Packet - Shasta County Office of Education

Transcription

Superintendent
Tom Armelino
Board of Education
Diane Gerard
Rhonda Hull
Sharon Hunter
Steve MacFarland
Laura Manuel
William Stegall
Elizabeth “Buffy” Tanner
1644 Magnolia Ave.  Redding, CA 96001
(530) 225-0200  Fax (530) 225-0329
www.shastacoe.org
SHASTA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
SPECIAL MEETING and BUDGET STUDY SESSION AGENDA
June 8, 2016
9:00 a.m.
Shasta County Office of Education – Board Room
1644 Magnolia Ave., Redding, CA 96001
Mission
To be leaders in educational excellence, offering support to schools and community to ensure Shasta County students
receive a quality education preparing them for high school graduation and success in career and college.
2015/16 Goals
1.
2.
The Shasta County Office of Education will continue to serve as an active partner in the Reach Higher Shasta (RHS) initiative.
a. We will continue to serve on the Executive Committee for RHS.
b. We will continue to serve on subcommittees of RHS as deemed appropriate.
c. We will continue to advocate on behalf of RHS in our community.
d. We will continue to pursue resources to support the goals of RHS.
Ensure that school districts and community partners receive clear and transparent communication regarding services provided
by the Shasta County Office of Education.
a. We will survey school districts to determine their needs and interest in services provided by the Shasta County Office
of Education.
b. We will align the services we offer to best serve the needs of school districts and students we serve.
c. We will clearly articulate and ensure school districts understand the services we provide.
The Shasta County Board of Education welcomes you to its Regular meetings scheduled on the second Wednesday of each month
(except June) at 1:30 p.m. at the Shasta County Office of Education Board Room or other posted location. The June meeting will be
held on the fourth Wednesday to allow time for budget preparation. For any month in which a holiday conflicts with the second
Wednesday of the month, the meeting will be held on the third or fourth Wednesday as posted. Board agenda materials are
available at the Shasta County Office of Education in the Superintendent’s Office at 1644 Magnolia Ave., Redding, CA.
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY
Pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, any individual with a disability who
requires reasonable accommodation to attend or participate in a meeting or function of the Shasta County Board of Education
may request assistance by contacting the Shasta County Office of Education seven (7) days prior to the meeting or function at:
1644 Magnolia Ave., Redding, CA 96001; phone (530) 225-0227; fax (530) 225-0329
1.
2.
3.
4.
Open Session
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
HEARING OF PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA
Under this item, the public is invited to complete a Speaker Card indicating which item listed on the agenda they would like to
comment on and will be allowed to do so when the item comes up. For Special Board meetings, the law does not require the
public be given an opportunity to address items not listed on the agenda.
Shasta County Board of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 1 of 147
5. DISCUSSION
5.1. Proposed Revisions to Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) and Annual Update (pgs. 4-119)
9:30 a.m. 5.2. PUBLIC HEARING to Receive Public Comment Regarding the Proposed Local Control
Accountability Plan (LCAP) and Annual Update In addition to verbal comments made at the Public
Hearing on the LCAP, written comments can be submitted to: Tom Armelino, Shasta County Superintendent of Schools
at 1644 Magnolia Ave., Redding, CA 96001 and will be considered in any revisions to the LCAP if received by 4:00 p.m.
on June 14, 2016. The proposed LCAP is available for public inspection at www.shastacoe.org or at the address
provided for written comments.
6. BUDGET STUDY SESSION
6.1. Proposed 2016/17 Budget (pgs. 120-141)
11:00 a.m. 6.2. PUBLIC HEARING to Receive Public Comment Regarding the Proposed 2016/17 Budget
7. BOARD BUSINESS
7.1. Procedure/Timeline to Fill Board Vacancy (pgs. 142-146)
7.2. Superintendent Armelino’s Absence at June 22, 2016 Board Meeting (pg. 147)
8. OTHER COMMENTS
9. SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
10. REMINDERS/UPCOMING EVENTS
• June 18, 2016, 3:00-4:00 p.m. – Tier I Program Graduation at PDC
11. NEXT MEETING – June 22, 2016, 1:30 p.m. at Shasta County Office of Education, 1644 Magnolia
Ave., Redding, CA 96001
12. ADJOURN
See attached/reverse side for policy/procedures governing participation at the Shasta County Board of Education meetings.
June 8, 2016
Page 2 of 147
THE SHASTA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION WELCOMES AND ENCOURAGES YOUR PARTICIPATION AT THEIR MEETINGS. TO ENSURE AN
ORDERLY MEETING, ALL PARTICIPANTS WILL BE ASKED TO OBSERVE THE FOLLOWING:
Procedures for placing an item on the agenda, making a presentation, or speaking to an item on the agenda shall be as follows (Board
Bylaw #9322):
Any member of the public or any Board member may request that a matter within the jurisdiction of the Board be placed on the agenda
of a regular meeting. The request must be in writing and be submitted to the Superintendent or designee with supporting documents and
information, if any, at least seven (7) days before the scheduled meeting date. Items submitted less than seven (7) days before the
scheduled meeting date may be postponed to a later meeting in order to allow sufficient time for consideration and research of the issue.
The Board President and Superintendent shall decide whether a request is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. Items not
within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board may not be placed on the agenda. In addition, the Board President and Superintendent
shall determine if the item is merely a request for information or whether the issue is covered by an existing policy or administrative
regulation before placing the item on the agenda.
The Board President and Superintendent shall decide whether an agenda item is appropriate for discussion in open or closed session, and
whether the item should be an action item, informational item or consent item.
The agenda shall provide members of the public the opportunity to address the Board on any agenda item before or during the Board's
consideration of the item. The agenda shall also provide members of the public an opportunity to testify at regular meetings on matters
which are not on the agenda but which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. (Education Code 35145.5, Government
Code 54954.3)
Persons addressing the Board shall be guided by the following conditions (Board Bylaw #9323):
Members of the public are encouraged to attend Board meetings and to address the Board concerning any item on the agenda or within
the Board's jurisdiction. So as not to inhibit public participation, persons attending Board meetings shall not be requested to sign in,
complete a questionnaire, or otherwise provide their name or other information as a condition of attending the meeting.
In order to conduct business in an orderly and efficient manner, the Board requires that public presentations to the Board comply with
the following procedures:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The Board shall give members of the public an opportunity to address the Board either before or during the Board's consideration of
each item of business to be discussed at regular or special meetings. (Education Code 35145.5, Government Code 54954.3)
At a time so designated on the agenda, members of the public may bring before the Board, at a regular meeting, matters that are not
listed on the agenda. The Board may refer such a matter to the Superintendent or designee or take it under advisement, but shall
not take action at that time except as allowed by law. The matter may be placed on the agenda of a subsequent meeting for action
or discussion by the Board. (Education Code 35145.5, Government Code 54954.2)
Without taking action, Board members or County Office staff members may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed
by the public about items not appearing on the agenda. Additionally, on their own initiative or in response to questions posed by the
public, a Board or staff member may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his/her
own activities. (Government Code 54954.2) Furthermore, the Board or a Board member may provide a reference to staff or other
resources for factual information, ask staff to report back to the Board at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter, or take
action directing staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (Government Code 54954.2)
The Board need not allow the public to speak on any item that has already been considered by a committee composed exclusively of
Board members at a public meeting where the public had the opportunity to address the committee on that item. However, if the
Board determines that the item has been substantially changed since the committee heard it, the Board shall provide an opportunity
for the public to speak. (Government Code 54954.3)
A person wishing to be heard by the Board shall first be recognized by the President and shall then proceed to comment as briefly as
the subject permits. Individual speakers shall be allowed three (3) minutes to address the Board on each agenda or nonagenda item.
The Board shall limit the total time for public input on each item to 20 minutes. With Board consent, the President may increase or
decrease the time allowed for public presentation, depending on the topic and the number of persons wishing to be heard. The
President may take a poll of speakers for or against a particular issue and may ask that additional persons speak only if they have
something new to add.
The Board President may rule on the appropriateness of a topic. If the topic would be more suitably addressed at a later time, the
President may indicate the time and place when it should be presented. The Board shall not prohibit public criticism of its policies,
procedures, programs, services, acts or omissions. (Government Code 54954.3) In addition, the Board may not prohibit public
criticism of County Office employees.
The Board President shall not permit any disturbance or willful interruption of Board meetings. Persistent disruption by an individual
or group shall be grounds for the chair to terminate the privilege of addressing the Board. The Board may remove disruptive
individuals and order the room cleared if necessary; in this case, members of the media not participating in the disturbance shall be
allowed to remain, and individual(s) not participating in such disturbances may be allowed to remain at the discretion of the Board.
