sports authority
Transcription
sports authority
DEBTWIRE BROADCAST: SPORTS AUTHORITY BANKRUPTCY LIKELY TO BE FAST, FURIOUS AND CONTENTIOUS Debtwire’s panel of journalists and analysts will recap the first-day hearing, discuss the debtors’ dual-track plan and dissect the proposed roll-up DIP financings. | 8 March 2016 AGENDA 1. Opening Remarks: Andrew Ragsly, Managing Editor [email protected] 2. Case Overview: Reshmi Basu, Associate Editor, Americas [email protected] 3. First Day Action: Patrick Holohan, Court Reporter [email protected] 4. Financial Insights: Phillip Emma, Senior Analyst [email protected] 5. Legal Analysis: Jack M. Tracy II, Senior Legal Analyst [email protected] 6. Q & A 7. Appendix 2 CASE OVERVIEW In 2006, Sports Authority LBO’d by Leonard Green & Partners for USD 1.3bn. In May 2015, company extends tenor on USD 340m mezz notes to 2018 from 2016 to avoid springing maturity on TL (TL quoted 87/90). In November 2015, the company brings on advisors amid liquidity concerns and operational fumbles (TL quoted 69/72). Ahead of critical holding period, Sports Authority inks rescue financing from TPG (TL quoted 69/72). In late December, Sports Authority releases 3Q results, in which EBITDA slides 87% YoY (TL quoted 33/39). In January, the borrower enters into DIP negotiations with existing lenders. Concerns over valuation of collateral becomes a lightning rod in discussions, as company elects to miss interest payment (TL quoted 29/35). On March 2, company files for Chapter 11 protection. (TL quoted 13/16). 3 FIRST DAY ACTION Hearing kicks off with little controversy. Judge Walrath quickly approved the company’s motions for joint administration, cash management, employee wages and retention of KCC as claims and noticing agent. The proposed sale of consigned goods was the major issue of the day. Some vendors, particularly Agron Inc. and ASICS, wary of company selling consigned goods without their consent. Parties plan a break from about 11:45 to 1:30, but don’t come back until 3:30. At that point, still no agreement. Eventually, parties agree to escrow 100% of consignment sale proceeds while they work on a longer term deal. The second day hearing is set for 29 March. The USD 695m DIP was relatively uncontroversial. Judge Walrath will not allow the DIP lenders to have a lien on unencumbered assets of Puerto Rico unit. 4 FINANCIAL INSIGHTS: CAPITAL STRUCTURE PREPETITION CAPITAL STRUCTURE ABL USD 650m Facility FILO Loan Term Loan Secured Debt Claim Mezzanine Notes - Senior Subordinated Notes Total Debt Cash Net Debt Coupon Face Amount Price Market Amount Maturity Proposed Adjustment L + 1.5%/ L+2.0% L + 6.4% L + 4.5% 345 95 277 717 350 1,067 1 1,066 0 15 345 95 42 482 17 May 2017 14 Jun 2017 16 Nov 2017 (345) (95) 277 277 11.50% PREPETITION CLAIMS Indebtedness ABL Credit Agreement FILO (Including Capitalized Prepayment Fee) Term Loan Total Secured Debt Claims Mezzanine Note Principal (Sr Subordinated) Mezzanine Note Interest Reference Note Owed to Mezzanine Holders Total Subordinated Debt Claims Total Debt Related Claims Other Claims Paramus Loan Agreement (Secured) Consigned Goods (Secured) Trade Debt Total Debt and Other Claims Claim Outstanding (USD m) 345 95 277 717 350 19 3 372 1,089 3 85 179 1,356 19 Feb 2018 482 1 481 The ABL was secured primarily by a first-priority security interest in the inventory and accounts receivable and a second-priority interest in the PP&E and intellectual property securing the term loan. The company entered into the FILO Agreement on 3 November 2015 as a liquidity enhancement with collateral for the loan a last-out, first priority interest in the ABL collateral and secondpriority interest in the term loan collateral. The term loan is the only part of the capital structure with a publicly quoted price. As late as 2 December 2015 the term loan was quoted near 70, according to Markit but as reports started surfacing that the company had engaged advisors to work with management on operational and financial issues. Source: First Day Declaration ("The Aguilar" document.) 5 FINANCIAL INSIGHTS: LIQUIDATION ANALYSIS INVENTORY LIQUIDATION VALUE USD m (except per store amounts) Percent of Cost Liquidation Value Inventory at 30 January at Cost Assumed OLV (10% Ineligible) Total store count Inventory OLV per store (Actual) Stores closing (from 18-week forecast) Assumed liquidation proceeds Residual Total Inventory Value after closure Total DIP and FILO DIP Proceeds from Store Closures Adjusted DIP and FILO DIP Coverage of DIP and FILO DIP Inventory Value 75% 665.9 449.5 462 972,906 141 137.2 312.3 440.0 137.2 302.8 103.1% Inventory Value 70% 665.9 419.5 462 908,045 141 128.8 291.5 440.0 128.0 312.0 93.4% Inventory Value 65% 665.9 389.5 462 843,185 141 118.9 270.7 440.0 118.9 321.1 84.3% The Orderly liquidation value appraisals used by Gordon Brothers Retail Partners and Tiger Capital Group are not available, but we have made assumptions based on the typical advance rates found in retail ABL deals. The 18-week