, but also nonresident companies.
The following questions were in the Agenda of the day as well, such as:
o The availability of drugs laboratories,
o Their certification,
o Competitiveness of the market; and,
o Reference laboratories for dispute resolution.
It was stated that the Georgian market was liberalized; however there were not many laboratories
still existing. They did not have a reference laboratory; therefore they outsourced the service in
Europe, pointing the possibility to use the Armenian companies, if they passed the appropriate
certification process and receive certification.
Meeting #5, Agricultural Cooperatives Development Agency
Hovsepyan, Nelli Harutyunyan and Lilit Gulkanyan
Hosted by: Ana Sabakhtarishvili, Deputy
Chairman and Kakha Nadiradze, Head of
Targeted Projects Department
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Vahe
Chibukhchyan (Deputy Director), Tamar
Minasyan, Public Relations Associate, Sonya
During the meeting Ana Sabakhtarishvili represented the legislation reforms of agricultural
cooperatives, mainly the adoption of law on Agricultural Cooperative as well as the main functioning
principles of the cooperatives which were as follows:
 Voluntary participation and
fairness;
 One member, one voice;
 Joint management of Share
capital;
 Cooperation
through
Cooperative(second
level
cooperatives);
 Cooperative is independent
form of a business and
totally
controlled
by
members;
Mrs. Sabakhtarishvili also represented agricultural cooperative registration procedure and main
requirements.
Agricultural cooperative members SHOULD be:
 At least 3 in mountainous regions and 5 in rest of Georgia.
 An individual, Minimum age of 18;
 Cooperatives.
Agricultural cooperative REGISTRATION procedure:
 Register as cooperative
7
 Apply to ACDA for granting the status of agricultural cooperative.
During the meeting Mrs. Sabakhtarishvili talked about the state support the agricultural
cooperatives, which was mainly expressed by the possibility in applying to the state grant
programmes and special tax approach as well.
The tax system for agricultural cooperatives was as
follows:
PROFIT TAXES
Turnover of GEL 200,000 which was one of the
obstacles for establishing farmer organizations still
remains in tax code on primary production level.
However, according to the recent changes
introduced for agriculture cooperative, this
threshold was abolished from tax code until
January 2017 and therefore, is not subject of taxation. Also, supply of agriculture products produced
by cooperative members or/and provision of relevant services within cooperative members will not
be counted as gross income until January 2017 and therefore is not subject of taxation. However,
the tax code does not clearly define if this article is applicable to processing cooperatives. Dividends
are not subject to taxation for primary production cooperatives as well as for processing
cooperatives.
Grants received by agriculture cooperatives are tax exempt. Moreover, the share contribution by
member farmers is not counted as an income for cooperatives and exempted from taxation.
VALUE ADDED TAX
The initial supply prior to manufacturing and processing of agricultural products (prior changing of a
commodity code) by an individual in agricultural production (excluding eggs) are exempted from tax
(with entitlement to reclaim input VAT deduction).
PROPERTY TAX
The assets (excluding land plots) owned and used by
agriculture cooperatives are not subject of taxation
until January 2017. Moreover, the movable assets
that are leased by agriculture cooperatives are
exempted. Agriculture land plots with up to five
hectare area owned by an individual as of March 1,
2004 are exempted from tax, but in case of
agriculture cooperatives, if agriculture land plot
owned by individuals will be used as a contribution
(share) to the agriculture cooperatives and
registration date will be changed, the land plots will
be counted as a cooperative asset and are taxed according to regime mentioned ahead.
Mrs. Sabakhtarishvili also represented ongoing programmes that were directed to the agricultural
cooperative development.
For the NCLR, it was much informative and helpful to hear about Georgian practice and especially
their approach of solving such arduous problems.
8
DAY 2: December 23, 2014
Meeting #6, Customs Clearance Zone “Tbilisi”, Gardabani municipality
Hosted by: Mr. Samson Uridia – Head of the
Department for International Relations; Mr. Shota
Tsuladze – Head of the Main Division of the Customs
Clearance of the Customs Department; Mr. Dimitri
lomadze - Head of the Service Division of the Customs
Clearance Zone “Tbilisi” of the Main Division of the Customs Clearance Zone of the Customs
Department; Mr. Mikheil Kavtaradze – Deputy Head of the Main Division of the Customs Clearance
of the Customs Department and Mr. Givi Murvanidze – Deputy Head of Information Technology
Center
Regulatory Guillotine Project team:
Armen Yeghiazaryan (Director), Heghine
Manukyan (Deputy Director), Lusine
Tovmasyan, Lilit Meshchyan, Garri
Kasparov and Tamar Minasyan
The following topics were discussed at the
meeting:
 Legal certainty
 Infrastructure and equipment
 Transparency and anti-corruption measures
 Bilateral relations with neighbouring countries
 The process of customs valuation and its differences with the Armenian system.