When the room is ordered cleared due to a disturbance, further Board proceedings shall concern only matters appearing on the
agenda. (Government Code 54957.9)
Thank you for your cooperation.
June 8, 2016
Page 3 of 147
! # June 8, 2016
SCOE LCAP AND ANNUAL UPDATE
#
Jodie VanOrnum
#
# Jodie VanOrnum
Judy Flores
#
June 1, 2016
# #
✔
% #$%#
$
"
%
$
%
✔ $
%
$
%
$
!
%
#!$'"! #&
The LCAP is an important component of the LCFF. Under the LCFF all LEAs are
required to prepare an LCAP, which describes how they intend to meet annual goals
for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities identified
pursuant to EC Section 52060(d).
This is the annual review of the LCAP along with proposed revisions for 2016-2017.
The LCAP must address the 8 state priorities: 1) Basic (Conditions of Learning) 2)
State Standards (Conditions of Learning) 3)Parental Involvement (engagement) 4)
Pupil Achievement (Pupil Outcomes) 5)Pupil Engagemetn (engagement 6)School
Climate (engagement) 7)Course Access (Conditions of Learning 8)Other Pupil
Outcomes (Pupil Outcomes) 9)Expelled Pupils - (Conditions of Learning) 10) Foster
Youth (Conditions of Learning)
%""&
N/A
#&
N/A
June 8, 2016
Page 4 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 5 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 6 of 147
1 of 113
Introduction:
The state priorities listed in Education Code sections 52060 and 52066 can be categorized as specified below for planning purposes, however,
school districts and county offices of education must address each of the state priorities in their LCAP.
A. Conditions of Learning: Basic: degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned pursuant to Education Code section 44258.9, and fully
credentialed in the subject areas and for the pupils they are teaching; pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials pursuant
to Education Code section 60119; and school facilities are maintained in good repair pursuant to Education Code section 17002(d). (Priority 1)
Implementation of State Standards: implementation of academic content and performance standards and English language development
standards adopted by the state board for all pupils, including English learners. (Priority 2)
Course access: pupil enrollment in a broad course of study that includes all of the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210
and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of Section 51220, as applicable. (Priority 7)
Expelled pupils (for county offices of education only): coordination of instruction of expelled pupils pursuant to Education Code section 48926.
(Priority 9)
Foster youth (for county offices of education only): coordination of services, including working with the county child welfare agency to share
information, responding to the needs of the juvenile court system, and ensuring transfer of health and education records. (Priority 10)
B. Pupil Outcomes: Pupil achievement: performance on standardized tests, score on Academic Performance Index, share of pupils that are
college and career ready, share of English learners that become English proficient, English learner reclassification rate, share of pupils that
pass Advanced Placement exams with 3 or higher, share of pupils determined prepared for college by the Early Assessment Program. (Priority
4)
Other pupil outcomes: pupil outcomes in the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210 and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of
Education Code section 51220, as applicable. (Priority 8)
C. Engagement: Parental involvement: efforts to seek parent input in decision making at the district and each school site, promotion of parent
participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and special need subgroups. (Priority 3)
Pupil engagement: school attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, high school
graduations rates. (Priority 5)
School climate: pupil suspension rates, pupil expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, parents and teachers on the
sense of safety and school connectedness. (Priority 6)
LEA:
Shasta County Office of Education
Contact:
Jodie VanOrnum, Executive Director Student Programs, [email protected], (530)225-0360
June 8, 2016
Page 7 of 147
2 of 113
LCAP Year:
2016-17
Local Control and Accountability plan and Annual Update Template
The Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) and Annual Update Template shall be used to provide details regarding local educational
agencies͛(LEAs) actions and expenditures to support pupil outcomes and overall performance pursuant to Education Code sections 52060,
52066, 47605, 47605.5, and 47606.5. The LCAP and Annual Update Template must be completed by all LEAs each year.
For school districts, pursuant to Education Code section 52060, the LCAP must describe, for the school district and each school within the
district, goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052,
including pupils with disabilities, for each of the state priorities and any locally identified priorities.
For county offices of education, pursuant to Education Code section 52066, the LCAP must describe, for each county office of educationoperated school and program, goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in
Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, who are funded through the county office of education Local Control Funding
Formula as identified in Education Code section 2574 (pupils attending juvenile court schools, on probation or parole, or mandatorily expelled)
for each of the state priorities and any locally identified priorities. School districts and county offices of education may additionally coordinate
and describe in their LCAPs services provided to pupils funded by a school district but attending county-operated schools and programs,
including special education programs.
Charter schools, pursuant to Education Code sections 47605, 47605.5, and 47606.5, must describe goals and specific actions to achieve those
goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, for each of the
state priorities as applicable and any locally identified priorities. For charter schools, the inclusion and description of goals for state priorities in
the LCAP may be modified to meet the grade levels served and the nature of the programs provided, including modifications to reflect only the
statutory requirements explicitly applicable to charter schools in the Education Code.
The LCAP is intended to be a comprehensive planning tool. Accordingly, in developing goals, specific actions, and expenditures, LEAs should
carefully consider how to reflect the services and related expenses for their basic instructional program in relationship to the state priorities.
LEAs may reference and describe actions and expenditures in other plans and funded by a variety of other fund sources when detailing goals,
actions, and expenditures related to the state and local priorities. LCAPs must be consistent with school plans submitted pursuant to Education
Code section 64001. The information contained in the LCAP, or annual update, may be supplemented by information contained in other plans
(including the LEA plan pursuant to Section 1112 of Subpart 1 of Part A of Title I of Public Law 107-110) that are incorporated or referenced as
relevant in this document.
For each section of the template, LEAs shall comply with instructions and should use the guiding questions as prompts (but not limits) for
completing the information as required by statute. Guiding questions do not require separate narrative responses. However, the narrative
June 8, 2016
Page 8 of 147
3 of 113
response and goals and actions should demonstrate each guiding question was considered during the development of the plan. Data
referenced in the LCAP must be consistent with the school accountability report card where appropriate. LEAs may resize pages or attach
additional pages as necessary to facilitate completion of the LCAP.
State Priorities
The state priorities listed in Education Code sections 52060 and 52066 can be categorized as specified below for planning purposes, however,
school districts and county offices of education must address each of the state priorities in their LCAP. Charter schools must address the
priorities in Education Code section 52060(d) that apply to the grade levels served, or the nature of the program operated, by the charter
school.
A. Conditions of Learning:
Basic: degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned pursuant to Education Code section 44258.9, and fully credentialed in the subject
areas and for the pupils they are teaching; pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials pursuant to Education Code section
60119; and school facilities are maintained in good repair pursuant to Education Code section 17002(d). (Priority 1)
Implementation of State Standards: implementation of academic content and performance standards and English language development
standards adopted by the state board for all pupils, including English learners. (Priority 2)
Course access: pupil enrollment in a broad course of study that includes all of the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210 and
subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of Section 51220, as applicable. (Priority 7)
Expelled pupils (for county offices of education only): coordination of instruction of expelled pupils pursuant to Education Code section
48926. (Priority 9)
Foster youth (for county offices of education only): coordination of services, including working with the county child welfare agency to share
information, responding to the needs of the juvenile court system, and ensuring transfer of health and education records. (Priority 10)
B. Pupil Outcomes:
Pupil achievement: performance on standardized tests, score on Academic Performance Index, share of pupils that are college and career
ready, share of English learners that become English proficient, English learner reclassification rate, share of pupils that pass Advanced
Placement exams with 3 or higher, share of pupils determined prepared for college by the Early Assessment Program. (Priority 4)
Other pupil outcomes: pupil outcomes in the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210 and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of
June 8, 2016
Page 9 of 147
4 of 113
Education Code section 51220, as applicable. (Priority 8)
C. Engagement:
Parental involvement: efforts to seek parent input in decision making at the district and each schoolsite, promotion of parent participation in
programs for unduplicated pupils and special need subgroups. (Priority 3)
Pupil engagement: school attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, high school
graduations rates. (Priority 5)
School climate: pupil suspension rates, pupil expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, parents and teachers on the
sense of safety and school connectedness. (Priority 6)
June 8, 2016
Page 10 of 147
5 of 113
Section 1: Stakeholder Engagement
Meaningful engagement of parents, pupils, and other stakeholders, including those representing the subgroups identified in Education Code
section 52052, is critical to the LCAP and budget process. Education Code sections 52060(g), 52062 and 52063 specify the minimum
requirements for school districts; Education Code sections 52066(g), 52068 and 52069 specify the minimum requirements for county offices of
education, and Education Code section 47606.5 specifies the minimum requirements for charter schools. In addition, Education Code section
48985 specifies the requirements for translation of documents.
