Weekly Credit Update
Transcription
Weekly Credit Update
Weekly Credit Update 27 October 2015 Analysts Mads Rosendal +45 45 14 88 79 [email protected] Katrine Jensen +45 45 12 80 56 [email protected] Investment Research www.danskebank.com/CI Important disclosures and certifications are contained from page 44 of this report Contents - General credit market news and current themes - Scandi High Yield - Scandi Investment Grade - Credit indicators - Coverage universe, credit ratings and recommendations 2 What's on our mind - General credit market news • With the reporting season well underway, last week saw a significant improvement in risk sentiment which came on the back of a supportive tone from the ECB and the Chinese central Bank. • European credit indices closed significantly tighter with iTraxx Main tightening 10bp to close at 70bp, while iTraxx Crossover tightened almost 40bp to close at 292bp. • Mario Draghi indicated that the ECB was preparing to extend its bond-buying programme in December, which will be supportive for the overall risk sentiment on European credit markets going forward. • New issue activity in the Nordic region was relatively subdued overall but Verisure Holding AB (Sweden) came to the market with a multitranche EUR400m (8Y FRN), SEK2.8bn (8Y FRN) and EUR700m (7Y FIXED). • The reporting season was kicked into gear last week with a slew of reports from Nordic Financials and Corporates. Overall, most reports have been solid with most misses coming from commodity-related sectors. For more details please see our HY and Investment Grade news section(s) in this report. Sources: Bloomberg, Danske Bank Markets (both charts) 3 Scandi High Yield 4 Stena 2020 high yield switch ideas (published on 1 October 2015) On 31 August we changed our recommendation to ´Underweight` on Stena’s bonds. Please see Stena Q2 15 Credit Update – Outlook dark in Drilling Fundamentally, we see increased credit risk in Stena and recommend investors switch into names with same or stronger credit profiles, such as Volvo (hybrid) or TDC (hybrid). Please see the key details of proposed switches out of Stena 2020 on the following pages. Z-spd, EUR 750 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Nordic BB- VLVY 4.2% 2075 TDCDC 3.5% STENA 3015 7.875% 2020 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Source: Bloomberg, Moody’s, Danske Bank Markets Nordic BB 9 10 11 12 Years to maturity Switch idea (1/2) Sell Stena 2020, Buy Volvo hybrid call 2020 (published on 1 October 2015) Add 0.2 years of Volvo exposure (to first call) and earn approx. the same yield/spread. Lower credit risk in Volvo than in Stena. S&P changed the outlook to stable (from negative) on Volvo’s ‘BBB’ corporate credit rating on 29 September. See also Volvo Q2 15 credit update: above expectations but outlook softening SELL Stena 7.875% 2020 BUY – Volvo 4.2% hybrid call 2020 Difference Recommendation UNDERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT - ISIN: XS0495219874 XS1150673892 - EUR EUR - ‘B2’ / ‘BB’ ‘Ba1’ / ‘NR’ +4 notches / n.a. Senior unsecured Hybrid instrument - Coupon: 7.875% 4.200% -3.675pp Maturity: March 15, 2020 1st call, June 10, 2020 (final legal maturity 2075) +0.2year (measured to 1st call date) 110.50 (indicative, bid) 95.50 (indicative, ask) -15.00 Yes, @ benchmark +50bps or at price of 101 in case of change of control event. Yes, @ price of100 from1st call date onwards. - 5.27% p.a. 5.30% p.a. +0.03% p.a. +494bp +500bp +6bp Currency Credit ratings: Type of instrument: Cash price: Callable YTM: Z-spread: Source: Bloomberg, Danske Bank Markets. Switch idea (2/2) Sell Stena 2020, Buy TDC hybrid call 2021 (published on 1 October 2015) Add one year of TDC exposure (to first call) and give up a yield of 0.21% per year. Lower credit risk in TDC than in Stena. Negative spread differential of around 27bp seems acceptable given TDC’s higher credit rating. TDC aims at maintaining an investment grade corporate credit rating. SELL STENA 7.875% 2020 BUY –TDC 3.5% hybrid call 2021 Difference Recommendation UNDERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT - ISIN: XS0495219874 XS1195581159 - EUR EUR - ‘B2’ / ‘BB’ ‘Ba2’ / ‘BB+’ +3 notches /+1 notch Senior unsecured Hybrid instrument - Coupon: 7.875% 3.500% -4.375pp Maturity: March 15, 2020 1st call, February 26, 2021 (final legal maturity 3015) +1.0year (measured to 1st call date) 110.50 (indicative, bid) 92.75 (indicative, ask) -17.75 Yes, @ benchmark +50bps or at price of 101 in case of change of control event. Yes, @ price of100 from1st call date onwards. - YTM: 5.27% p.a. 5.06% p.a. -0.21% p.a. Z-spread: +494bps +467bps -27bps Currency Credit ratings: Type of instrument: Cash price: Callable Source: Bloomberg, Danske Bank Markets. Recent trade ideas (high yield) Recent ideas Type Switch Trade Sell Stena 2020, Buy TDC hybrid Idea Fundamentally, we see increased credit risk in Stena and recommend investors switch into names with same or stronger credit profiles such as TDC (hybrid). Opened Fundamentally, we see increased credit risk in Stena and recommend investors switch into names with same or stronger credit profiles such as Volvo (hybrid). Bonds trade tight to `BB-`curve and bonds no longer attractive. We take profit on trade initiated 27 February 2015 (TR: 3.9% / ann. TR 7.9%). Opened Switch Sell Stena 2020, Buy Volvo hybrid Outright Close of Trade Tallink NOK 2018. Currency trade Sell SSAB 2019 (SEK) and BUY The spread between the SSAB 2019 (SEK) and SSAB (EUR) 2019 is too wide SSAB 2019 (EUR) Outright Outright Outright Currency trade Buy Volvo 2075 Hybrid The Volvo 4.2% 2075 Hybrid currently trades at attractive levels, in our view, with a pick-up of around 2025bp to the rating implied spread. Start spread Start spread Opened Start spread 347 Close of trade SSAB Recent performance in the SSAB EUR bond has closed the earlier 19bps gap between the EUR and the SEK 2019 bonds. Opened EGASDK '20 440 Start spread Opened Outright 08 Sep 2015 37 16 Jun 2015 The Akelius Residential SEK 2019 FRN 3M Stibor+240bps trades wide relative to other similar unrated SEK bonds. Source: Danske Bank Markets 6 Start spread Opened Buy Akelius Residential 2019 in SEK Buy Tallink 2018. 01 Oct 2015 20 Aug 2015 Opened Outright -27 Opened In our view the Destia 2019 FRN trades at a fairly attractive spread when compared to our B+ indicative senior unsecured rating. This is in our view most likely a combination of low liquidity and Destia’s PE ownership. Buy Destia 2019 01 Oct 2015 Start spread Start spread 26 May 2015 433 13 Apr 2015 225 10 Mar 2015 Start spread -2 Opened Start spread EGASDK '20's, which we see as 'B' indicatively trade way Opened too cheap relative to the industrial 'B' curve Start spread 27 Feb 2015 470 02 Feb 2015 664 FRN Tallink 2018 in NOK trades cheap to a global median ‘BB-’ credit curve (converted into NOK). See the end of this presentation for a list of our coverage including shadow ratings and recommendations 8 Best and worst performers (Nordic coverage universe) - High yield 1 month in local currencies Olympic Ship AS NOK 2017 -206 Teekay Offshore Partners LP NOK 2016 -215 Olympic Ship AS NOK 2019 -164 SAS AB SEK 2017 -80 Solstad Offshore ASA NOK 2016 -106 Hoist Kredit AB SEK 2016 -77 Odfjell SE NOK 2017 -101 Color Group AS NOK 2017 -61 Odfjell SE NOK 2018 -96 Hoist Kredit AB EUR 2017 -46 BW Offshore Ltd NOK 2019 -95 Prosafe SE NOK 2016 -38 SAS AB SEK 2019 -68 Stockmann OYJ Abp EUR 2018 -24 BW Offshore Ltd NOK 2018 -56 -11 Stolt-Nielsen Ltd NOK 2021 -51 Meda AB SEK 2019 -8 Outokumpu OYJ EUR 2019 -51 Beerenberg Holdco II AS NOK 2018 Teekay Offshore Partners LP/Teekay… 94 Prosafe SE NOK 2017 405 Seadrill Ltd NOK 2018 95 North Atlantic Drilling Ltd USD 2019 488 Fred Olsen Energy ASA NOK 2016 106 Seadrill Ltd USD 2017 531 Seadrill Ltd USD 2017 159 Seadrill Ltd SEK 2019 607 Solstad Offshore ASA NOK 2019 179 Teekay Offshore Partners LP/Teekay… 203 Fred Olsen Energy ASA NOK 2016 1,424 Olympic Ship AS NOK 2019 270 Farstad Shipping ASA NOK 2018 1,458 Farstad Shipping ASA NOK 2018 Fred Olsen Energy ASA NOK 2019 386 Farstad Shipping ASA NOK 2017 500 Nynas AB SEK 2018 387 1,370 1000 -335 Prosafe SE NOK 2016 92 1500 YTD in local currencies 0 -500 Change in local currencies (bp) Fred Olsen Energy ASA NOK 2019 927 Olympic Ship AS NOK 2017 2,650 Farstad Shipping ASA NOK 2017 2,760 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 -500 Change in local currencies (bp) Source: Bloomberg, Danske Bank Markets (both charts) 9 Danske Bank Markets Nordic High-Yield Index • In tandem with a strong European credit market, we saw positive secondary Nordic High Yield markets during last week. Spreads tightened some 12bp over the week. • The widening trend since the summer seems to have stopped in October, where the HY index spreads have remained range bound around the ASW +460 level. • Last week we saw Verisure Holding AB (Sweden) issue EUR400m (8Y), SEK2.8bn (8Y) and EUR700m (7Y) in new high yield bonds . Danske Bank Markets Nordic High-Yield Index 106.0 105.5 105.0 104.5 104.0 103.5 103.0 102.5 102.0 101.5 101.0 100.5 100.0 Dec-2014 480 460 440 420 400 380 360 340 320 300 Mar-2015 Jun-2015 Sep-2015 DBM Hedged NOK Nordic HY Index Value DBM Hedged EUR Nordic HY Index Value DBM Nordic HY Index, ASW-spread (bps). RHS Key index statistics Date Yield ASW spread, bps # Bonds AVG credit rating Avg duration TR since start TR YTD TR MTD Index sector breakdown Index start Index end Change 31-dec-2014 23-okt-2015 4.7% 430 456 26 110 BB 2.8 3.1% 3.1% 0.6% Source: Bloomberg, Danske Bank Markets [all tables and charts] Real estate 13% Technology 2% Utilities 3% Consumer, Cyclical 6% Communica tions 9% Industrial 15% Diversified 4% Basic Materials 15% Consumer, non-cycli. 