UVS International 02

Transcription

Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
UAS Nordic 2009 Conference
Oslo, Norway – November 24, 2009
UAS: THE GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
Peter van Blyenburgh
What is UVS International?
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
1997
Non-profit association founded in Paris, France as Euro UVS
1999
EURO UVS is registered in Den Haag, The Netherlands
2004
Changed its name to UVS International – Global Scope
Operates: Out of offices in Paris, France
2009
263 Corporate & Institutional Members in 38 countries
111 Honorary Members - 24 countries & 7 international orgs
Nat. military & CAAs + EASA + EDA + EUROCONTROL + FAA + NATO
www.uvs-info.com
November 24, 2009
World’s largest generic UAS & UGV web site
CAA = Civil Aviation Authority
EDA = European Defence Agency
EASA = European Aviation Safety Agency
FAA = Federal Aviation Administration
Page: 2/70
Members & Affiliations
= Honorary Mbrs

Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belarus
Belgium
Botswana
Brazil
Canada
China
Czech Rep.
Denmark
Finland
France

Germany
Greece
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Israel
Italy
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
= Corporate Mbrs

Working Groups Instigated by UVSI - UAV DACH
Partner Organizations
- ADE, India
- Eurocontrol EC, France
- Eurosatory
- Japan UAV Association
- UVS France, France
- UAVS, UK
- UVS Canada
- IWGLUAS
- ICC
- AVBS, Czech Rep.
- European Air Sports Ass.
- Intern. Aviation Grp, China
- RCAPA, USA
- UAS Norway, Norway
- UATAR, Australia
- UVS Korea, S. Korea
Portugal
Russian Fed.
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
UK
USA
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
263 Members
38 Countries
10 International Orgs.
- EUROCAE WG73
Member - RTCA SC 203
Participant - ICAO UAS SG
- EC UAS Conf.
Org. Committee
Mutual Memberships
- ATCA, USA
- EUGIN, Belgium
- EUROCAE, France
- European Institute, USA
Instigated by UVS International
November 24, 2009
Page: 3/70
Board of Directors
Peter van Blyenburgh
Blyenburgh & Co., France
President
nd
(2 year - 6th mandate)
15 members
12 countries
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Jean Caron
EADS DS, France
Treasurer
nd
(2 year - 4th mandate)
Nick Miller
Thales Aerospace, UK
Secretary
st
(1 year – 3rd mandate)
Patrick Barrier
ATE
South Africa
st
(1 year – 1st mandate)
Patrice Chenière
Sagem DS
France
nd
(2 year - 2nd mandate)
Ian Glenn
ING Engineering
Canada
nd
(2 year - 1st mandate)
Ole Vidar Homleid
Robot Aviation
Norway
st
Richard Kennedy
Boeing R&T
Spain
nd
David Kershaw
BAE Systems
UK
nd
Alexander Koldaev
Irkut Corp.
Russian Fed.
nd
Manfred Lehnigk
Diehl BGT Defence
Germany
nd
Steve May
General Atomics
USA
nd
Itai Toren
Elbit Systems
Israel
year - 1st mandate)
Robert Veenhuizen
CybAero
Sweden
nd
John Walker
Padina Group
USA
nd
November 24, 2009
(2nd
Page: 4/70
WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?
Remotely Piloted Aircraft (System)
or
Unmanned Aircraft (System)
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
AIRCRAFT
Europe
Certified/Approved
Not Certified (models)
Civil
State (Military & Non-Military)
< 150 kg
> 150 kg
Piloted
Remote Pilot
Pilot-less (tethered objects)
Optional Remote Pilot
Human
Onboard Pilot
Machine
Pilot in Command
November 24, 2009
Page: 5/70
REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT
Purpose-Built Aircraft
Converted Aircraft
Civil
State (Military & Non-Military)
Europe
LUAS
November 24, 2009
< 150 kg
UAS
> 150 kg
OPA
Page: 6/70
TERMS & DEFINITIONS – 1/4
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Produced by the UVS International-instigated Interim Working Group on Light UAS (IWGLUAS)
Submitted to EUROCAE, EUROCONTROL, FAA & ICAO for consideration
Aircraft
ICAO Annex 8
Unmanned
Any machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from the reaction
of the air other than the reaction of the air against the earth’s surface.
No person on board capable of exercising any control over the aircraft.
Unmanned aircraft (UA)
An aircraft designed to operate with no person on board
capable of exercising any control over the aircraft.
Light Unmanned Aircraft (LUA)
Unmanned aircraft system (UAS)
Non-Recreational Purposes
Unmanned aircraft with a mass of less than 150 kg.
The combination of unmanned aircraft (UA), the
system elements necessary to enable the taxiing,
take-off/launch, flight and recovery/landing of UA,
and required to accomplish its mission objectives.
Acronyms are invariant and refer both to singular & plural.
November 24, 2009
Page: 7/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Unmanned aircraft system (UAS)
UAS system elements
The combination of unmanned aircraft (UA), the
system elements necessary to enable the taxiing,
take-off/launch, flight and recovery/landing of UA,
and required to accomplish its mission objectives.
- Unmanned aircraft
- Control station(s) / pilot station(s)
- Software
- Health monitoring
- Communication link (s) (command & control + data)
- Data terminal (s) (payload exploitation)
- Payload (s)
- Launch & recovery systems
- Flight termination system (s)
- Support & maintenance equipment
- Power generation, distribution & supply
- Air traffic control communications equipment (voice + data)
- Handling, storage & transport equipment
- All required documentation related to aforementioned
November 24, 2009
Page: 8/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
UAS operator (UAS-o)
The legal entity approved for the operation of a UAS.
UAS crew (UAS-c)
All persons assigned to fulfil specific functions relative
to the correct & safe operation of the UAS.
UAS commander (UAS-cdr)
The person who has overall authority & responsibility for
the safe operation of a UAS during a specific mission.
The UAS-cdr may also fulfil the UAS pilot function.
UAS pilot (UAS-p)
The person in direct control of the UA whilst the engine
is running and responsible to the UAS-cdr.
The UAS-p may have direct control of more than one UA.
UAS crew member (UAS-cm)
A person assigned to perform specific duties prior to UA
flight, during the operation of the UAS, and after
recovery or landing of the UA.
November 24, 2009
Page: 9/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Automatic
Execution of a predefined process that requires UAS-c initiation.
Communication
link
A data link to transfer voice or data between the UAS crew, air
traffic control, airspace users and other data users.
Control link
A data link for up-linking command instructions and downlinking status between the UA and the control station (s).
Data link
A term referring to all interconnections to, from and within the
UAS. It includes control, communication, and payload links.
Control station (CS)
Pilot station (PS)
A facility or device (s) from which a UAV is controlled for all
phases of flight. There may be more than one control station as
part of a UAV system.
Optionally piloted
aircraft (OPA)
Aircraft that may be operated by an onboard pilot or without an
onboard pilot.
Payload
All elements of a UA that are not necessary for flight but are
carried for the purpose of fulfilling specific mission objectives.