Previously Georgian businesses also had the problem of discretionary interpretation of customs
procedural requirements due to vagueness of the legislation, which in its turn affected greatly the
process of customs valuation and consequently estimation of customs duties.
Currently Georgian customs estimates the value with special software. This gives to importers and
exporters chance to estimate the exact amount of money to be paid, providing businesses with
highest grade of certainty and predictability.
Mr Samson Uridia explained the process on
the example of importing of vehicles. For
customs clearance the importer only needs
to enter VIN code, Maker, Production Year
and the engine capacity in the system and
made the payment either with cash or
electronically. Moreover, based on the
application of the importer, it is allowed to
transport a vehicle from Poti and Batumi
ports and go through the customs
clearance in Tbilisi. Without the need of the importer to be present in Poti or Batumi, vehicle and its
goods can be subject to customs clearance in any customs clearance zone as it is requested by the
importer.
9
Mr. Uridia made a presentation on
experience of Georgian Government in
fighting corruption. The anti-corruption
measures administered in the country started
in 2006, along with reforming lawenforcement and judicial systems were
targeted on fiscal system including tax and
customs administration. Significant payroll
raises for public servants employed in the
sector were carried out within a short timeframe in order to help fight economic crime
and corruption. Bigger part of the staff had been fired, following by hiring a younger generation of
tax and customs officials.
At the end Georgian representatives described
recent measures that have been undertaken in
order to improve the institutionalization and the
efficiency of cooperation between the Georgian
customs and customs services of neighbouring
countries. Mr Uridia specially mentioned mutual
recognition of authorized economic operators and
development of new mechanisms for the exchange
of information between Georgian and Turkish
Customs. Then he expressed his anticipation of
mutually beneficial cooperation with Armenian
customs service regarding mentioned issues. As per
the speaker, Armenian and Georgians already
started cooperation within the framework of UNDP
and EU funded Provision of Equipment and Infrastructure for the Bagratashen-Sadakhlo Border
Crossing Point between Armenia and Georgia and enhancement of their capacities (SBIBM) project.
However Georgian side is looking forward for more active cooperation.
Meeting #7, Parliament of Georgia
Hosted by: Dr. Gia Jorjoliani, MP, Leader of SocialDemocrats Party
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Vahe Chibukhchyan
(Deputy Director), Sonya Hovsepyan, Nelly Harutyunyan
and Lilit Gulkanyan
Dr. Jorjoliani is a famous politician in Georgia, he is the head of the new founded political movement
“Social Democrats for Development” and the founder of the organization “Centre for Social Studies”.
As a member of parliament, he is responsible person of regional/community development issues in
the country. During the meeting he represented briefly the state-of-affairs of regional management
and development in Georgia by stressing the key importance the Georgian authorities give to this
vital area. He was well-informed about foreign best practices and brought some interesting cases for
comparison. In order to promote regionalism and regional policy development in Georgia it is key to
attract and engage people, as well as all stakeholders (local government, community and central
government) in such processes as it is done in many developed countries (Norway, Netherlands).
Presently, they need to support communities in their endeavour through implementing RDA projects
10
and also launching other types of activities which
should entail strengthening and promotion of local
democracy in Georgia. Strong local communities mean
strong regions. To this regard, the Lisbon Treaty and the
EU's new high-level strategy (Europe 2020) introduced
a third dimension: territorial cohesion. Georgia will
benefit much from this project to further support local
regional development initiatives.
Another issue in question was establishing adequate
legal framework for regional development and, in general, regulatory processes in Georgia and
Armenia.
Conclusion: Opinions exchanged on this issue led to a conclusion that since each of these countries
have passed their own individual way towards achieving regional improvements (land privatization,
local self-governments institutionalization) they would most likely design and implement their own
model of regional reforms in this area.
For NCLR, it was much informative and helpful to hear about Georgian practice and especially their
approach of solving such arduous problems.
