Banco Bradesco S.A - University of Oregon Investment Group
Transcription
Banco Bradesco S.A - University of Oregon Investment Group
December 3rd 2013 Financial Banco Bradesco S.A Ticker: BBD Current Price: $13.27 Recommendation: Sell Implied Price: $13.64 Investment Thesis Company Logo Banco Bradesco is one of Brazil’s most stable banks, however reductions in commodity exports has led to a slowdown of the economy not seen in the last 20 years. As global interest rates begin to rise, triggered by tapering due early next year, loan growth has been reduced from 18% to 11% as demand for higher credit rates decreases. Events such as the 2014 World cup and 2016 Summer Olympics may artificially inflate Brazil’s economy and potentially leave it volatile when returning to post-event levels of spending. Large swings in currency exchange rates can severely impact Bradesco’s ADR stock price. Deflation can be followed by high levels of inflation as seen in the recent past with the Brazilian Real. Brazil’s economy has posted near double digit growth rates in 2010 and has not been stressed with handling low levels of growth seen mid 2012 – present. This is a cause for concern on how the central bank moves forward. Covering Analysts: Justin Goschie Email: [email protected] 1 University of Oregon Investment Group December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Business Overview Banco Bradesco is the second largest publicly held bank in Brazil and pursuing expansion branches in Argentina and more recently Mexico. Although Bradesco has offices in New York, London, Hong Kong and Japan, more than 98% of their main operational revenue is currently isolated to Brazil, making future expansion critical to increase growth as Brazil’s economy begins to mature. Banco Bradesco was founded by Amador Aguiar in 1943. Originally targeting small farmers, landowners and retailers, the bank grew to Brazil’s largest private bank in 8 years (1951). Bradesco has been the leader in developing technologies across Latin America by introducing the first credit card and Internet Banking Systems to emerging markets. Currently Bradesco provides a wide range of financial products and services including credit cards, insurance and pension plans, investment banking and asset management. Earnings are reported in two main segments: Banking or Insurance, pension planning and asset management. 2012 Revenue was categorized as 43% loans and advances, 8% from fees and commissions and 27% from insurance or pension plans. Banking is defined by day-to-day trading gains/losses or broad investment transactions. Banking and Financial Segments As the primary revenue driver for Banco Bradesco, banking services, including loans, brought in over 59% of revenue. 25.7 million checking accounts have been opened by 2012. 4,686 branches service an ever-growing middle and lower class. 48.6 million saving accounts are currently active amongst Bradesco’s clients. Accounting for nearly a third of total loan and advances, commercial loans provide a stable and critical piece to Bradesco’s net interest income. Working capital loans, investment lines and overdraft loans are some of the services provided to commercial clients. Bradesco’s real estate division is set to see an increase in both top and bottom lines as interest rates rise and consumer confidence is regained. Even though real estates services only hold a 7.7% stake in Bradesco’s total loan portfolio, they are Brazil’s leading mortgage lender with a 35.1% market share. Bradesco were the first bank to issue credit cards in Brazil, as stated above, and they continue to be one of the largest card issuers with a base of 93.1 million credit and private-labeled cards. Visa, American Express, Elo, MasterCard are all accepted in over 200 countries. Fees from credit cards generate income by issuance fees/annual fees, interest on balances, fees from withdrawals and cash advances. Transactions in 2012 totaled 1,225,600,000 up from 959,100,000 in 2010. Bradesco BBI is the direct subsidiary that coordinates the investment banking divisions. In 2012, BBI advised customers on over 170 transactions totaling R$155.4 Billion. Services are open to equities, fixed income, structured operations, mergers and acquisitions, project financing and trading services. Asset management is also under the same roof and includes 1,373 funds and 231 portfolios that provide services to 3.2 million investors. Insurance, Pension and Saving Plans Bradesco Seguros, the Insurance division of Banco Bradesco, is the largest insurance provider in Brazil and in all of Latin America. 2012 numbers further enhanced this by making Bradesco Seguros the largest in both revenue and UOIG 2 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group technical provisions according to SUSEP and ANS. Products include health, life, personal accident, auto and insurance for other assets reaching 31.3 million policyholders. Bradesco Saúde provides health insurance coverage to more than 3.9 million beneficiaries covered by corporate or family plans. Approximately 57,000 companies in Brazil, including 50 of the top 100, use Bradesco Saúde and its subsidiaries to provided plans to their employees. As of December 31, 2012, health services included 9,475 labs, 12,163 specialized clinics, 14,445 physicians, and 2,552 hospitals located throughout Brazil. Bradesco Vida e Previdência is the subsidiary that provides life and personal accident insurance. Insurance can also be purchased to hedge against miscellaneous events such as job loss. 23.5 million life insurance policyholders were registered at year-end 2012. Bradesco Auto/RE subsidiaries provide Auto, property and liability insurance products. Bradesco aims to offer relatively affordable and highly profitable products within this division. Many subsidiaries offer highly specialized teams that provide tailor-made services and products to the need of each policyholder. Transportation, engineering, operational and oil risk top this segment of 3.9 million people currently insured. Insurance products are sold directly through brokers in Bradesco branded branches and also through non-exclusive brokers throughout Brazil. Bradesco pays brokers’ fees on a commission basis to all its 32,077 public brokers. Insurance products can also be sold directly through their website. Since 1981 Bradesco Vida e Previdência also offers pension plans and is currently the leading plan manager in Brazil based upon SUSEP. Due to recent tax relief (down to 12% of taxable income) and Brazilian law allowing private pensions to continue receiving grant benefits to entities, sales have been up and now included more than 2.3 million participants. (63.7% are individual plans) Saving plans are strictly regulated by the Brazilian government and must meet guidelines set by the Brazil Central Bank. 20% of saving account deposits must be held in reserves at the Central Bank. These accounts carry interest annually at 6.2% plus a reference rate. This reference rate stems from an addition of 70% of the SELIC rate. Demand deposits and time deposits are held to similar requirements. Bradesco totaled 3.5 million registered savings plans in 2012. Strategic Positioning Bradesco has structured their corporation and vast subsidiaries to work in different levels. First the bank structures separate divisions for banking, insurance, pension plans, credit cards, investment banking, asset management, etc. Depending on the segment, these divisions can be broken down by individual or corporate income levels. Bradesco positions their branches around or in post offices still seeing heavy traffic in Brazil. ATM’s are position next to areas of shopping, businesses and sometimes even inside a sponsored business/client. The goal is to be the most accessible bank in Brazil. Quickly researching competition shows Banco Bradesco is not in the strategic position it needs to make transactions/funds readily available to all people of Brazil. UOIG 3 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group However, Bradesco leads IT services for financials in Latin America. Internet Banking Systems and mobile transactions have rapidly improved Bradesco’s position to be accessible and a leader within their domestic industry. Security enhancements in major markets have been led by Bradesco in the form of adding biometric readers at ATMs to those clients who register for the service. Innovation and catching up to mature economies and their banking applications could set Bradesco apart from the competition for a short period. This edge is not projected to hold long as Santander and other banks have quickly come up with their own mobile banking and Internet-based products that will steal the competitive advantage in coming months. Bradesco’s achievements and recognition in recent years: Ranked 13th among 20 global banks (Bloomberg) The Most Valuable Brand in Brazil Consumer Award of Excellence in Customer Service Top 100 