Instructions: Describe the process used to consult with parents, pupils, school personnel, local bargaining units as applicable, and the
community and how this consultation contributed to development of the LCAP or annual update. Note that the LEA͛s goals, actions, services
and expenditures related to the state priority of parental involvement are to be described separately in Section 2. In the annual update
boxes, describe the stakeholder involvement process for the review, and describe its impact on, the development of the annual update to
LCAP goals, actions, services, and expenditures.
Guiding Questions:
1) How have applicable stakeholders (e.g., parents and pupils, including parents of unduplicated pupils and unduplicated pupils
identified in Education Code section 42238.01; community members; local bargaining units; LEA personnel; county child welfare
agencies; county office of education foster youth services programs, court-appointed special advocates, and other foster youth
stakeholders; community organizations representing English learners; and others as appropriate) been engaged and involved in
developing, reviewing, and supporting implementation of the LCAP?
2) How have stakeholders been included in the LEA͛s process in a timely manner to allow for engagement in the development of the
LCAP?
3) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was made available to stakeholders related to the state
priorities and used by the LEA to inform the LCAP goal setting process? How was the information made available?
4) What changes, if any, were made in the LCAP prior to adoption as a result of written comments or other feedback received by the
LEA through any of the LEA͛s engagement processes?
5) What specific actions were taken to meet statutory requirements for stakeholder engagement pursuant to Education Code
sections 52062, 52068, and 47606.5, including engagement with representatives of parents and guardians of pupils identified in
Education Code section 42238.01?
6) What specific actions were taken to consult with pupils to meet the requirements 5 CCR 15495(a)?
7) How has stakeholder involvement been continued and supported? How has the involvement of these stakeholders supported
improved outcomes for pupils, including unduplicated pupils, related to the state priorities?
Involvement Process
Impact on LCAP
June 8, 2016
Page 11 of 147
6 of 113
Stakeholders have been involved in every aspect of the development of
the 2016-17 Court and Community School LCAP. Stakeholder groups
include teachers, parents, students, community members via the YVPC,
Parent Advisory/SSC,SCOE Board of Education, District Partners, Law
Enforcement, Probation, and Bargaining Units. Progress on data has
been provided to each of these groups along with an opportunity for
each group to share their thoughts, opinions, and feedback about
development of the 2016-17 School Year LCAP. The following
dates/activities represent stakeholder input:
Board of Education Updates/Input: 11/18/15; 2/10/16; 5/11/16;
Alt. Ed. Collaborative Forum; 10/27/15
School Site Council Goals Update/Input: 9/22/15; 11/17/15;
Stakeholder involvement has had a significant impact on the
development of our 2016-17 LCAP. Overall, elements of the ROP,
Career/Work model have been effective. Students who have not
been successful have barriers such as truancy, drug use and lack of
self regulation skills to fully engage in the program. Teachers are
improving their capacity to manage online-blended learning and it has
been a tool that engages students. Lastly, many of our stakeholders
noticed a lot of action/services that were duplications. As such,
action steps will be narrowed to focus on Career and College
Readiness, teacher effectiveness, and attendance. Input indicates
too many repetitive goals and services. the 16-17 LCAP will reflect
fewer, more refined goals to emphasize core efforts and emphasis on
unduplicated pupils and students with exceptional needs.

Achievement Night Parent Input Boards: 2/23/16
YVPC Community Member Goal Progress: 3/24/16

Student Stakeholder Surveys/Forums: 3/22/16; March-April Open
Surveys (included Special Education students)

Teachers: Monday Collaboration/PD meetings; 4/4/16

Other school personnel: 1/27/16
LCAP meeting; 2/18/16
Student Programs Manager¶s Meeting; 3/1/16

Bargaining Units: CTA 4/15/16; CSEA 4/19/16; 4/29/16

Parents have indicated that services such as career
opportunities and behavior counseling that will benefit their
students.
Student feedback has confirmed the need for staff who have
high expectation and develop relationships with their students.
Program staff has consistently asked for additional training in
relationships, trauma informed instruction and restorative
practices.
Participants at the quarterly Alternative Education
Collaborative Forum (Mental Health, Districts, Special
Education and Law Enforcement) have reviewed data and
believe an emphasis on reduction of chronic truancy is
necessary. In addition, they would like to continue the
provision of ROP and work experience options for alternative
education students.
Staff have identified some options for assessment of ELA and
Math.
Stakeholder input confirms that integration of career and
college opportunities work for some students and should
remain available for eligible students.
CAHSEE Goals will be removed from the LCAP. Progress
towards high school graduation will be represented in ILCP
work, local benchmark assessment and the SBAC.
Additional impacts of stakeholder engagement included:

June 8, 2016
Moving the ROP classroom to the ERC site
Staffing reconfigurations to provide for improved
Page 12 of 147
7 of 113

teacher/student relationship in the ROP 11-12th class
Reduction of a teacher at the Juvenile Court School to meet
the lower enrollment; provision of an additional aide to allow for
small group instruction;
Elimination of the CAHSEE as a measure of student progress
Annual Update:
Annual Update:
Stakeholders have been involved in every aspect of updating the 201516 Court and Community School LCAP. Stakeholder groups include
teachers, parents, students, community members via the YVPC, Parent
Advisory/SSC,SCOE Board of Education, District Partners, Law
Enforcement, Probation, Bargaining Units. Progress on data has been
provided to each of these groups along with an opportunity for each
group to share their thoughts, opinion and feedback about progress
towards goals and adjustments for the 2016-17 School Year. The
following dates/activities represent stakeholder input:
Stakeholder groups include teachers, parents, students, community
members via the YVPC, Parent Advisory/SSC,SCOE Board of
Education, District Partners, Law Enforcement, Probation, Bargaining
Units. Their input has guided actions for the annual update.
Progress on data has been provided to each of these groups along
with an opportunity for each group to share their thoughts, opinion
and feedback about progress towards goals and adjustments for the
2015-16 School Year. The following dates/activities represent
stakeholder input:
Board of Education Updates/Input: 11/18/15; 2/10/16; 5/11/16;
The BOE has supported the restructuring of staff to meet the required
ratios based on enrollment. Based on input from SUSHD/GWUSD,
they also understand the decision to offer one Community Classroom
for AUHSD as those districts will be serving their own.
Alt. Ed. Collaborative Forum; 10/27/15
School Site Council Goals Update/Input: 9/22/15; 11/17/15;
Achievement Night Parent Input Boards: 2/23/16
School Site Council members emphasized the need for continued
ROP/Work offerings along with counseling.
YVPC Community Member Goal Progress: 3/24/16
Parents want continued counseling and career options.
Student Stakeholder Surveys/Forums: 3/22/16; March-April Open
Surveys
Community members emphasized importance of ongoing
collaboration to support at risk and foster youth.
Teachers: Monday Collaboration/PD meetings; 4/4/16
Student input reveals a need to clarify and streamline systems and
responsibilities for sharing information about college and careers
(teacher responsibility, career-parent coach responsibility). There is a
continued need to educate students about FAFSA completion;
transcripts; graduation requirements; emphasis for teachers to use
Blended Learning and Technology strategies for instruction. There is
also a need for continued implementation of credit recovery strategies
for improved graduation rates.
Other school personnel: 1/27/16
LCAP meeting; 2/18/16
Student Programs Manager¶s Meeting; 3/1/16

Bargaining Units: CTA 4/15/16; CSEA 4/19/16; 4/29/16
June 8, 2016
Page 13 of 147
8 of 113
Program metrics and data included in the LCAP and used as monitoring
tools has been shared with each of the groups in various forums, both
formal and informal. Metrics include ACHIEVE 3000 Lexile
Growth; Behavioral Data (suspensions/referrals/attendance), and college
and career readiness data. The data was reviewed and participants
given opportunities to make suggestions for addition or elimination of
strategies or services. Input indicates a need to strenghten assessment
of students, continue the work in strengthening relationships, and
supporting college and career readiness. Parent involvement through the
stakeholder involvement process has emphasized the need to offer
social-emotional development options for students, along with
career/work opportunities. Students have participated in surveys and
focus groups and indicate the need for highly engaging instruction from
teachers who develop relationships and high expectations. School Site
Council has met 4 times during the year to review LCAP progress and
identify effectiveness of activities. Interagency partners have shared
concerns about student attendance and need to work collaboratively
through SARB to decrease the chronic truancy rates. All Staff meetings
and weekly collaboration have given staff opportunities for input
regarding LCAP goals and updates. Staff have shared the continued
need to emphasize engagement through educational options such as
blended learning via technology, The SCOE Board has been provided
information about the LCAP¶s implementation on multiple occasions
throughout the year. Program administration has met to sustain
accountability and implementation of activities and services embedded in
the LCAP. The involvement process included all of the meetings listed
above. The Board of Education will hold a Public Hearing on May 11,
2016 and will approve the document on June 22, 2016.