November 24, 2009
Page: 10/70
10/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
UAS Airframe & Propulsion
Fixed Wing
Single Wing (High, mid, low)
Flying Wing
Circular Wing
Folding Wing
Morphing Wing
Twin Wing
Tail-Sitter
Tilt Body
Tilt Wing
Rotary Wing
Motorised Rotor
Non-Motorized Rotor
Non-Motorized Rotor with
Tip Propulsion
Canard Rotor Wing
Pendulum Rotor
Shrouded Rotor
Tilt Rotor
Motorized Para-foil
Lighter-than-Air
Flapping Wing
Optionally Piloted Aircraft
Converted Manned Aircraft
November 24, 2009
Single Engine
Twin Engines
Pusher Engine
Puller Engine
Push + Puller Engines
Rotor + Pusher Engines
Propeller driven
Rotor driven
Jet driven
Photo-electric cells
Fuel Cell
Hydrogen
Chemical Muscle
2-Stroke
Diesel
Electric
Gasoline
Kerosene
Page: 11/70
11/70
UAS Launch Methods
- Manned Aircraft or Balloon
- Tracked Para-foil Exdrone
- UAS (Predator)
Finder
Bungee Cord
(hand-tensioned)
DragonEye
Canister-launched
(hand-held)
- Black Widow
Car/Truck-launched
- Aerosonde
- Snow Goose
Container-launched
- Pneumatic
Neptune
- RATO
KZO
Hand-launched
- Aladin
- Tracker/DRAC
Launcher
- Bungee
LUNA
- Hydraulic
Phoenix
- Pneumatic
Sperwer
- Atmospheric
Vulture Mk II
RATO (rocket assisted take-off)
Pioneer
Sea Surface Take-Off
- Aelius
- Gull
Sub-surface launched
Under development
Submarine Tube-launched
Under development
Weapon-Launched
Under development
Wheeled Take-Off
- Predator
- Global Hawk
Wheeled Take-Off + Other
- RATO
- Hunter
- Pneumatic launch - Shadow
VTOL
- FireScout
- S-100
- RMax
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Air-Launched
November 24, 2009
L3 BAI Aerosystems
NRL
AeroVironment
AeroVironment
Aerosonde
MMIST
DRS Technologies
Rheinmetall DE
EMT
EADS DS
EMT
BAE Systems
Sagem
ATE
Pioneer UAV Inc
Aeroart
Warrior Marine
General Atomics AS
Northrop Grumman
NorGru & IAI
AAI Corp.
Northrop Grumman
Schiebel
Yamaha Motor Co
Page: 12/70
12/70
UAS Recovery Methods
Belly Landing
Deep Stall
Expendable
Net Recovery-Land - No airbag
Net Recovery-Land + Airbag
Net Recovery-Naval
Parachute & A/C in standard position
Parachute & A/C in upside-down position
Parachute + Airbag
Parafoil
Skid Landing
In-Flight Recovery by Manned Aircraft
Vertical Cable - Wing Snatch (SkyHook)
VTOL
Sea Surface Landing
Wheeled Recovery
Wheeled Recovery with Arresting Hook
November 24, 2009
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Aerosonde
Aladin
Harpy
- LUNA
- SilverFox
Vulture Mk II
Pioneer
Numerous
Phoenix
Sperwer
Snow Goose
- Sojka III
- Ranger
Aerosonde
EMT
IMI
EMT
Adv. Ceramics Research
ATE
Pioneer UAV Inc.
BAE Systems
Sagem
MMIST
VTUL a PVO
RUAG Aerospace
ScanEagle
- FireScout
- S-100
- RPH2
- Aelius
- Gull
- Neptune
- Neptune
Predator
- Hunter
- Hermes 450
Boeing/Insitu
Northrop Grumman
Schiebel
Fuji Heavy Ind.
Aeroart
Warrior Marine
L3 BAI Aerosystems
DRS Technologies
General Atomics AS
NorGru + IAI-Malat
Elbit Systems
Page: 13/70
13/70
UAS Launch Methods
Maritime Launch & Recovery
Pioneer UAV, Inc., USA
Pioneer
November 24, 2009
Insitu, Inc. & Boeing, USA
ScanEagle
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Schiebel, Austria
S-100
Page: 14/70
14/70
UAS Launch Methods
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Insitu, Inc. & Boeing, USA
ScanEagle
AeroVironment, USA
Aqua Puma
DRS Technologies, USA
Neptune
Advanced Ceramics Research, USA
SilverFox
November 24, 2009
Page: 15/70
15/70
UAS Launch Methods
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Applied Research Associates &
SPAWAR, USA
TACMAV
Aeroart, France
Aelius
Warrior (Aero-Marine), UK
Gull
November 24, 2009
Page: 16/70
16/70
UAS CATEGORIES
Mass
η
μ
Mini
CR
SR
MR
MRE
LADP
LALE
MALE
HALE
Strato
EXO
UCAV
LET
DEC
TGT
Endurance
Range
Flight Alt.
Nano
< 0,025 kg
Micro
<5
Mini
< 20/25/30/150
Close Range
25-150
Short Range
50-250
Medium Range
150-500
MR Endurance
500-1500
Low Alt. Deep Penetration 250-2500
Low Alt. Long Endurance 15-25
Medium Alt. Long Endur. 1000-1500
High Alt. Long Endurance 2500-5000
Stratospheric
>2500
Exo-stratospheric
TBD
Unmanned combat AV
>1000
Lethal
TBD
Decoys
150-500
Aerial Targets
10-10.000
< 1 km
< 10
< 10
10 - 30
30 - 70
70 - 200
> 500
> 250
> 500
> 500
> 2000
> 2000
TBD
+/- 1500
300
0 - 500
5 – 200
100 m
250
150 m
3.000
3.000
5.000
8.000
50 - 9.000
3.000
5/8.000
20.000
> 20.000
> 30.500
12.000
4.000
50 - 5.000
50 – 10.000
= According to national legal restrictions
= Can currently be armed
= Capable of carrying ordnance
= Expendable
November 24, 2009
< 1 hour
1
<2
2–4
3-6
6 - 10
10 - 18
0,5 - 1
> 24
24 - 48
24 - 48
> 48
TBD
+/- 2
3-4
<4
> 0,5

Page: 17/70
17/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
International UAS Activity
2009 = 1190 Systems - 422 Producers - 61 Countries
Algeria
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bahrain
Belarus
Belgium
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Chile
China (PR)
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Rep.
Egypt
Equator
Finland
France

= UAS in Inventory

Germany
Greece
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Italy
Japan
Jordan
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
= Producing Countries

Romania
Russia
Serbia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
UAE
UK
Ukraine
USA
= Ongoing R&D

= Future Producers?