Sustainable Companies The last point emphasizes a new path that Banco Bradesco is trying to build upon. Every year the company now publishes their Sustainability Report that brings a revised mission for the company to be more efficient in order to keep shareholder wealth but also to increase stakeholder wealth by reducing their environmental impact and wasted energy/resources. Social contributions are also made for the betterment of Brazil’s environment into the future. Business Growth Strategies Organic Growth Bradesco’s organic growth is closely linked to the national GDP growth given the nature of the financial sector. Brazil has recently seen a rapid increase in national wealth, 7th wealthiest economy as of 2012, due to an improving lower and middle class and also discoveries of vast energy deposits offshore. However, Brazil’s recent surge is coming to end and a slowing economy is expected. Energy deposits have been underperforming since 2012. Oil and natural gas output have posted 16th months of decline and famously made Eike Batista lose $33 Billion in as little as a year and half. Forecasts of 2.7% - 3% have been advised for year-end 2013 and projected to be upper-bounded at 3.5% - 3.75% as Brazil matures. Due to the slowing economy, Bradesco could potentially look for higher growth in the increasing lower and middle class as a significant population looks for financial security and credit. New clients could be collected as national wealth spreads and new money is invested. Another possible growth generating strategy could be in geographical expansion. Successfully implementing their brand extensions in Argentinean and Mexico banking system may generate growth. Acquisition Growth To complement organic growth, Bradesco constantly seeks opportunities for strategic alliances and selective acquisitions to help consolidate their position as one of the leading financial institutions. Bradesco plans on expanding in consumer financing, investment banking, broker dealing and insurance markets. Recent partnerships with Banco do Brasil and Caixa Econômica Federal is examples of growth opportunities in credit and pre-paid cards (consumer financing). Recent insurance acquisitions include Odontoprev, increasing presence in dental care plans and further cementing leadership in insurance. Bradesco plans to continually focus on asset quality, potential operating synergies, and industry know-how through acquisition growth. UOIG 4 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Other notable acquisitions: Banco do Estado – right to provide services to the State of Rio de Janeiro. (Payroll, supplier payroll, collection of state taxes) Ibi Services S. de R.L México – exclusive joint sale of financial products and services through C&A Mexico chain stores. Industry Background Banks are crucial in the world economy to provide capital and financial services to businesses or individuals to maximize their potential and act as an intermediary to allocate capital in the economy. Banks take deposits from corporations or individuals and in return offer secure storage of funds and pay interest to the depositors. Some capital is keep as reserves, both internally and at a domestic central bank to satisfy requirements, but most deposits are used to create loans that generate revenue. In today’s economy, banks have become vastly more sophisticated and have developed instruments for debt and equity that generates generous amounts of profits. The banking industry is highly fragmented and includes segments such as retail banking, corporate and investment banking, and asset and wealth management. Investment banks provide corporations a way to raise capital (IPOs). Asset managers and pension planners provide products for planning for the future and retirement. Banks in these industries usually set fees based on past performance and client benefits. As with any industry, performance captures a larger clientele base. Key factors for banks: Introduce innovative products: Technology driven Risk management for consumer confidence Outsource specific non-banking activities Branches used to promote financial products, not just processing Satisfy consumer demands in local markets and provide attractive rates Hedge against risks by utilizing financial instruments Economies of scale Overview The global outlook for the banking industry in the short-run faces uncertainty due to the 2007-2009 subprime mortgage crisis. Volatility has been present globally as economies regain pre-recession levels. The industry is forecasted to climb to an estimated $163,068 billion by 2017 with a CAGR of 8% over the next five years. The abundance of cheap credit and government programs artificially helping economies through bond programs causes concern looking forward. The outlook for the financial sector in Brazil has been changing rapidly. Moody’s recently reported a stable outlook for the foreign sector but dismisses rising growth rates moving forward. Brazil has already adjusted regulations for capital requirements while tightening the industry’s standards and increased the presence of state-run banks. Brazil’s banks will also get an added boost when the country hosts the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Summer Olympics. This period is projected to help revenues by increasing credit card fees and transactions as tourists and locals will increase spending during these major events. Renovations and new infrastructure will also aid in the coming years. Historically these events have hurt local economies in the long run with the exception of London in 2012. Brazil must manage their economy when returning to normal after such events. UOIG 5 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Macro factors Interest rates heavily influence banks decision-making and profits. Most banks face interest rates established by a domestic central bank. In Brazil, SELIC is used to set interest rates and is equivalent to America’s federal fund rate. Despite intuition, rising interest rates do not mean financials will increase margins. Only banks where the rates they charge borrowers rise more quickly than their own cost of funding will be more profitable. When valuing banks, you should be more concerned with the interest spreads rather than the general interest rates going forward. Another concern with rising interest rates is the law of supply and demand. As borrowing costs increase for the consumer, demand for loans will decrease as a result. Brazil traditionally keeps higher interest rates compared to global rates due to inflation but not too high as they try to keep GDP growth stable. Inflation is another key macro factor that influences the financial sector. Data from the Federal Reserve shows a decrease in bank lending during inflationary periods. Brazil as seen several problems regarding inflation in the past and had to introduce a new currency 25 years ago to stop hyperinflation during the late 80’s. The past 10 years still sees abnormal inflation in the Brazilian Real. During august 2013, Brazil’s central bank announced a currency intervention program that will provide $60 billion of cash and insurance to foreign exchange markets by year-end. In this case, deflation is the concern as the real slips to five year lows. This will become vital to the ADR American stock price and is explained later in the Excess Return model section. Unemployment rates can be a valuable indicator for financial sectors as well. As unemployment rates rise in an economy, credit losses could balloon unpredictably because of high defaults. It is increasingly difficult to find safe and credit worthy clientele in this environment and banks will increase reserves for bad-loans. Unemployment rates have historically taken multiple periods, if not years, to recover to historic averages making this one of the most fearful indicators within the financial sector. Brazil’s unemployment seems stable reaching 2015 forecasts at 5.3% but in an emerging marketing can be hard to evaluate. Competition Due to intensive consolidation in the past few years, competition in banking services has increased and has led to a decrease in profits attainable by the industry. New state-run banks are also disrupting the financial sector in Brazil. Consolidation amongst the largest institutions is a direct result of firms trying to become more diversified and gain a competitive advantage. Bradesco is one of these firms and is trying to create synergies between their subsidiaries. Merging together has also helped cut administration costs. In 2008, Itau and Unibanco merge creating the largest bank at the time in terms of assets. Brazilian banks have always benefited from organic growth when Brazil was rapidly expanding; however competition is becoming severe due to a decline in growth rates. Banks are stressing the importance of technology services and diverse products making the industry have less bargaining power to consumers. As the market