Teacher input will lead to the restructuring of the Professional
Development Schedule and Content.
Bargaining unit input led to the provision of Restorative Justice
Training for a Para-educator to act as lead for others in appropriate
classroom strategies. Additional leadership training and inclusion in
professional development will be offered for para-educators.
Based on input from the stakeholders listed above, several additions
and deletions have been made in this year¶s plan:
Professional Development have encompassed implementation of the
Blended Learning Strategies and Management;
Integration of Behavior Management Strategies; Enrollment
necessitated reduction in para-educator assignments;
Goals will be eliminated and duplication of activities or services will be
eliminated.
Section 2: Goals, Actions, Expenditures, and Progress Indicators
Instructions:
All LEAs must complete the LCAP and Annual Update Template each year. The LCAP is a three-year plan for the upcoming school year and the
two years that follow. In this way, the program and goals contained in the LCAP align with the term of a school district and county office of
education budget and multiyear budget projections. The Annual Update section of the template reviews progress made for each stated goal
in the school year that is coming to a close, assesses the effectiveness of actions and services provided, and describes the changes made in
the LCAP for the next three years that are based on this review and assessment.
June 8, 2016
Page 14 of 147
9 of 113
Charter schools may adjust the table below to align with the term of the charter school͛s budget that is submitted to the school͛s authorizer
pursuant to Education Code section 47604.33.
For school districts, Education Code sections 52060 and 52061, for county offices of education, Education Code sections 52066 and 52067, and
for charter schools, Education Code section 47606.5 require(s) the LCAP to include a description of the annual goals, for all pupils and each
subgroup of pupils, to be achieved for each state priority as defined in 5 CCR 15495(i) and any local priorities; a description of the specific
actions an LEA will take to meet the identified goals; a description of the expenditures required to implement the specific actions; and an
annual update to include a review of progress towards the goals and describe any changes to the goals.
To facilitate alignment between the LCAP and school plans, the LCAP shall identify and incorporate school-specific goals related to the state
and local priorities from the school plans submitted pursuant to Education Code section 64001. Furthermore, the LCAP should be shared with,
and input requested from, schoolsite-level advisory groups, as applicable (e.g., schoolsite councils, English Learner Advisory Councils, pupil
advisory groups, etc.) to facilitate alignment between school-site and district-level goals and actions. An LEA may incorporate or reference
actions described in other plans that are being undertaken to meet the goal.
Using the following instructions and guiding questions, complete a goal table (see below) for each of the LEA͛s goals. Duplicate and expand
the fields as necessary.
Goal: Describe the goal:
When completing the goal tables, include goals for all pupils and specific goals for schoolsites and specific subgroups, including pupils
with disabilities, both at the LEA level and, where applicable, at the schoolsite level. The LEA may identify which schoolsites and
subgroups have the same goals, and group and describe those goals together. The LEA may also indicate those goals that are not
applicable to a specific subgroup or schoolsite.
Related State and/or Local Priorities: Identify the state and/or local priorities addressed by the goal by placing a check mark next to the
applicable priority or priorities. The LCAP must include goals that address each of the state priorities, as defined in 5 CCR 15495(i), and any
additional local priorities; however, one goal may address multiple priorities.
Identified Need: Describe the need(s) identified by the LEA that this goal addresses, including a description of the supporting data used to
identify the need(s).
Schools: Identify the schoolsites to which the goal applies. LEAs may indicate ͞all͟for all schools, specify an individual school or a subset of
schools, or specify grade spans (e.g., all high schools or grades K-5).
Applicable Pupil Subgroups: Identify the pupil subgroups as defined in Education Code section 52052 to which the goal applies, or indicate
June 8, 2016
Page 15 of 147
10 of 113
͞all͟for all pupils.
Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes: For each LCAP year, identify and describe specific expected measurable outcomes for all pupils
using, at minimum, the applicable required metrics for the related state priorities. Where applicable, include descriptions of specific expected
measurable outcomes for schoolsites and specific subgroups, including pupils with disabilities, both at the LEA level and at the schoolsite
level.
The metrics used to describe the expected measurable outcomes may be quantitative or qualitative, although the goal tables must
address all required metrics for every state priority in each LCAP year. The required metrics are the specified measures and objectives
for each state priority as set forth in Education Code sections 52060(d) and 52066(d). For the pupil engagement priority metrics, LEAs
must calculate the rates specified in Education Code sections 52060(d)(5)(B), (C), (D) and (E) as described in the Local Control
Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template Appendix, sections (a) through (d).
Actions/Services: For each LCAP year, identify all annual actions to be performed and services provided to meet the described goal. Actions
may describe a group of services that are implemented to achieve the identified goal.
Scope of Service: Describe the scope of each action/service by identifying the schoolsites covered. LEAs may indicate ͞all͟for all schools,
specify an individual school or a subset of schools, or specify grade spans (e.g., all high schools or grades K-5). If supplemental and
concentration funds are used to support the action/service, the LEA must identify if the scope of service is districtwide, schoolwide,
countywide, or charterwide.
Pupils to be served within identified scope of service: For each action/service, identify the pupils to be served within the identified scope of
service. If the action to be performed or the service to be provided is for all pupils, place a check mark next to ͞ALL.͟
For each action and/or service to be provided above what is being provided for all pupils, place a check mark next to the applicable
unduplicated pupil subgroup(s) and/or other pupil subgroup(s) that will benefit from the additional action, and/or will receive the
additional service. Identify, as applicable, additional actions and services for unduplicated pupil subgroup(s) as defined in Education
Code section 42238.01, pupils redesignated fluent English proficient, and/or pupils subgroup(s) as defined in Education Code section
52052.
Budgeted Expenditures: For each action/service, list and describe budgeted expenditures for each school year to implement these actions,
including where those expenditures can be found in the LEA͛s budget. The LEA must reference all fund sources for each proposed
expenditure. Expenditures must be classified using the California School Accounting Manual as required by Education Code sections 52061,
52067, and 47606.5.
Guiding Questions:
June 8, 2016
Page 16 of 147
11 of 113
1) What are the LEA͛s goal(s) to address state priorities related to ͞Conditions of Learning͍͟
2) What are the LEA͛s goal(s) to address state priorities related to ͞Pupil Outcomes͍͟
3) What are the LEA͛s goal(s) to address state priorities related to parent and pupil ͞Engagement͟(e.g., parent involvement, pupil
engagement, and school climate)?
4) What are the LEA͛s goal(s) to address any locally-identified priorities?
5) How have the unique needs of individual schoolsites been evaluated to inform the development of meaningful district and/or
individual schoolsite goals (e.g., input from site level advisory groups, staff, parents, community, pupils; review of school level
plans; in-depth school level data analysis, etc.)?
6) What are the unique goals for unduplicated pupils as defined in Education Code sections 42238.01 and subgroups as defined in
section 52052 that are different from the LEA͛s goals for all pupils?
7) What are the specific expected measurable outcomes associated with each of the goals annually and over the term of the LCAP?
8) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was considered/reviewed to develop goals to address each state
or local priority?
9) What information was considered/reviewed for individual schoolsites?
10) What information was considered/reviewed for subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052?
11) What actions/services will be provided to all pupils, to subgroups of pupils identified pursuant to Education Code section 52052, to
specific schoolsites, to English learners, to low-income pupils, and/or to foster youth to achieve goals identified in the LCAP?
12) How do these actions/services link to identified goals and expected measurable outcomes?
13) What expenditures support changes to actions/services as a result of the goal identified? Where can these expenditures be found
in the LEA's budget?
GOAL:
Goal 1: Ensure that ALL students graduate college and career ready by providing quality
programs and support to schools and the community.