World total
49
World total
43
World total
54
World total
10
Europe
16
Europe
23
Europe
21
Europe
3
November 24, 2009
Page: 18/70
18/70
UAS Categories (I)
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Nano
Micro
ProxDynamics, Norway
Hornet 1 – 15 grams
TU Delft, Netherlands
Delfly – 3 grams
NRL, USA
Mite
AeroVironment, USA
Wasp I
Miraterra, USA
DragonSlayer
Mini
Sirehna, France
Elsa
SurveyCopter, France
Copter 1
EADS DS, France
Tracker (DRAC)
Elbit Systems, Israel
SkyLark I
Mini
(LighterThanAir)
PixScene, France
Airstar
November 24, 2009
Skive Aviation, Switzerland
Skive
Gates Technologies, France
GT AirCat
Page: 19/70
19/70
UAS Categories (II)
Yamaha, Japan
RMax II
EMT, Germany
Luna
Schiebel, Austria
Camcopter
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
CybAero, Sweden
CR
Close
Range
(CR)
Elbit Systems
Israel
SkyLark II
Singapore Technologies, Singapore
SkyBlade II
Adv. Ceramics Research, USA
Silver Fox
Short
Range
(SR)
ATE, South Africa
Vulture MK II
November 24, 2009
Schiebel, Austria
S-100
VTUL a PVO, Czech Rep
Sojka III
Aerovision, Spain - Fulmar
Page: 20/70
20/70
UAS Categories (III)
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Short
Range
(SR)
Aurora FS, USA
GoldenEye 50
AAI Corp., USA
Shadow 200
EADS DS, France
Orka
November 24, 2009
BAE Systems, UK
Phoenix
Sagem, France
Sperwer
Rheinmetall DE,
Germany
KZO
Yakovlev, Russia
Pchela
RUAG, Switzerland
Ranger
IAI-Malat Div., Israel &
Northrop Grumman, USA
Hunter
Sagem, France
Crecerelle
FireScout
Medium
Range
(MR)
Bell Helicopter, USA
Eagle Eye
Page: 21/70
21/70
UAS Categories (IV)
Thales, UK & Elbit Systems, Israel
Watchkeeper
Denel Aerospace, S.Africa
Seeker II
Sagem, France
Sperwer B
Galileo Avionica, Italy
Falco
IAI-Malat Div., Israel
E-Hunter
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Medium
Range
Endurance
(MRE)
AAI Corp, USA
Shadow 600
Low Altitude
Deep
Penetration
(LADP)
EADS DS, France &
Galileo Avionica, Italy
Carapas
November 24, 2009
EADS DS, France &
EADS, Germany
CL289
Galileo Avionica
Italy
Nibbio
Page: 22/70
22/70
UAS Categories (V)
Boeing & InSitu Group, USA
ScanEagle
General Atomics AS, USA
Predator A
Boeing, USA
A-160 Hummingbird
November 24, 2009
Aerosonde (AAI), Australia
Aerosonde Mk III
EADS DS, France
Eagle 1
Denel Aerospace, South Africa
Bateleur
Boeing & Insitu, USA
Integrator
Elbit Systems, Israel
Hermes 1500
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Low
Altitude
Long
Endurance
(LALE)
Medium
Altitude
Long
Endurance
(MALE)
IAI-Malat Div., , Israel
Heron TP
Page: 23/70
23/70
UAS Categories (VI)
BAE Systems, UK
Mantis
General Atomics AS, USA
Predator B
November 24, 2009
AeroVironment, USA
Global Observer
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Medium
Altitude
Long
Endurance
(MALE)
EADS Military Aircraft Systems, Germany
Talarion
Page: 24/70
24/70
UAS Categories (VII)
RQ-4B
Global Hawk
RQ-4A
Global Hawk
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
High
Altitude
Long
Endurance
(HALE)
Stratospheric
Long
Endurance
(STRA LE)
Aurora Flight Sciences, USA
Odysseus
November 24, 2009
EADS MAS, Germany &
EuroHawk
Page: 25/70
25/70
UAS Categories (VIII)
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
EADS MAS, Germany
Barracuda
BAE Systems, UK
Corax
Dassault, France +
Euro consortium
Neuron
Saab, Sweden
Sharc
Alenia Aeronautica, Italy
Sky-X
Unmanned
Combat
Aerial
Vehicle
(UCAV)
Boeing, USA
X-45A
X-47B
Boeing, USA
X-46
November 24, 2009
X-47A
Page: 26/70
26/70
UAS Categories (IX)
Sirehna//Sonovia/EADS
(Dyn’Aero), France
MCR/Surveyor 2500
Boeing, USA
LittleBird
Irkut, Russia (Stemme, Germany)
Irkut 850
Aurora FS, USA - Aeronautics, Israel Rheinmetall DE, Germany
(Diamond, Austria)
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Optionally
Piloted
Aircraft
(OPA)
Excelnet, Malaysia
Eagle
Converted
Manned
Aircraft
Sagem D&S, France (Stemme, Germany)
Patroller
November 24, 2009
BAE Systems, UK (J&AS Aero Design, Poland)
Herti 1A
Herti 1D
Page: 27/70
27/70
Model Aircraft
RECREATIONAL Purposes
Toys
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Model Aircraft (<20-25 kg & >20/25 & <150kg)
Very Large Model Aircraft (> 150 kg)
November 24, 2009
Page: 28/70
28/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Military UAS Types in Service in
per Country (Europe & USA)
LUAS
Albania
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Rep.
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Nr Systems
Total
November 24, 2009
UAS Total
1
1
1
1
1
1<
1
2
1
1
3
2 + 2*
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
5
5
1
1
1
4
LUAS
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Macedonia
Montenegro
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
UK
USA
Light UAS (<150 kg)
UAS (> 150 kg)
Europe
11
28
39
UAS Total
2
2
4
1
1
2
1
1
1*
1
18
1
2
1 + 1*
1
1
1
1
3 + 1*
5
14
32
USA
18
14
32
* = On order
< = Terminated
Page: 29/70
29/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Military Applications
CURRENT
FUTURE
Command & Control Relay
Decoy
Battle Damage Assessment
Psychological Warfare
Reconnaissance
Surveillance
Target Designation
Treaty Monitoring
Weapons Delivery
DRIVERS:
November 24, 2009
Aerial Mine Detection
Artillery Correction
Battle Management
Comms & Data Relay
Digital Mapping
Electronic Warfare
Flight Path Recce
NRBC Recce
Perimetric Surveillance
Radar Jamming
Radar Saturation
Sensor Delivery
SIGINT
Urban Warfare
Offensive Missions:
-anti-radar
-anti-vehicle
-anti-ship
-anti-structure
Maritime Surveillance
Dangerous missions -> No risk to pilot
Lesser political risks
Information = Power & Permits Precision Strike
Cost-Effectiveness in relation to manned A/C
Page: 30/70
30/70
Out-of-Country Military Deployments
Bosnia
France
UN
USA
’93-’96
Crecerelle
Fox AT
Gnat 750
Pioneer
Predator
Kosovo ’98-’99
France
CL-289
Crecerelle
Hunter
Germany
CL-289
UK
Phoenix
USA
Hunter
Pioneer
Predator
Kosovo ’05
Belgium
Hunter
Australia ’01 +++
USA
Global Hawk
Djibouti/Yemen ’02
USA
Predator
East Timor ’02
Australia
Aerosonde III
Solomon Islands ’03
Australia
Aerosonde III
Avatar
November 24, 2009
Afghanistan ’01-now
Australia
Scan Eagle
Canada
Sperwer
SkyLark
Heron ScanEagle
France
SIDM/Harfung
Skorpio
Sperwer
Germany
Aladin
KZO
LUNA
Italy
Predator A
Netherlands Aladin
SkyLark
Sperwer
U.A.E.