becomes more consolidated, the four main banks will set targets on each other and market share will be ever more important in the future The big four Brazilian Banks are: Banco Bradesco, Banco de Brazil, Itaú Unibanco and Banco Santander. UOIG 6 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Management and Employee Relations Luiz Carlos Trabuco Cappi, CEO Mr. Trabuco began in the company in 1969. He was appointed CEO in 2010. Prior to becoming the new CEO, Trabuco held various board seats across different subsidiaries owned by Banco Bradesco including CEO of Banco Seguros, one the company’s largest subsidiary. Lazaro de Mello Brandao, Chairman Mr. Brandao has served as chairman since March 1999. He started his career at Banco Bradesco back in 1942 and has worked his way up within the company ranks. Compensation In 2012, the Executive Officers of Bradesco and its subsidiaries were paid a total of R$ 344.8 million without stock options. Management Guidance Guidance set by management has historically been bullish to actual fiscal numbers. The Brazilian economy has seen massive inflation, protests, and large swings in unemployment numbers that creates massive error margins in forecasts for financials as they rely heavily on macro factors. Recently the Brazilian economy has settled into some trends you can justify predictions on. In 2013 alone, management has trimmed guidance numbers twice to accommodate a slowing economy. This can be found over the history of Bradesco and management guidance only holds weight after Q3 and after being reduced by several hundred basis points. Many analysts believe guidance should be taken at the most conservative estimates to represent actuals for Bradesco. Portfolio Strategy and History Banco Bradesco is currently held in two of the three UOIG portfolios. BBD was originally pitched and bought in October of 2011. Tall Firs Banco Bradesco currently holds a 2.86% weight in the portfolio as of fiscal year end 2012. 1200 shares were purchased at a cost basis of $21,849.60 and has yielded a purchase return of -3.89%. Bradesco does not fit the overall portfolio strategy seeking value. As this report will conclude, BBD is fairly valued in the market and is subject to volatility in the Brazilian Real that cannot be hedged away using current positions in Tall Firs. Svigals Management purchased 145 Banco Bradesco shares at a cost basis of $2,525.15. Total return for BBD has yielded 1.81%. Based upon the strategy of the Svigals, growth and value tilt, Bradesco sees limited growth as the Brazilian economy begins to slow and does not stay in line with the portfolio’s goals. UOIG 7 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Recent News “Brazil Central Bank Says Banks Face $65 Billion Loss” (Nov 22 nd 2013) – Brazilian banks may have to spend R$149 billion to support consumers seeking to recover deposits lost in economic overhaul more than two decades ago. 25% of the financial system capital would be impacted. The lawsuit stems from Brazil’s efforts to control hyperinflation from 1986 to 1994. The government froze bank deposits, introduced new currency and reduced returns on savings accounts. – Bloomberg “Bradesco says state bank competition will limit options” (Oct 22 nd 2013) – BBD is grappling with hefty bond losses and weak credit demands and expects intense competition form state-run banks to limit any attempt to raise borrowing costs and offset slower growth in interest income. Despite higher domestic interest rates, a mix of less risky types of credit should continue driving down net interest margins going forward. - Reuters “Bradesco cuts revenue forecast a second time” (Oct 21 st 2013) – Banco Bradesco trimmed its projections for interest income growth this year for the second straight quarter to account for sagging demand for new credit in Latin American countries. Net interest income is now forecasted to be 1%-3% for the year. Lack luster growth in loan books to be the cause. – Reuters “Brazil is no bargain” (Sept 3rd 2013) – Emerging markets have been in a tailspin since May when Ben Bernanke hinted that the fed would cut bond purchases. The Bovespa is down 10% after recovering from a 21% decline from May to July. Banco Bradesco hit rock bottom in May 2013 in contrast to U.S banks reaching multi-year highs. Brazil is in a decline and few companies show signs that the worst is over. – MarketWatch Catalysts Upside Increase in credit card fees/transactions due to major world events including 2014 World Cup and 2016 Summer Olympics Increased wealth in lower and middle class households Growing demand for insurance products Stability in the financial sector Downside Volatility in the Brazilian real (Inflation) Rising interest rates in Brazil may hurt loan demand as costs mount Increased competition from State-run banks may reduce margins Reducing commodity exports may effect Brazil economy growth U.S Fed tapering quantitative easing Comparable Analysis Constructing a valuation by using comparable analysis for a financial company is difficult. Common multiples such as EV/EBIT, EV/EBITDA and EV/Net Income are not applicable to financial firms. Enterprise Value is difficult to determine due to their complex capital structures and reporting structures. Because EV and operating metrics cannot be used to provide a platform for comparable analysis, the industry uses equity multiples such as Price/Book or UOIG 8 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Price/Earnings. Price/Tangible Book Value was also used to gauge financials real tangible equity in order to get a better understanding of what the equity could be valued out in the future. Comparable companies were chosen based on a variety of macro and firm specific characteristics. Banco Santander (BSBR) and Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) were first given consideration because both capture the macro environment in Brazil. They are also Banco Bradesco’s main competitors under the same rules and guidelines set by the domestic Central Bank. Screening for comparable banks in foreign markets were then done by growth rates projected for Revenue and Earnings Per Share (EPS) for years 2014 and 2015. Projections were used to create a forward comparable analysis opposed to an LTM comparable due interest rates and many macro factors quickly changing as the global economy recovers from the 2007-2009 recession. After similar growth rates were screened, banks from India (IBN) and Chile (BCH) were chosen to be comparables. Inflation, GDP YoY growth, unemployment rates, and lastly interest rates were similar to the state Brazil is currently in and more critically, what is forecasted into the future. Lastly, Royal Bank of Canada (RY) was chosen to capture a maturing economy that Brazil is expected to settle into the near future. RY also captured a near identical Tier 1 Capital Adequacy Ratio. T1CAR represents a bank’s financial strength, capturing core capital to credit risks by evaluating risk-weighted assets. All comparable firms used Basel Committee on Banking Supervision guidelines in setting their formals for asset risk weights. Banco Santander S.A (Brazil) – 30% “Banco Santander S.A. operates as a full-service bank in Brazil and internationally. It operates in three segments: Commercial Banking, Global Wholesale Banking, and Asset Management and Insurance. The Commercial Banking segment provides traditional banking services primarily for retail customers, enterprises, and corporations through its branch network. This segment offers current accounts, saving accounts, and time deposits; loans to individual customers, including consumer finance, checking account overdraft loans, personal loans, and payroll loans; credit cards; loans to small and medium-size businesses (SMEs); agricultural loans; mortgages; leasing; insurance and asset management products; private retirement plans; and cash management services for SMEs. Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. was founded in 1957 and is headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil.” – Yahoo Finance Itaú Unibanco Holdings S.A (Brazil) – 30% “Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. provides various financial products and services in Brazil and internationally. Its products include personal loans, overdraft protection, payroll loans, vehicle loans, credit cards, mortgage and agricultural loans, real estate and working capital loans, and trade note discount and export; investment products, such as pension plans, mutual funds, time deposits, demand deposit accounts, savings accounts, and capitalization plans; and insurance products, including life, home, credit/cash cards, vehicles, and loan protection, as well as exchange and brokerage services. The company also provides investment options; private retirement plans; and investment capital loans, inventory financing, trade financing, foreign currency services, equipment leasing services, letters of credit, and guarantees, as well as collection and electronic payment services. The company was formerly known as Itaú Unibanco Banco Múltiplo S.A. and changed its name to Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. in April 2009. The company was founded in 1944 and is headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. operates as a subsidiary of Itausa - Investimentos Itau S.A.” – Yahoo Finance UOIG 9 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Banco de Chile (Chile) – 5% “Banco de Chile provides traditional banking products and specialized financial services to large corporations, small and mid-sized businesses, and individuals in Chile. The company offers various deposit products, including current accounts, demand deposits, savings accounts, and time deposits. Its loan products portfolio comprises installment, residential mortgage, and nonresidential mortgage loans; commercial loans, including short and long term loans, working capital loans, and project finance; leasing contracts; factoring and foreign trade loans; and consumer loans, such as installment loans, credit cards, and lines of credit and other loans. The company also offers liquidity management, debt instruments, foreign trade, derivative contracts, and leases, as well as corporate finance solutions; and public and private securities underwriting services, and payment and collection services. Banco de Chile was founded in 1893 and is headquartered in Santiago, Chile. Banco de Chile operates as a subsidiary of LQ Inversiones Financieras S.A.” – Yahoo Finance ICICI Bank Ltd (India) – 20% “CICI Bank Limited, together with its subsidiaries, provides banking and financial services to corporate and retail customers in 19 countries, including India. It primarily offers commercial banking, retail banking, project and corporate finance, working capital finance, insurance, venture capital and private equity, investment banking, broking, and treasury products and services. The company provides current and savings accounts, term deposits, fixed and recurring deposits, outward remittances, and salary accounts; credit, debit, prepaid, and corporate cards; and home, commercial vehicle, personal, and car loans, as well as loans against securities. It also offers life, travel, health, car, two wheeler, home, and student medical insurance products; demat accounts; and investment products, such as mutual funds, gold, bonds, foreign exchange, and initial public offerings, as well as senior citizens savings schemes. ICICI Bank Limited was founded in 1955 and is based in Mumbai, India.” – Yahoo Finance Royal Bank of Canada (Canada) – 15% “Royal Bank of Canada, a diversified financial service company, provides personal and commercial banking, wealth management, insurance, corporate and investment banking, and transaction processing services worldwide. It operates through five segments: Personal & Commercial Banking, Wealth Management, Insurance, Investor & Treasury Services, and Capital Markets. The Personal & Commercial Banking segment provides personal and business financial services, and cards and payment solutions. It offers a suite of financial products and services to its individual and business clients through branch, automated teller machines, online, and telephone banking networks, as well as through proprietary sales professionals. Royal Bank of Canada was founded in 1864 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.” – Yahoo Finance Multiples were weighted according to industry standards. Price/Book (50%) was weighted the most, as this is the most important metric within the financial sector. Price/Earnings (30%) was weighted less but still contributed nearly a third to the implied price. The remaining weight was given to Price/Tangible Book (20%) due to the belief of better indicating future equity book value. Effects of foreign currency fluctuations were improved by converting foreign currency book value of equity from SEC Filings to the Brazilian Real. Exchange rates used for BRL/CLP, BRL/INR, and BRL/CAD can be found in appendix 1 by the implied price. All values were then converted into USD to keep it UOIG 10 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group consistent with posted ADR American prices found on American stock exchanges used to calculate the numerator (Price) in the multiples. Due to this, the implied price derived from the comparable analysis might prove to be diluted from a true, accurate price. This was taken into consideration and is represented by weighting the analysis 30 percent in the final implied price for Banco Bradesco. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis The Discounted Cash Flow model is generally used during an analysis of a firm. While this is typically the way our analyst use for valuations, it is very difficult to construct DCF models for financials for a variety of reasons. The first reason is because financials do not report traditional data according to GAAP standards and have their own set of rules. One major difference is financials value bank assets at their market price instead of book price normally found in GAAP. Financials must have the ability to adjust for loan losses so they average out over time. Secondly, debt is used more as a raw material instead of a source of capital. Large swings in deposits and company debt make equity the only thing you need to consider. Due to this disparity only capital at a financial institution is defined as equity. This makes weighted average cost of capital and enterprise value render useless from a valuation view. Other reinvestment items such as capital expenditure and working capital are thrown out due to banks having minimal expenditures for buildings. Banks do reinvest in intangible assets but their capital expenditures are negligible on cash flow statements and show little depreciation. Working capital is also difficult to project due to the nature of financial structures. Large and volatile swings in current assets or liabilities due to timing difference in loans outstanding and customer deposits arise. Due to the nature of these problems we cannot estimate cash flows accurately. We are not able to estimate cash flows without estimating reinvestment and we are not able to measure expected future growth, as the reinvestment rate cannot be determined. Therefore, a DCF model should not be used to value financial institutions. Excess Return Analysis – (in Brazilian Real) An excess return model uses CAPM as the discount rate when valuing a firm because the only thing you value is equity and not the total firm value. Because you are not valuing debt, WACC provides no use in our model. WACC would put the cost of capital at unrealistic low values. In an excess return model, the value of the firm can be written as the sum of the capital currently invested in the firm and discounted excess returns the firm expects in the future. Inherently the model considers where the firm will put investments in the future after dividends are considered and retained earnings are added back in. The valuation of the firm solves for net income and takes away equity cost of capital, taken as cost of equity (CAPM) of the book value of the firm. The excess equity is then discounted by the CAPM to find the present value of the excess equity return. Book value of equity is recalculated every year, pulling form the ending balance in the prior year less dividends and added retained earnings. UOIG 11 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group To find the value of equity, the present value of the discounted excess return is added to the current book value of equity and the terminal value of excess returns, taken as: NI11 – (Cost of Equity11)*(BV of Equity11) Cost of Equityt-Terminal Growth Rate This will yield the terminal value, which will then be discounted by the CAPM to the appropriate year. ADRs Bradesco is listed in Brazil on the Ibovespa. Being a foreign company, Bradesco is listed on US exchange only as an ADR; meaning US investors are paying for a right to a foreign registered company. ADRs carrying no voting rights and are reported in the foreign currency and then exchanged back to the dollar. Exchange rates are always current in the prices of listed ADRs causing an overwhelming importance of currency fluctuations in the day-to-day stock price. This explains why numbers are modeled in the Brazilian Real and then the implied price is taken at the current exchange rate of the USD/BRL. To offer a supplement to restricted voting rights, Bradesco gives U.S investors access to their preferred shares, resulting in a 10% more weighting for earnings and dividends than common stock. ADRs can include outside risks not found in the U.S. Political risks can cause instable characteristics reflected on the stock price. Brazil has recently seen protests and government acceptance is coming off of low levels in metro areas and may cause Bradesco’s stock price