Seguridad de dispositivos médicos y armonización mundial
Transcription
Seguridad de dispositivos médicos y armonización mundial
28/09/2012 II Simposio Nacional de la Calidad 2012 Seguridad de dispositivos médicos y armonización mundial 25 de Setiembre 2012 Dr. Peter Lee Consultor coreano Director/Ingeniero jefe KATS-KTL Chief Engineer and Director of the International Cooperation Center, KTL(Korea Testing Laboratory). Engaged in diverse industrial fields such as a Medical device control system, Certification, ISO management system, CE marking, Inspection/Audit and Electric & Electronic Products Safety/EMC test affairs from 1981 in the Republic of Korea. Earned a Ph. Doctorate of Technology policy at Korea Polytec University, Master of Industrial engineering at Soongsil Univ. and B.E of Electronics engineering at Chung-Ang Univ. E-mail: [email protected] 1 28/09/2012 El milagro de la República de Corea A penas hace 50 años atrás. Corea lo había perdido todo. http://youtu.be/PpznfKHNDnw “Haremos cualquier cosa” le suplicaron los mineros al presidente de Alemania Occidental. El milagro de la República de Corea K-Pop singers PSY Gangnam Style + Idol Groups http://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0 Horse-Riding Dance Girls Generation PSY - GANGNAM STYLE (강남스타일) Singer Psy Dong Bang Shin Gi At NBC-TV “Today Show” in New York Wonder Girls 2 28/09/2012 Topics • Scope of Medical Device - Definition, Classification, Basic Principle, Pre/Post Market Safety, Areas of Improvements • Overview and status of GHTF - Harmonization, History, Purpose, Structure, Activities • Introduction and Perspective of AHWP - Overview, Objectives, Organization, Terms of Reference What is a Medical Device? • Defines a medical device as any healthcare product that does not achieve its principal intended purposes by chemical action or by being metabolized. - As simple as a tongue depressor or a thermometer - As complex as robotic surgery devices FDA's MDEpiNet - Improving Medical Device Safety and Effectiveness 3 28/09/2012 The Products US FDA regulate… FDA Device Classification • Medical Device Classes: Class I - General Controls - Most exempt from premarket submission Class II - Special Controls - Premarket Notification Class III - Premarket Approval - Require Premarket Application 4 28/09/2012 GHTF MD Classification System CLASS RISK LEVEL A (I) Low Risk DEVICE EXAMPLES Surgical retractors / tongue depressors B (IIa) Low-moderate Risk Hypodermic Needles / suction equipment C (IIb) Moderate-high Risk Lung ventilator / orthopedic implants D (III) High Risk Heart Valve / Implantable defibrillator Definition • Diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of a disease, injury or disability, or • Investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or physiological process, or • Control of conception and • Principal mode of action not pharmacological, immunological or metabolic 5 28/09/2012 LEY Nº 29459 del Peru LEY DE LOS PRODUCTOS FARMACÉUTICOS, DISPOSITIVOS MÉDICOS Y PRODUCTOS SANITARIOS Artículo 1.- Objeto de la Ley La presente Ley define y establece los principios, normas, criterios y exigencias básicas sobre los productos farmacéuticos, dispositivos médicos y productos sanitarios de uso en seres humanos, en concordancia con la Política Nacional de Salud y la Política Nacional de Medicamentos, las cuales deben ser consideradas por el Estado prioridades dentro del conjunto de políticas sociales que permitan un acceso oportuno, equitativo y con calidad a los servicios de salud. LEY Nº 29459 del Peru LEY DE LOS PRODUCTOS FARMACÉUTICOS, DISPOSITIVOS MÉDICOS Y PRODUCTOS SANITARIOS Artículo 4.- Definiciones 3. Dispositivo médico: Cualquier instrumento, aparato, implemento, máquina, reactivo o calibrador in vitro, aplicativo informático, material u otro artículo similar o relacionado, previsto por el fabricante para ser empleado en seres humanos, solo o en combinación, para uno o más de los siguientes propósitos específicos: a) Diagnóstico, prevención, monitoreo, tratamiento o alivio de una enfermedad. b) Diagnóstico, monitoreo, tratamiento, alivio o ompensación de una lesión. c) Investigación, reemplazo, modificación o soporte de la anatomía o de un proceso fisiológico. d) Soporte o mantenimiento de la vida. e) Control de la concepción. f ) Desinfección de dispositivos médicos. 