Related State and/or Local Priorities: X
1 X 2 _3 X 4 _5 _6 X 7 X 8 COE
only: _ 9 _ 10 Local:
NA
June 8, 2016
Page 17 of 147
12 of 113
Identified Need:
School Site Council and Teachers identified the need for high academic and social-emotional expectations for alternative
education students. Students and parents indicated the benefitf of having Career Coach to connect them to Experiential
Work programs and ROP. Student surveys indicated low percentages of students prepared for graduation and completion
of FAFSA.
Board Members, teachers, parents and community members indicate the need to maintain facilities, qualified teachers and
standards aligned curriculum in all programs. Also indicated was the need to emphasize educational options that include
career readiness and work experience.
All stakeholders identify the need to implement state standards, with fidelity, in all programs with all students and subgroups.
Teachers, parents and students identified the need for all students, including EL's and those on IEP's, enrolled in or
receiving services from County Office of Education programs to have course access: Core, VAPA, Health, PE, CTE Foreign
language and Drivers Ed, as appropriate for grade level and student need.
Needs were identified through student focus groups; parent forums and surveys; teacher conversations and collaboration
meetings; the Single Plan for Student Achievement addresses and references the need for services to prepare students for
career and college.
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
All Schools
Grades: All
Applicable Pupil Subgroups:
All
LCAP Year 1
June 8, 2016
Page 18 of 147
13 of 113
Expected Annual
Priority 1: Facilities will be maintained with FIT rating of ³Good´or better.
Measurable
Outcomes:
Priority 1: 100% of teachers will be fully credentialed and appropriately assigned.
Priority 1: 100% Curriculum will be aligned with state standards
Priority 2: 100% of teachers will implement California Standards in the areas of math, ELA, and NGSS as measured by
walkthroughs.
Priority 4: Student Achievement in SBAC Math and ELA will improve.
Priority 4: Increase student enrollment and completion of advanced placement courses, including A-G options, by 10% over
15-16 school year
Priority 4: 100% of ELL students will be assessed annually for English Proficiency
Priority 4: 70% of EL students will demonstrate increased proficiency on CELDT
Priority 4: 20% of ELL students will be reclassified.
Priority 4: Increase the number of students who demonstrate college preparedness on the EAP or via the Achieve 3000
assessment by 10%.
Priority 7: Increase students enrolled in career orientation by 10% over 15-16.
Priority 7: 100% of students will have ICLPs that ensure broad course access and are monitored by career coordinator,
teachers and administration.
Priority 8: 50% of students will earn credits during summer school; 50% of students will earn certifications from courses
such as Food Handler's, CPR, Driver's Ed, etc.
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
Pupils to be served within identified scope of
service
June 8, 2016
Budgeted
Expenditures
Page 19 of 147
14 of 113
1a. Teachers and paraprofessionals will participate in 30
hours of collaborations and PD that focus on:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
California Standards instruction (Math, ELA,
NGSS, ELD)
Curriculum alignment (Math, ELA, NGSS, ELD)
Student outcome data
Course Access including pathways curriculum
through ROP partnership
Review results of career interest surveys with
students and coordinate completion of
Individualized Career Learning Plans and career
activities
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------_ Foster Youth _ American Indian or Alaska
Native _ Hispanic or Latino _ Two or More
Races _ Low Income Pupils _ Redesignated fluent
English proficient _ Asian _ Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander _ English Learners _ Black or
African American _ Filipino _ White _ Students
with Disabilities _ Homeless
_ Other
See 1b and 1c
$1835 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$1800 S & C
¶s & ¶s
1b. Provision of a content area expert in the area of
LEA Wide
English Language Arts from the County Office of
Education to provide assistance and support in program Grades: All
development and implementation, including using time to
align K-12 curriculum and instruction with CCSS(ELA,
ELD). Content area expert will provide strategies for
multi tiered supports to support our Special Education,
Alternative Education, Foster Youth and English
Language Learners.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $6428 in Title
1A
_ Foster Youth _ American Indian or Alaska
_ Other
1c. Provision of a content area expert in the area of
LEA Wide
Mathematics and NGSS from the County Office of
align K-12 curriculum and instruction with CCSS.
Content area expert will include multi tiered strategies of
support to support our Special Education, Alternative
Education, Foster Youth and English Language Learners.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $5139 Title 1A
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 20 of 147
15 of 113
1d. Provision of Career Coach to provide guidance and
coaching on course access, college and career
readiness, monitor Individual Career Learning Plans and
engage/coach parents and assist teachers in developing
systems to monitor ILCP's.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1e. Provide extended time to students to increase overall LEA Wide
academic achievement and career and college readiness:
Grades: All
1. Extended learning time, including summer school
in 2017, to provide opportunities for students to
receive academic support, including Alternatives
and School Choice (reasonable supports) and
behavioral support.
2. Extended learning time for after school at Juvenile
Court School aligned to standards and pathways.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $52450 S & C
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
X All
_ Other
$2664 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$2990 S &C
¶s & ¶s
Extended learning time to provide opportunities for
students to receive academic support, electives and
enrichment activities, including visual and performing arts
and foreign language.
1f. Maintain Facilities with FIT rating of ³Good´or better.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $0
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 21 of 147
16 of 113
1g. Provide individualized intervention and acceleration
services to students on a daily basis, embedded in
regular classroom instructional schedule, to increase
overall student achievement and address the individual
needs of special education, foster youth, adjudicated
youth and ELL students.
1.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Provide aides to increase student support and
access to interventions, 1-1 tutoring and academic
support
X All
_ Other
$4056 S & C
¶s &
¶s;
$10560 S & C
5710
$19,214 Title
1A
$4413 S &
C 5000¶s
Use and evaluate the use of on-line interventions and
reporting systems, credit recovery and acceleration
resources (i.e, iPass, Aeries.net, ACHIEVE 3000,
Odysseyware, Acellus), as well as provide for other
qualifying operating expenses. Note: Odysseyware has
a wide variety of options, including Spanish courses,
psychology and child development, thus meeting the
requirements for increasing A-G and course access.
Through enrollment in ROP courses of study and Career
Choice Curriculum at the 9-10th grade level, students will
participate in Career Pathways Instruction and engage in
technology based instructional strategies.
1h Teachers credentials and assignments will be
monitored by administration in their regular duties.
All Schools
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
costs.
_ Other
LCAP Year 2
June 8, 2016
Page 22 of 147
17 of 113
Expected Annual
Measurable
Outcomes:
walkthroughs.
16-17 school year
assessment by 10%.
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
service
June 8, 2016
Budgeted
Expenditures
Page 23 of 147
18 of 113
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
NGSS, ELD)
activities
X All
_ Other
See 1b and 1c
$1925 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$1890 S & C
¶s & ¶s
LEA Wide
Language Learners.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $6720 in Title
1A
_ Other
LEA Wide
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $5389 Title 1A
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 24 of 147
19 of 113
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
behavioral support.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $54650 S & C
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
X All
_ Other
$2794 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$3140 S &C
¶s & ¶s
1f. Maintain Facilities
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $0
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 25 of 147
20 of 113
1.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
support
X All
_ Other
$4256 S & C
¶s &
¶s;
$11060 S & C
5710
$20,114 Title 1A
$4633 S &
C 5000¶s
1h Teachers credentials and assignments will be
monitored by administration in their regular duties.
All Schools
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
costs.
_ Other
LCAP Year 3
June 8, 2016
Page 26 of 147
21 of 113
Expected Annual
Measurable
Outcomes:
walkthroughs.
17-18 school year
assessment by 10%.
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
service
June 8, 2016
Budgeted
Expenditures
Page 27 of 147
22 of 113
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
NGSS, ELD)
activities
X All
_ Other
See 1b and 1c
$2020 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$1985 S & C
¶s & ¶s
LEA Wide
Language Learners.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $7050 in Title
1A
_ Other
LEA Wide
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $5640 Title 1A
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 28 of 147
23 of 113
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
behavioral support.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $57382 S & C
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
X All
_ Other
$2933 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$3297 S &C
¶s & ¶s
1f. Maintain Facilities
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $0
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 29 of 147
24 of 113
1.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
support
X All
_ Other
$4468 S & C
¶s &
¶s;
$11613 S & C
5710
$21,119 Title
1A
$4864 S &
C 5000¶s
Teachers credentials and assignments will be monitored
by administration in their regular duties.
All Schools
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
costs.
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 30 of 147
25 of 113
GOAL:
Goal 2:Ensure that ALL students are actively engaged and supported through a safe, healthy,
culturally responsive, and rigorous learning environment.