to become volatile. Other risks include devalued currency, moving the price down even if Bradesco has been performing well. Inflationary risk can also be classified within currency risks. Beta A variety of betas were calculated using 5 year Daily, 5 year Weekly, 3 year Weekly, 3 Year Daily, 1 year Daily and 3 or 5 year Daily Hamada and Vasicek betas regressed against the S&P 500 index and weighted accordingly to give Bradesco’s overall beta of 1.45. Hamada betas use comparable companies’ respected D/E ratio and tax rate to reach an unlevered beta. After taking the weighted average of the unlevered betas, you re-lever using Bradesco’s D/E ratio and tax rate to reach an industrylevered Bradesco beta. Vasicek betas again target an industry-weighted beta. After regressing compareables and weighting their betas, you compare variances between the industry and Bradesco. More weighting is given to the one with a smaller variance. Betas regressed against the Ibovespa (^BVSP) were not used because it would of lead to a misleading valuation from a biased CAPM. The reason being is capturing the true beta of Bradesco would not reflect the ADR purchased in the states and would over compensate for country risks if we left values in the Brazilian Real. The Brazilian Real will capture most of the country risk. UOIG 12 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Interest Income Model Interest income was calculated using the balance sheet approach to give the most accurate projections. Average balances of interest-bearing assets and liabilities were taken and then projected off guidance or historical growth rates. Deviations away from historical growth rates were caused by forecasted macro factors in Brazil out to 2018. Also taken into consideration was a maturing competitive environment and the number of people needed loans would stabilize and can be reflected in decreasing growth rates reaching the terminal year. As part of the main thesis, interest rates are steadily increased in the projections and make up the forecasted average yield. Taking the projected average balance of interest-bearing assets (revenue) and liabilities (expenses) and multiplying by your forecasted yields gives revenue and expenses looking forward. Net interest income was then calculated and provisions for loan losses were trended down from historical averages based on Bradesco reaching all-time low delinquency ratios and Brazilian default ratios projected to decline. Non-Interest Income Model Non-interest income was broken down and consolidated into revenue and expense line items that could be projected. The model mainly consists of operational revenue/expenses from credit cards, asset management, trading/banking, insurance, and personnel/administrative expenses. Other revenue/expense generating activity was categorized as “other.” Line items were projected out from guidance, historical growth, research or macro factors during the valuation. Dividend Payout Projecting out dividends was done by using a historic payout ratio since 2009, which yielded a payout ratio of 34%. The rate was steadily increased towards the terminal year to keep the historic book value to loan ratio around 12.5%. If the ratio falls below this level then it may signify a poor tier 1 ratio and a potential liquidity problem. If the ratio becomes too high, then Bradesco is holding excess capital and the money would be better served in the form of dividends to shareholders than held by Bradesco. Terminal Discount Rate The 10-year U.S T-bill was used as the long-term risk free rate, which yields 2.76% in the market. Excess Return Conclusion The excess return model yields an overvaluation of 0.47% for Bradesco. During the month of August the Brazilian Real suffered five-year lows against the dollar making the final implied price bearish. As the Brazilian central bank stimulates the Real, the final implied price would increase, keeping trending dollar inflation constant. The effect exchange rates have on the implied price can be seen in the sensitivity tables at the end of the report. UOIG 13 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Recommendation This valuation results in a sell for both Tall Firs and Svigals portfolio. By weighting the excess return model by 70% and the comparable model by 30%, Bradesco is undervalued by 2.82%. This is within the margin of error, and the undervalued final implied price gives our positions no room to grow. Because of this, Banco Bradesco does not fit our value and growth style portfolios and is to heavily dependent on exchange rates that cannot be hedge away. Bradesco is one of the most stable financial institutions in Brazil. However, Brazil is poised to see economic slowdown as commodities fall and suspend macro growth rates. Rising interest rates have already been accounted for in the current market price so this yields no real advantage in the coming years. Major world events such as the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Summer Olympics may artificially inflate the economy in Brazil and as seen all to often in the past, tend to hurt economy once they return to post-event levels. These risks are too much to ignore and funds should be utilize for a less volatile, more undervalued position. This is why the recommendation is a sell. Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate 13.21 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5% (0) 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5% 2.13 14.23 14.23 14.48 14.77 15.14 2.13 7.23% 7.23% 9.09% 11.32% 14.07% 2.23 13.59 13.59 13.83 14.11 14.46 8.95% 2.33 12.98 12.98 13.21 13.48 13.81 2.43 12.45 12.45 12.67 12.92 13.24 2.53 11.96 11.96 12.17 12.41 12.72 Exchange Rate Exchange Rate Terminal Growth Rate 2.23 2.42% 2.42% 4.20% 6.33% 2.33 -2.16% -2.16% -0.47% 1.57% 4.07% 2.43 -6.18% -6.18% -4.56% -2.60% -0.20% 2.53 -9.88% -9.88% -8.32% -6.44% -4.14% UOIG 14 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 1 – Comparable Analysis Comparables Analysis (R$ in Thousands) Stock Characteristics Current Price 50 Day Moving Average 200 Day Moving Average Beta Size Short-Term Debt Long-Term Debt Diluted Basic Shares Market Capitalization Growth Expectations % Revenue Growth 2014E % Revenue Growth 2015E % EPS Growth 2014E BBD BSBR BCH IBN Banco Santander ITUB Itau Unibanco Holding Banco de Chile ICICI Bank RY Royal Bank of Canada Banco Bradesco Max $86.78 $90.80 $88.24 $1.39 Min $6.46 $6.87 $6.54 $0.89 Median $35.86 $34.41 $35.88 $1.33 Weight Avg. $27.65 $27.97 $27.13 $1.28 $13.27 $14.28 $13.76 1.45 30.00% $6.46 $6.87 $6.54 1.33 30.00% $14.07 $14.79 $13.87 1.38 5.00% $86.78 $90.80 $88.24 0.89 20.00% $35.86 $34.41 $35.88 1.39 15.00% $66.52 $66.97 $62.79 0.96 361,924,000 103,347,000 4,518,380 95,788,800 5,590,000 14,827,000 155,290 13,476,066 147,426,000 63,916,000 1,440,000 25,723,178 210,355,900 66,302,050 2,889,249 45,969,258 307,846,000 78,525,000 3,817,413 50,657,068 259,983,000.0 64,369,000 3,981,916 25,723,178 361,924,000 103,347,000 4,518,380 63,573,603 5,590,000 14,827,000 155,290 13,476,066 6,952,000 63,916,000 576,980 20,690,503 147,426,000 16,418,000 1,440,000 95,788,800 12.30% 15.10% 13.50% 4.80% 7.44% 6.80% 7.30% 10.10% 11.10% 7.31% 10.69% 11.73% 9.82% 10.07% 13.60% 4.80% 10.10% 13.20% 7.30% 10.20% 13.50% 8.20% 9.28% 9.60% 12.30% 15.10% 11.10% 5.40% 7.44% 6.80% 15.30% 6.70% 9.50% 11.15% 13.40% 9.50% 12.40% 6.70% 15.30% 7.91% 10.50% 2.12% 25.42% 18.64 2.77 5.60% 3.11% .94% 6.38% 9.82 0.28 1.55% 4.62% 1.44% 17.29% 13.15 0.84 3.98% 4.00% 1.34% 14.25% 13.39 0.949 4.05% 7.09% 1.37% 18.22% 13.5 0.36 4.55% NA 1.22% 6.38% 13.15 0.28 4.40% 10.50% 1.44% 18.70% 13.67 0.84 5.60% 4.62% 2.12% 25.42% 11.59 2.77 2.93% 3.11% 1.45% 14.30% 9.82 0.67 1.55% NA 0.94% 17.29% 18.64 2.27 3.98% 13.23 18.30 12.30 7.33 12.91 13.10 % EPS Growth 2015E Profitability Margins Net Interest Margin ROA ROE Financial Leverage Dividend Per Share Dividend Yield Credit Metrics Tier 1 Capital Adequacy Ratio Operating Results Net Income Net Interest Income 2012 Book Value of Equity 18.30 7.33 12.91 14.09 $ 8,305,328 $ 23,724,629 $ 45,790,393 $ 1,119,825 $ 2,338,035 $ 3,750,655 $ 1,845,983 $ 12,819,520 $ 33,144,978 $ 4,535,493 $ 14,187,109 $ 29,739,017 $ $ $ 5,713,034 20,610,596 31,155,629 $ $ $ 1,845,983 14,773,231 34,853,712 $ 7,792,620 $ 23,724,629 $ 33,144,978 $ $ $ 1,119,825 2,338,035 3,750,655 $ 1,710,611 $ 2,989,607 $ 11,416,594 $ 8,305,328 $ 12,819,520 $ 45,790,393 2012 Tangible Book Value of Equity Multiples P/BE P/TB P/E $ 36,129,380 0 3.59x 3.74x 13.93x $ 3,605,371 0 0.74x 1.23x 8.16x $ 20,871,179 #NUM! 1.92x 2.04x 12.03x $ 23,475,920 0 1.65x 1.93x 11.38x $ 27,768,880 $ 20,871,179 $ 31,105,240 $ 3,605,371 $ 11,416,594 $ 36,129,380 1.81x 1.81x 12.10x 2.09x 2.65x 11.53x 1.63x 1.82x 8.87x Multiple P/BE P/TB P/E Implied Price (USD $) Current Price Undervalued 0.74x 1.23x 13.93x 1.92x 2.04x 8.16x 3.59x 3.74x 12.03x Implied Price Weight 13.49 50.00% 14.04 20.00% 17.03 30.00% $14.66 Exchange Rate (USD/BRL) 2.3345 13.27 Foreign Echange Rates 10.48% BRL/CLP BRL/INR BRL/CAD 227.261 UOIG 15 27.1259 0.4591 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 2 – Excess Return Model Excess Return Model (R$ in thousands) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Net Interest Income $ 27,190,512 $ 32,771,291 $ 35,611,286 $ 43,492,965 $ 44,630,110 $ 47,198,265 $ 50,655,413 $ 54,258,281 $ 58,031,875 $ 61,560,944 Net Interest Income After PLL $ 16,380,901 $ 27,015,166 $ 27,315,135 $ 31,982,786 $ 32,507,058 $ 33,800,361 $ 35,735,313 $ 37,213,312 $ 38,676,458 $ 40,456,515 % Growth 64.92% 1.11% 17.09% 1.64% 3.98% 5.72% 4.14% 3.93% 4.60% 9,394,538 10,834,333 12,804,795 13,957,227 15,680,944 17,562,657 20,056,555 22,262,776 24,711,681 19.7% 15.3% 18.2% 9.0% 12.4% 12.0% 14.2% 11.0% 11.0% 2,212,733 (608,270) 2,110,113 3,376,181 4,389,035 5,047,390 5,552,129 5,996,300 6,356,078 % of income Net fee and commission income 7,847,382 % Growth Net gains/(losses) on financial assets helf for trading 5,983,781 % Growth Net gains/(losses) on financial assets available for sale 757255 % Growth Income from insurance and pension plans 60.0% 30.0% 15.