10% Energy 16% 10 Recent Nordic high-yield issuance Selected new issues (High Yield) Date Issuer Coupon CCY Volume Maturity S&P / Mdy / Fitch ASW/DM 21/10/2015 Verisure Holding Ab STIB3M +725bps SEK 2 816 m Oct/23 B / Caa1e / 725 21/10/2015 Verisure Holding Ab EUR003M +725bps EUR 400 m Oct/23 B / Caa1e / 725 15/10/2015 Verisure Holding Ab 6% EUR 700 m Nov/22 B / (P)B1 / 591 01/10/2015 Finnair Oyj (Hybrid) 7.875% EUR 200 m PERP / / 500 16/09/2015 Akelius Residential Ab 3.375% EUR 300 m Sep/20 BB+ / / 300 03/09/2015 Lock As 7% EUR 30 m Aug/21 B+ / B2 / 505 03/09/2015 Lock As 5.5% EUR 200 m Aug/20 B+ / B2 / 550 03/09/2015 Np3 Fastigheter STIB3M +490bps SEK 300 m Oct/18 / / 490 02/09/2015 Sagax Ab EUR006M +350bps EUR 30 m Sep/20 / / 350 13/07/2015 Boa Offshore As NIBOR3M +1000bps NOK 150 m Dec/18 / / 1000 06/07/2015 Gripship As NIBOR3M +650bps NOK 210 m Jul/18 / / 650 03/07/2015 Digiplex Norway As NIBOR3M +375bps NOK 575 m Jul/19 / / 375 26/06/2015 Fastighets Gronlandet So STIB3M +275bps SEK 425 m Jun/21 / / 275 24/06/2015 Solteq Oyj 6% EUR 27 m Jul/20 / / 535 22/06/2015 Uppfinnaren 1 Ab 10% SEK 175 m PERP / / 775 10/06/2015 Sagax Ab STIB3M +320bps SEK 300 m Jun/20 / / 320 17/06/2015 Func Food Group EUR003M +900bps EUR 38 m Jun/19 / / 900 03/06/2015 Bw Offshore Ltd NIBOR3M +425bps NOK 900 m Jun/20 / / 425 28/05/2015 Hoegh Lng Holdings US0003M +500bps USD 130 m Jun/20 / / 500 25/03/2015 Corem Property Grp Ab STIB3M +350bps SEK 750 m Apr/18 / / 350 22/05/2015 Nelja Energia As EUR006M +650bps EUR 50 m Jun/21 / / 650 21/05/2015 Color Group Asa NIBOR3M +485bps NOK 700 m Jun/20 / / 485 21/05/2015 Technopolis Plc 3.75% EUR 150 m May/20 / / 340 12/05/2015 Norwegian Air Shuttle As NIBOR3M +575bps NOK 1 000 m May/18 / / 575 Source: Danske Bank Markets 11 Company news from the past week (high yield) Name Outokumpu EG Stora Enso News Outokumpu (DBM:'B' / NO): Somewhat surprisingly to us, Oukokumpu has announced a CEO change. Roeland Baan will step up to replace the current CEO Mika Seitovirta. Baan is currently the Executive Vice President and CEO of Aleris Europe and Asia. Aleris is a global leader in aluminum rolled products. Before joining Aleris, Baan was the Executive Vice President and CEO of Mittal Steel Europe and subsequently Executive Vice President and a member of the Management Committee of the combined Arcelor Mittal Group. Overall, the new CEO seems highly credible with multiple years of industry expertise and experience in driving turnarounds. However, to us the negative performance of Outokumpu this year is most likely not a result of wrong decision-making by the current CEO but more due to adverse market conditions beyond the control of management, such as falling nickel pricing, ever-increasing Chinese steel exports and production problems, i.e. the new CEO will have his work cut out and as long as the market is as weak as it is now, we don’t expect to see an immediate turnaround in financial results. At best, we believe this should improve sentiment on Outokumpu until the Q3 results in ten days time. EG (B) announces that it will not do a tab issue of its current DKK1.1bn outstanding bond. Instead, EG will raise senior unsecured funding through a bank loan. The funds will be used to redeem debt at the newly acquired Silkeborg Data. This development is credit positive for the existing outstanding bonds, as there will be no primary issuance supply to weigh on secondary spreads. So in summary, the aftermath from the Silkeborg acquisition ends up being a net positive for EG's current bondholders, as business risk and financial risk will be slightly improved and because there will be no new primary supply (in the short term at least). Stora Enso (MW): Stora came out with Q3 results. No big surprises, as the result had already been preannounced some two weeks ago, but nonetheless a very strong result. Sales increased about 5% ex. paper and were flat including paper. The strength of the report was an increase in the EBITDA of around 17% compared to last year on the back of favourable currency effects combined with a ramp up of the newly inaugurated Montes del Plata pulp mill in South America. Reported net debt to EBITDA declined to around 2.5x vs. 2.8x in the previous quarter. Overall, we view this as a credit neutral result due to the pre-announcement and we do not expect to see any impact on spreads. Implication Credit neutral Credit positive Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 12 Company news from the past week (high yield) PGS Dolphin Corem PGS: Q3 numbers in line, revenues 13% behind consensus, EBITDA 2% behind. Covenants on the RCF renegotiated from 2.75x to 4x, with outstanding remaining at USD500m, creating more financial headroom. Outlook very negative with Q4 Q1 margins to be adversely impacted by weakening market with FY15 EBITDA expected to be USD500m, in line with consensus. As expected, the new build due to be delivered in Q3 16 is agreed to be pushed out to Q1 17. PGS is taking over the Sanco Sword and Saco Swift vessel charters from Dolphin, very negative for Dolphin. PGS will stack to V –class vessels at delivery of the Sanco vessels in Q1 16 to keep the market balance stable. Order book at USD245m, slightly down from Q2, with 85% booked for Q4 and 50% booked for Q1. All in all, we see this as a positive report for PGS, as more financial headroom and the move to take out further capacity outweighs the negative outlook with FY EBITDA expected to be in line with consensus. Credit negative that PGS is taking over two of its vessels charters in Q1 16, putting Dolphin’s fleet below critical mass at only three seismic vessels Corem (DBM: BB-) reported a fairly uneventful quarter with the exception of the bid for Tribona (which, as expected, it withdrew on Thursday evening following Klövern’s announcement that it has sold its shares in Tribona to Catena). Rental income decreased slightly due to somewhat higher vacancies compared to last year. Positively, the occupancy rate increased by one percentage point to 90% at the end of Q3. Margins remain high with NOI margin at 79%. Cash flow was negative by SEK280m following net repayment of loans by SEK154m, acquisitions of properties of SEK122m and capex of SEK122m. All in all, this resulted in an unchanged net LTV of 73% and including the preference shares 81% (not adjusted for the SEK1.3bn stake in Klövern). The LTM EBITDA/interest coverage was also unchanged at 1.8x (including preference shares 1.1x). In our view, a credit neutral report for Corem. As pointed out in our SEK Credit Market Trends published this week, we find good value in the short Corem 17 bonds. Credit positive Credit negative Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 13 Company news from the past week (high yield) Name Norwegian Victoria Park News Norwegian (BB-/NO; B+/NO) reported a significant improvement y/y in Q3 15. EBITDA was NOK1.5bn vs. NOK0.7bn in Q3 14. The report demonstrates a strong underlying business improvement and increases the belief in its ability to prosper on its long-haul operations (Q3 14 was impacted by startup problems on long haul). The EBITDA-margin was 20.4% v.s 11.5% in Q3 14. Net profit was NOK833m vs. cons. of NOK897m. However, in the volatile airline industry not too much should be put into this, in our view. Unit cost ex fuel was up 15% y/y to NOK0.30 – however, adjusted for the depreciation of NOK against USD and EUR affects unit cost by 10% y/y - and adjusted for currency and the rise in passengers Norwegian claims that unit cost ex fuel decreased by 2%. Norwegian guides for production growth of 5% y/y in 2015 and 18% y/y in 2016 due to the fleet expansion. Norwegian has hedged 31% of expected fuel consumption in Q4 15 and 36% of expected fuel consumption in 2016 (9% for 2017). Net debt rose to NOK15.5bn at end-Q3 15 from NOK11.3bn at end-2014 due to the sizeable fleet expansion, which left the equity ratio of 11% - up from 9% end2014. Norwegian guides for capex of NOK5.5bn in 2015 and NOK8.4 for 2016. This will keep metrics subdued. We expect adj. net debt of EBITDA of 7x for 2016 (based on reported EBITDA of NOK2.6bn 2016E) - and further deleveraging depends on the level of EBITDA-generation possible, which remains to be seen. Over the past two-three quarters, Norwegian has fared well operationally, which gives rise to some optimism regarding the company's ability to deleverage to be commensurate with our BB(corporate) and B+ (bond) shadow rating - but the stretched financial metrics (although mitigated by state guaranteed funding from Boeing) is