The Web has Spam…
Transcription
The Web has Spam…
Have you ever used the Web… ! ! The effects of Web Spam on The Evolution of Search Engines to get informed? to help you make decisions? n n n n ! CS315-Web Search and Mining Financial Medical Political Religious… The Web is huge n > 1 trillion (! ?) n n n The Web has Spam… We depend on search engines to find information static pages publicly available, … and growing every day Much larger, if you count the “deep web” Infinite, if you count pages created on-the-fly Any controversial issue will be spammed Search results steroid drug HGH (human growth hormone) Search results for mental disease ADHD (a:en;on-‐deficit/hyperac;vity disorder) Page 1 Political issues will be spammed … you like it or not! Search results for Senatorial candidate John N. Kennedy, 2008 USA Elec;ons Famous search results for “miserable failure” Why is there Web Spam? A Brief History of Search Engines ! 1st Generation (ca 1994): n n AltaVista, Excite, Infoseek… Ranking based on Content: w Pure Information Retrieval ! 2nd Generation (ca 1996): n n Lycos Ranking based on Content + Structure w Site Popularity ! n 3rd Generation (ca 1998): n ! Web Spam: n Attempt to modify the web (its structure and contents), and thus influence search engine results in ways beneficial to web spammers Google, Teoma, Yahoo Ranking based on Content + Structure + Value w Page Reputation ! In the Works n Page 2 Ranking based on “the user’s need behind the query” 1st Generation: Content Similarity 1st Generation: How to Spam ! “Keyword stuffing”: ! Content Similarity Ranking: Add keywords, text, to increase content similarity The more rare words two documents share, the more similar they are ! Documents are treated as “bags of words” (no effort to “understand” the contents) ! Similarity is measured by vector angles ! Query Results are ranked t3 d 2 by sorting the angles between query and documents θ ! How To Spam? d1 Page stuffed with casinorelated keywords t1 t2 2nd Generation: Add Popularity 2nd Generation: How to Spam ! Create “Link Farms”: ! A hyperlink Heavily interconnected owned sites spam popularity from a page in site A www.aa.com 1 to some page in site B is considered a popularity vote from site A to site B ! Rank similar documents according to popularity ! How To Spam? www.bb.com 2 www.cc.com 1 www.dd.com 2 www.zz.com 0 Interconnected sites owned by vespro.com promote main site Page 3 3rd Generation: Add Reputation… 3rd Generation: How to Spam ! The reputation “PageRank” of a page Pi = ! Organize Mutual Admiration Societies: the sum of a fraction of the reputations of all pages Pj that point to Pi “link farms” of irrelevant reputable sites ! Idea similar to academic co-citations ! Beautiful Math behind it n n PR = principal eigenvector of the web’s link matrix PR equivalent to the chance of randomly surfing to the page ! HITS algorithm tries to recognize “authorities” and “hubs” ! How To Spam? Mutual Admiration Societies An Industry is Born via Link Exchange ! ! ! Page 4 “Search Engine Optimization” Companies Advertisement Consultants Conferences “Google-bombs” spam Anchor Text… 3rd Generation: Reputation & Anchor Text ! Anchor text tells you what the reputation is about ! Business weapons ! Political weapon in pre-election season n Page A Page B Anchor n n n ! How To Spam? www.ibm.com n Big Blue today announced record profits for the quarter n “Egypt” “Jew” Other uses we do not know? ! n … mostly for political purposes Promote steroids Discredit AD/HD research Activism / online protest ! n Joe’s computer hardware links Compaq HP IBM “miserable failure” “waffles” “Clay Shaw” (+ 50 Republicans) Misinformation ! n Armonk, NY-based computer giant IBM announced today “more evil than satan” “views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google…” Search Engines vs Web Spam ! Search Engine’s Action ! Web Spammers Reaction ! 1st Generation: Similarity ! Add keywords so as to increase content similarity + Create “link farms” of heavily interconnected sites + Organize “mutual admiration societies” of irrelevant reputable sites + Googlebombs n ! 2nd Generation: + Popularity n ! “miserable failure hits Obama in January 2009 ! ! Content + Structure + Value 4th Generation (in the Works) n Ac;vists openly collabora;ng to Google-‐bomb search results of poli;cal opponents in 2006 Content + Structure 3rd Generation: + Reputation + Anchor Text n ! Content Ranking based on the user’s “need behind the query” ! ?? Can you guess what they will do? Is there a pattern on how to spam? Page 5 Societal Trust is (also) a Graph And Now For Something Completely(?) Different ! Propaganda: n Attempt to modify human behavior, and thus influence people’s actions in ways beneficial to propagandists ! Theory of Propaganda ! Propagandistic Techniques (and ways of detecting propaganda) n n Developed by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis 1938-42 Word games - associate good/bad concept with social entity ! Web Spam: w Glittering Generalities — Name Calling n n n n n Attempt to modify the Web Graph, and thus influence users through search engine results in ways beneficial to web spammers Transfer - use special privileges (e.g., office) to breach trust Testimonial - famous non-experts’ claims Plain Folk - people like us think this way Bandwagon - everybody’s doing it, jump on the wagon Card Stacking - use of bad logic ! Propaganda: Attempt to modify the Societal Trust Graph and thus influence people in ways beneficial to propagandist Web Spammers as Propagandists Propaganda in Graph Terms ! Web Spammers can be seen as ! Word Games employing propagandistic techniques in order to modify the Web Graph n n ! There is a pattern on how to spam! ! ! ! ! ! Page 6 ! Modify Node weights Name Calling Glittering Generalities Transfer Testimonial Plain Folk Card stacking Bandwagon ! ! ! ! ! n n Decrease node weight Increase node weight Modify Node content + keep weights Insert Arcs b/w irrelevant nodes Modify Arcs Mislabel Arcs Modify Arcs & generate nodes