S-100
UK
Desert Hawk
Hermes 450
Herti
Predator B
USA
Dragon Eye
Global Hawk
Pointer
Predator A & B
Reaper
Shadow 200
South Korea ’03
USA
Shadow 200
Angola ’03 - now
IL Serv. Supplier Aerostar
Ivory Coast ’04
IL Serv. Supplier Aerostar
Dem. Rep. of Congo ’06
Belgium
Hunter
Ivory Coast ’06
France
Skorpio
Iraq ’03 -now
Australia
Scan Eagle
SkyLark
Italy
Predator A
Japan
RMax
Romania
Shadow 600
UK
Desert Hawk
Hermes 450
Phoenix
USA
Desert Hawk
Dragon Eye
Global Hawk
I.Gnat
Hunter
MAV
Pioneer
Predator A & B
Puma
Raven A & B
Scan Eagle
Shadow 200
Silver Fox
Snow Goose
Tern
Wasp
Lebanon ’06
France
Sperwer (NU)
Kosovo ‘07
France
Sperwer
Chad ’08
France
SkyLark I
CL289
Page: 31/70
31/70
Potential
Governmental Non-Military UAS Applications
Customs Authorities
Coastal patrol
On-shore border patrol
EU maritime surveillance
EU on-shore border patrol
Civil Security & National Police
Environmental
Contamination measurement
Systematic search ops
Natural disaster monitoring
Emergency medical/food supply
Local science missions
Atmospheric measurements
Wild game surveillance
Fishery control
Ozone measurements
Weather assessment
Crop monitoring
Sandbank shift measurement
Glacier & ice cap monitoring
Police Authorities
Civil Security
Avalanche survivor search
Coastal water surveillance
Maritime search & rescue
EU Civil Security
Maritime surveillance
Regional Fire Brigade
Forest fire surveillance
National Fire Brigade
Forest fire surveillance
Natural disaster monitoring
USEP Study Results
November 24, 2009
Information gathering (in buildings)
Special ops, anti-terrorist
Urban law enforcement
Pre-intervention info gathering
Urban riot control
Perimeter defence
Hostile protest control
Criminal investigation (several days)
Surveillance of public gatherings
Road traffic surveillance
Delivery of non-lethal disabling means
Coastal border immigration control
Ship lane surveillance
Permanent police surveillance
Land border immigration control
Maritime immigration control
EU land border immigration control
Contractor Supplied
Flight Services
Training
Terrain mapping
Aerial photography
Monument inspection
Network comms relay (small theatre)
Network comms relay (large theatre)
Emergency comms network
The seeds of a totally
new service industry ?
Page: 32/70
32/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Quantity of UAS
Produced in Europe & USA
LUAS
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Rep
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Italy
November 24, 2009
UAS
Total
2
2
1
1
3
1
1
56
31
1
1
21
1
1
3
1
1
34
22
1
11
22
9
1
9
LUAS
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Serbia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
UK
6
7
4
2
1
3
4
8
1
8
30
UAS Total
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
15
European Total
Light UAS
UAS
146
77
Total
223
USA Total
Light UAS
UAS
203
138
Total
341
7
9
4
3
2
4
5
11
4
9
45
Page: 33/70
33/70
WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS?
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Most military UAS are still “user specific”
High development costs + low volume production =
High acquisition cost & high ownership cost
No standards
No airworthiness norm
No certification norms
No ATM regulations
Involved communities do not speak the same language
The Critical Issues :
- Sense & Avoid
- Spectrum & Bandwidth
- Security
- Insufficient R&D funding
Flight in non-segregated airspace is impossible
Result : The markets for the following 3 sectors cannot emerge:
- non-military governmental
- scientific
- commercial
November 24, 2009
Page: 34/70
34/70
This Is NOT The Solution !
November 24, 2009
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
Page: 35/70
35/70
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ?
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
INDUSTRY SHOULD BE THE DYNAMO
National approaches with cooperation between:
- Industry
- Gvmt Authorities
- Stakeholder Orgs
- Academia
National efforts [civil & military] in Europe & USA should be
coordinated to form a harmonized approach (in cooperation with
EASA, EDA, Eurocontrol, FAA, NATO) with active ICAO involvement
European & USA efforts to be coordinated internationally (beyond
Europe & USA) with: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Japan,
N.Zealand, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, UAE
International approaches to be harmonized at earliest possible stage
Standards (functional requirements) to be consensually defined with
implication of the national CAAs & Air Navigation Service Providers
A common terminology in English should be defined
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) should be implicated
November 24, 2009
Page: 36/70
36/70
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ?
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
INDUSTRY SHOULD BE THE DYNAMO
National approaches with cooperation between:
- Industry
- Gvmt Authorities
- Stakeholder Orgs
- Academia
National efforts [civil & military] in Europe & USA should be
coordinated to form a harmonized approach (in cooperation with
EASA, EDA, Eurocontrol, FAA, NATO) with active ICAO involvement
European & USA efforts to be coordinated internationally (beyond
Europe & USA) with: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Japan,
N.Zealand, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, UAE
International approaches to be harmonized at earliest possible stage
Standards (functional requirements) to be consensually defined with
implication of the national CAAs & Air Navigation Service Providers
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) should be implicated
November 24, 2009
Page: 37/70
37/70
EUROCAE WG73 on UAS
UAS MTOM > 150 kg – EASA Rules
Participation
International industry & regulatory authorities
Participation is funded by the participants
3-4 annual plenary meetings of 2 to 3 days each
Participation open to all from all countries
Activities
Coordinated with EASA & RTCA
Management
Chair: Eurocontrol
Sub-Groups
1
2
3
4
Objective
November 24, 2009
Vice chair: FAA
UAS Operations & Sense & Avoid (>150kg)
Airworthiness & Continued Airworthiness (>150kg)
Command & Control, Communication & Spectrum
Light UAS (MTOM < 150kg) & VLOS Operations
Creation of UAS-related standards & guidance
material for submission to EASA & national aviation
authorities for consideration
Page: 38/70
38/70
EUROCAE WG73 on UAS
SG4 on LUAS (MTOM < 150 kg)
First Deliverable
OBJECTIVE
Create a baseline guidance document around which to bring the European
CAAs together & propose a harmonized approach to the operation of LUAS in
European airspace.
A “sanitized & adapted” version of the latest update of UK CAA’s CAP722 has been reviewed &
commented on by ICC participants. Consolidation of the comments has taken place.
The consolidated document has been reviewed by the members of EUROCAE WG73
The document + comments retained by SG4 will now be reviewed by the participants in LUAS
Survey (before 31 Dec 2009)
The final guidance document will be submitted to EUROCAE WG73 & EUROCAE Council.
After approval by the EUROCAE Council, the final guidance document will be made available to
all European & non-European CAAs, as well as other interested parties.
November 24, 2009
Page: 39/70
39/70
ICC
International Coordination Council
International advisory group initiated by UVS International
Objective
Within the framework of UVS International’s Global Access Initiative:
- Contribute to increasing international awareness of UAS-related matters;
- Give national & multi-national working groups the possibility to make
their voice heard globally;
- Increase the dual-directional flow of information in all regulatory matters
between all ICC members;
- Be instrumental to organize and supply national inputs to international
working groups, or other UAS-related international efforts;
- Contribute to standards work within EUROCAE WG73 SG4 on Light UAS.
Current
Participants
European Air Sports
RCAPA, USA
UAV-DACH (AT/CH/DE/NL)
UVS France
Coordination
The start-up of the ICC was coordinated with:
- the chairman of EUROCAE WG73 SG4 on Light UAS;
- the chairman of JARUS.
November 24, 2009
Korea UVS, S. Korea
UAS Norway
UAVS, UK
UVS International
PLATINO, Spain
UATAR, Australia
UVS Canada
Page: 40/70
40/70
ICC
International Coordination Council
Principal - Open to the international Light UAS (<150 kg) community;
- No single organization dominates;
- Increase the flow of information to all;
- Promote international coordination, cooperation & understanding.
Drivers
- Implement the recommendations produced by the Interim Working
Group on Light UAS;
- Permit the international Light UAS community to contribute in a
significant way to the standards work concerning Light UAS within the
framework of EUROCAE WG73 SG4;
- Create a structure & methodology permitting SMEs & SMIs to contribute
without over-stressing their personnel, time & financial limitations;
- Permit the national entities to elaborate their contribution in their
national languages & supply national opinion papers in English.