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 1,516,779 1,365,101 1,269,544 1,180,676 1,098,029 1,021,167 -0.4% -51.6% 419.0% -20.0% -10.0% -7.0% -7.0% -7.0% -7.0% 3,076,175 1,413,016 1,632,283 2,834,573 4,183,972 5,523,304 6,636,077 7,303,919 45.0% 19.3% -54.1% 15.5% 73.7% 47.6% 32.0% 20.1% 10.1% 728,867 577,053 682,122 870,662 1,044,794 1,253,753 1,504,504 1,805,405 2,166,486 2,599,783 -20.8% 18.2% 27.6% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 7,828,125 5,833,854 10,327,155 8,865,636 9,707,871 10,678,659 11,746,524 12,921,177 14,213,295 15,634,624 % Growth Total Non-Interest Income 446.9% 1,895,974 2,577,730 % Growth Other non-interest income -127.5% 365,302 1,778,016 % Growth Equity in the earnings of associates -63.0% 754,416 -25.5% $ 24,923,426 $ % Growth 21,350,324 77.0% $ -14.3% 24,676,817 -14.2% $ 15.6% 27,960,196 9.5% $ 13.3% 31,235,135 10.0% $ 11.7% 36,202,065 10.0% $ 15.9% 41,314,592 10.0% $ 14.1% 47,039,245 10.0% $ 13.9% 52,372,961 10.0% $ 11.3% 57,627,251 10.0% % of income Total Income $ 41,304,327 $ % Growth Personnel expenses $ 70,002,426 $ 77,049,905 $ 84,252,558 $ 91,049,419 $ 98,083,766 9.3% 8.1% 7.7% (7,334,164) (8,794,017) (11,150,970) (11,656,422) (12,239,243) (12,912,401) (13,622,584) (14,371,826) (15,090,417) (15,844,938) 19.9% 26.8% 4.5% 5.0% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.0% 5.0% (8,138,058) (9,761,445) (11,477,134) (11,900,383) (12,525,153) (13,214,037) (13,907,773) (14,603,162) (15,333,320) (16,061,653) 19.95% 17.58% 3.69% 5.25% 5.50% 5.25% 5.00% 5.00% 4.75% (1,516,529) (1,966,433) (2,120,335) (2,538,260) (3,045,912) (3,502,799) (4,028,219) (4,632,451) (5,327,319) (6,126,417) 29.7% 7.8% 19.7% 20.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% (897,638) (682,961) 2,625,813 (951,385) (665,970) (599,373) (539,435) (485,492) (436,943) (393,248) -23.9% 284.5% -136.2% -30.0% -10.0% -10.0% -10.0% -10.0% -10.0% (10,852,765) (11,836,517) (15,185,857) (17,394,300) (19,133,730) (21,621,115) (24,431,860) (27,608,002) (30,437,822) (33,481,604) 12,565,173 $ % Growth Income and social contribution taxes 63,742,193 10.1% 9.1% $ $ 9.8% % Growth Income Before Income Taxes 59,942,982 6.3% % Growth Other non-interest expense $ 15.3% % Growth Net gains/(losses) of foreign currency transactions 51,991,952 7.5% % Growth Depreciation and amortization $ 17.1% % Growth Administrative expenses 48,365,490 (4,264,330) 15,324,117 28.3% $ 14,683,469 14.5% $ 15,502,232 10.0% $ 16,132,185 13.0% $ 18,152,702 13.0% $ 20,520,034 13.0% $ 22,551,625 10.3% $ 24,423,598 10.0% $ 26,175,906 22.0% -4.2% 5.6% 4.1% 12.5% 13.0% 9.9% 8.3% 7.2% (5,271,924) (3,594,027) (4,150,538) (4,517,012) (5,445,810) (6,156,010) (6,765,488) (7,327,079) (7,852,772) Tax Rate 33.94% 34.40% 24.48% 26.77% 28.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% Net Income Attributed to Noncontrolling Interest (17,836) (112,618) (131,388) (60,124) (63,742) (70,002) (77,050) (84,253) (91,049) (98,084) % of TR for Noncontrolling Interest Net Income -0.04% $ 8,283,007 -0.23% $ % Growth 9,939,575 -0.25% $ 20.0% 10,958,054 -0.10% $ 10.2% 11,291,570 0.10% $ 3.0% 11,551,431 0.10% $ 12,636,889 0.10% $ 14,286,974 0.10% $ 15,701,885 0.10% $ 17,005,469 0.10% $ 18,225,050 2.3% 9.4% 13.1% 9.9% 8.3% 7.2% Equity Cost 7,902,593.32 8,747,049.97 9,667,358.71 10,703,882.29 11,838,710.02 13,063,984.96 Excess Equity Return 3,648,837.88 3,889,838.69 4,619,615.37 4,998,002.76 5,166,759.33 5,161,065.36 103% 114% 127% 141% 156% Cumulated Cost of Equity Present Value Excess return $ Beginning BV of Equity Cost of Equity Equity Cost Ending BV of Equity Net Income 71,346,390.00 $ 8,283,007 $ Dividend Pay Out Ratio Dividends Paid Retained Earnings $ 8,283,007 $ 9,939,575 $ 10,958,054 $ 11,291,570 3,554,260 $ $ 3,647,178 $ 3,552,434 $ 3,306,176 174% $ 2,973,209 71,346,390.00 78,970,334.59 87,279,088.89 96,637,056.91 106,882,536.90 11.08% 11.08% 11.08% 11.08% 11.08% 11.08% 7,902,593.32 8,747,049.97 9,667,358.71 10,703,882.29 11,838,710.02 13,063,984.96 78,970,334.59 $ 3,411,179 11,551,431 87,279,088.89 $ 12,636,889 96,637,056.91 $ 14,286,974 106,882,536.90 $ 15,701,885 117,944,594.71 117,944,594.71 $ 17,005,469 129,790,877.42 $ 18,225,050 29% 33% 34% 34% 34.25% 34.5% 34.75% 34.95% 35% (2,914,982.00) (3,568,337.00) (3,839,385.00) (3,927,486.61) (4,328,134.37) (4,929,006.06) (5,456,405.05) (5,943,411.54) (6,378,767.61) 7,024,593 $ 7,389,717 $ 7,452,185 $ 7,623,945 $ 8,308,754 $ 9,357,968 $ UOIG 16 10,245,480 $ 11,062,058 $ 11,846,283 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 3 – Interest-Earning Assets & Liabilities Balance Sheet Growth (R$ in thousands) Loans and advances to banks 2009A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 64,545,465 75,900,028 79,159,989 87,075,988 97,089,727 108,740,494 122,333,055 137,013,022 152,769,520 .85% 17.59% 4.30% 10.00% 11.50% 12.00% 12.50% 12.00% 11.50% 17.91% 64,053,338 9.39% 194,680,442 14.11% 18.26% 62,407,194 12.11% 234,942,522 20.68% 18.72% 8.59% 262,855,317 11.88% 18.06% 8.95% 291,769,402 11.00% 18.15% 9.20% 328,240,577 12.50% 18.15% 9.50% 372,553,055 13.50% 18.10% 9.60% 427,504,631 14.75% 17.95% 9.75% 487,355,279 14.00% 17.85% 9.85% 550,711,465 13.00% 17.80% 87,326,233 89,784,000 100,109,160 108,117,893 121,092,040 135,623,085 150,541,624 167,101,203 11.45% 32,879,788 -2.57% 10.25% 34,888,119 39.93% 10.39% 2.81% 8.72% 11.50% 8.85% 8.00% 9.10% 12.00% 9.20% 12.00% 9.25% 11.00% 9.28% 11.00% 9.50% 33,549,814 66,915,243 73,606,767 78,023,173 82,704,564 87,253,315 91,921,367 96,517,435 6.11% -3.84% 99.45% 10.00% 6.00% 6.00% 5.50% 5.35% 5.00% 9.58% 3,778,920 10.05% 9.62% 9.75% 9.85% 10.10% 10.35% 10.70% 11.00% 4,510,835 3,657,763 3,840,651 4,186,310 4,646,804 5,181,186 5,802,929 6,557,309 -3.76% 19.37% -18.91% 5.00% 9.00% 11.00% 11.50% 12.00% 13.00% 11.60% 70,498,746 8.00% 16.13% 11.65% 11.75% 11.85% 11.95% 12.10% 12.35% 75,623,917 94,667,517 111,234,332 133,481,199 162,179,657 197,048,283 239,413,664 287,296,397 35.08% 7.27% 25.18% 17.50% 20.00% 21.50% 21.50% 21.50% 20.00% 9.70% 11.60% 9.60% 9.85% 10.00% 10.20% 10.25% 10.60% 11.00% 32,553,623 59,239,456 48,722,266 51,401,991 54,486,110 58,054,950 61,973,659 66,311,816 71,119,422 306.11% 81.98% -17.75% 5.50% 6.00% 6.55% 6.75% 7.00% 7.25% 8.81% 10.32% 7.82% 8.00% 8.50% 8.50% 8.75% 8.75% 9.00% 494,975 518,296 546,918 572,897 600,109 628,614 658,474 689,751 722,514 4.35% 4.71% 5.52% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 64,001,712 % Growth Average Yield Loans and advances to customers % Growth Average Yield Financial assets held for trading % Growth Average Yield Financial assets held for sale 7.96% 170,608,470 % Growth Average Yield Investments held to maturity 9.61% 3,926,680 % Growth Average Yield Assets pledged as collateral 11.18% 52,190,117 % Growth Average Yield Central Bank compulsory deposits 8.74% 8,015,947 % Growth Average Yield Other interest-earning assets 6.67% 474,363 % Growth Average Yield Total Interest Earning Assets % Growth Average Yield Interbank Deposits Funding in open market Borrowings and onlendings Saving deposits Time deposits Funds from securities issued Subordinated debt Insurance and pension plans 12.86% 12.96% 13.10% 13.18% 13.19% 13.28% 13.42% 471,502 542,227 607,295 680,170 765,191 862,753 974,911 -12.95% -30.23% 30.76% 15.00% 12.00% 12.00% 12.50% 12.75% 13.00% 7.45% 106,591,802 12.95% 128,494,578 10.30% 152,354,820 10.45% 10.65% 10.80% 10.95% 11.10% 11.20% 185,872,880 227,694,278 280,063,963 345,878,994 428,025,255 530,751,316 32.01% 20.55% 18.57% 22.00% 22.50% 23.00% 23.50% 23.75% 24.00% 9.36% 33,869,850 10.89% 44,962,370 7.72% 8.95% 9.15% 9.20% 9.25% 9.35% 9.45% 47,408,499 50,253,009 54,775,780 61,074,994 68,556,681 77,469,050 87,733,699 16.54% 32.75% 5.44% 6.00% 9.00% 11.50% 12.25% 13.00% 13.25% 2.51% 47,792,922 12.85% 55,515,889 4.96% 62,758,934 5.00% 5.30% 5.60% 5.90% 6.15% 