forecast provided by the company does not shed any light on proceeds from the liquidation, but does reflect the store count going from 462 to 321 stores at the end of May. The company stated that sales for Fiscal Year 2015 were USD 2.6b. With the company being marketed for sale, the two most likely comps for valuing the revenue are Big 5 Sporting Goods and Dick’s Sporting Goods. Big 5 trades at an EV/Revenue of 0.3x and Dick’s trades at 0.7x. Using the store closure time-line from the 18-week forecast, we assume the pro forma annual sales post the store closings will be USD 1.8b. Using the Big 5 valuation of 0.3x revenue, implies a value for USD 542m for the remaining store base – if an industry buyer was inclined to purchase the remaining stores. Source: Disclosure statement. 6 FINANCIAL INSIGHTS: CORPORATE STRUCTURE Guarantors of TL and Mezz Mezz reference notes Sports Authority Holdings, Inc. (Delaware) FORMER EMPLOYESS ABL borrower Guarantors of ABL 99.97% 0.03% Excluded Subsidiary Slap Shot Holdings, Corp. (Delaware) $277m TL due Nov. 16, 2017 $343m Mezz due Feb. 19, 2018 $650m ABL due May 17, 2017 $95m ABL FILO tranche due June 14, 2017 The Sports Authority, Inc. (Delaware) TSA Ponce, Inc. (Delaware) TSA Stores, Inc. (Delaware) TSA Caribe, Inc. (Puerto Rico) TSA Gift Card, Inc. (Virginia) Source: Disclosure statement. 7 LEGAL ANALYSIS: THE DIPS Two DIPS Used Solely For Roll-Ups USD 500m “creeping” roll-up of ABL. USD 95m full roll-up of FILO at Final Order. Debtors could fund cases on cash collateral alone. DIPs Maintain Prepetition Collateralization Except: Proceeds from leases. Avoidance action proceeds (w/ cap). Unencumbered assets. Also adds super-priority admin expense. Possibility of USD 25m Junior DIP. 8 LEGAL ANALYSIS: DUAL-TRACK PROCESS Milestones End Dual-Track Process by May. Likely avoiding May rent. Term Loan Lenders Appear On Board. Equity Splits Negotiation with Mezzanine Noteholders: 96/4. From Undersecured to USD 80m Oversecured. 9 LEGAL ANALYSIS: LENDER LIABILITY TPG provided Emergency Bridge Loan Provided to get through holidays Vulnerable to attack (Radioshack/Molycorp) Cross-holdings with ABL will shed light on TPG’s “control” Prepayment premium (2%) Non-consensual Releases Highly Unlikely Split in Third Circuit, appealed through Millennium Health Walrath’s record Likely GUC carrot in a plan to circumvent 10 DISCLAIMER We have obtained the information provided in this report in good faith from publicly available data as well as Debtwire data and intelligence, which we consider to be reliable. This information is not intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. You should seek independent tax, legal and/or investment advice before acting on information obtained from this report. We shall not be liable for any mistakes, errors, inaccuracies or omissions in, or incompleteness of, any information contained in this report, and not for any delays in updating the information. We make no representations or warranties in regard to the contents of and materials provided on this report and exclude all representations, conditions, and warranties, express or implied arising by operation of law or otherwise, to the fullest extent permitted by law. We shall not be liable under any circumstances for any trading, investment, or other losses which may be incurred as a result of use of or reliance on information provided by this report. All such liability is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any opinions expressed herein are statements of our judgment at the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Reproduction without written permission is prohibited. For additional information call Debtwire Analytics at (212) 686-5374. Copyright 2016 S&P Capital IQ (and its affiliates, as applicable). This may contain information obtained from third parties, including ratings from credit ratings agencies such as Standard & Poor's. Reproduction and distribution of third party content in any form is prohibited except with the prior written permission of the related third party. Third party content providers do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of any information, including ratings, and are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such content. THIRD PARTY CONTENT PROVIDERS GIVE NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. THIRD PARTY CONTENT PROVIDERS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY, COMPENSATORY, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, COSTS, EXPENSES, LEGAL FEES. OR LOSSES (INCLUDING LOST INCOME OR PROFITS AND OPPORTUNITY COSTS OR LOSSES CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE) IN CONNECTION WITH ANY USE OF THEIR CONTENT, INCLUDING RATINGS. Credit ratings are statements of opinions and are not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell securities. They do not address the suitability of securities or the suitability of securities for investment purposes, and should not be relied on as investment advice. 12