Related State and/or Local Priorities:
_1 _2 X 3 _4 X 5 _6 X 7 _8 COE
NA
Identified Need:
In order for students to be actively engaged, they must be at school. Attendance rates have been unacceptable at under
70% and while chronic absenteeism has decreased to 54% from 73%, this is an alarming number. Students need to be in
school to learn and these numbers need to decrease. Parents must be aware of and involved in decision making and
participating in their students program to the best of their abilities. Parents reported via phone calls that their students were
more interested in school when enrolled in career and ROP classes and learning applicable skills. 60% of students
reported that they had not been involved in any career activities.
Suspension rates per student have declined because teachers are using relationship development strategies from
Capturing Kids Hearts, Trauma Informed Care, etc. Teacher implementation of these strategies needs to continue through
the next school year. Nearly 50% of students reported that they were not aware of their progress towards graduation which
indicates a need for a more systematic approach of communicating with students and their parents about opportunities
available in the Pathways Program. 0% of parents responded to a survey that was mailed 2 times, indicating a need to
document other types of parent engagement and involvement in their students' education.
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
All schools
Grades: All
All
LCAP Year 1
June 8, 2016
Page 31 of 147
26 of 113
Expected Annual
Priority 3: Parent Engagement data 100% of parents will report knowledge of student progress towards career and college
Measurable
readiness
Outcomes:
Priority 3: Maintain parent involvement in school governance (School Site Council).
Priority 5: Attendance Rates - Increase average attendance to 90%, a 26% increase over 64% reported in 15-16.
Priority 5: Chronic Absenteeism rates - Decrease chronic absenteeism by 20%, to 35%, over the 55% reported in 15-16.
Priority 5: MS dropout rate - Does not apply, middle-school not enrolled.
Priority 5: HS dropout rate - Reduce the High School Dropout rate by 20% Baseline: 2014 10% Dropout rate
Priority 5: HS graduation rate - Graduate 100% of eligible seniors. Baseline: 2014 87% Graduation Rate
Priority 6: Suspension/Expulsion Rates - Maintain less than 10% suspensions per year. Baseline: 2014 9.6%
Priority 6: Increase number of students and parents who complete the annual survey of school safety and connectedness
by 10%
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
2a. Engage students and their families in relevant
LEA Wide
learning through participation in ROP classes,
Grades: All
Experiential Work Program and functional exposure to
careers by employing a Parent and Career Coach to work
during and after school hours.
service
Budgeted
Expenditures
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- See 1d; 1h
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 32 of 147
27 of 113
2b. Ensure adequate social and emotional support is
provided to students, including special education, ELL,
foster youth, and adjudicated youth.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Provide Counseling services
Provide professional development in positive
behavioral interventions
Provide health services via nurse consultations
Provide transition services to students via Career
Coordinator
Collaborate with interagency staff to develop
consistent programming between home to school
(group home, probation officers, Ed. Right
Holders)
2c. Increase Attendance Rates with the following
actions/services:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
Engaging learning experiences monitored by
administrator
Engaging SARB Specialist in monitoring
attendance
Engaging Social Worker for 20% FTE to make
student and parent connections
Department will seek parental input about decisions
through School Site Council, Parent Surveys, input at
board meetings, parent conferences, stakeholder
meetings.
All Schools
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_ Other
$9000 Title 1A
$9600 Nurse
$6000 YVPC
Title 1A
See 1d;
Part of Director
Salary
$16791 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$6758 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$13,528 Social
Worker Title 1A
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
cost.
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 33 of 147
28 of 113
Ensure that students and parents have the tools and
technology available at every event and stakeholder
meeting to complete the school safety and
connectedness surveys.
All
Grades: All
2f. A Data Technician will be assigned to the program for LEA Wide
provision of streamlined enrollment, data entry and ease
Grades: All
of direct parent contact.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
costs.
_ Other
X All
_ Other
$6373 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$3180 Title 1A
¶s & ¶s
LCAP Year 2
Expected Annual
Measurable
readiness
Outcomes:
Priority 5: Attendance Rates - Maintain 90% attendance rate
Priority 5: Chronic Absenteeism rates - Decrease chronic absenteeism by 10%, from the reported in 16-17.
by 10%
June 8, 2016
Page 34 of 147
29 of 113
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Coordinator
Holders)
actions/services:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
administrator
attendance
service
Budgeted
Expenditures
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- See 1d; 1h
_ Other
X All
_ Other
X All
_ Other
June 8, 2016
$9450 Title 1A
$10080 Nurse
$6300 YVPC
Title 1A
See 1d;
Part of Director
Salary
$17630 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$7096 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$14,204 Social
Worker Title 1A
Page 35 of 147
30 of 113
2d Department will seek parental input about decisions
meetings.
All Schools
2e Ensure that students and parents have the tools and
All
Grades: All
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
cost.
_ Other
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
costs.
_ Other
X All
_ Other
$6691 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$3339 Title 1A
¶s & ¶s
LCAP Year 3
June 8, 2016
Page 36 of 147
31 of 113
Expected Annual
Measurable
readiness
Outcomes:
Priority 5: Attendance Rates - Maintain 90% attendance rate
Priority 5: Chronic Absenteeism rates - Decrease chronic absenteeism by 10%, from the reported in 17-18.
by 10%
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
LEA Wide
Grades: All
service
Budgeted
Expenditures
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- See 1d; 1h
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 37 of 147
32 of 113
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Coordinator
Holders)
actions/services:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
administrator
attendance
2d Department will seek parental input about decisions
meetings.
All Schools
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_ Other
$9922 Title 1A
$10584 Nurse
$6615 YVPC
Title 1A
See 1d;
Part of Director
Salary
$18511 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$7450 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$14,914 Social
Worker Title 1A
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
cost.
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 38 of 147
33 of 113
2e Ensure that students and parents have the tools and
All
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional
costs.
_ Other
X All
_ Other
June 8, 2016
$7025 S & C
¶s & ¶s
$3506Title 1A
¶s & ¶s
Page 39 of 147
34 of 113
GOAL:
Goal 3: Countywide, SCOE will coordinate services to ensure that services for expelled youth are _1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 _8 COE
only: X 9 _ 10 Local:
provided by SCOE in cooperation with local districts with the goal of decreasing expulsion and
suspension and ensuring expelled students have appropriate programs. (Expelled youth are
included within the unduplicated counts of students receiving services which are included above NA
for students in SCOE programs.)
Identified Need:
Required by State Law. Many districts will be developing programs to serve their own expelled youth in lieu of the Career
Pathways to Success Community School. Revisions will be made to the plan to reflect new programs/offerings. SCOE will
leverage resources, time and facilities to convene districts and interagency partners together for training in expulsion
regulations, best practices and connecting them to resources.
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
Countywide
Grades: All
All
LCAP Year 1
Expected Annual
Priority 9: County Expulsion data Reduce County-wide Expulsions by 10% via improved restorative practices and
Measurable
alternatives to suspension/expulsion.
Outcomes:
Priority 9: SARB Data Reduce County-wide SARB referrals by 10% via improved practices for improved attendance and
alternatives to suspension/Expulsion.
Priority 9: Success to transition data Assure 100% of qualifying students receive support to transition to college and career
opportunities after high school.
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
service
June 8, 2016
Budgeted
Expenditures
Page 40 of 147
35 of 113
3a.Update, distribute and implement the 2016 expulsion Countywide
plan developed in collaboration with SCOE, LEAs, SARB
Grades: All
Board, Probation, Juvenile Hall, and related personnel.
3b. Monitor the effectiveness of the plan in collaboration Countywide
with LEAs, SARB Board, Probation, Juvenile Hall and
Grades: All
related personnel.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Included in
Director Salary
See 2c
_ Other
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Part of Director
Salary
_ Other
LCAP Year 2
Expected Annual
Priority 9: County Expulsion data Reduce County-wide Expulsions by 10% of 16-17 via improved restorative practices and
Measurable
Outcomes:
Priority 9: SARB Data Reduce County-wide SARB referrals by 10% 16-17 via improved practices for improved attendance
and alternatives to suspension/Expulsion.
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
service
June 8, 2016
Budgeted
Expenditures
Page 41 of 147
36 of 113
Grades: All
Grades: All
related personnel.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Included in
Director Salary
See 2c
_ Other
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Included in
Director Salary
See 2c
_ Other
LCAP Year 3
Expected Annual
Priority 9: County Expulsion data Reduce County-wide Expulsions by 10% of 17-18 via improved restorative practices and
Measurable
Outcomes:
Priority 9: SARB Data Reduce County-wide SARB referrals by 10% 17-18via improved practices for improved attendance
and alternatives to suspension/Expulsion.