the reason why we keep our Negative Outlook on our shadow ratings. Overall, a credit neutral report from Norwegian, in our view. At first glance an ok Q3 report from Victoria Park (DBM: BB-; bonds B+). Due to earlier acquisitions, rental income is up by 100% to SEK168m with operating net result of SEK94m (vs SEK43m in Q3 2014). Loan to value ratio stood at 58.6% at end September, before the acquisition of SEK531m of properties in the city of Borås. Still, leverage remains well in line with the newly communicated lower financial policy leverage target of 65% LTV. Victoria Park has deemed that it has both the capacity to maintain a leverage of 65% vs earlier 70%, to continue to grow, and to also pay some dividend (25% of the result vs earlier no dividends). In Q3, VP managed to achieve a rental increase of 3% in Malmö which will come through gradually in the coming quarters. All in all, we are comfortable with our BB/B+ ratings on Victoria Park and its bonds and the 2018 bond remains one of our top picks in the SEK property universe. Implication Credit neutral Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 14 Company news from the past week (high yield) Name SSAB Akelius Meda Wihlborgs Fastpartner News SSAB (BB-): SSAB released its Q3 results, which missed expectations with earnings (EBIT) of SEK191m vs. Bloomberg consensus of SEK15m. The quarter was adversely affected by negative currency effects of around SEK200m. Compared with the second quarter of 2015, operating profit/loss was down by SEK492m. Lower fixed and variable costs (SEK550m) impacted positively on earnings, whereas lower volumes (SEK570m), lower prices SEK250m), currency effects (SEK150m) and lower capacity utilisation (SEK80m) impacted negatively on earnings. SSAB expects demand for steel to remain strong in 2016; however, given the overcapacity and high exports from China (monthly exports reached an all time high in September) profitability is expected to remain muted. Net debt increased by SEK796m during Q3 and there is limited scope for further deleveraging towards yearend given the weak outlook for profitability. Overall, a credit negative report from SSAB which shows that they also are not immune to the immense pressure from Chinese steel producers. We would expect some spread widening on the back of this report. Akelius acquires 279 apartments in Washington. The acquisition is Akelius’s first in Washington, price SEK468m. After the acquisition, Akelius owns 15 residential properties with 1,485 apartments in the US. With regard to Swedish specialty pharma company Meda (DBM: BB-/Stable) - it may be worth keeping an eye on Canadian industry peer Valeant (BB-/Ba3). The company has over the years pursued an aggressive M&A strategy favoured by the equity market. However, following a combination of comments from US politicians that pharma companies have been raising prices too much (putting the spotlight especially on Valeant), and claims that Valeant is pursuing an aggressive way of accounting for acquired companies, its shares have dropped some 55%, while the CDS has moved from the +200 level to now roughly 450bp. While Meda only has a limited presence in the US (some 13-14% of total revenues), all the above may create some nervousness towards the whole specialty pharma sector. Strong Q3 report from Wihlborgs. Rental income up by 3% and operating result by 11%. Economic occupancy rate unchanged at 91%. Property value of SEK27bn at end September, with a slight decline in loan to value to 57%, which gives some headroom in our 'BB+' credit view (with BB on the bonds). Wihlborg SEK bond trades at a tight level vs sector peers. FastPatner presents a strong Q3 report. Rental income up by a whopping 23%, mainly due to earlier acquisitions. Operating net up by 29%, and a further slight increase in property values. Interest coverage up to 3.2x from 2.7x in 2014, and a slight improvement in solidity. We see no reason to change our 'BB'/Stable credit view on the company (with bonds at 'BB-'). FastPartners SEK bonds look fairly priced relative to sector peers in the 'BB' category. Implication Credit negative Credit neutral Credit negative Credit positive Credit positive Source: Danske Bank Markets 15 Company news from the past week (high yield) Name Heimstaden Corem Akelius News Swedish real estate company Heimstaden (DBM: BB; bonds BB-) announced it is selling all its properties in the city of Trelleborg, consisting of 688 apartments with 58,000 square metres to Nordhalla. Sales price not disclosed. Heimstaden owns 40% of Nordhalla. At end Q2, Heimstaden had a net LTV of 51%, i.e. with some financial headroom within our 'BB' rating. We see today's announcement as broadly credit neutral as we think Heimstaden may still carry out further acquisitions, but within the company's communicated financial policy. Heimstaden remains one of our favoured companies in the Swedish property sector. SEK bonds now look fairly valued vs peers. Catena has acquired Klövern’s Tribona shares (which Corem had placed a bid on). Klövern will be paid in cash (about SEK600m). Corem is now out of the picture regarding the Tribona acquisition and hence there will be no financial effects for the company. Akelius (Corp level BBB-, bonds BB+) acquires 279 apartments in Boston. Two central properties built in 2014 and the acquisitions are Akelius’s first in Boston. Total purchase price SEK1,385m. Implication Credit neutral Credit neutral Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 16 Scandi Investment Grade 17 Overweight – Vestas EUR 2.75% 2022 IG credit profile but priced as HY (first published on 19 August) Indicative ASW offer (bps) 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2014 • On 19 August, Vestas delivered strong and credit positive Q2 15 results, with a robust globally spread order intake, a record order backlog, healthy cash flows and very strong credit metrics. • Given the volatile global wind turbine markets, the high credit quality of some competitors (GE, Siemens), the recent very harsh restructuring of the company and the prudent financial targets introduced (e.g. maximum target net debt/EBITDA < 1x ), we do not expect the group to accelerate future re-leveraging aggressively in an unbalanced way. • The key risk factor for this name remains political. The global wind turbine industry is likely to be dependent on subsidies for years to come, although less and less so as the turbine produced cost per MWh is reduced. This is a strategic priority for Vestas. • Given our view of Vestas as a ‘BBB-’ credit, we reiterate that we regard the current pricing of the 2.75% 2022 as attractive at an ASW of +270bp. • In our view, a ‘fair’ credit spread for this type of bond would be in the range of 125-150bp, reflecting a ‘political/volatility’ spread add-on of 40-65bp to the ‘BBB-’ curve. VWSDC '22 (NR/NR) Corporates: BBB- 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Source: Bloomberg, Moody’s, Danske Bank Markets See Vestas Q2 15: Strong performance – bonds attractively priced, 19 August. 18 Recent trade ideas (investment grade) Recent ideas Type Outright Trade Buy Vestas 2022 (revisited). Outright Buy Nykredit AT1 (perpetual) Nykredit has issued an AT1 with a 7.125% trigger.This hybrid trade attractive to Nordic peers. Outright Buy Nykredit T2 CoCo first call 2021 (dated) Nykredit has issued a tier 2 bond as a CoCo with a 7% trigger.We believe the T2 CoCo trades with a discount to peers because of the CoCo feature. Sector spread Idea The Vestas EUR 2.75% 2022 trades cheap to a EUR corporate BBB. curve. Switch from Securitas 2018 to We recommend to buy the ISS Global A/S 2020 as we believe valuation is attractive compared to ISS Global ISS Global A/S 2020 A/S’ BBB-/Positive Outlook from S&P as the bond is currently trading close to the ‘BBB-’ curve. Opened Start spread Opened Start spread Opened 24 Aug 2015 270 10 Aug 2015 511 10 Aug 2015 Start spread 361 Opened Start spread 03 Jun 2015 32 Source: Danske Bank Markets See the end of this presentation for a list of our coverage including shadow ratings and recommendations 19 Best and worst performers (Nordic coverage universe) - Investment grade 1 week in local currencies -7 -7 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2020 -13 Carlsberg Breweries A/S EUR 2022 Nordea Bank AB EUR 2025 -7 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2025 -9 Carlsberg Breweries A/S EUR 2019 Carlsberg Breweries A/S EUR 2019 -9 Nordea Bank AB EUR 2022 -6 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2031 -8 Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB EUR… -6 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2019 -6 Statoil ASA EUR 2025 -6 Investor AB EUR 2023 -6 Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB EUR… -6 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2027 -6 Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB EUR… Telenor ASA EUR 2020 -6 Pohjola Bank Oyj EUR 2018 Carlsberg Breweries A/S EUR 2022 -6 Fingrid OYJ EUR 2024 -6 2 Sampo Oyj EUR 2017 14 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2027 2 Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB EUR… 14 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2025 2 SBAB Bank AB SEK 2018 14 Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA EUR 2016 2 DONG Energy A/S EUR 2016 14 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2027 3 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2017 3 Lansforsakringar Bank AB SEK 2020 4 Danske Bank A/S SEK 2019 7 Neste Oyj EUR 2016 7 Fortum OYJ EUR 2016 0 -5 -10 Change in local currencies (bp) 15 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2031 16 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2022 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2017 18 Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA EUR 2016 4 5 -14 TeliaSonera AB EUR 2021 -6 -5 10 1 month in local currencies 20 Vattenfall AB EUR 2024 20 Neste Oyj EUR 2016 Fortum OYJ EUR 2016 23 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 Change in local currencies (bp) Source: Bloomberg, Danske Bank Markets (both charts) 20 Selected new investment-grade issues Date Issuer Coupon CCY Volume Maturity S&P / Mdy / Fitch ASW/DM 21/10/2015 Eika Boligkreditt As 0.625% EUR 500 m Oct/21 / Aa1e / 22 20/10/2015 Dongfeng Motor Hong Kong 1.6% EUR 500 m Oct/18 / A1 / Ae 150 19/10/2015 Aktia Bank Plc STIB3M +95bps SEK 800 m Oct/18 A- / A3 / WD 95 19/10/2015 Wells Fargo & Company 2% EUR 1 500 m Apr/26 A+ / A2 / AA- 103 Source: Danske Bank Markets 21 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name Nordea Securitas News Nordea (UW): the Polish regulator tells the largest Polish banks to set aside more capital to help cope with Swiss-franc loan portfolios, according to Reuters. Nordea still sits on the majority of the risk from the Polish mortgage loans it sold off to PKO in June 2013 due to a loss guarantee running until April 2018, in which Nordea will have to cover half of the loan losses above 0.4% per annum. The Polish Lower House just recently decided that 90% of the loss from converting CHF loans back to PLN will have to be covered by the banks. The law is not final yet and may be amended. Nordea has cEUR3bn of Polish mortgage loans, which means that this could potentially cost the bank some hundred millions EUR in a bad scenario, we estimate. Not enough to rock the boat, but a reminder of why we believe Nordea's large diversification is hitting the bank from several sides these years (Russian exposure, Norway due to oil, Finland due to low economic activity and now also Poland). This could mean that a solution for the Polish mortgage loans in CHF could be near and hence the loss guarantee from Nordea be effective. Securitas (MW) has announced the acquisition of Diebold Inc. Electronic Security Business in the US. The purchase price is approx. SEK2.9bn (EV), which equates to approx. 11x EBITDA for 2015 (Securitas trades 9x). This high-tech security company's services include intrusion alarms, fire alarms and monitoring of elevators with more than 55,000 monitored customer locations. We are not surprised by this acquisition, as Securitas lacks scale in the higher-margin high-tech security business to mitigate fierce price pressure in manned guarding – hence, in this respect we believe that the acquisition will improve Securitas’s overall business risk profile somewhat. However, we believe that due to the acquisition adj. net debt to EBITDA will increase to c. 3.2x from the 2.7x reported in Q2 15 (Q3 15 to be reported on 4.Nov) and we believe that S&P will remove the Positive Outlook on its BBB rating for Securitas. However, we believe that Securitas will be able to maintain its BBB rating, as we think S&P will give Securitas time to deleverage over the coming 18-24 months (according to Securitas ,the acquisition will be EPS enhancing from 2016). Overall, we maintain our MW recommendation on Securitas and expect spreads to widen some15bp on this announcement due to the higher leverage, integration risk and potential removal of Positive Outlook from S&P. Implication Credit negative Credit negative Source: Danske Bank Markets 22 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name Vattenfall APMM LKAB Neste News Vattenfall (MW) has confirmed that 1GW out of its total installed capacity of 7.8GW of German lignite will likely be included in the newly German proposed capacity scheme. Vattenfall’s board has yet to make a final decision. Vattenfall mentions that the rest of the capacity will be running as previously. The 1GW of capacity will be running for around four years after it has been put in reserve (within the next couple of years). The whole industry will receive around EUR230m / year and Vattenfall comprises roughly 37% of this. This is broadly in line with expectations and previous unconfirmed reports. Slightly positive in the sense that we now have some more clarity on the German regulatory regime around lignite, which should make it easier for Vattenfall to sell these assets. APMM (MW): Maersk Oil cuts 10-12% of its current workforce, aiming to reduce operating costs by 20% by end of 2016, as the company responds to changed market conditions. This should not come as a surprise, as APMM already flagged this in connection with the Q2 15 report. APMM will release Q3 15 on 6 November – however, steam bas already been taken off due to profit warning last Friday. LKAB posted a weak result for Q3, where net sales declined by 16% and the underlying operating margin fell from 22% to 19%. Due to the persistently low global iron ore prices and an expectation that market dynamics will not reverse any time soon LKAB decided to recognise impairment losses of SEK7.1bn related to property, plant and equipment. Importantly, this impairment does effect equity but not the company's cash flow. In fact, the Q3 operating cash flow was positive SEK813m. This can be compared to investments of SEK1.4bn during the quarter. Hence, leverage rose somewhat further but LKAB's balance sheet remains very strong with a gross cash position of SEK15.2bn and net debt of SEK1.8bn (including provisions for the urban transformation of SEK12bn in the debt calculation). Focus is now with the new CEO on cost reductions, and the production growth volume target of 37m tonnes has been deferred. We moved to a Negative outlook on our BBB+ credit view on LKAB following Q2 results and intend to take a fresh look at this credit view after today's announcement. The company's SEK bonds continue to trade at a tight level relative to peers in the BBB category. Strong Q3 15 result from Neste (MW). Revenues fell 21% due to weaker liquids prices y/y. More importantly, Group comparable EBITDA improved 35%, reflecting a very strong refinery margin in traditional fuels and also better earnings in Neste’s renewable division. Neste’s result landed ahead of market expectations. Neste’s credit metrics improved on the back of a strong Free Cash Flow, taking adj. net debt to LTM EBITDA to 1.6x from 2x. Neste maintains its FY outlook, and we remain comfortable with our ‘BBB-‘ indicative rating, reflecting a strong leverage level currently, but also darker skies ahead due to weaker refinery margins. Implication Credit positive Credit neutral Credit negative Credit positive Source: Danske Bank Markets 23 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name Electrolux APMM Sandvik News Electrolux (MW) reported a solid set of Q3 15 figures with operating profit of SEK1.5bn (SEK1.3bn consensus) which represents an 8% increase compared to Q3 14 based on flat margins. Revenue increased by 9% y/y primarily driven by currency (6%) as organic growth was only 2% vs. 3% in H1 15. Organic growth was solid in Europe (5%) and North America (7%) whereas Latin America (-5%) and Asia (-13%) were weak. Adj. net debt to LTM EBITDA declined to 1.6x from 2.0x Q3 14 - and slightly up from 1.4x in Q2 15. Despite the solid result, we regard the Q3 15 report as credit neutral. All eyes continue to be on the potential GE Appliances acquisition - Electrolux expects to close the acquisition in 2015. We maintain our MW recommendation on Electrolux. APMM (MW): Measured over the past 12 months, Maersk Line has accounted for 49% of APMM Group operating cash flow – hence, a potential further prolonged weakening going into 2016 (the container market is structurally oversupplied) in Maersk Line could make the Group more hesitant in pursuing very large scale M&A in the oil segment. Should APMM pursue very large scale M&A in the Oil industry at the same time as the container market is in limbo, it could raise investor concerns regarding the Group’s commitment to the BBB+ rating. In this respect, it is our very clear belief that APMM is committed to maintaining the BBB+ rating, as it has used the past years to build up credibility around this and has stated this ambition many times in both financial reports and CMDs. Sandvik (MW): Sandvik released Q3 results. At first glance, results look weak with sales some 7% behind BBG consensus. Also, the EBIT declined by 7% y/y and the operating margin was 11.2% vs. 11.9% y/y. The result was weaker, as FX and ongoing cost savings could not offset the decline in volumes. Organically, sales fell 8% y/y, which