Harmonization - The national position papers are harmonized in EUROCAE WG
73 SG4 on Light UAS;
- Each ICC member delegates one or several representatives to
participate in EUROCAE WG 73 SG4 on Light UAS.
November 24, 2009
Page: 41/70
41/70
JARUS
Joint Authorities for Rulemaking on UAS
International coordination group initiated & chaired by CAA The Netherlands
Objective
Definition of a common and harmonised set of airworthiness,
operational and airspace requirements for Light UAS.
CAA Participants
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Czech Rep.
France
Germany
Italy
Malta
Netherlands
Norway
South Africa
Spain
Switzerland
UK
November 24, 2009
Observers
Coordinated With
Feeds Inputs To
EASA
EUROCONTROL
Transport Canada
FAA, USA
ICAO
EASA
Eurocontrol
Eurocae WG73
Deliverable
A single set of draft airworthiness, operational & airspace
requirements, accepted by participating countries.
These draft requirements will be available to industry and
other UAS stakeholders for consultation.
Outreach
All European & non-European CAAs can join
Page: 42/70
42/70
International Civil Aviation Org.
27 Jun 2005
23 & 24 May ‘05
ICAO issues a State letter + questionnaire regarding UAS.
Sent to 43 States & 9 international organizations.
- ICAO exploratory meeting on UAS;
- Invitees: States & internat. orgs having replied to State letter.
Conclusions
- ICAO to coordinate development of a strategic document to be
used as the basis for development of regulations.
- Informal “core group” formed to develop guidance document.
- Request for ICAO UAS focal point to be evaluated by ICAO.
Core Group
CAA, UK
ENAC, Italy
FAA, USA
Min. of Transport, Germany
Transport Canada
9 Jan 2007
Draft guidance document submitted to ICAO
April 2007
Draft guidance document presented to ICAO Council
ICAO Council approves start-up of ICAO UAS Study Group
Aug 2007
ICAO State letter announces creation of official UAS SG
November 24, 2009
Eurocontrol, Europe
RTCA, USA
UVS International
Page: 43/70
43/70
ICAO UAS Study
Group
Participation: 15 States + 9 International Orgs:
CAAs of: Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Czech Rep., France, Germany,
Italy, Netherlands, Russian Fed., Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, UK, USA
International organizations: CANSO, EASA, EUROCAE, EUROCONTROL,
IAOPA, ICCAIA, IFALPA, IFATCA, UVS International
1st Deliverable
In 2010
UAS Circular providing an overview of UAS activities incl. extensive
background information for use by States in developing their regulatory
frameworks.
The circular will also assist industry to understand what goals to aim for &
what performance-based Standards And Recommanded Practices (SARPs)
are to be anticipated in the future.
A preliminary list of terms & explanations will be included.
November 24, 2009
Page: 44/70
44/70
Global ATM Forum On Civil/Military Cooperation - ICAO HQs - 19-21 Oct ‘09
Historic Event
Participation
1st Civil/Military event at ICAO
1st time UAS are an official agenda item at an ICAO Plenary Meeting
433 Delegates - 216 State repr. (civil & military), 46 international orgs (incl. UVS
International), 38 industry repr., 28 ICAO repr., 10 ANSPs, 50 exhibitor repr.
Conclusions
ICAO, States, Military Authorities & Partners will endeavour to work together for mutal benefit:
- use ICAO as an open forum for civil/military cooperation, collaboration & sharing of best practices;
- develop a new ICAO manual on civil/military cooperation;
- disseminate ICAO State letter to advise States & international orgs of the C/M Forum and the
follow-up actions;
- Cooperation toward assuring safe & efficient integration of UAS into non-segregated airspace;
- Cooperation on ATM security issues;
- ICAO will propose agenda item to be included on the agenda of the 37th Session of ICAO Assembly
addressing Civil/Military cooperation;
- ICAO will ensure that momentum gained is strengthened at high levels in State administrations &
international orgs;
- Assembly working paper will propose an amendment to Assembly Resolution A36-13 Appendix O,
Coordination of Civil and Military Air Traffic, aimed at strengthening States’ commitments to
enhance cooperation between civil & military authorities.
November 24, 2009
Page: 45/70
45/70
French Min. of Interior
Regulatory Study Contract
Subject
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
On November 6, 2008 the French Ministry of Defence, Direction Générale de la
Police Nationale, Services des Technologies de la Sécurité Intérieur, notified the
award of a study contract to UVS International. This 5 month study concerned the
analysis of the French legal framework relative to the use of Light UAS (<150 kg)
in French airspace by French Homeland Security forces.
This study included the following:
- Detailed analysis of the existing legal framework & the proposal of a solution that will permit
the operation use of LUAS by the French Homeland Security forces;
- Technical guidelines on how to deploy a LUAS and be in conformity with the current French
regulations;
- A proposal concerning the adaptation of the current French regulations in the short/medium
term in order to permit generalization of the operational use of Light UAS by the French
Homeland Security forces.
UVS International, the prime contractor, has successfully concluded this study in cooperation
with UAS Consulting & Services, France, its sub-contractor for this contract.
November 24, 2009
Page: 46/70
46/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Survey on Non-Military Applications for Light UAS (LUAS)
EC Request
In June 2009 EC DG TREN requested UVS International to conduct this fast
track non-funded world-wide survey
Participation
Australia
France
Norway
Sweden
Austria
Germany
Pakistan
Switzerland
120 Organizations from 27 countries
Belgium
Greece
Portugal
Taiwan
16 European countries
And:
November 24, 2009
Brazil
India
Romania
Turkey
Canada
Israel
Russia
UK
Cyprus
Italy
S. Africa
USA
Czech Rep.
Netherlands
Spain
11 non-European countries
3 International associations
1 International regulatory working group (JARUS) including
15 national CAAs + FAA + EASA + Eurocontrol
2 Multi-national working groups (INOUI & UAV-DACH)
Page: 47/70
47/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Quantity of Contributors per Country
Australia
6
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Cyprus
Czech Rep.
France
Germany
Greece
India
Israel
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
2
4
2
6
1
3
13
5
1
2
1
3
3
6
November 24, 2009
incl. 1 national ass.
& 1 national WG
Pakistan
1
Portugal
1
Romania
1
Russia
1
S. Africa
2
Spain
10
Sweden
3
Switzerland
5
Taiwan
1
Turkey
2
UK
11
USA
18
International Associations
3
International Regulatory WG
1
Multi-National WG
2
Page: 48/70
48/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Contributor Break By Stakeholder Category
Abbreviation
Stakeholder Category
Qnty
FSP
FCS
Gvt
Gvt Research
Gvt Operator
Industry
Ass. Internat.
Ass. Nat.
RA
RSP
Research
SME
Stan. Org.
UAS T&E
Uni
WG Multi-Nat.
WG Nat.
Flight Service Provider
Flight Service Customer
Governmental Entity
Governmental Research
Governmental Operator
Company > SME
International Association
National Association
Regulatory Authority
Regulatory Service Provider
Research Organization
Small & Medium-Sized Enterprise
Standards Organization
UAS Test & Evaluation
University
Multi-National Working Group
National Working Group
23
1
13
5
8
16
3
6
17
1
18
69
1
4
11
2
1
November 24, 2009
Operator:
Legal entity deploying the UAS
Flight Service Provider:
Non-governmental UAS operator
Conducting aerial work
Industry:
Personnel: > 250
Turnover: > 50 million Euro
SME:
Personnel: < 250
Turnover: < 50 million Euro
Note:
Contributors can fall into more
than one stakeholder category
Page: 49/70
49/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Inputs Received from 120 Organizations
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Cyprus
Czech Rep.