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
service
June 8, 2016
Budgeted
Expenditures
Page 42 of 147
37 of 113
Grades: All
Grades: All
related personnel.
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Included in
Director Salary
See 2c
_ Other
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Included in
Director Salary
See 2c
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 43 of 147
38 of 113
GOAL:
Goal 4: SCOE will coordinate services county-wide in accordance with the foster youth grant and _1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 _8 COE
only: _ 9 X 10 Local:
ED CODE and review the plan annually for changes.
NA
Identified Need:
Due to the new state requirements around foster youth, Foster Youth District Liaisons¶identified the need for additional
trainings for district classified office staff, foster parent agencies, group homes and social workers. This supports an effort
to build best practices for enrollment and to support school success for foster youth. Based on student data, GPA's,
student feedback, foster parent feedback needs still exist in the area of providing academic support and mentoring/tutoring
services for students.
Goal Applies to:
Schools:
Countywide
Grades: All
Foster Youth
LCAP Year 1
Expected Annual
Priority 10: Foster numbers
Measurable
Outcomes:
Increase by 20% the number of FY students receiving counseling or mentoring services.
Sustain 80% passing rates of C or better for FY students based on report cards
Maintain less than 10% of FY students being referred to the SARB process.
Assure that 90% of FY students are being served in their comprehensive school of residence.
Priority 10: Program goal achievement
Implement and monitor the Executive Advisory Council for InterAgency Partnership, through quarterly collaboratives.
Priority 10: Foster youth surveys
Survey 80% of Foster Youth for academic and social-emotional needs.
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
service
June 8, 2016
Budgeted
Expenditures
Page 44 of 147
39 of 113
4a. Monitor local policy/procedures and data
Countywide
infrastructure necessary to support and monitor
educational success, including efficient transfer of health Grades: All
and education records and the health and education
passport.
1.
2.
Work with CDE, districts and county child welfare
and probation agencies to obtain, share and
analyze data to accurately identify foster youth and
track progress on all required metrics.
Maintain and monitor MOUs with probation, HHSA
and district agencies to increase graduation rates
and reduce school transfer rates.
4b. Ensure foster youth liaisons (Ed Code 48853.5) and
district level oversight staff have adequate time,
knowledge, and resources to meet the needs of foster
youth.
1.
2.

Hire or assign, train and supervise sufficient liaison
staff and district level oversight staff to ensure
district and school site staff are informed about
and implement all laws and district policies
affecting foster youth.
Monitor services provided to foster youth at the
district level to ensure:
All foster youth have access to necessary
education and school counseling services.
To reduce school transfers and ensure foster
youth are transported to their school of origin when
in their best interest, including funding or otherwise
facilitating transportation.
Ensure priority access for foster youth to tutoring
and other academic and social/emotional supports,
afterschool and summer enrichment programs,
and extracurricular activities.
Countywide
Grades: All
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $69,231 FY $
¶s & ¶s
X Foster Youth _ American Indian or Alaska
_ Other
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $91,000 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 45 of 147
40 of 113
4c. Students will have a more coordinated delivery of
Countywide
social services and educational services through
Grades: All
collaboration with Shasta County Health and Human
Services Children¶s Division, Probation, School Districts
and Foster Family Agencies. Meetings are held in
response to student in crisis and having significant needs.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Schedule, attend and document meetings for
every high school foster youth to assess academic
progress towards graduation
Attend foster youth IEP¶s and SST meetings to
review academic and behavioral successes and
challenges
Attend High Risk Team meetings and Critical
Family Team Meetings
Update foster youth educational database
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $59,780 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
Attend intake staffing meetings, assist with educational
data entry
LCAP Year 2
Expected Annual
Measurable
Outcomes:
Increase by 20% of 16-17 the number of FY students receiving counseling or mentoring services.
June 8, 2016
Page 46 of 147
41 of 113
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
Countywide
passport.
1.
2.
youth.
1.
2.

Countywide
Grades: All
service
Budgeted
Expenditures
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $72,694 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $95,550 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 47 of 147
42 of 113
Countywide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
4.
challenges
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $62,769 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
data entry
LCAP Year 3
Expected Annual
Measurable
Outcomes:
Increase by 20% of 17-18 the number of FY students receiving counseling or mentoring services.
June 8, 2016
Page 48 of 147
43 of 113
Actions/Services
Scope of
Service
Countywide
passport.
1.
2.
youth.
1.
2.

Countywide
Grades: All
service
Budgeted
Expenditures
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $76,329 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $100,327 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
June 8, 2016
Page 49 of 147
44 of 113
Countywide
Grades: All
1.
2.
3.
4.
challenges
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------- $65,907 FY $
¶s & ¶s
_ Other
data entry
June 8, 2016
Page 50 of 147
45 of 113
Annual Update
Annual Update Instructions: For each goal in the prior year LCAP, review the progress toward the expected annual outcome(s) based on, at a minimum, the
required metrics pursuant to Education Code sections 52060 and 52066. The review must include an assessment of the effectiveness of the specific actions.
Describe any changes to the actions or goals the LEA will take as a result of the review and assessment. In addition, review the applicability of each goal in
the LCAP.
Guiding Questions:
1) How have the actions/services addressed the needs of all pupils and did the provisions of those services result in the desired outcomes?
2) How have the actions/services addressed the needs of all subgroups of pupils identified pursuant to Education Code section 52052, including,
but not limited to, English learners, low-income pupils, and foster youth; and did the provision of those actions/services result in the desired
outcomes?
3) How have the actions/services addressed the identified needs and goals of specific schoolsites and were these actions/services effective in
achieving the desired outcomes?
4) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was examined to review progress toward goals in the annual update?
5) What progress has been achieved toward the goal and expected measurable outcome(s)? How effective were the actions and services in
making progress toward the goal? What changes to goals, actions, services, and expenditures are being made in the LCAP as a result of the
review of progress and assessment of the effectiveness of the actions and services?
6) What differences are there between budgeted expenditures and estimated actual annual expenditures? What were the reasons for any
differences?
Original Goal
from prior year
LCAP:
Goal Applies to:
Related State and/or Local Priorities: X
80% of alternative education students participating in a pre and post Math and English 1 X 2 _3 X 4 _5 _6 X 7 _8 COE
Language Arts diagnostic summative assessments, will demonstrate growth in their
scores.
Schools:
All programs
Grades; all
Grades: All
All
Expected Annual
1. Maintain 30 collaboration meetings.
Measurable
Outcomes:
2.& 6. Maintain baseline of 100% HQT & 0% mis-
Actual Annual
Measurable
Outcomes:
June 8, 2016
1. 30 Collaboration meetings were held for a total of
473 hours of training.
Page 51 of 147
46 of 113
assignments
2. 100% of teachers meet the HQT requirement and
0 mis-assignments.
3. Increase students enrolled in career orientation
course by 50% over 2014-15.
3. Student participation in career orientation courses
was sustained at about 33%.
4. 100% of teachers will implement California
Standards in the areas of math, ELA, and as
developed, NGSS as measured by walkthroughs.
4. 100% of teachers are implementing California
standards with room for improvement.
4.a. Maintain 100% math course materials aligned
with CCSS
4a. Math materials are 100% aligned to Common
Core.
5. 100% of students will have ICLPS that are
updated by teachers and monitored by career
coordinator and administration.
5. 100% of students have ILCP's developed, less
than 30% are monitored by consistently updated by
teachers.
6. *See Above
7. Student enrollment and completion of advanced
placement courses has not occured.
7. Increase student enrollment and completion of
advanced placement courses, including A-G Options
by 25% over 2014-15.
8. Offer 19 days of summer learning opportunities
9. 80% of students will meet grade level
proficiencies based on diagnostic assessments.
8. 13 days of summer learning will be offered in June
2016.
9. Conistent assessments have not been given and
80% of students have met grade level proficiencies
based on SBAC results.
ELA - Students in 7-8, and 11 not meeting standards
decreased. Students nearly meeting standard
increased. work is needed to increase students
meeting and exceeding standard.
Other Measures
API is N/A for the 2015-2016 year.
100% of EL students will be assessed annually for
English Proficiency and Reclassification Rates will be
reported.
50% of annually assessed EL students will
demonstrate increased proficiency on CELDT or
other measure.
50% of annually identified EL students will be
reclassified.