Meeting #8, Governing for Growth in Georgia, USAID
Hosted by: Natalia Beruashvili - Deputy Chief of Party,
Nino Chokheli - GoG Capacity Strengthening Component
lead, Economic Governance and Policy Expert and Grigori
Chikovani - Water and Energy Expert
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Vahe Chibukhchyan (Deputy Director) and Karen Ghaltakhchyan
Natalia Beruashvili represented the basic
principles and directions of their activities and,
particularly, mentioned that the main purpose of
the program is to assure the direct participation
of businesses and citizens' in the reform process.
In terms of participation, the program does not
guarantee the participation of businesses and
citizens' in the law drafting process, but their
participation in adoption of approaches of main
directions, particularly policy making, fiscal,
documentation and other directions, which will
subsequently be implemented within the legal acts related to the adoption of the reforms and the
legal provision of the reforms. USAID is the coordinator of the project.
11
In terms of works, meetings with citizens and
businesses are held by sectors, such as energy and
water projects, education and science, transport
and communication, etc. At the same time, a
major role and significance is given to the
proposals on the implementation of reforms
submitted by the business and citizens, as well as
collection of information on the regulatory impact
effectiveness of the legal acts which ensure the
reform implementation, and the
recommendations submitted to the Government on the main directions of further steps of the
reform process.
The NCLR representative introduced the working mechanism and collaboration format of the NCLRbased Business Council, and, particularly was interested in the degree of involvement and activity of
the businesses in the reform implementation process and subsequent actions to improve
collaboration.
At the request of the Georgian side, the NCLR representatives talked about the format of the
meetings with the businesses and the assessment of the effectiveness of that format.
Both sides expressed their willingness to continue their cooperation and to make more effective the
involvement of businesses and citizens in the reform processes by mutual visits and exchange of
experience.
Meeting #9, LEPL Technical and Construction Supervision Agency at the Ministry of Economy and
Sustainable Development of Georgia
Hosted by: Grigoul Kakauridze, Head of the Agency,
Astamur Chaba, Deputy Head, and David Gigineishvili,
Head of Spatial Planning and Construction Policy
Department
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Vahe Chibukhchyan (Deputy Director) and Karen Ghaltakhchyan
The meeting was dedication to the introduction of the Agency’s activities and functions as well as its
role in urbanization.
The NCLR representative introduced the NCLR main activities and cooperation with Government
agencies, local authorities, businesses and
citizens.
Grigoul Kakauridze presented the implemented
urbanization reforms starting from 1992
onwards. At the request of Georgian colleagues
the NCLR representative briefly presented the
Armenian legislation on urbanization.
A number of issues were discussed were as
follows:
 The implementation of GIS system,
 The availability of a requirement for architectural assignment in Georgia,
12
 The implementation of general plan,
 Spatial planning, zoning systems and their effect on the sector,
 The Georgian experience on licensing in urbanization, and,
 Minimum requirements for professional qualification of architects, builders and technical
controllers,
 Sanitary norms and rules,
 Construction rules, their application and post-soviet reforms.
The parties exchanged thoughts and analyzed the existing practices.
DAY 3: December 24, 2014
Meeting #10, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in Georgia
Hosted by: Lasha Dolidze, Deputy Team Leader
Regulatory Guillotine Project team: Sonya Hovsepyan,
Nelli Harutyunyan, Lilit Gulkanyan and Karen
Ghaltakhchyan
Cooperative Issues
The meeting was dedicated to the main functioning principles of the
cooperatives, the
agricultural cooperative registration procedure and main
requirements. Mr. Dolidze also talked about the tax system for
agricultural cooperatives.
Lasha Dolidze mentioned two steps that must be taken to promote the
development of agricultural cooperatives;
1. The support of the state. By saying state support he meant not
only the tax approach, but also so called the “cheap credits”.
2. Internal management of the cooperatives.
Seeds Certification Issues
Mr. Dolidze mentioned that in Georgia there
was no regulation on certification of seeds and
pedigree seeds. He told that it w as necessary to
implement regulation on certification, but it
must be not obligatory, but voluntary.
For NCLR, it was much informative and helpful
to hear about Georgian practice and especially
their approach of solving such arduous
problems.
13
PUBLIC VISIBILITY OF THE MISSION
During all meetings and discussions Armen Yeghiazaryan, Director of NCLR presented the activities of
the Regulatory Guillotine project in Armenia with stressing the critical role that the Donor
organizations – OSCE Yerevan Office, Austrian Development Agency, the operational unit of the
Austrian Development Cooperation and the World Bank have in realization of the project.