France
Germany
Greece
India
Israel
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
November 24, 2009
3
3
4
2
6
1
1
11
9
1
2
1
7
11
5
139 Completed Application Matrixes
Pakistan
1
Portugal
1
Romania
2
Russia
2
S. Africa
5
Spain
21
Sweden
2
Switzerland
5
Taiwan
1
Turkey
3
UK
7
USA
21
Multi-National WG
For details see www.uvs-info.com
NA
NA
1
Page: 50/70
50/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Inputs Received from 120 Organizations
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Cyprus
Czech Rep.
France
Germany
Greece
India
Israel
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
November 24, 2009
5
2
4
1
3
1
2
9
5
1
2
0
3
2
5
89 Petition Letters Addressed to DG TREN
Pakistan
1
Portugal
1
Romania
2
Russia
0
S. Africa
2
Spain
10
Sweden
3
Switzerland
4
Taiwan
1
Turkey
2
UK
10
USA
4
Multi-National WG
1
1
2
Page: 51/70
51/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Types of Aircraft Involved
APPLICATIONS
Current
Desired
Fixed Wing
Rotary Wing
- single rotor, not shrouded
- single rotor, shrouded
- bi-rotor
- tri-rotor
- quadri-rotor
- hexa-rotor
Flexible Wing
Motorized Para-Foil
Lighter-than-Air
November 24, 2009
57
49
13
5
16
2
12
1
7
3
6
31
33
10
5
6
1
11
5
2
5
Page: 52/70
52/70
153 European UAS Producers/Developers
AUSTRIA
AeroSpy
Diamond
Schiebel
BELGIUM
FlyingCam
JP Engineering
BULGARIA
Aviotechnica
CROATIA
Def. Research Est.
CZECH REP.
Airship Club
TL Elektronik
FINLAND
Patria
FRANCE
ABS AeroLight
Aerodrones
Bertin Technologies
EADS DS
Euro MC
Gates Techno.
KYU Microdrones
Novadem
Philae Concept
PR Automation
RFTronic
Fly-n-Sense
SMP Technologies
Technisolar
Vertivision
GERMANY
AirRobots
Diehl BGT Defence
EADS Deutschl.
EuroHawk
Inst. for Thermogr.
MicroDrones
OHB System
RotRob
Sim Security
November 24, 2009
AIT
KameraDrone
Gatewing
Verhaert
Kintex
Soko
ESC
VTUL à Pvo
Aeroart
Alcore Industries
Dassault Aviation
ECT Industries
Flying Robots
Infotron
Lehmann Aviation
Onéra
PolyAvionics
PY Design
Sagem DS
Sirehna
SurveyCopter
Thales
Workfly
Ascending Techn.
Borjet
DLR
EMT
IMAR Navigation
MavionicS
Mikado
Rheinmetall DE
ScaleCopter
UAV S&S
GREECE
Arpedon
BSK Defence
EADS 3 Sigma
HUNGARY
HI Aero
ITALY
A2Tech
Aermatica
Aero Sekur
Alenia Aeronautica
Alpi Aviation
CIRA
Internat. Aviation Supply
MavTech
Nautilus
Nimbus
Selex Galileo
Siralab
UTRI
NETHERLANDS
Albatros UAS
ASTI
Delft Dynamics
GeoCopter
HighEye
NORWAY
ET-Air
Martitime Robotics
NORUT
Odin Aero
ProxDynamics
ProxFlyer
Robot Aviation
Scandicraft
Simicon
POLAND
AF Inst.of Techn.
Res.& Devlp Centre
WB Electronics
SERBIA
EMA-UAV
Utva Aircraft Ind.
SLOVAKIA
Advanced Unmanned Systems
SLOVENIA
AvioTech
C-Astral
SPAIN
Aerovision
Airview
Aitem
Alfa US
CATUAV
EADS CASA
Elimco
Grupo Tekplus
Indra Sistemas
INTA
Proytec
Robotnik Automation
SRC
UAV Navigation
SWEDEN
CybAero
Saab
SmartPlanes
SWITZERLAND
Aeromedia
Aeroscout
MiniZepp
RUAG Aerospace
SenseFly
Skive Aviation
SkyBotix
SwissCopter
Swiss UAV
weControl
UNITED KINGDOM
Autonomous Vehicles
BAE Systems
CyberFlight
Dragonfly AS
FanWing
Flying Wings
GFS Projects
Kestrel Aerospace Lindstrand Techno.
MagSurvey
MBDA
Meggitt
QinetiQ
Roke Manor
Selex S&AS
SkyShips
Tasuma
Thales
U-Tacs
Universal Target Systems
VTOL Technolog. Warrior
Companies produce or develop LUAS (<150 kg)
Not incl. universities
29
Companies produce or develop UAS (>150 kg)
Not incl. universities
2
Companies involved with UAS < 150 & >150 kg
126
Page: 53/70
53/70
Current Non-Military LUAS Applications
Security-Related
Scientific & Research
Aerial photogrammetry (BE,CH,DE,NL)
Agricultural monitoring (ES, UK, USA)
Arctic research (DE, NO, UK, USA)
ATM Research (DE, ES)
Climate monitoring (NO)
Coastal mapping (NL)
Coastal zone studies (NL)
Crop monitoring (USA)
Forestry management/research (SE)
Geophysical survey (BR)
Glacier & ice cap monitoring (DK, NO)
Iceberg monitoring (NO)
Invasive species identification/analysis (USA)
Marine mammal monitoring (USA)
Meteorological research (DE, NO, USA)
Ocean & sea research support (NO)
Plant growth vigour mapping (USA)
Salt water infiltration detection (NL)
Thermal imaging of buildings (heat wastage)
Vegetation identification (USA)
Volcano monitoring (JP)
UAS sensor research (CA,DE,ES,FR,NO,USA)
Wildlife census (ES, USA)
November 24, 2009
Border surveillance (IL, USA)
Crowd surveillance (CH, CN, FR, ZA)
(Forest) Fire fighting support (ES, HU, UK, USA)
International summit surveillance (CA, FR)
Maritime & Sea lane surveillance (BE, ES)
Natural disaster site surveillance (CN, IN, RU, USA)
Police applications (CA, DE, FR, NL, UK, ZA)
Regional surveillance (Gasa & Occupied Territories)
Road traffic surveillance (CH)
Experimentation (AT, AU, BE, CA, CH, CN, CZ, DE,
ES, FR, IT, MY, NL, NO, SG, PT, SE, SI, ZA, UK)
Contractor Supplied Flight Services
Advertising (light-than-air UAS)(indoor & outdoor)
Aerial data collection (AU,AT,BE,CH,ES,IT,NL,SE,UK)
Aerial photography & video (many countries)
Agricultural fertilizer dispensing (CN, JP, KR)
Agricultural insecticide spraying (CN, JP, KR)
Cinema (aerial shots & special effects)
Critical infrastructure inspection (FR, NL)
Forest fire operations support (ES, USA)
Historical monument inspection (FR)
Illegal cannabis cultivation detection (NL)
Magnetic field survey (AU)
Oil & gas pipeline monitoring (RU)
Terrain mapping (BE, DE, NL)
Page: 54/70
54/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Recommendations
LUAS Should Be The EC’s Nr 1 Priority
They are here NOW
INDUSTRY (Products & Services) = PRINCIPALLY SMIs & SMEs
Traditionally not recognized UAS stakeholders (model aircraft community) should be involved
European CAAs should agree on a common approach (JARUS)
National approaches with co-operation between:
- Industry (producers & services)
- CAAs
- Air Navigation Service Suppliers
- Other Stakeholder Orgs
- Government Authorities
- Academia
National associations & Working Groups & Centres of Competence to be used to
organize national inputs
EUROCAE should federate players around a common approach (SG4)
LUAS community should be recognized as a separate stakeholder
November 24, 2009
Page: 55/70
55/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Recommendations
European UAS-Related Regulatory Matters
European National Visions (all classes of UAS) should be harmonized to create a European
Vision (in coordination with SESAR)
UAS should be recognized as a relevant stakeholder within SESAR