6 28/09/2012 Essential Requirements • Safety and performance Design & construction “state of the art” - Chemical, physical, biological hazards - Infection and microbial contamination - Interaction, interference with other equipment - Dependence on energy source and software - Accuracy, stability, specificity of measurement and diagnostic instruments Basic Principle • Risk/benefit analysis - Acceptable risks when weighted against benefits to the patient - Compatible with high level of protection of health and safety • Risk reduction - Elimination or reduction as far as possible (safe design and construction) - Protection measures - Information about residual risks 7 28/09/2012 Basic Principle • Clinical evaluation - Required for all medical devices - Critical analysis of clinical data - Demonstration of conformity with Essential Requirements Scientific literature Clinical investigations (GCP) Required for implantable and class III MD Subject to national notification/approval Basic Principle • Quality management system (QMS) - Consistent compliance with regulatory requirements • (Voluntary) harmonized standards - Presumption of conformity with Essential Requirements - ISO, IEC, CEN, CENELEC 8 28/09/2012 Basic Principle • Conformity assessment procedure - Self-certification (only low-risk MD) - Third-party certification (for class IIa, IIb, III) Notified Bodies Designated and monitored by competent authorities Assessment of QMS and design dossier (class III) or technical file (class IIa, IIb: sampling) Prior assessment of changes to QMS or MD design Periodic surveillance inspections of manufacturer Certificates with limited validity / renewal Basic Principle • Labeling - Label - Instructions for use - CE-marking • Registration and Listing - Manufacturers / authorized representatives - MD of class I 9 28/09/2012 Where to adjust the balance between both necessities? • Pre-market control - risk related classification - fast introduction of innovation • Post-market control - surveillance - vigilance Post-market safety • Obligations of manufacturers - Post-market surveillance plan, incl. post-market clinical follow-up - Reporting of serious incidents to CA - Application of Field Safety Corrective Actions (FSCA) - Communication of FSCA to users by means of Field Safety Notice (FSN) 10 28/09/2012 Post-market safety • Responsibilities of competent authorities - Central recording and evaluation of reported incidents and FSCA - Information sharing between competent authorities (NCAR system) - Market surveillance ◦ Measures against non-compliant MD ◦ Measures against dangerous products Strengths • Flexibility • Timeliness • Cost-effectiveness • Balance between pre- and post-market control • Manageable for SMEs 11 28/09/2012 Areas for improvement • Oversight of 70+ Notified Bodies • Designation and monitoring • Uniform standards of conformity assessments Areas for improvement • Clinical investigations • Introduction of the concept “sponsor” • Coordination of technical assessment for multi-national CI 12 28/09/2012 Areas for improvement • Post-market safety - Consistent and timely reactions to safety issues - Coordination of analysis of serious incidents and market surveillance activities Areas for improvement • Transparency - Economic operators and medical devices - Summary device information - Traceability of devices (UDI) - Internet sales 13 28/09/2012 Overview and status of GHTF Global Harmonization Task Force Call for Harmonization The call for harmonization of regulatory approaches is coming from many sectors : • Governments • Industry • Public 14 28/09/2012 Why Harmonize? • Regulatory harmonization should : • Provide consistent application of regulatory principles and approaches • Improve regulatory system effectiveness and efficiency • Reduce duplication • Rationalize time and costs • Allow new products/technologies to enter the market place • Create transparent regulatory processes Potential Challenges to harmonization • Differences in delegation of regulatory authorities between levers of government within a country • Geo-political issues • Consistency in the degree of implementation 15 28/09/2012 Harmonization of Medical Device Regulations • Harmonization is consistent with the policies of many regulatory authorities • Regulatory programs are expected to : • use available international standards/guidelines as basis for technical regulations • proactively influence their development, as appropriate • Consult with stakeholders/public Overview • GHTF(Global Harmonization Task Force) • Informal grouping of medical device regulators and industry • Began in 1992 with Canada, European Union, Japan, USA and Australia as founding members • Currently consists of a Steering Committee, 5 Study Groups and several Ad Hoc Groups • Has links with several partners, including : ISO, IEC, WHO, PAHO, AHWP 16 28/09/2012 Overview • Working to reduce or eliminate technical differences in regulatory requirements and practices • GHTF conferences and commenting on draft guidance documents • Participation is broadening • “Participating members” • “Observers” Purpose • To encourage convergence in regulatory practices related to ensuring the safety, effectiveness / performance, and quality of medical devices, promoting technological innovation and facilitating international trade and • To serve as an information exchange forum through which countries with medical device regulatory systems can benefit from the experience of other members. 