During the mission the NCLR team worked closely with PR units of state agencies – to raise
awareness of the Regulatory Guillotine project in Armenia and the Georgian visit.
National Agency of Public Registry (NAPR) under the Ministry of Justice of Georgia: Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/NAPR.gov.ge/photos/a.184825471569319.69331.184796691572197/85
4395357945657/?type=1&theater
საჯარო რეესტრის ეროვნული სააგენტო
December 22
სომხური დელეგაცია იურიდიულ პირთა და ქონების რეგისტრაციის ქართულ მოდელს
გაეცნო
სომხეთის სამართლებრივი რეგულირების ცენტრის წარმომადგენლები იურიდიული
პირებისა და ქონების რეგისტრაციის პროცედურების გამარტივება-ლიბერალიზაციასთან
დაკავშირებით ქართულ გამოცდილებას ეცნობიან. შეხვედრა სომხურ დელეგაციასა და
საჯარო რეესტრის ეროვნული სააგენტოს წარმომადგენლებს შორის დღეს გაიმართა.
შეხვედრაზე საქართველოს საკანონმდებლო რეფორმებთან ერთად ელექტრონული
რეგისტრაციის, უძრავი ქონების ობიექტებისთვის მისამართის მინიჭებისა და
რეგისტრაციის პროცესში ნოტარიუსის როლთან დაკავშირებული საკითხებიც განიხილეს.
2011 წლიდან სომხეთის სამართლებრივი რეგულირების ეროვნული ცენტრის ფარგლებში
„მარეგულირებელი გილიოტინის პროექტი“ მიმდინარეობს. პროექტის მიზნებს ბიზნესის
14
წარმოების კუთხით რეფორმის გატარება, სახელმწიფო სერვისების ხარჯების შემცირება
და ბიზნესის გარემოს გაუმჯობესება წარმოადგენს. მასში სომხეთის ყველა სამინისტრო
და მარეგულირებელი ორგანოა ჩართული. მულტი დონორული კონსორციუმი კი
პროექტის ფარგლებში მიმდინარე რეფორმას ეხმარება.
რეფორმის წარმატებით განხორციელების მიზნით, სომხურ მხარეს ქართული პრაქტიკის
გაზიარება და საქართველოს იუსტიციის სამინისტროსთან თანამშრომლობა სურს.
ქართული მოდელის შესწავლა სომეხ სპეციალისტებს ქმედითი რეფორმების
განხორციელების საშუალებას მისცემს.
Not-Official (Google) translation
Public Register
December 22
Armenian delegation to the registration of legal persons and property of the model introduced in
Georgian
Armenian Center for the legal regulation of legal persons and property registration procedures are
introduced and liberalization of the Georgian experience. The Armenian delegation and
representatives of the national agency today.
The legislative reforms of electronic registration, real estate objects to the granting or registration of
the notary of the related issues.
Since 2011, the legal regulations of the National Center of Armenia under the "regulatory guillotine
project" is underway. The project aims to conduct business in the reform of public services to reduce
costs and improve the business environment. Armenia and all of the regulatory bodies involved.
Multi-donor consortium in the project, helping to reform.
Successful implementation of the reform, the Armenian side wants to cooperate with the Ministry of
Justice and the Georgian practices. Georgian model of effective implementation of reforms will allow
the Armenian specialists.
Revenue Service: Official Website
http://rs.ge/Default.aspx?sec_id=4846&lang=2&newsid=3254
15
სომეხი კოლეგები ქართულ გამოცდილებას ეცნობიან
23-December-2014
საქართველოს კანონმდებლობის გამარტივების, ლიბერალიზაციის პროცედურებისა და
მარეგულირებელი რეფორმების ქართული მოდელის შესწავლა და გაზიარება, ასევე,
რეგიონული თანამშრომლობის ხელშეწყობა - ასეთია საქართველოში სომხეთის
საკანონმდებლო რეგულირების ეროვნული ცენტრის (NCLR) დელეგაციის ვიზიტის
მიზანი. ვიზიტი 23 დეკემბერს, საქართველოს ფინანსთა სამინისტროს შემოსავლების
სამსახურთან სომხეთის მარეგულირებელი „გილიოტინის“ (Guillotine) პროექტის
ფარგლებში განხორციელდა. დელეგაციის შემადგენლობაში იყვნენ სომხეთის
საკანონმდებლო რეგულირების ეროვნული ცენტრის დირექტორი არმენ იეგაზარიანი და
სომხეთის
მთავრობის
ექსპერტები.