The European Vision (civil & military) should be coordinated with NATO
European standards (functional requirements) to be consensually defined by EUROCAE
WG73 with active participation of EASA, national CAAs & Air Navigation Service Providers,
Industry & other Stakeholders
Europe should actively contribute to creating a Trans-Atlantic UAS Vision
November 24, 2009
Page: 56/70
56/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Recommendations
European UAS-Related Industrial & R&D Matters
Political awareness of unmanned systems, related technologies & their potential should be
increased
Unmanned system-related technologies (air, ground, naval, space) should be recognized as
being of strategic importance for Europe
Definition of requirements for R&D, studies, and technology demonstrations should be
better coordinated amongst all EC DGs & EC agencies in order to avoid duplication
Increased funding required for R&D, study contracts & technology demos
EASA should be given the financial means of their ambitions
Importance of SMEs & SMIs should be recognized
Community access to EC-funded study results should be improved
Number of European technology demonstrations should be increased
Public awareness of unmanned systems & their societal benefits should be improved
November 24, 2009
Page: 57/70
57/70
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
DG TREN Hearing on Light UAS – Brussels, Belgium – 8 Oct 2009
Historic Event
Participation
Objective
Conclusion
1st European Commission Hearing on UAS
49 European LUAS community stakeholder representatives (industry & gvmt)
Present the conclusions of the survey on non-military applications for LUAS
Create awareness with the EC on:
- The ongoing non-military LUAS activities in Europe (gvmt, research,
commercial);
- Most current non-military UAS activities in Europe concern LUAS;
- Give the LUAS community the opportunity to voice their opinion on the
existing problems;
- Give the LUAS community the opportunity to propose actions for
consideration by the EC to resolve the current problems.
The EC’s conclusion will be made public in the near future
EC UAS Conference – Brussels, Belgium – April 2010
November 24, 2009
Page: 58/70
58/70
EUROPEAN REGULATORS
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
EASA – European Aviation Safety Agency
Member
States
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Rep., Denmark, Estonia, Finland,
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovak Rep., Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
United Kingdom
EUROCONTROL – European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation
Member
States
Albania, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Rep., Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, former Yugoslav Rep. of Macedonia, Turkey,
Ukraine, United Kingdom
Regulators currently involved with UAS regulations
November 24, 2009
Page: 59/70
59/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
EUROCAE WG73 SG4 on LUAS
ICAO
EC DG TREN
EUROCAE
EASA
Eurocontrol
FAA
FAA ARC
RTCA SC203
EUROCAE WG73
SG1 - OPS & S&A
SG2 - Airworthiness
SG3 - C&C, Comms
& Spectrum
November 24, 2009
Individual Companies &
Organizations
SG4 – Light UAS
JARUS
Chair:
CAA/NL
Australia
Belgium
France
= WG73 Management Team Italy
Netherlands
= ICAO UAS SG Participants S. Africa
Switzerland
UVS International
SG4 Chair: CAA/NL
ICC
Coordinator:
UVSI
Austria
Czech Rep.
Germany
Malta
Norway
Spain
UK
IWGLUAS Coordinator:
UVSI
Page: 60/70
60/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
EUROPEAN STAKEHOLDERS
Civilian Orgs
•
•
•
•
•
•
GD Enterprise
GD TREN
GD Research
EASA
EUROCONTROL
JAA
Multi-Nat. Orgs
AEA
CANSO
EARTO
ERA
EREA
EUGIN
Eurocockpit Assn
European Air Sport
Assn
• IATA
• IFALPA
• IFATCA
• IOPA
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
November 24, 2009
Military Orgs
• EDA – Euro. Defence
Agency
• EMAAG -Euro Military
Aviation Authorities
Group
• JMAG - Joint Military
Airworthiness Group
• NATO:
- FINAS (USAR)
- JCG UAV
- JAPCC
- NATMC
• OCCAR
National Orgs
Min. of Transport
Min. of Interior
Min. of Defence
Air Navigation
Service Providers
• CAAs
• Model A/C Assns
• Technology Platforms
- ASTRAEA, UK
- NIMUP, Netherlands
- Pégase, France
- PLATINO, Spain
•
•
•
•
Prof. Orgs & WGs
• ASD
• EUROCAE WG73
• (Multi)-National WGs
- UAV DACH
- UAV Germany, DE
- former Castor, Sweden
• National Assns:
- AVBS, Czech Rep.
- UAVS, UK
- UVS France
- UAS Norway
- Ass. of Aerospace
Universities, UK
Existing Multi-National Tech. Platforms
•
•
•
•
ACARE
ERTRAC
EUROP
SESAR JU
Research
Industry
20 out of 27 Countries
• Competence poles &
Centres of excellence
• Academia
Page: 61/70
61/70
EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONAL UAS-RELATED ACTIVITIES
NATIONAL
Austria
Czech Rep
Finland
ACADEMIC
NATIONAL:
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Czech Rep.
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
- Netherlands
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- UK
MULTI-NATIONAL
NTP = National
Techn. Platform
November 24, 2009
CAA & Min. of Research
Min. of Transport & CAA
- FDF & CAA
- Artic Test Range
France
- DGA-CEV - USAR-FW
- USAR-VTOL
- DGA (MoD) UAV-REG
- DGAC (CAA) - NAVDROC
- New decree
- Min. of Interior
- Pégase
Germany - BWB-WTD - DFS
- Min. of Transport
- UAV DACH
- UAV Germany NTP
Italy
- DGAA & ENAC
Netherlds - CAA
- Police
- RNLAF
Norway
UAS Norway
Slovenia Uni. Of Ljubljana
Spain
PLATINO
NTP
Sweden
- FMV & CAA UAV Vision
- Saab & LFV Castor
Switzerl.
- CAA & Swiss AF
- Min. of Interior
UK
- ASTRAEA NTP
- CAA-DAP CAP722
- DoT & NATS
- Min. of Interior
- MoD-DPA
- ParcAberporth
- RAF UAV Battle Lab
- UAVS Association
MULTI-NATIONAL
ASD
CANSO
EARTO
EASA
EC-DGTREN
ECAP
EDA
ASG - UAV WG
UAV WG
A.NPA
INOUI Programme
Certification Group
- C&C + S&A studies
- Staff rqmt study
- UAS Roadmap
- Air4All
- Midcas
EMAAG
EUROCAE
WG-73 on UAS
Eurocontrol - ANT
- UAV-OAT TF
Eurocontrol Experimental Centre
UVSI
IWGLUAS
JARUS
JAA/Eurcontrol UAV TF
JMAG (now includes ETAP)
NATO
- AG7 FINAS
- FINAS-USAR-ST
- JAPCC
- NATMC
- RTO
SESAR
UAV DACH (A, CH, D, NL)
USEP
Security & Environment
Page: 62/70
62/70
NON-EUROPEAN
INSTITUTIONAL UAS-RELATED ACTIVITIES
USA
ICAO
UAS Study Group
OTHER COUNTRIES
Australia - CASA - Civil Aviation Safety Authority
- Department of National Defence
- Defence Science & Technology Org.