6.30% 71,231,390 81,203,785 92,775,324 106,227,746 122,161,908 141,097,004 21.46% 16.16% 13.05% 13.50% 14.00% 14.25% 14.50% 15.00% 15.50% 6.20% 95,818,484 6.76% 122,328,948 5.77% 117,810,860 5.90% 6.10% 6.25% 6.35% 6.50% 6.60% -3.33% 27.67% -3.69% 8.69% 9.15% 6.41% 11,501,257 28,260,014 50,848,755 45.68% 145.71% 79.93% 6.35% 8.81% 6.76% 24,410,454 25,335,543 32,278,136 15.62% 3.79% 27.40% 8.29% 11.00% 8.94% 76,641,029 89,762,154 107,519,858 15.50% 17.12% 19.78% 7.94% 7.47% 122,523,294 4.00% 6.55% 59,747,287 17.50% 6.85% 36,474,294 13.00% 9.00% 130,099,028 21.00% 7.55% 127,424,226 4.00% 6.75% 66,916,962 12.00% 7.00% 41,398,323 13.50% 9.20% 157,419,824 21.00% 7.80% 132,839,756 4.25% 7.00% 75,281,582 12.50% 7.30% 47,090,593 13.75% 9.35% 188,510,239 19.75% 8.00% 138,817,545 4.50% 7.20% 85,068,187 13.00% 7.45% 53,683,276 14.00% 9.45% 225,458,246 19.60% 8.15% 145,411,378 4.75% 7.50% 96,127,052 13.00% 7.60% 61,333,143 14.25% 9.50% 264,349,794 17.25% 8.20% 152,681,947 5.00% 7.60% 108,623,569 13.00% 7.65% 70,226,448 14.50% 9.60% 309,289,259 17.00% 8.25% 10.68% 80,746,939 9.38% 29,061,740 4.50% 39,349,069 6.23% 99,119,118 9.04% 7,894,818 9.56% 21,113,340 8.22% 66,354,013 % Growth Average Yield Total Interest Earning Liabilities 7.73% $ 344,232,714 % Growth Average Yield 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 910,600,178 $ 1,037,575,688 $ 1,179,049,451 $ 1,332,795,265 13.23% 13.94% 13.64% 13.04% 14.41% % Growth Average Yield 7.00% 804,225,098 $ 11.76% 360,575 % Growth Average Yield 7.00% 719,611,188 $ 11.34% 13.75% % Growth Average Yield 2014E 516,805 % Growth Average Yield 2013E 13.93% % Growth Average Yield 2012A 593,677 % Growth Average Yield 2011A 7.45% 7.21% 7.87% 6.86% $ 396,150,415 $ 463,847,484 $ 571,611,101 $ 646,309,013 $ 17.09% 23.23% 13.07% % Growth Average Yield 2010A 8.13% $ 397,142,603 $ 495,020,071 7.43% $ 571,451,364 $ 656,743,410 $ 757,440,473 $ 878,316,621 $ 1,024,455,866 $ 1,195,740,332 $ 1,401,378,152 15.37% 24.65% 15.44% 14.93% 15.33% 15.96% 16.64% 16.72% 17.20% 7.81% 9.45% 6.94% 7.40% 7.67% 7.89% 8.07% 8.24% 8.37% UOIG 17 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 4 – Net Interest Income Model Interest Revenue (R$ in Thousands) 2009A Loans and advances to banks 2010A 5,096,837 2011A 2012A 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 6,059,777 9,194,044 6,800,239 7,793,301 8,932,255 10,330,347 11,743,973 13,358,770 15,047,798 18.89% 51.72% -26.04% 14.60% 14.61% 15.65% 13.68% 13.75% 12.64% 35,552,902 43,975,833 47,460,302 52,956,146 59,575,665 67,432,103 76,737,081 86,992,917 98,026,641 16.35% 23.69% 7.92% 11.58% 12.50% 13.19% 13.80% 13.36% 12.68% 2,212,121 1,489,851 1,080,916 918,779 780,962 663,818 564,245 479,608 407,667 -35.78% -32.65% -27.45% -15.00% -15.00% -15.00% -15.00% -15.00% -15.00% 6,398,665 9,076,069 7,831,848 8,859,661 9,838,728 11,140,468 12,545,135 13,970,263 15,874,614 -12.78% 41.84% -13.71% 13.12% 11.05% 13.23% 12.61% 11.36% 13.63% 3,161,328 3,342,997 3,373,070 6,434,573 7,176,660 7,685,283 8,353,161 9,030,718 9,835,586 10,616,918 5.75% 0.90% 90.76% 11.53% 7.09% 8.69% 8.11% 8.91% 7.94% 438,812 438,485 360,835 589,835 447,436 491,891 550,646 619,152 702,154 809,828 -0.07% -17.71% 63.46% -24.14% 9.94% 11.94% 12.44% 13.41% 15.33% 4,561,679 6,862,222 8,744,459 9,090,234 10,956,582 13,348,120 16,542,325 20,197,449 25,377,848 31,602,604 50.43% 27.43% 3.95% 20.53% 21.83% 23.93% 22.10% 25.65% 24.53% 534,676 2,869,307 6,112,337 3,808,229 4,112,159 4,631,319 4,934,671 5,422,695 5,802,284 6,400,748 436.64% 113.02% -37.70% 7.98% 12.63% 6.55% 9.89% 7.00% 10.31% 35,707 40,774 37,540 40,103 42,008 44,003 46,093 48,283 50,576 1.04% 14.19% -7.93% 6.83% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% % Growth Loans and Advances to Customers: - Loan operations 30,556,168 % Growth - Leasing transactions 3,444,554 % Growth Financial Assests: - For trading 7,335,837 % Growth - Available for sale % Growth - Held to maturity % Growth Pledged as collateral % Growth Compulsory deposits with Brazilian Central Bank % Growth Other financial interest income 35,338 % Growth Total Interest Income $ 55,165,229 $ % Growth 63,772,183 $ 15.60% 82,367,272 $ 29.16% 83,133,716 $ 0.93% 93,260,826 $ 12.18% 105,326,231 $ 12.94% 119,991,541 $ 13.92% 136,906,542 $ 14.10% 156,567,713 4.75% $ 14.36% 178,837,393 14.22% Interest Expense (R$ in Thousands) 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Deposits from Banks: - Interbank deposits 63,381 38,521 46,693 48,582 56,662.75 64,676.87 73,458.35 83,788.43 95,765.59 -39.22% 21.21% 4.05% 16.63% 14.14% 13.58% 14.06% 14.29% 14.02% 7,570,414 9,981,262 13,996,866 11,756,969 16,635,623 20,834,026 25,765,885 31,993,807 40,020,361 50,155,999 31.85% 40.23% -16.00% 41.50% 25.24% 23.67% 24.17% 25.09% 25.33% 1,308,893 851,093 5,775,844 2,349,470 2,512,650 2,903,116 3,420,200 4,044,844 4,764,347 5,527,223 -34.98% 578.64% -59.32% 6.95% 15.54% 17.81% 18.26% 17.79% 16.01% 2,964,110 3,754,755 3,623,935 4,202,652 4,953,431 5,798,458 6,745,462 7,940,524 9,312,402 20.99% 26.67% -3.48% 15.97% 17.86% 17.06% 16.33% 17.72% 17.28% 8,962,897 8,329,374 11,198,180 7,551,805 8,025,276 8,601,135 9,298,783 9,994,863 10,905,853 11,603,828 -7.07% 34.44% -32.56% 6.27% 7.18% 8.11% 7.49% 9.11% 6.40% 754,943 730,443 2,490,536 3,439,688 4,092,689 4,684,187 5,495,555 6,337,580 7,305,656 8,309,703 -3.25% 240.96% 38.11% 18.98% 14.45% 17.32% 15.32% 15.28% 13.74% 1,735,641 2,022,578 2,787,681 2,884,331 3,282,686 3,808,646 4,402,970 5,073,070 5,826,649 6,741,739 16.53% 37.83% 3.47% 13.81% 16.02% 15.60% 15.22% 14.85% 15.71% 5,128,627 6,083,511 6,705,431 7,985,971 9,822,477 12,278,746 15,080,819 18,374,847 21,676,683 25,516,364 % Growth - Funding in the open market % Growth - Borrowings and onlending % Growth 109,190.02 Deposits from Customers: - Saving deposits 2,449,921 % Growth - Time deposits % Growth Funds from securities issued % Growth Subordinated debt % Growth Insurance and pension plans % Growth Total Interest Expense 18.62% $ 27,974,717 $ 31,000,892 $ 27,190,512 $ 32,771,291 % Growth Net Interest Income 10.22% $ 46,755,986 $ 35,611,286 10.82% % Growth 19.10% $ 39,640,751 $ 43,492,965 50.82% 23.00% $ 48,630,716 $ 44,630,110 (15.22%) 25.01% $ 58,127,965 $ 47,198,265 22.68% 22.82% $ 69,336,128 $ 50,655,413 19.53% 21.84% $ 82,648,261 $ 54,258,281 19.28% 17.97% $ 98,535,838 $ 58,031,875 19.20% 8.67% 22.13% 2.61% 5.75% 7.32% 7.11% 6.95% 6.08% (11,510,179) (12,123,052.47) (13,397,904.56) (14,920,100.01) (17,044,968.27) (19,355,417.33) (21,104,429.54) 259,225,907 310,842,550 342,015,306 378,845,390 425,330,304 481,293,549 549,837,686 624,368,301 4.61% 2.22% 2.67% 3.37% 3.20% 3.15% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10% % Growth $ 19.02% (8,296,151) 234,610,182 16,380,901 61,560,944 20.52% Loans outstanding $ $ (5,756,125) (10,809,611) Net-Interest Income (after PLL) 117,276,448 19.22% Provision for Loan Losses % of Loans 17.71% $ 27,015,166 64.92% $ 27,315,135 1.11% $ 31,982,786 17.09% $ 32,507,058 1.64% $ 33,800,361 3.98% $ 35,735,313 5.72% UOIG 18 $ 37,213,312 4.14% $ 38,676,458 3.93% 703,480,985 3.00% $ 40,456,515 4.60% December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 5 – Non-Interest Income Model Non-Interest Income Model (R$ in thousands) Net fee and commission income % of Total Income % Growth Net gains/(losses) on financial assets helf for trading % of Total Income % Growth Net gains/(losses) on financial assets available for sale % of Total Income % Growth Premiums retained from insurance and pension plans % of Total Income % Growth Equity in the earnings of associates % of Total Income % Growth Other non-interest income % of Total Income % Growth Total Non Interest Income % Growth 2009A 7,847,382 7.66% 5,983,781 5.84% 757,255 .74% 24,118,550 23.55% 728,867 .71% 7,828,125 7.64% $ Non-Interest Expense Model ($ in thousands) Personnel expenses % of Expenses % Growth Administrative expenses % of Expenses % Growth Depreciation and amortization % of Expenses % Growth Changes in insurance provisions and pension plans % of Expenses % Growth Retained claims % of Expenses % Growth Selling expenses on insurance and pension plans % of Expenses % Growth Net gains/(losses) of foreign currency transactions % of Expenses % Growth Other non-interest expense % of Expenses % Growth Total Non-Interest Expense % Growth 47,263,960 $ 2009A (7,334,164) 9.28% (8,138,058) 10.29% (1,516,529) 1.92% (12,780,545) 16.17% (8,329,154) 10.54% (1,230,835) 1.56% (897,638) 1.14% (10,852,765) 13.73% $ (51,079,688) $ 2010A 9,394,538 8.50% 19.72% 2,212,733 2.00% -63.02% 754,416 .68% -0.37% 27,994,116 25.33% 16.07% 577,053 .52% -20.83% 5,833,854 5.28% -25.48% 46,766,710 $ -1.1% 2011A 10,834,333 7.83% 15.33% (608,270) (.44%) -127.49% 365,302 .26% -51.58% 34,315,543 24.82% 22.58% 682,122 .49% 18.21% 10,327,155 7.47% 77.02% 55,916,185 $ 19.6% 2012A 12,804,795 8.54% 18.19% 2,110,113 1.41% 446.90% 1,895,974 1.27% 419.02% 40,176,745 26.81% 17.08% 870,662 .58% 27.64% 8,865,636 5.92% -14.15% 66,723,925 $ 19.3% 2013E 13,957,227 8.16% 9.00% 3,376,181 1.97% 60.00% 1,516,779 .89% -20.00% 48,212,094 28.18% 20.00% 1,044,794 .61% 20.00% 9,707,871 5.67% 9.50% 77,814,946 $ 16.6% 2014E 15,680,944 8.01% 12.35% 4,389,035 2.24% 30.00% 1,365,101 .70% -10.00% 57,131,331 29.17% 18.50% 1,253,753 .64% 20.00% 10,678,659 5.45% 10.00% 90,498,824 $ 16.3% 2015E 17,562,657 7.82% 12.00% 5,047,390 2.25% 15.00% 1,269,544 .57% -7.00% 67,557,799 30.07% 18.25% 1,504,504 .67% 20.00% 11,746,524 5.23% 10.00% 104,688,420 $ 15.7% 2016E 20,056,555 7.77% 14.20% 5,552,129 2.15% 10.00% 1,180,676 .46% -7.00% 79,549,309 30.84% 17.75% 1,805,405 .70% 20.00% 12,921,177 5.01% 10.00% 121,065,250 $ 15.6% 2017E 22,262,776 7.54% 11.00% 5,996,300 2.03% 8.00% 1,098,029 .37% -7.00% 92,873,818 31.46% 16.75% 2,166,486 .73% 20.00% 14,213,295 4.82% 10.00% 138,610,702 $ 14.5% 2018E 24,711,681 7.36% 11.00% 6,356,078 1.89% 6.00% 1,021,167 .30% -7.00% 106,804,891 31.79% 15.00% 2,599,783 .77% 20.00% 15,634,624 4.65% 10.00% 157,128,223 13.4% 2010A (8,794,017) 9.83% 19.90% (9,761,445) 10.91% 19.95% (1,966,433) 2.20% 29.67% (14,272,242) 15.95% 11.67% (9,577,429) 10.71% 14.99% (1,566,715) 1.75% 27.29% (682,961) .76% -23.92% (11,836,517) 13.23% 9.06% 2011A (11,150,970) 9.67% 26.80% (11,477,134) 9.95% 17.58% (2,120,335) 1.84% 7.83% (18,212,405) 15.80% 27.61% (11,168,612) 9.69% 16.61% (1,858,351) 1.61% 18.61% 2,625,813 (2.28%) 284.47% (15,185,857) 13.17% 28.30% 2012A (11,656,422) 9.49% 4.53% (11,900,383) 9.69% 3.69% (2,538,260) 2.07% 19.71% (23,326,101) 18.99% 28.08% (13,123,833) 10.68% 17.51% (2,313,795) 1.88% 24.51% (951,385) .77% -136.23% (17,394,300) 14.16% 14.54% 2013E (12,239,243) 8.57% 5.00% (12,525,153) 8.77% 5.25% (3,045,912) 2.13% 20.00% (28,224,582) 19.76% 21.00% (15,486,123) 10.84% 18.00% (2,869,106) 2.01% 24.00% (665,970) .47% -30.00% (19,133,730) 13.40% 10.00% 2014E (12,912,401) 7.86% 5.50% (13,214,037) 8.04% 5.50% (3,502,799) 2.13% 15.00% (32,458,270) 19.76% 15.00% (18,273,625) 11.12% 18.00% (3,564,864) 2.17% 24.25% (599,373) .36% -10.00% (21,621,115) 13.16% 13.00% 2015E (13,622,584) 7.20% 5.50% (13,907,773) 7.35% 5.25% (4,028,219) 2.13% 15.00% (37,327,010) 19.72% 15.00% (21,608,562) 11.42% 18.25% (4,438,256) 2.35% 24.50% (539,435) .29% -10.00% (24,431,860) 12.91% 13.00% 2016E (14,371,826) 6.58% 5.50% (14,603,162) 6.69% 5.00% (4,632,451) 2.12% 15.00% (42,926,061) 19.66% 15.00% (25,552,124) 11.70% 18.25% (5,547,820) 2.54% 25.00% (485,492) .22% -10.00% (27,608,002) 12.64% 13.00% 2017E (15,090,417) 6.00% 5.00% (15,333,320) 6.10% 5.00% (5,327,319) 2.12% 15.00% (49,364,971) 19.64% 15.00% (30,215,387) 12.02% 18.25% (6,657,383) 2.65% 20.00% (436,943) .17% -10.00% (30,437,822) 12.11% 10.25% 2018E (15,844,938) 5.49% 5.00% (16,061,653) 5.56% 4.75% (6,126,417) 2.12% 15.00% (55,782,417) 19.32% 13.00% (35,729,695) 12.38% 18.25% (7,988,860) 2.77% 20.00% (393,248) .14% -10.00% (33,481,604) 11.60% 10.00% (58,457,759) $ (68,547,851) $ (83,204,479) $ (94,189,819) $ (106,146,483) $ (119,903,698) $ (135,726,938) $ (152,863,562) $ (171,408,832) 14.4% 17.3% 21.4% 13.2% 12.7% 13.0% UOIG 19 13.2% 12.6% 12.1% December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 6 –Excess Return Model Assumptions Excess Return Model Assumptions Tax Rate Risk Free Rate Beta Market Risk Premium % Equity % Debt Cost of Debt CAPM Exchange Rate (USD/BRL) Considerations 30.00% Terminal Growth Rate 3.00% 2.76% Terminal Value 37,918,071 1.45 PV of Terminal Value 21,844,008 5.75% Sum of PV Free Cash Flows 16,890,176 100.00% Excess Equity Value 38,734,184 0.00% Current Book Value 78,970,335 N/A Market Capitalization 117,704,519 11.08% Fully Diluted Shares 3,817,413 2.3345 Implied Price (Brazilian Real $) 30.83 Implied Price (USD $) 13.21 Current Price 13.27 Overvalued Final Implied Price (0.47%) Price Target Weight Excess Return Model 13.21 70.00% Forward Comparables Analysis 14.66 30.00% Price Target $13.64 Current Price 13.27 Undervalued 2.82% UOIG 20 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 7 – Beta Analysis Vasicek Beta Company Banco Santander Itau Unibanco Holding Banco de Chile ICICI Bank Royal Bank of Canada HDFC Bank Ltd. U.S Bancorp Wells Fargo Beta Variance Weight Vasicek Beta Beta 1.37 1.54 0.76 1.68 1.09 1.46 1.56 2.00 5 Year Daily Weighting SD 0.0503 0.0380 0.0352 0.0501 0.0262 0.0418 0.0451 0.0528 20.00% 20.00% 7.50% 10.00% 7.50% 15.00% 15.00% 5.00% Industry Banco Bradesco 1.44 0.0019 1.46 0.0013 40% 1.45 60% Banco Santander Itau Unibanco Holding Banco de Chile ICICI Bank Royal Bank of Canada HDFC Bank Ltd. U.S Bancorp Wells Fargo Beta Variance Weight Vasicek Beta Beta 1.37 1.54 0.76 1.68 1.09 1.46 1.56 2.00 0.0025 0.0014 0.0012 0.0025 0.0007 0.0017 0.0020 0.0028 Hamada Beta Beta Weighting D/E Banco Santander Itau Unibanco Holding Banco de Chile ICICI Bank Royal Bank of Canada HDFC Bank Ltd. U.S Bancorp Wells Fargo 1.37 1.54 0.76 1.68 1.09 1.46 1.56 2.00 25.00% 25.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 5.00% 5.00% 501.14% 626.90% 237.70% 277.80% 169.00% 129.50% 132.90% 117.10% 9.43% 18.56% 10.37% 25.57% 21.73% 30.09% 28.94% 31.97% SD 0.0503 0.0380 0.0352 0.0501 0.0262 0.0418 0.0451 0.0528 20.00% 20.00% 7.50% 10.00% 7.50% 15.00% 15.00% 5.00% Industry Banco Bradesco 1.44 0.0019 1.46 0.0013 40% 1.45 60% Tax Rate Unlevered Beta 552% 28.00% Weighted Average Unlevered Beta 5 Year Daily Weighting 5 year Daily Company Banco Bradesco Levered Banco Bradesco Beta Vasicek Beta Company Variance Variance 0.0025 0.0014 0.0012 0.0025 0.0007 0.0017 0.0020 0.0028 0.42 1.46 2.11 Hamada Beta 5 year Daily Company Beta Weighting D/E Banco Santander Itau Unibanco Holding Banco de Chile ICICI Bank Royal Bank of Canada HDFC Bank Ltd. U.S Bancorp Wells Fargo 1.37 1.54 0.76 1.68 1.09 1.46 1.56 2.00 25.00% 25.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 5.00% 5.00% 501.14% 626.90% 237.70% 277.80% 169.00% 129.50% 132.90% 117.10% 9.43% 18.56% 10.37% 25.57% 21.73% 30.09% 28.94% 31.97% Tax Rate Unlevered Beta 552% 28.00% Weighted Average Unlevered Beta Banco Bradesco Levered Banco Bradesco Beta 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.55 0.47 0.77 0.80 1.11 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.55 0.47 0.77 0.80 1.11 0.42 1.46 2.11 UOIG 21 December 3rd, 2013 University of Oregon Investment Group Appendix 8 – Sensitivity Analysis Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued) Risk Free Rate 13 2.36% 2.56% 2.76% 2.96% 3.16% (0) 2.36% 2.56% 2.76% 1.40 14.33 13.97 13.63 13.31 13.01 1.40 8.02% 5.30% 1.43 14.07 13.73 13.40 13.09 12.80 1.43 6.05% 3.44% 1.45 13.82 13.49 13.18 12.88 12.60 1.45 4.16% 1.48 13.58 13.26 12.96 12.67 12.40 1.48 1.50 13.35 13.04 12.75 12.48 12.22 1.50 Adjusted Beta Adjusted Beta Risk Free Rate Implied Price 2.96% 3.16% 2.73% 0.31% (1.99%) 0.97% (1.35%) (3.56%) 1.65% (0.71%) (2.95%) (5.07%) 2.34% (0.06%) (2.33%) (4.48%) (6.53%) 0.60% (1.71%) (3.89%) (5.96%) (7.93%) Undervalued/(Overvalued) Risk Free Rate 13.21 2.28% 2.48% 2.76% 2.88% 3.08% (0) 2.28% 2.48% 2.68% 2.88% 3.08% 0.048 17.23 16.68 15.98 15.70 15.26 0.048 29.83% 25.73% 21.91% 18.33% 14.99% 0.053 15.43 15.00 14.45 14.22 13.87 0.053 16.25% 13.04% 10.02% 7.18% 4.50% 0.058 14.00 13.66 13.21 13.03 12.74 0.058 5.52% 2.94% 0.50% (1.80%) (3.98%) 0.063 12.85 12.57 12.20 12.05 11.81 0.068 11.91 11.67 11.37 11.24 11.04 Market Risk Premium Market Risk Premium Risk Free Rate 0.063 (3.15%) (5.26%) (7.26%) (9.16%) (10.97%) 0.068 (10.29%) (12.04%) (13.71%) (15.30%) (16.82%) Undervalued/(Overvalued) 13 2.0% Terminal Growth Rate 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 1.40 13.29 13.45 13.63 13.83 14.06 1.43 13.08 13.23 13.39 13.58 13.79 1.45 12.88 13.02 13.17 13.34 13.54 1.48 12.69 12.82 12.96 13.11 13.29 1.50 12.50 12.62 12.75 12.90 13.06 (0) 2.0% 1.40 0.16% 1.35% 1.43 (1.41%) 1.45 (2.91%) 1.48 1.50 4.0% 2.69% 4.22% 5.97% (0.30%) 0.94% 2.35% 3.95% (1.89%) (0.75%) 0.55% 2.03% (4.37%) (3.42%) (2.37%) (1.17%) 0.19% (5.77%) (4.90%) (3.92%) (2.82%) (1.58%) Implied Price Undervalued/(Overvalued) Terminal Growth Rate Terminal Growth Rate 13.21 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5% (0) 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.5% 2.13 14.23 14.23 14.48 14.77 15.14 2.13 7.23% 7.23% 9.09% 11.32% 14.07% 2.23 13.59 13.59 13.83 14.11 14.46 8.95% 2.33 12.98 12.98 13.21 13.48 13.81 2.43 12.45 12.45 12.67 12.92 13.24 2.53 11.96 11.96 12.17 12.41 12.72 Exchange Rate Exchange Rate Terminal Growth Rate 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% Adjusted Beta Adjusted Beta Implied Price 2.23 2.42% 2.42% 4.20% 6.33% 2.33 -2.16% -2.16% -0.47% 1.57% 4.07% 2.43 -6.18% -6.18% -4.56% -2.60% -0.20% 2.53 -9.88% -9.88% -8.32% -6.44% -4.14% UOIG 22 University of Oregon Investment Group December 3rd, 2013 Appendix 9 – Sources SEC Filings Bradesco Company Investor Relations page Company presentations Press releases Earnings call transcripts IBIS World Factset Trading Economics Bloomberg Yahoo Finance Reuters Google Finance Financial Times Morning Star FinViz Damodaran Publications UOIG 23