მარეგულირებელი „გილიოტინის“ პროექტი სომხეთში 2011 წლის ოქტომბერში დაიწყო.
რეფორმის მიზანია ბიზნესისა და საზოგადოებრივი მომსახურების ხარჯების შემცირება
50%-ით. მის მხარდასაჭერად და პროექტის განსახორციელებლად ორგანიზებულია
დონორთა კონსორციუმი. პროექტის განმავლობაში იგეგმება „გილიოტინის“ რეფორმა და
მარეგულირებელი შედეგების შეფასება (RIA) სომხეთში. აღნიშნული პროექტისა და
მარეგულირებელი რეფორმების წარმატებით განხორციელებისათვის, სომხეთის
მთავრობა მნიშვნელოვნად მიიჩნევს საუკეთესო საერთაშორისო გამოცდილების
გაზიარებას. სწორედ ასეთად მიიჩნიეს კანონმდებლობის გამარტივებისა და
ლიბერალიზაციის
მხრივ
საქართველოს
გამოცდილება.
შემოსავლების სამსახურში ვიზიტის ფარგლებში სომეხი სტუმრები ეწვივნენ თბილისის
გაფორმების ეკონომიკურ ზონას და ადგილზე ნახეს განხორციელებული რეფორმის
შედეგები, გაეცნენ საბაჟო სფეროში ინსტიტუციური რეფორმებისა და ინოვაციური
ელექტრონული
მომსახურების
სივრცეებს.
სსიპ შემოსავლების სამსახური
Not-Official (Google) translation
Armenian and Georgian experience are introduced
23-December-2014
Simplification of legislation, procedures and regulatory reforms to liberalize experiments in the
Georgian model, as well as the promotion of regional cooperation - as in Georgia in the regulation of
the National Center of Armenia (NCLR) The purpose of the visit. To December 23, the Ministry of
Finance of Armenia with the regulatory "guillotine" (Guillotine) within the project. The delegation
included the regulation of the Armenian National Center of Armenia Armen iegazariani and
government experts.
Regulatory "Guillotine" project began in October 2011 in Armenia. The reform aims to reduce costs
by 50% for business and public services. And its support for the implementation of the project is
organized by a consortium of donors. Meetings with "guillotine" reform and regulatory impact
assessment (RIA) in Armenia. The successful implementation of the project and regulatory reforms,
the Armenian government considers it important that the best international experience. And such
legislation to simplify and liberalize the ones of experience.
RS, the Armenian guests will visit Tbilisi Economic Zone and visited and checked the results of the
reforms, institutional reforms were introduced in the field of custom electronic services and
innovative spaces.
Revenue Service
16
Revenue Service: from Facebook page
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwetqZP1Af8&feature=youtu.be
Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs: Official website
http://www.moh.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=GEO&sec_id=29&info_id=2237
სომხეთის რეპუბლიკის დელეგაციის ვიზიტი
22 დეკემბერი, 2014
დღეს საქართველოს შრომის, ჯანმრთელობისა და სოციალური დაცვის სამინისტროს ოფიციალური
ვიზიტით სომხეთის რესპუბლიკის დელეგაცია ეწვია. კერძოდ, სომხეთის რესპუბლიკის საკანონმდებლო
რეგულაციების ნაციონალური სააგენტოს წარმომადგენლები. შეხვედრას ჯანდაცვის მინისტრის მოადგილე
ვალერი კვარაცხელია ესწრებოდა. ვიზიტის მიზანი გამოცდილების გაზიარება ,კანონებისა და მიმდინარე
რეფორმების შესწავლაა. ჯანდაცვის სამინისტროს წარმომადგენლებმა გაუზიარეს არსებული გამოცდილება
კანონის ლიბერალიზაციისა და გამარტივების პროცედურებთან დაკავშირებით და თუ, როგორ ხდება
საქართველოში მედიკამენტებისა და სამედიცინო აღჭურვილობის ექპორტი, იმპორტი და რეგისტრაცია.
17
Not-Official (Google) translation
Delegation to the Republic of Armenia
December 22, 2014
The Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs of
the Republic of
Armenia on an
official visit, the
delegation
visited. In particular, the legislative regulation of the Armenian
National
Agency. The
meeting was
attended by
Deputy
Minister of Health Neutral. The visit aimed to share
experiences, to study the laws and reforms. Health
Ministry officials shared the experience of
liberalization and simplification of procedures and
the law, how the medicines and medical equipment
in Georgia exports, imports and registration.
Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs: Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.904744089545258.1073742277.220225047997169&t
ype=3
სომხეთის რეპუბლიკის დელეგაციის ვიზიტი
18
დღეს საქართველოს შრომის, ჯანმრთელობისა და სოციალური დაცვის სამინისტროს
ოფიციალური ვიზიტით სომხეთის რესპუბლიკის დელეგაცია ეწვია. კერძოდ, სომხეთის
რესპუბლიკის საკანონმდებლო რეგულაციების ნაციონალური სააგენტოს
წარმომადგენლები. შეხვედრას ჯანდაცვის მინისტრის მოადგილე ვალერი კვარაცხელია
ესწრებოდა. ვიზიტის მიზანი გამოცდილების გაზიარება ,კანონებისა და მიმდინარე
რეფორმების შესწავლაა. ჯანდაცვის სამინისტროს წარმომადგენლებმა გაუზიარეს
არსებული გამოცდილება კანონის ლიბერალიზაციისა და გამარტივების პროცედურებთან
დაკავშირებით და თუ, როგორ ხდება საქართველოში მედიკამენტებისა და სამედიცინო
აღჭურვილობის ექპორტი, იმპორტი და რეგისტრაცია.
Not-Official (Google) translation
Delegation to the Republic of Armenia
The Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs of the Republic of Armenia on an official visit, the
delegation visited. In particular, the legislative regulation of the Armenian National Agency. The
meeting was attended by Deputy Minister of Health Neutral. The visit aimed to share experiences, to
study the laws and reforms. Health Ministry officials shared the experience of liberalization and
simplification of procedures and the law, how the medicines and medical equipment in Georgia
exports, imports and registration.
Agricultural Cooperative Development Agency: Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/430923750352731/photos/a.483582625086843.1073741831.43092375
0352731/613536738758097/?type=1&theater
19
სასოფლო-სამეურნეო კოოპერატივების განვითარების სააგენტო
December 25
სასოფლო-სამეურნეო კოოპერატივების განვითარების სააგენტოში გაიმართა შეხვედრა
სომხეთის - ’’საკანონმდებლო რეგულაციების ეროვნული ცენტრის’’ დირექტორის
მოადგილესთან, ბატონ ვაჰე ჩიბუხჩიანთან და მის თანმხლებ პირებთან.
ვიზიტის მიზანს წარმოადგენდა საქართველოში სასოფლო-სამეურნეო კოოპერატივების
განვითარების სააგენტოს საქმიანობისა და არსებული გამოცდილების გაცნობა.
შეხვედრაზე განხილულ იქნა არსებული საკანონმდებლო რეგულაციები, რომლებმაც
საფუძველი ჩაუყარეს სასოფლო-სამეურნეო კოოპერატივების შექმნას და მათი სტატუსის
განსაზღვრას საქართველოში. განხილულ იქნა საქართველოს კანონი ’’სასოფლოსამეურნეო კოოპერატივის შესახებ’’, ასევე არსებული საგადასახადო შეღავათები,
შემუშავებული სახელმწიფო პროგრამები კოოპერატივების განვითარებაგაძლიერებისათვის.
სტუმრებმა მიიღეს ამომწურავი ინფორმაცია სააგენტოს საქმიანობის და ჩატარებული
ღონისძიებების შესახებ.
სომხურმა დელეგაციამ გამოთქვა სურვილი სასოფლო-სამეურნეო კოოპერატივების
კანონშემოქმედებით საკითხებში საქართველოს გამოცდილების გაზიარების და
შემდგომში სასოფლო-სამურნეო კოოპერატივების განვითარების სააგენტოსთან მჭიდრო
თანამშრომლობის შესახებ
Not-Official (Google) translation
Agricultural Cooperative Development Agency
December 25
Agricultural Cooperative Development Agency held a meeting with Armenia - '' the legal regulations
of the National Centre Deputy Director, Mr. Vahe chibukhchian and his accompanying delegation.
Visit to Georgia in the Agricultural Cooperative Development Agency, and the experience of the
work. The meeting focused on the current regulations, which form the foundation of agricultural
cooperatives set up and their status in Georgia. Discussed the Law on Agricultural Cooperatives '', as
well as the tax benefits, state programs designed to enhance cooperative development.
The guests were given detailed information about the activities of the Agency and its activities.
The Armenian delegation has expressed a desire to share experiences of agricultural cooperatives in
matters of the law-making and the Agricultural Cooperative Development Agency, in close
cooperation.
20