is worse than what we saw at SKF last weak. Before the report Sandvik announced its intention to divest its mining systems business (about 25% of the Sandvik Mining segment) but the Q3 report did not contain further updates on this, i.e. Sandvik has not found a buyer just yet. Despite the soft result, cash flows were still strong and the overall reported net debt fell by some SEK2.5bn. We see adj. net debt to EBITDA at around 2.5x and we expect Sandvik to maintain its rating over the coming quarter, especially if Sandvik manages to find a buyer (and get a decent price) for MS. We maintain our Marketweight recommendation on what we view as a decent spread on the EUR denominated Sandvik 2026s. Implication Credit neutral Credit neutral Credit negative Source: Danske Bank Markets 24 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name APMM Volvo Kemira News APMM (MW): Profit warning released. The profit warning was 100% related to Maersk Line, which is being pressured by the low freight rates. APMM previously expected net profit of USD4.0bn based on an underlying result contribution from Maersk Line above USD2.2bn. The Group's new expectation is an underlying result of around USD3.4bn based on an underlying result in Maersk Line of around USD1.6bn (hence a downgrade of net profit in Maersk Line of USD0.6bn). From a credit perspective this is not a significant event and credit metrics will still be strong for the current BBB+ rating. However, the weakness in Maersk Line and the container market is likely to expand into 2016. In our view, this could make it less likely that APMM will pursue very significant M&A in the Oil segment and more likely that APMM goes for smaller bolt on acquisitions in the oil segment (although these could also be quite big) - which we would see as credit positive. Overall, we continue to see APMM as a high quality name in the BBB+ space. We maintain our Marketweight recommendation, as we struggle to see much upside at current valuation. Volvo (MW): Volvo released its Q3 report on Friday morning; a very decent report at first glance. Adj. EBIT at SEK5.4bn was 15% ahead of consensus with currency having a positive effect of SEK830m. The ebit margin excluding restructuring was 6.9% excl. restructuring charges vs. 4.3% for the same period last year. Order intakes were a tad below expectations (4%), which was mainly due to a very weak Latin America and North America, which were down 54% and 40%, respectively. Europe, on the other hand, was strong with orders increasing 11% y/y and Volvo has upgraded its FY truck order forecast for the region. Positively, the CE credit provisions in China increased by SEK50m less than expected (SEK293m vs. SEK350m cons.). Following the report, we still see adj. net debt to EBITDA at around 2x, which is commensurate with the current BBB rating. Overall, a slightly credit positive report but we view pricing of the Volvo senior curve to be inline with the rating. For more value we advise investors to look at the recently issued Volvo hybrids. Kemira (DBM:BBB-): Results were out Friday, looked to be in line with consensus on EBITDA while beating slightly on revenues. Sales grew 15% y/y mainly on the back of the Akzo Nobel acquisition in the pulp and paper chemicals segment. Organically, sales were roughly flat y/y. The oil and mining business was not untouched by the lower US shale oil activity, but the decline has not been as bad as feared. Leverage is still slightly elevated at around 3x times following the acquisition but we still expect leverage to decline to about 2.8x by year-end 2015. Overall, a credit neutral result and we keep out BBB- shadow rating on the name. Implication Credit negative Credit positive Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 25 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name News Saab presented a mixed report with sales above expectations while profitability remains weak. Organic growth surprised on the positive side and increased by 11% and the outlook for 2015 was again reiterated, leaving us with high expectations for the fourth quarter. We expect profitability to be high on the agenda after the deal with Brazil regarding 36 Gripen NG was signed in the quarter. Credit SAAB metrics strengthened slightly due to improved cash flow and released working capital. Our current rating assumes the company deleverages during the coming quarters to bring credit metrics to a level consistent with our ‘BBB+ ’credit view. Once again, the oil plunge caused no direct loan losses for DNB and generally speaking the Q3 results were in line with expectations. Capital requirements were upped by the Norwegian FSA, forcing DNB to continue its focus on building capital. We are pleased with this, but continue to believe the DNB uncertainty around future loan losses is too high for us to turn more positive. Underweight recommendation maintained. Swedbank reported solid Q3 results reflected in very strong financial ratios, return on equity of 13.5%, a loan loss ratio of 4bp, CET1 ratio of 23% and cost-income ratio of 43%. As Swedbank Swedbank trades very tight, especially in the senior space, we believe that its fundamental strength is already reflected in the pricing of its bonds and therefore we maintain our Marketweight recommendation. Nordea UW): The Q3 results gave no reason to be concerned as loan losses remained low, while capitalisation increased despite earnings being hit by weak financial markets. That said, we continue to be cautious about the period ahead given Nordea's relatively large exposure to oil, Russia and Nordea Finland. Thus, we continue to believe its bonds are too expensive and reiterate our Underweight recommendation. Low commissions hit SEB hard in Q3 as the bank is relatively dependent on fee income. Consequently, the operating profit was 6% below expectations but otherwise a robust report. We maintain our SEB Overweight recommendation on SEB. Handelsbanken (MW) disappointed on NII and followed its peers by reporting weak trading income in its Q3 results. However, fundamentals remained strong and, as uncertainty is rising around some of Handelsbanken its peers mainly due to oil exposure (direct or indirect), Handelsbanken could once again be a safe alternative. We thus maintain our Marketweight recommendation despite tight price levels. Implication Credit neutral Credit positive Credit positive Credit neutral Credit neutral Credit negative Source: Danske Bank Markets 26 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name Fortum Metso SBAB News Fortum’s (UW) Q3 15 result was weak and slightly behind market expectations. Group revenues are down 23% y/y on lower power prices in the Nordics, lower earnings in Russia and also lower heat earnings due to colder than normal weather. Group clean EBITDA falls 49% y/y. Results were weighed by a EUR761m write down of the Oskarhamn nuclear units 1 and 2. Fortum remains net cash following the network divestment and it remains unclear what the cash proceeds will be used for. Fortum delays its earnings target in Russia, which is a negative surprise. Overall a slightly negative report from Fortum at first glance. Metso (MW): Q3 results out from Metso missed expectations on both sales and earnings. Sales were EUR680m vs. Bloomberg consensus of EUR723m, while the EBITDA was about EUR10m below consensus. Needless to say, the weakness was driven by low commodity prices affecting both the mining and oil and gas industries which Metso supplies. Also, Metso is beginning to see mine closures which now affect the service demand, which has otherwise been Metso's leg to fall back on. Surprisingly to us, Metso has decided to keep its FY outlook for 2015, which could be seen as the main positive to take out from the report. We continue to see leverage adj. net debt to EBITDA to be in line with the rating and the group should be able to maintain its BBB rating over the interim. Spreads on the Metso 2019's have widened recently and trade on the 'BBB-' rating implied EUR curve, hence the bond offers good carry for the rating and downside is low should Metso be downgraded. Despite attractive valuation we expect further negative newsflow over the interim and we keep our Marketweight recommendation on the name. SBAB (MW): reported Q3 results on par with Q2 adjusted for the fair value adj. of financial instruments. Loan losses still insignificant at SEK3m for the quarter. RoE after tax of 10.5%. CET1 was 25.6% vs. minimum requirement of c.22%, so reasonable buffer. CEO says that "The situation in the Swedish housing market is highly distressing. Soaring housing prices increase the risk level for our customers, for us as a company and for the economy and society at large. This trend is not sustainable in the long term. The housing shortage is becoming increasingly pressing as housing prices continue to skyrocket. In some areas of Sweden, housing prices are increasing at a rate that in all likelihood, extends far beyond any long-term realism." We tend to agree with that, at least we also believe the largest risk for the Swedish banks currently is the housing market. However, a correction