17 28/09/2012 Basic Principles • Serves as an information exchange forum • Countries with medical device regulatory systems under development can benefit from others’ experience • May pattern their practices upon those of GHTF founding members • Avoid unnecessary (new) regulatory requirements • Wasteful for governments and industry • Delays technologies to the patient bedside Organizational Structure ISO, IEC Steering Committee Latin American Harmonization Working Party Study Group 3 Quality system requirements Study Group 5 Clinical evidence PAHO GMDN Agency Asian Harmonization Working Party Study Group 1 Regulatory systems Premarket assessment WHO Study Group 2 Vigilance reporting Market surveillance Study Group 4 Quality systems auditing ISO TC/210 18 28/09/2012 Steering Committee • Provides policy direction and strategic planning, and assigns and oversees technical work initiatives • Chair rotates between regions every three years • Regulator chair; industry vice-chair • Chair provides Secretariat • US FDA (CDRH) maintains the GHTF website and records • Meets twice/year and regular bi-monthly conference calls • Operates by consensus Study Groups • Work plans approved by Steering Committee • Volunteer experts appointed by Founding Member national regulators and industry associations • Meet face-to-face 2-3 times/years • Work by E-mail between meetings 19 28/09/2012 Study Groups Study groups are the engine of GHTF guidance development ( almost 40 posted) • SG1 : Pre-market conformance • SG2 : Post-market vigilance/surveillance • SG3 : Quality Systems • SG4 : Auditing • SG5 : Clinical effectiveness Special Topics: Ad Hoc Working Groups • Medical Device software • Combination Products • Training • Global Regulatory Model • Global Medical Device Nomenclature • Unique Device identifiers • GHTF Administrative processes 20 28/09/2012 Strategic goals • Emerging regulatory challenges • Implementing guidance documents • Mutual acceptance of common data by regulators • Evolving regulatory systems • Communications • Organization/infrastructure Accomplishments To Date • Risk-based classification system • Common definitions and vocabulary • Global Medical Device Nomenclature • Technical (science) requirements • Format and content of marketing applications (STED) • Assessment and review practices • Post-market activities • Quality Management Systems requirements and audits • Use of international standards 21 28/09/2012 GHTF Successes To Date • Adverse event reporting • The electronic national Competent Authority Report(NCAR) system • ISO 13485 and FDA Quality system Requirements • Auditing strategies and format finalized • Summary Technical Documentation for Demonstrating Conformity to the Essential Principles of Safety and Performance of Medical Devices (STED) • GHTF model served as basis of Australian system! Taking the Task Force Forward • Expansion • Guidance Implementation • New Challenges 22 28/09/2012 Expansion • Work with AHWP, Latin American Countries, ISO, IEC and others who share the GHTF goals • GHTF Training Plan • Invitation has been extended inviting organizations to become training partners • Continue to work with APEC on training • Involve other countries • Translate guidance documents into other languages • Join National Competent Authority Report system(NCAR) • Adopt guidance with feedback to GHTF Implementation • Implementation of guidance documents • Direct adoption of documents by regulatory authorities • Single QS audits used for multiple jurisdictions • Canada-Australia • Canada-USA Pilot • Improve operation and expand membership of NCAR • Adoption of GHTF Model as the regulatory framework for certain Asia economies 23 28/09/2012 New Challenges • Definition and regulation of “combination products” • Training strategy for countries with no regulatory framework • Expanded participation • Asia Harmonization working Party • Latin American Harmonization WP • ISO • IEC • WHO • Additional elements of global regulatory model • Global Medical Device nomenclature system GHTF Model • Guidance documents available in English on the GHTF website: www.ghtf.org • Links provided to translated documents • PAHO translated into Spanish and Portuguese • Training on the GHTF model and guidance documents • APEC sponsored • Training Partners Initiative 24 28/09/2012 The Future is Now • The GHTF has accomplished much • The time has come to build on this foundation and truly move toward the realization of global harmonization Introduction and Perspective of AHWP Asia Harmonization Working Party 25 28/09/2012 Overview • AHWP was established as a non-profit organization in 1998: www.ahwp.info • AHWP is an informal regional forum comprising of both government regulators and industry representatives from member economies in Asia • AHWP is a Liaison Member of GHTF Objectives • To forge a common direction for harmonization of medical devices regulation in Asia • To encourage increased understanding on the benefits of harmonization • To facilitate a linkage with GHTF • To encourage active