Lord Wakeham Letter to Inquiry
Transcription
Lord Wakeham Letter to Inquiry
For Distribution to CPs HOL}£ ~I LCNI[ Oourts of Justice. St~’snd L WC2A 2 LL -° I wonaer ff it would he he] Jul if I ser ~u~_ some Ints inetp -;~o-ur Inqu:l~° in ~o }Press Stun dso I do so cui~ri~ a view [o d~z en I issues re g 1<~ fh~ ring of mj-uncdons and anon] d the passa Ie of the in/unctions with "~i~ich [ was dos~y involved Hu ~ s Ac~ lggs and how self- repa rm m~ght u iiI neip de~ with some of the pr eros thai have ams\en in this ~<ea, ;ts pou will w i #as Chairman :)f° the ~ess C aints C savors :tom 1998 ~:c 2001 t was not <o ~ne issues when £ }cfb The 3overnment o~7 oh ~ nae oecn a member c}r£fl 1994 had e<s Ks intenuon - fhllowin~ me secon i Calcutt Repor~ ~n [991 - [c introduce a ~ys~.{~m of staI:uto~¢ controls on the press. It is no ~rsa~ t tha~. f an of Cabk~et c t~-ee C lo d into ~ow we woulG k in ~eat depth° I s £i~ ~:mple this. Ha m~ stu deal .o ~}ohr Ma] sr tha~ :his ld an [’ac ~ e~en dan~e s idea ~n8 h{~ acce d my ce. ])n ray ~< as 3ha an sf the PCC set about ,hi <o ~mp~v< Ks Re ance and ta~ion - which ha<~ been battered maml biy a seines of dals rs of Rcyal g [o ~na I sonsider I had some success, f a}s tha~t m) ~sk was n(H ~o b{s e~ -r{~a]ator~ )ut ~c svour [,C ~]ise d s in th{ press ahovs the imu~ required bY law throu£h a orocess of" edueatk}n= atios ~udfc n. As os~ o~ process~ I per d the newsp ~ s~ren~<nen KS Code of c~ seve~m s frsdudin g s_ ~olesa]e ~/}ds~on partic:ul on maz, te~ ~ re.! g zc pri foliowing [nea MOD300002429 For Distribution to CPs Diana. Princess of Wales in !997, The new elements of :he Code especiaD(y on children ann :he use of long lens phetograph~ have th~nk proved largel~ [ never consider it was my role ~o look into allegations of cfimmaiity or [lb~atftyo Quite apart from the practical implicatLons of t ~ T.o pan a quasi-police operation we never had the resources o~ -~ovTers to dc so~ When matters of a suspicious nature came up we [herefore declined [o deal with them and referred them to the relevan~ authorities [o take thorn uD The same happened on ma ;tots brougl~ ~:o me WhiCh were ck:ar!y libelous or lnvo]v~n g breach o~ copyiZh~o Sas~d on my expenepx:e at the PCCo and m) own beliefs as a Par!iament~dan in f,~edom of ssion, I remeHn ~w} osed rc @e h~position of m~ corKrcds, Fhey are £ in pnnmpte and ld no~ work fn practice° ondy an thor is to s~ren£ %~en self rc£~_ on, t am quite sure that t/he way fb here is m d~eren t~a~te between zo and corn p ce~ have never behoved there t,o :}e a si£nifi problem with the PCC% corn ts dHng mechanisms The Contains}on ~s goes a.~ reso g raps< complaints u~ cos< speedily as f~r an I on.: ld discern ~o ~ne satisfaction of ~he si can[ m~[orky of compI~nantso This of course ~s u’xactly what the ~ess C laints Co ssion was set u p [o ao on th ~ s~dvice of Calcutt Bv~ over the years~ it has added on f%ancdons ~e st a more latoE}- nature wf t its structures or remit bein~ nded . Most of this has happened m rr~ last few3 ears° cul sting in ~b_e disastrous :report on p~rlone h g, ] also suspect that the P~C~s Gove~,ance wkln I was mot impressed bried [o remodel i_ as a t qua~n~), fhr ed from its )ri~inal rnission~ or its p rn or expertise, think the first thfnM that has to happen ~n ~o a_te out and renew the basic c ~ints handling function. This is raH wna:t rna~Kers most ~o ordin~ memb~:rs of the public ~d is @so probably of @~eatest practical impnrta~ce 1~ the in~ust%% parfieularlN in the rc~on~ press ]"he bulk of the complaints of course, relate largel], to accuracy and especialIN in a digits] age., ~re reiadve]) canN to re~)ive° Person ~ ~ think aH this eouM be ves~ea m an "O d n who ld o~4sty need tr ea c hun g but would mo~ need a Commission ins size it in nova or the complex bureaucraq¢ tha~ has £rown up nd tlhe PCC~ The 0 ds and his staff could deal with most straigh ~wt complaints ~nd c6<nciliat.e them: but where an adjudic was ne<{ded on a point o~ Drmciple this could oe MOD300002430 For Distribution to CPs ! n~a ~asse rs most~ £~ee con ~ £s s d have to b~ the ©~bu8 ~s et such a s s of ~ses ere sa~ app~ s khe b 2£ ~n b~n of L~e 0 d in s on ~ ia to el ~e Ke~ Cou~ was is ~~ ~y % be ~ te th8 by J£~ a~ eu: :but { ~o usa ~ s n~ f but ~ use Hum~ ~ @d ~ no~ of in me ~o~ ~f Ln £2 ef tom ~m ~ @ ~t at~ to ac< ~n ~e~s~ :a @m Jsdge ~o exp}a~n dna~ h~s or bet ~whe~e, J~d ~e ~d th~n % d ct on [z~e,e~ ce ~n a j wi t ~e ss~ve ~o~ts of ~.s ou~ of ~h ~ of ti~c ®f ~,~arding access m h~Sdcs. T}i~s ~ MOD300002431 For Distribution to CPs p arr lany n~po men~s: and in view of the ~m of ~no w~n no fee’ S~ i£ as I hope, there is re of the d ation lam ~o introduce ° so lson arb r such a model might be of sam ~ p ica] us~ fn Some will con GqaL this [ea~:s rive suost~n~ve oroblems: ho~ ~e ’~ establish s %¢anda>ds re~ime~ which can lea] issues <~r complaints sf su~ a senous nature it is no~ approp~-iate for ths Ombudsman% nervier t:) dear}, with them. and how to ensure full indust~f- cornp}ianee ~i~ S~stem i%om th,{¢ poini of )f fng and indeed supper< br ti~e Code. On the er there sse m veo~ [ew occasions when ~ think such an investigation would be required, if you consider reeen~ yesss~ and le g Gne obvious fssu{ of h g t<: one side, we are tooking at the MeOanns the so-called "Cky Slickersf back in 2OOl~ the issues tha~: arose after the dearth of Dia~a m 1997 problem.~ ess pai~n]ents in tlhe West t:mal in 1995 and perh ave7 £ew other events° ] dc not be ~nere :~s need for a pe ent ood-% The Ombud coull Re s be responsible for eat s g one wheme a or :~ssue ~risea or wsere he ~u s a corn@ to be s{: serious tAat It requires s substandsd sOandards isvssti re p s of cornel s rise ~o n~ or concerns about ths new er age or indeeJ even an ndivJd~ai r(~! poK.ero On the issue of industo7 compliance° [ think this is the trickiest area. To some extent k has ~wa}~s been apr m but in a ~uch less acute m err there st< a ful of veO" s~ali local or e publish era outside the s]~sEem~ and the BCC has been able ~:~ deal more Ira Norff~@~ a.n~ SheIl% skze which has prcduced the read danger~ For myself ~ can’t unders~land ~ such a fargo p ~sould wish to remain out@de t/he s js~emo when the -}~ef]ts are so the dan,-era o~ s[atu[:oO~ control so obvinuso [ think the indust~% needs t@ took quic~ ~i. varfous 1mcep;[}ves, and oR when H em and is ~n -- which [~m 6: about produce bindin g agreements ~o Heep k there. As someone vvgho s senz so much time cons~ lering se issues, goin£ back now os er ne~fy rsven%~ years, I do passionat ely hope %qat ways <e strengtmen sew reguIaJon can ire found ra~her than a~y akernadve. Self regutsdior~ will never be perfect, but h vorms both m pro~ect ord~naa~/ people an8 [o presem&~e press free@on m a way tary controls wou]d ~Oto [ hope these thoughts are of some use. MOD300002432