will likely hit the consumption and i.e. the SME sector and hence not the mortgage sector. So SBAB is likely to be sheltered from this despite the CEO's worry. All in all a rather uneventful quarter. Implication Credit negative Credit negative Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 27 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name News Nordax Bank (BBB- shadow by Danske): pre-provision profit on level with Q2 as the 3% growth in the NII (positive) is neutralised by large trading income loss (SEK17m). Loan losses increased to SEK44m or 1.7% in loan loss ratio, which was higher than the 1.2% reported for FY2014. This is of course a bit negative, but the growth in problem loans of 9% YTD is not that worrying as it grew 18% in 2014. Coverage ratio was unchanged 54%. ROE remained high at 20.4%, which gives a good first line of defence and ability to build up capital, if needed. CET1 at 12.7% vs. 12.3% year-end. Capital req. is Nordax Bank c.8% including impact from 1.5% countercyclical buffer from next year. To conclude: Nordax is still a highly profitable bank with good capitalisation. Increasing loan losses is a bit worrying and something to watch, but coverage ratio remains reasonably high. Norway has become the largest market for Nordax, so a worsening situation here could become a challenge in the future. However, we expect Nordax credit models to show their robustness like they did in 2008-09. Hemsö reported solid results, with a rental increase of 1.4% q/q but a decrease of 4% y/y due to divestments. Leverage was unchanged while margins remained healthy. The replacement of the shareholder loan with common equity changes the characteristics of the cash flow, with stronger operating cash flow but overall neutral cash flow effects. The property portfolio contributed with Hemsö positive revaluation effects, while financial derivatives burdened the result in the quarter. Available and undrawn credit facilities remain very strong. We consider Hemö’s bonds to trade in line with other A-rated real estate names. Volvo (MW) and Scania (MW): Scania out with an update on new truck orders. Demand remained strong in Europe while emerging markets is still exhibiting weakness, especially Russia and Brazil. Volvo and Scania Overall, the bullish wording regarding Europe should be a positive readthrough to Volvo, which has the majority of its exposure to Europe. Avinor (MW): According to a government website, Norway will not increase airport fees for 2016 which is in-line with expectations. Over the past five years, the main driver of revenues has clearly been sales and rental income, whereas passenger charges, takeoff charges have only contributed on a minor scale. We continue to believe that the Norwegian government - which owns 100% of Avinor Avinor through the Ministry of Transport - will be a very strong supporter of Avinor. Also note that outstanding bonds are subject to a change of control that is triggered if there are any changes to the government’s 100% ownership of Avinor. We consider the news credit neutral and maintain our MW on Avinor. Implication Credit negative Credit neutral Credit positive Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 28 Company news from the past week (investment grade) Name Tele2 Husqvarna Atlas Copco TVO News Tele2 reported a strong set of Q3 15 numbers that beat consensus estimates. Revenues increased by 3% y/y and EBITDA was down slightly y/y primarily due to the Dutch operations. Credit metrics remained more or less unchanged from last quarter and we maintain our BBB credit rating on Tele2; however, we expect the credit metrics to slightly worsen in 2016 due to ongoing investments in the Netherlands. Husqvarna presented a stable report operationally with increased operating margins and good cash flow. Credit metrics continued to strengthen in the seasonally weak third quarter. According to the company, realistically it will no longer be able to reach the target of a 10% EBIT margin in 2016 due to unfavourable FX hedges. We retain our BBB- rating with positive outlook. We could raise this if the margin recovery is sustainable and increases towards the 10% area, cash flow remains. Atlas Copco (UW) Q3 15 overall inline with expectations - demand seen to remain at current level. Due to poor SKF report and the fact that Atlas generates close to 25% of EBIT in the Mining industry the market had feared worse, so this report is a relief. Operating profit of SEK.5.3bn was record high and in-line with consensus - up 28% y/y. Reported net debt to EBITDA declined to 0.7x in Q3 15 from 0.8x Q2 15. Overall, a credit neutral report but due to low expectations the market reaction could be positive. We maintain our UW recommendation due to the tight pricing of the bonds. Although Atlas has proven its very high quality over many industrial cycles, we believe valuation is rich at current levels. Due to higher shareholder focus we do not expect rating agencies to change the current "A" rating near-mid term. Furthermore, the end-market weakness is creating uncertainty going into 2016. TVO delivered a Q3 15 report with no major news. It demonstrated an impressive performance with load factors clearly in excess of 90% on its OL1 and OL2 reactors and with no outages, which we find comforting from a credit perspective. Group revenues were slightly down due to lower power production on the Meri-Pori coal station. Subsequently, Group revenues fell 7% y/y. TVO’s earnings are irrelevant, though, as it is a not-for-profit company with its fixed costs TVO did not offer any news on the ongoing arbitration with Areva/Siemens about a damages payment for the delayed OL3 reactor. Overall, it was a credit neutral result and we maintain our Overweight recommendation. A downgrade to High Yield is not our core scenario and as such we think that bonds trade at cheap levels. Implication Credit positive Credit negative Credit neutral Credit neutral Source: Danske Bank Markets 29 Credit Indicators 30 Chart pack: euro spreads and returns Euro IG ASW, iBoxx indices IG total return, iBoxx indices, 2014-01=100 Euro HY ASW, Merrill Lynch indices HY total return, Merrill Lynch indices, 2014-01=100 Source: Macrobond Financial, Danske Bank Markets [all charts] 31 Chart pack: relative value iTraxx vs iBoxx EUR CDS spreads – Nordic banks Euro vs US CDS indices - IG (Markit) Euro vs US HY bond indices (Merrill Lynch) Source: Bloomberg, Macrobond Financial, Danske Bank Markets [all charts] 32 Chart pack: general market development European swap and government yields 3M Libor, US and euro area Euro swap curve spread EUR/USD basis swaps Source: Macrobond Financial , Danske Bank Markets [all charts] 33 Chart pack: high-yield funds flow High yield US ETF fund flow 1,800 8,000 1,600 7,000 Cumulative ETF-flow MEUR Cumulative ETF-flow MEUR High-yield Europe ETF fund flow 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 dec- jan- feb- mar- apr- maj- junjul- aug- sep2014 20152015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 High Yield - Europe - Fixed Income 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 -1,000 dec- jan- feb- mar- apr- maj- jun-2 jul- aug- sep2014 20152015 2015 2015 2015 015 2015 2015 2015 High Yield - North America - Fixed Income Source: Bloomberg, Danske Bank Markets [all charts] 34 Chart pack: fund flows Europe, net sales US, net sales Sweden, net sales Norway, net sales Source: Macrobond Financial, Danske Bank Markets [all charts] 35 Chart pack: macro GDP y/y growth, calendar adjusted Purchasing Manager Indices Euro area y/y change in bank lending Euro area lending standards Source: Macrobond Financial, Danske Bank Markets [all charts] 36 Coverage universe, credit ratings and recommendations 37 Our coverage and shadow ratings 1 of 5 Ratings from S&P/Moody's/Fitch and Danske Bank Markets shadow ratings Company Ahlstrom Oyj Akelius Residential Property Ab Ambu A/S Ap Moeller - Maersk A/S Arla Foods Amba Atlas Copco Ab Avinor As Bank 1 Oslo Akershus As Bank Norwegian As Beerenberg Holdco Ii As Billerudkorsnas Ab Bw Offshore Cargotec Oyj Carlsberg Breweries A/S Cermaq Asa Citycon Oyj Color Group As Com Hem Holding Ab Corem Property Group Ab Danfoss A/S Danske Bank A/S Deep Sea Supply Dfds A/S Dlg Finance As Dna Ltd Dnb Bank Asa Dof Asa Dof Subsea Dolphin Geophysical Dong Energy A/S Dsv A/S Eg Holding Danske Bank S&P Moody's Fitch Analyst(s) Rating Outlook Sr. Unsec Rating Outlook Rating Outlook Rating Outlook BBStable M. Rosendal / J. Magnussen BBB- Stable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman BBB- Stable J. Magnussen / M. Rosendal BBB+ Stable Baa1 Pos B. Børsting/J. Magnussen BBB Stable M. Rosendal / B. Børsting A Stable A2 Stable M. Rosendal / E. Hjalmarsson AAStable A1 Stable O. Heldal/B. Børsting BBB+ Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen BBB Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen B Stable Ø. Mossige BBB- Stable M. Rosendal / L. Landeman BB+ Stable Ø. Mossige BBB- Stable M. Rosendal / E. Hjalmarsson Baa2 Neg BBB Stable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal BB Stable K. Bakken BBB Stable Baa2 