participation by all Asian Economies 26 28/09/2012 Objectives • To provide a forum for discussion and training, facilitate information exchange, initiate projects and provide platform for implementation of harmonization among regulators and industry groups in Asia Members (21 Economies) Myanmar Korea Brunei Darussalam Abu Dhabi India Chinese Taipei PR of China Malaysia Indonesia Singapore Chile Jordan Vietnam Cambodia Philippines Laos Hong Kong China Thailand Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Pakistan South Africa 27 28/09/2012 Structure AHWP Chair, Co-Chair, Secretariat AHWP TC Chair, Co-Chair, Secretariat WG01 WG02 Pre-Market Submission Post-Market Surveillance WG01a IVDD WG03 Quality Management System WG04 WG05 Quality System Audit Clinical Evidence Special Task Group (STG1) WG06 Capacity Building & Training Special Task Group (STG2) Terms of Reference • To work towards building a common regulatory consensus based on acceptance of international standards as the chief means of ensuring product safety and assurance • To move towards recognition of a common audit that can be accepted throughout the Asian region • To work with the GHTF in technical harmonization efforts and seek formal representation and participation at GHTF Steering Committee & Study Groups 28 28/09/2012 Terms of Reference • To work towards a harmonized system of medical device vigilance reporting for adoption within the region and information sharing • To facilitate the process of regional implementation of APEC initiatives for medical devices sector Harmonized Regulatory System in Asia Pre-Market • Definition • nomenclature • CSDT • Essential Principles • Standards • Quality System • Clinical evidence • Conformity Assessment • ………… Placement on Market • Registration/licensing • Advertisement & claims • …….. Post-Market • Surveillance & vigilance system • Usage • Adverse Event Reporting • Information sharing network • ……….. 29 28/09/2012 Accomplishments • Comparative study on regulatory systems in Asian Member Economies • Adoption of • GHTF definition of medical device • Medical device classification & classification rules • Nomenclature system • Accepted as a Liaison Members of GHTF • Cooperation/collaboration with international bodies - GHTF, WHO, APEC(ongoing) • Wider participation - Saudi Arabia, South Africa, China, India(new members) • AHWP website as a main communications tool Accomplishments Recommendations from the Comparative study • Establish a clear & stated national policy as the basis and framework for medical devices regulatory system • Adopt definition classification of medical devices • Use a region-wide nomenclature for medical devices • Establish a comprehensive database and common reporting format to monitor and document adverse incidents • Assist each other in understanding, adapting and adopting GHTF recommendations • Build the capacity of the regulatory authorities & industry players 30 28/09/2012 Current Tasks At AHWP level • Discussion with GHTF on AHWP-GHTF Collaboration • Discussion with WHO on AHWP-WHO Collaboration • Continue working towards enlarging the participating economies • Organizing training programs At TC level • Strengthening its organization • Inviting representative from Members Economies to join WGs • Planning and carrying out specific activities for WGs Current Tasks Tasks currently undertaken by WGs & STG Work Group WG01 Current Task WG01a CSDT Conformity Assessment IVDD WG02 Safety Alert Dissemination System (SADS) WG03 To be determined WG04 To be determined WG05 To be determined WG06 Diploma in MD Regulation in collaboration with Northeastern University, Boston, USA STG (Nomenclature) Special Task to resolve nomenclature issue with GMDN STG (Legal Entity) Special Task to set up AHWP Administration service Ltd. 31 28/09/2012 Strengthening AHWP • Gap analysis • What we have done/achieved vs what we want to do/achieve • A strong organization is required • Major issues to strengthen our organization • Lack of infrastructure - to assist Member Economies to adopt AHWP’s recommendations into their national systems • Lack of expertise - to assist AHWP in the harmonization effort • Lack of financial support - to carry out planned activities Strengthening AHWP • Enlarge the participating economies • Strengthen TC and WGs • Organize training programs • Establish effective communications network amongst Member Economies • Seek involvement of experts from professional/international bodies and academia • Seek budgetary and suitable GHTF recommendations • Adopt and adapt suitable GHTF recommendations • Assist each other in understanding, adapting and adopting GHTF recommendations 32 28/09/2012 Setting up permanent Secretariat • AHWP an a nonprofit organization needs to registered a legal entity • Set up AHWP Administration Service Ltd. In Hong Kong • Finance management for AHWP Activities • Fix office location of permanent secretariat in Hong Kong Muchas Gracias! 33