- University Initiatives
Canada - CCUVS – Canadian Centre for UVS
- DND – Department of National Defence
- TC – Transport Canada
- UVS Canada
Japan
- JAAA - Japan Agricultural Aviation Auth.
- CAA
- JAXA - Jap. Aerospace Exploration Agncy
- Japan UAV Assn.
India
Min. of Defence & CAA & NASP
N.Zealand UVS NZA Assn. & CAA
Russia
Min. of Emergency Situations (ERMERCOM)
Singapore - Defence Science & Technology Agency
- Min. of Defence & CAA
S. Africa Min. of Defence & CAA
S. Korea Korea Aerospace Industries Assn.
KARI – Korea Aerospace Research Inst.
UAE
- CAA & UAE Air Force
- UAV Centre of Excellence
November 24, 2009
AIAA Inst. of Aeronautics & Astronautics
AIA
Aerospace Industries Assn.
AOPA Aircraft Owners & Pilots Assn.
ATCA Air Traffic Control Assn.
DARPA
DHS Department of Homeland Security:
- US Coast Guard
DOC Department of Commerce :
- NOAA
DOD Department of Defense:
- OSD (Office of Secretary of Defense)
- Policy Board on Federal Aviation
- US Army & US Army Research Lab
- US Air Force & USAF Research Lab
- US Navy & Navy Research Lab
DOT Department of Transport :
- FAA UAS Program Office
JPDO Joint Planning & Development Org.
JIPT Joint Integrated Project Team (US
Army, US Air Force, US Navy):
- Near Term: Advance COAs
- Long Term: Access to the NAS
NASA AMES & NASA DFRC
NGATS Next Generation Air Traffic System
Standards Organizations :
- ASTM & RTCA & SAE
UAS Task Force
University Initiatives
Page: 63/70
63/70
Current Status of
Coordination & Cooperation

Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
DG TREN, Eurocontrol, FAA & ICAO are playing dynamic federating & leading roles
EASA has produced its A.NPA after wide international consultation
UAS standards work in EUROCAE WG73 & RTCA SC203 is progressing
EUROCAE & RTCA are coordinating their UAS activities
Eurocontrol has produced the UAV-OAT document
Eurocontrol & FAA & EASA are coordinating their UAS activities
National CAAs in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Czech Rep., France, Germany, Italy,
Malta, Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, UK have formed
JARUS to coordinate & harmonise their activities regarding Light UAS
Interim Working Group on Light UAS has produced its recommendations
JARUS
ICAO has started up its official UAS Study Group
ICAO’s Global ATM Forum on Civil/Military Coop. (Oct ’09) had UAS on the agenda
The upcoming World Radio Conference has UAS on the agenda
Conclusion: A coordinated international approach is becoming reality
November 24, 2009
Page: 64/70
64/70
Global Access Initiative
Instigated by UVS International in
co-ordination with UNITE/ACCESS 5 in Aug ’05
Encourage creation of national UAS industry working groups,
organizations & associations to create National Visions.
Reach out to all relevant stakeholders on a global scale.
Facilitate the international exchange of information.
Promote & coordinate collaboration on international scale.
Promote early stage international harmonisation of UAS-related standards,
rules & regulations permitting UAS insertion into non-segregated airspace.
Maintain or increase current flight safety levels.
www.uvs-info.com
World’s largest
generic
UAS web site
November 24, 2009
Make all information pertaining to work ongoing internationally
regarding the introduction of UAS (all categories) into nonsegregated airspace available to ALL .
Reference docs [military - regulatory authorities - studies - white
papers (scientific, government & commercial user groups)]
Page: 65/70
65/70
International Test Range
Directory Initiative
OBJECTIVE
Create an open & free web site that will make comparable test range
data available to all.
- Testing, qualification, and certification of military & civil UAS will make it necessary
for the international UAS community to make increased use of qualified test ranges;
- Anticipated increase in the requirement to training military & civil UAS operators;
- There is no easily accessible international test range database or directory, which
permits comparison between test ranges;
- By identifying the basic facilities & services offered by each test range, the
differences between the various ranges will be made clear to potential customers;
- Internationally there is currently no minimal test range safety standard imposed for
civil UAS testing, qualification, certification purposes and it may be of interest that
such a standard is worked towards & agreed on;
- The international test range directory will most probably also be of interest to a
number of industrial communities not directly involved with UAS (e.g. the upcoming
commercial space flight community).
www.testranges.org is currently online and the data collection has started
November 24, 2009
Page: 66/70
66/70
UAS Security Applications
User Group Web Site
OBJECTIVE
USER
GROUP
GOAL
November 24, 2009
Create a secure & free web site with restricted access for the
European security community to facilitate & promote the flow of
sensitive non-classified UAS-related information.
Non-military government authorities: homeland security; municipal,
regional & national police & fire brigades; customs authorities; civil
security forces; border patrol; coast guard.
Improve awareness of UAS-related matters by the user group members.
Provide an acceptable environment to:
- exchange information;
- upload documents, study reports, position papers, presentations, case
studies, operational experience, accident reports, etc. (create online
library);
- on-line discussion;
- Inform on upcoming events;
- send emails to other web site users.
Reach out to other similar national sites & coordination with them.
Page: 67/70
67/70
CONCLUSIONS - 1
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
UAS access to non-segregated airspace is a GLOBAL ISSUE
Significant national & international efforts are underway
Regulatory
Authorities
No single country can come up with the “global” solution
International coordination & cooperation is crucial
Industry
Experience, study results & information should be shared
Military
European UAS Vision
Government
National Visions
North American Vision
Global
UAS Vision
Internal
Security
ALL international stakeholders should be involved
Academia
Participation in EUROCAE &/or RTCA WGs is encouraged
Scientific
Community
Obtaining High Level Political Support Is Now Imperative
November 24, 2009
Page: 68/70
68/70
Federating
The
International
UAS
Community
CONCLUSIONS - 2
UAS Norway participates in: - EUROCAE WG73 & ICC
- Global Access Initiative
- « inherently non-hazardous UAS » initiative
UAS Norway is recognized
CAA Norway is a member of JARUS
as UVS International partner
Norwegian governmental & non-governmental stakeholders
Regulatory Industry Military Government Internal
Authorities Research / Scientific Community Security
Academia
ANSPs
are invited to form with UAS Norway a national Norwegian UAS vision
Norway can play a leading role in promoting UAS for Arctic observation
Norwegian UAS Vision
European Union Vision
North American Vision
Scandinavian UAS Vision?
November 24, 2009
Global
UAS Vision
Other National Visions
Page: 69/70
69/70
UVS
INTERNATIONAL
86 rue Michel-Ange
75016 Paris, France
Tel.: 33-1-46.51.88.65
Fax: 33-1-46.51.05.22
[email protected]
[email protected]
World’s
Largest UAS
Conference
www.uvs-international.org
www.uvs-info.com
www.uas2010.org
Paris, France
14-18 Jun ’10
World’s Principal UAS
Regulatory Event
Federating, Instigating, Coordinating, Cooperating,
Promoting, Disseminating Information for the Benefit of the
International Unmanned Systems Community