Stable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman BBStable B+ N. Ripa / B. Børsting BBPos O. Heldal / L. Landeman BBStable B+ E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman BBB Stable J. Magnussen / B. Børsting A Stable A2 Stable A Stable BNeg I. Båtvik / Ø. Mossige BBB- Stable N. Ripa / B. Børsting BBStable M. Rosendal / B. Børsting BBB- Stable O. Heldal / L. Landeman A+ Neg Aa3 Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen B+ Neg I. Båtvik/Ø. Mossige B+ Neg I. Båtvik/Ø. Mossige I. Båtvik BBB+ Stable Baa1 Stable BBB+ Stable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman BBB Stable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal B Stable J. Magnussen / N. Ripa Recomm. MARKETWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT 38 Our coverage and shadow ratings 2 of 5 Ratings from S&P/Moody's/Fitch and Danske Bank Markets shadow ratings Danske Bank S&P Moody's Fitch Analyst(s) Company Rating Outlook Sr. Unsec Rating Outlook Rating Outlook Rating Outlook Eidesvik B Neg I. Båtvik / Ø. Mossige Eika Boligkreditt As AStable L. Holm / K. Jensen Eika Gruppen As BBB Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Eksportfinans Asa BBBPos Ba3 Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Electrolux Ab BBB Stable Wr WD B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Elenia Oy J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Elisa Oyj BBB+ Stable Baa2 Stable O. Heldal / L. Landeman Entra Eiendom As AStable O. Heldal / L. Landeman Farstad Shipping Asa BB Neg BBI. Båtvik / Ø. Mossige Fastpartner Ab BB Stable BBL. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson Fingrid Oyj A+ Stable A1 Stable A+ Stable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Finnair Oyj BB Stable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Fortum Oyj BBB+ Stable Baa1 Stable ANeg J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Fortum Varme Holding Samagt Med Stockholms Stad Ab BBB+ Stable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Fred Olsen Energy Asa BBStable B+ S. Stormyr / B.K. Røed G4S Plc BBBStable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Getinge Ab BB+ Neg L. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson Golar Lng Partners Lp BB Stable BBB.K. Røed / J. Meyer Golden Close Maritime Corp Ltd BS. Stormyr / B.K. Røed Havila CCC+ Neg I. Båtvik / Ø. Mossige Heimstaden Ab BB Stable BBL. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson Hemso Fastighets Ab AStable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman Hkscan Oyj BB Stable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Hoegh Lng Holdings Ltd BBStable B+ B.K. Røed / J. Meyer Hoist Kredit Ab BBStable B+ G. Bergin / L. Landeman Husqvarna Ab BBBPos E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman Ikano Bank Ab BBB Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Investor Ab AAStable A1 Stable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Iss A/S BBBPos B. Børsting / M. Rosendal J Lauritzen A/S B Stable BB.K. Røed / J. Meyer Jernhusen Ab AStable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman Jyske Bank A/S AStable Baa1U Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Kemira Oyj BBBStable Wr M. Rosendal / L. Landeman Recomm. MARKETWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT 39 Our coverage and shadow ratings 3 of 5 Ratings from S&P/Moody's/Fitch and Danske Bank Markets shadow ratings Company Kesko Oyj Klaveness Ship Holding As Loomis Ab Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Ab Meda Ab Metsa Board Oyj Metso Oyj Ncc Ab Neste Oyj Nibe Industrier Ab Nokia Oyj Nokian Renkaat Oyj Nordax Bank Ab Nordea Bank Ab North Atlantic Drilling Ltd Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa Norwegian Property Asa Nykredit Bank A/S Nynas Group Ocean Rig Udw Inc Ocean Yield Asa Odfjell Se Olav Thon Eiendomsselskap Asa Olympic Ship As Orava Residential Reit Plc Orkla Asa Outokumpu Oyj Pacific Drilling Sa Petroleum Geo Services Pohjola Bank Oyj Posten Norge As Postnord Ab Recomm. Danske Bank S&P Moody's Fitch Analyst(s) Rating Outlook Sr. Unsec Rating Outlook Rating Outlook Rating Outlook BBB Stable M. Rosendal / E. Hjalmarsson BBStable B+ B.K. Røed / J. Meyer BBBStable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal BBB+ Neg L. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson BBStable L. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson BB Stable Ba2 Stable M. Rosendal / E. Hjalmarsson OVERWEIGHT BBB Stable Baa2 Stable M. Rosendal / L. Landeman MARKETWEIGHT BBBStable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman BBBStable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman OVERWEIGHT BBBStable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman BB+ Pos Ba2 Stable BB Pos O. Heldal / L. Landeman MARKETWEIGHT BBB+ Stable J. Magnussen / M. Rosendal BBBStable L. Holm / K. Jensen AANeg Aa3 Stable AAStable L. Holm / K. Jensen UNDERWEIGHT B+ Neg B S. Stormyr / B.K. Røed BBNeg B+ B. Børsting / M. Rosendal BBBStable O. Heldal / L. Landeman A Neg Baa3U Stable A Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen OVERWEIGHT B+ Stable B+ J. Magnussen / L. Landeman BStable Caa3 Neg S. Stormyr / B.K. Røed BB BBØ. Mossige B+ Stable B B.K. Røed / J. Meyer BBB+ Stable O. Heldal / L. Landeman B+ Stable B I. Båtvik/Ø. Mossige B+ Stable B+ M. Rosendal / L. Landeman BBB+ Pos O. Heldal / L. Landeman B Neg M. Rosendal / E. Hjalmarsson B Neg Caa2 Neg S. Stormyr / B.K. Røed B+ Neg B1 Neg I. Båtvik AANeg Aa3 Stable A+ Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen MARKETWEIGHT AStable O. Heldal / L. Landeman BBB+ Stable G. Bergin / L. Landeman 40 Our coverage and shadow ratings 4 of 5 Ratings from S&P/Moody's/Fitch and Danske Bank Markets shadow ratings Danske Bank S&P Moody's Fitch Analyst(s) Company Rating Outlook Sr. Unsec Rating Outlook Rating Outlook Rating Outlook Prosafe Se BB Stable BBS. Stormyr / B.K. Røed Ramirent Oyj BB+ Stable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Rem Offshore BNeg I. Båtvik / Ø. Mossige Sandnes Sparebank BBB+ Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Sandvik Ab BBB Neg M. Rosendal / E. Hjalmarsson Sas Ab BStable Wr Stable B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Sbab Bank Ab A Neg A2 Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Scania Ab AM. Rosendal / B. Børsting Schibsted Asa BBB Stable O. Heldal / L. Landeman Seadrill Ltd BBStable B+ S. Stormyr / B.K. Røed Securitas Ab BBB Pos Wr B. Børsting / M. Rosendal Siem Offshore BNeg I. Båtvik / Ø. Mossige Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken Ab A+ Neg Aa3 Stable A+ Pos L. Holm / K. Jensen Skanska Ab BBB+ Stable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman Skf Ab BBB Stable Baa1 Neg M. Rosendal / E. Hjalmarsson Sognekraft As BBB Stable BBB J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Solstad Offshore Asa BBStable B+ I. Båtvik / Ø. Mossige Spar Nord Bank A/S BBB+ Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Sparebank 1 Boligkreditt As AStable L. Holm / K. Jensen Sparebank 1 Nord Norge A1 Stable A Stable L. Holm / K. Jensen Sparebank 1 Smn A1 Stable AStable L. Holm / K. Jensen Sparebank 1 Sr-Bank Asa A1 Stable AStable L. Holm / K. Jensen Sponda Oyj BBBStable E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman Ssab Ab BBStable M. Rosendal / L. Landeman St1 Nordic Oy BB Stable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Statkraft Sf AStable Aaa Stable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Statnett Sf A+ Stable Wr Stable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Statoil Asa AANeg Aa2 Stable J. Magnussen / L. Landeman Steen & Strom As BBB+ Stable O. Heldal / L. Landeman Stena Ab BB Stable B2 Stable N. Ripa / B. Børsting Stockmann Oyj Abp B+ Stable M. Rosendal / L. Landeman Stolt-Nielsen Ltd BB+ Stable BB B.K. Røed / J. Meyer Recomm. MARKETWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT OVERWEIGHT MARKETWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT UNDERWEIGHT 41 Our coverage and shadow ratings 5 of 5 Ratings from S&P/Moody's/Fitch and Danske Bank Markets shadow ratings Company Stora Enso Oyj Storebrand Bank Asa Storebrand Livsforsikring As Sunnfjord Energi As Suomen Hypoteekkiyhdistys Svensk Fastighetsfinansiering Ab Svenska Cellulosa Ab Sca Svenska Handelsbanken Ab Swedavia Ab Swedbank Ab Swedish Match Ab Sydbank A/S Saab Ab Tallink Grupp As Tdc A/S Technopolis Oyj Teekay Lng Partners Lp Teekay Offshore Partners Lp Tele2 Ab Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Telenor Asa Teliasonera Ab Teollisuuden Voima Oyj Thon Holding As Tine Sa Upm-Kymmene Oyj Vasakronan Ab Vattenfall Ab Vestas Wind Systems A/S Victoria Park Ab Volvo Ab Wihlborgs Fastigheter Ab Danske Bank S&P Moody's Fitch Rating Outlook Sr. Unsec Rating Outlook Rating Outlook Rating Outlook BB Stable Ba2 Stable WD BBB+ Stable BBB+ Neg Nr Stable BBB+ Stable Baa1 Stable BBBStable BBBBBB Neg BBB Stable AStable Baa1 Stable AANeg Aa2 Stable AAStable AStable A+ Stable Aa3 Stable A+ Pos BBB Stable Baa2 Stable Baa1 Stable BBB+ Stable Wr BB Stable BBBBB Neg Baa3 Stable BBB Neg BB+ Stable BB BB Stable BBBBStable B+ BBB Stable BBB+ Stable Baa1 Stable BBB+ Stable A Stable A3 Stable AStable A3 Neg AStable BBBNeg Wr BBB Stable BBB+ Stable BBB+ Stable BB+ Stable Ba1 Stable WD AStable BBB+ Neg A3 Neg ANeg BBBBBStable B+ BBB Stable Baa2 Stable BBB Stable BB+ Stable BB Analyst(s) Recomm. M. Rosendal / L. Landeman MARKETWEIGHT L. Holm / K. Jensen L. Holm / K. Jensen J. Magnussen / L. Landeman L. Holm / K. Jensen Louis Landeman M. Rosendal / B. Børsting MARKETWEIGHT L. Holm / K. Jensen MARKETWEIGHT G. Bergin / L. Landeman L. Holm / K. Jensen MARKETWEIGHT B. Børsting / M. Rosendal MARKETWEIGHT L. Holm / K. Jensen OVERWEIGHT E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman N. Ripa / J. Magnussen O. Heldal / L. Landeman MARKETWEIGHT L. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson Ø. Mossige Ø. Mossige O. Heldal / L. Landeman O. Heldal / L. Landeman MARKETWEIGHT O. Heldal / L. Landeman MARKETWEIGHT O. Heldal / L. Landeman UNDERWEIGHT J. Magnussen / L. Landeman OVERWEIGHT O. Heldal / L. Landeman O. Heldal / L. Landeman M. Rosendal / L. Landeman MARKET WEIGHT E. Hjalmarsson / L. Landeman J. Magnussen / L. Landeman UNDERWEIGHT N. Ripa / J. Magnussen OVERWEIGHT L. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson M. Rosendal / B. Børsting MARKETWEIGHT L. Landeman / E. Hjalmarsson Source: Standard & Poor's, Moody's, Fitch, Danske Bank Markets 42 Fixed Income Credit Research team Thomas Hovard, Chief Analyst Head of Credit Research +45 45 12 85 05 [email protected] Brian Børsting, Senior Analyst Industrials +45 45 12 85 19 [email protected] Ola Heldal, Senior Analyst TMT +47 85 40 84 33 [email protected] Louis Landeman, Senior Analyst TMT, Industrials +46 8 568 80524 [email protected] Lars Holm, Senior Analyst Financials +45 45 12 80 41 [email protected] Sondre Dale Stormyr, Senior Analyst Offshore Rigs +47 85 40 70 70 [email protected] Mads Rosendal, Analyst Industrials, Pulp & Paper +45 45 14 88 79 [email protected] Gabriel Bergin, Analyst Strategy, Industrials +46 8 568 80602 [email protected] Henrik René Andresen, Senior Analyst Credit Portfolios +45 45 13 33 27 [email protected] Jakob Magnussen, Senior Analyst Utilities, Energy +45 45 12 85 03 [email protected] Niklas Ripa, Senior Analyst High Yield, Industrials +45 45 12 80 47 [email protected] Øyvind Mossige, Senior Analyst Oil Services +47 85 40 54 91 [email protected] Knut-Ivar Bakken, Senior Analyst Fish Farming +47 85 40 70 74 [email protected] Bjørn Kristian Røed, Senior Analyst Shipping +47 85 40 70 72 [email protected] Emil Hjalmarsson, Analyst Real Estate, Construction +46 8 568 80634 [email protected] Katrine Jensen, Analyst Financials +45 45 12 80 56 [email protected] Iver Christian Båtvik, Analyst Shipping +47 95 97 74 45 [email protected] Haseeb Syed High Yield, Norway +47 85 40 54 19 [email protected] 43 Disclosures This research report has been prepared by Danske Bank Markets, a division of Danske Bank A/S ('Danske Bank'). The authors of this research report are Mads Rosendal, Senior Analyst, and Katrine Jensen, Analyst. Analyst certification Each research analyst responsible for the content of this research report certifies that the views expressed in the research report accurately reflect the research analyst's personal view about the financial instruments and issuers covered by the research report. Each responsible research analyst further certifies that no part of the compensation of the research analyst was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations expressed in the research report. Regulation Danske Bank is authorised and subject to regulation by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority and is subject to the rules and regulation of the relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where it conducts business. Danske Bank is subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority (UK). Details on the extent of the regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from Danske Bank on request. The research reports of Danske Bank are prepared in accordance with the Danish Society of Financial Analysts' rules of ethics and the recommendations of the Danish Securities Dealers Association. Conflicts of interest Danske Bank has established procedures to prevent conflicts of interest and to ensure the provision of high-quality research based on research objectivity and independence. These procedures are documented in Danske Bank's research policies. Employees within Danske Bank's Research Departments have been instructed that any request that might impair the objectivity and independence of research shall be referred to Research Management and the Compliance Department. Danske Bank's Research Departments are organised independently from and do not report to other business areas within Danske Bank. Research analysts are remunerated in part based on the overall profitability of Danske Bank, which includes investment banking revenues, but do not receive bonuses or other remuneration linked to specific corporate finance or debt capital transactions. Danske Bank, its affiliates and subsidiaries are engaged in commercial banking, securities underwriting, dealing, trading, brokerage, investment management, investment banking, custody and other financial services activities, may be a lender to the companies mentioned in this publication and have whatever rights are available to a creditor under applicable law and the applicable loan and credit agreements. At any time, Danske Bank, its affiliates and subsidiaries may have credit or other information regarding the companies mentioned in this publication that is not available to or may not be used by the personnel responsible for the preparation of this report, which might affect the analysis and opinions expressed in this research report. See http://www-2.danskebank.com/Link/researchdisclaimer for further disclosures and information. 44 General disclaimer This research has been prepared by Danske Bank Markets (a division of Danske Bank A/S). It is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of, and shall under no circumstances be considered as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any relevant financial instruments (i.e. financial instruments mentioned herein or other financial instruments of any issuer mentioned herein and/or options, warrants, rights or other interests with respect to any such financial instruments) ('Relevant Financial Instruments'). The research report has been prepared independently and solely on the basis of publicly available information that Danske Bank considers to be reliable. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure that its contents are not untrue or misleading, no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness and Danske Bank, its affiliates and subsidiaries accept no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss, including without limitation any loss of profits, arising from reliance on this research report. The opinions expressed herein are the opinions of the research analysts responsible for the research report and reflect their judgement as of the date hereof. These opinions are subject to change, and Danske Bank does not undertake to notify any recipient of this research report of any such change nor of any other changes related to the information provided in this research report. This research report is not intended for retail customers in the United Kingdom or the United States. This research report is protected by copyright and is intended solely for the designated addressee. It may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, by any recipient for any purpose without Danske Bank's prior written consent. Disclaimer related to distribution in the United States This research report is distributed in the United States by Danske Markets Inc., a U.S. registered broker-dealer and subsidiary of Danske Bank, pursuant to SEC Rule 15a-6 and related interpretations issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The research report is intended for distribution in the United States solely to 'U.S. institutional investors' as defined in SEC Rule 15a-6. Danske Markets Inc. accepts responsibility for this research report in connection with distribution in the United States solely to 'U.S. institutional investors'. Danske Bank is not subject to U.S. rules with regard to the preparation of research reports and the independence of research analysts. In addition, the research analysts of Danske Bank who have prepared this research report are not registered or qualified as research analysts with the NYSE or FINRA but satisfy the applicable requirements of a non-U.S. jurisdiction. Any U.S. investor recipient of this research report who wishes to purchase or sell any Relevant Financial Instrument may do so only by contacting Danske Markets Inc. directly and should be aware that investing in non-U.S. financial instruments may entail certain risks. Financial instruments of non-U.S. issuers may not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and may not be subject to the reporting and auditing standards of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.