Math - Students in 7-8, and 11 not meeting
standards decreased. Students nearly meeting
standard increased. work is needed to increase
students meeting and exceeding standard.
EL students are monitored annually; no students
were identified and assessed as EL nor reclassified.
0 students were assessed on the CELDT.
LCAP Year: 2015-16
June 8, 2016
Page 52 of 147
47 of 113
Planned Actions/Services
Actual Actions/Services
Budgeted
Expenditures
Estimated
Actual Annual
Expenditures
1. Students will experience a more coordinated
See 1a and
curriculum that is CCSS aligned and incorporates the ELD 1b
standards as a result of increased time for teacher
collaboration.
Teachers have participated in established
collaboration and professional development with an
emphasis on Math and Language. 50% of teachers
based on informal and formal observations are
implementing CCSS aligned lessons.
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
--------------------------------------------------------------------_ Foster Youth _ American Indian or Alaska Native _ Hispanic or
Latino _ Two or More Races _ Low Income Pupils _ Redesignated
fluent English proficient _ Asian _ Native Hawaiian or Pacific
Islander _ English Learners _ Black or African
American _ Filipino _ White _ Students with
Disabilities _ Homeless
_Other
$2400 LCFF
S&C
30 collaboration days were held for 45 hours of
$1,818 Title I D,
training, collaboration, lesson study. Additional time $381 Title I A,
provided through Staff Development Days held in
$478 S & C
Extra Teacher August, January 4th and April 4th.
Hours
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
Native _ Hispanic or Latino _ Two or More Races _ Low
Income Pupils _ Redesignated fluent English
proficient _ Asian _ Native Hawaiian or Pacific
_ Other
1.a. Maintain 30 Collaboration hours of professional
development for all programs, utilizing collaboration,
lesson study, and site visitation to monitor and improve
program delivery.
See 1a and 1b
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 53 of 147
48 of 113
X All
_ Other
1.b. Establish a schedule for teachers and instructional
assistants to meet regularly to review instructional
materials and strategies they are implementing
cooperatively, including data entry and reporting through
Aeries.net. Minimum day schedule to include all
certificated personnel responsible for student instruction.
X All
_Other
2 hours per
month x
10months x 7
paras = 140
hrs x $15/hr =
$2364 S & C.
Extra pay.
A minimum day collaboration schedule was
$1,627 S & C
developed and followed. Time included Professional
Development and training for implementation of best
practices and effective strategies. 6 paras were able
to meet 1 x per month for an hour for a total of 60
hours. The time was effective in providing para's
time to communicate with their teacher and to review
materials for instruction.
Object: 20003999
Teacher cost
included in
base pay for
work days.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 54 of 147
49 of 113
2. Students are to be instructed by teachers with
See 2a, 2b,
excellent pedagogical skills because of improved reading 2c
and ELA coaching, including familiarity with NGSS.
All students were instructed by HQT. STEP
evaluation process is leading to increased teacher
knowledge in the content areas.
See 2a and 2b
See 2a and 2b
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
2.a. Provision of a content area expert in the area of
Education to provide assistance and support in program
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
.1 FTE ELA
Content
specialist
11 sessions were held with Shelly for over 16 hours $10,356
$10,078 Title
IA
Object: 10003999
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 55 of 147
50 of 113
X All
_ Other
2.b. Provision of a content area expert in the area of
Mathematics from the County Office of Education to
provide assistance and support in program development
and implementation, including using time to align K-12
curriculum and instruction with CCSS.
X All
_Other
.1 FTE Math
content
specialist
11 sessions were held for approximately 16 hours of $10,149
training in the area of math.
$10,289 Title
IA
Object: 10003999
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
2.c. Provision of training and participation in NGSS
professional development.
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
Included in
collaboration
days.
Teachers have been exposed to NGSS Information. See 1a
June 8, 2016
Page 56 of 147
51 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
3. Students will have relevant courses with a pathways
curriculum through ROP Partnership Collaborative.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
To be
incorporated
into
collaboration
time. (see
1.a.)
An MOU with ROP for student attendance was
executed and eligible students participated in ROP.
50% of students enrolled in the ROP courses made
progress towards completion of a career pathway.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
See 9d
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 57 of 147
52 of 113
3.a. Use of standards-aligned instructional materials and
strategies by engaging all certificated instructors in
regular Professional Development and Collaboration,
incorporating all ideas expressed in this document.
Scope of
service:
To be
incorporated
into
collaboration
time. (see
1.a.)
30 days of Professional Development provided.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
3.b. Engage students and their families in relevant
learning through internships, job placement and functional
exposure to careers by employing a Parent and Career
Coach to work during and after school hours.
Incorporated in
1a
X All
_Other
.55 FTE Inst
Services
Coordinator
(Parent Career
Coach)
Career Coach has engaged students in work
Title 1 - 13,297
experience and facilitated enrollment in ROP. The
S&C - 31219
strategy has been effective in that student
participation in ROP and work experience increased.
$ 44516
A portion of
salary was
moved to Foster
Youth;
$53,020
LCFF S & C
Object 20003999
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 58 of 147
53 of 113
X All
_ Other
4. Students will use math course materials that are
aligned with CCSS.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
Books
purchased
2014-15. PD
to be
incorporated
into
collaboration
(1.a.)
Students have been instructed in standards aligned
curriculum: CPM integrated 1; Carnegie; I Learn.
Analysis of additional materials completed and a
plan developed for ordering.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
5. Students will use improved Individualized Career
Learning Plans, with a focus on college and career.
Purchased in
previous years.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
Career Coach ILCP's were integrated in to GOOGLE Forms. All
Costs See 3.b students complete career interest surveys for entry
in to their ILCPs.
See 3 b
5.a. Conduct career interest surveys with students
and coordinate completion of Individualized Career
Learning Plans and career activities
June 8, 2016
Page 59 of 147
54 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
6. Students will have engaging teachers who have the
needed content and pedagogical knowledge, including
delivery of instructional strategies.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
See 6a
Training has been provided; Conferences in
See 6a
engagement and strategies have been offered. All
teachers have administered the My Student Survey
for feedback in strategy. Consistent Implementation
of engaging strategies is not evident in the 66% of
classrooms.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 60 of 147
55 of 113
6.a. In addition to scheduled PD (#2 above), provide
opportunity for alternative education staff to attend the
JSSAC, CISC and other conferences that highlight best
practices in comprehensive and alternative education.
Conference
fees
$10000 Title
IA
Teachers have attended multiple
$14250, Title 1
conferences: Google Summit; Bruce Perry - Trauma A
Informed Care; Restorative Justice; CUE; Title I
$4250 Title 1D
Conference; JCCSAC; and ASCD
Object: 5200
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
6.b. Development and use of a teacher evaluation
instrument that emphasizes student achievement and
professional learning, including TEACHSCAPE access, 2
days Professional Training, ongoing Peer Observation,
Calibration and support.
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
Peer
evaluation
pilot
The STEP Evaluation handbook is developed and all $3360 Title I
teachers have been trained in program elements.
Teachers have access to online teacher support
resources.
Training for
teachers sub
cost
$120/day
$6,000 Eval
grant
Object 10003000
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 61 of 147
56 of 113
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
6.c Local measures for math and language that have
Peer
embedded-direct application and strategies for instruction evaluation
will be identified and teachers will be trained in
pilot
administration and disaggregation;
Training for
teachers sub
cost
$120/day
Review and discussion of measures has been
conducted. A consistent plan has not been
identified or implemented.
$2500 Title IA
$2050 LCFF
Base
$10,900 Lottery
Object 5801
$6,000 Eval
grant
Object 10003000
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 62 of 147
57 of 113
7. Students will have the benefit of intervention programs. See 7.a.
Scope of
service:
Interventions and small groups have been effective
in increaseing student engagement and for working
more closely with students in their identified deficit
areas. Students were placed in appropriate lexile
levels in Achieve 3000. Additional support of paraeducators for lower student-teacher ratios; as well
as additional teacher time for lower class size.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
$50097; Title
1D Teachers
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
7. a. Provide intervention services to students on a daily
basis, embedded in regular classroom instructional
schedule.
Teachers
$100,938; Title
1A
X All
_Other
Cost of
additional
teachers
Students have had benefit of aides and smaller
Need $ from
class size for more direct instruction and lesson
Nancy
modification. Achieve 3000 adjusts lessons to match
student reading level. Teachers modify curriculum to
$65,343 Title meet student grade level in math and use of ILearn.
IA
$83,171 Title
ID
Object: 1000
±
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 63 of 147
58 of 113
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
7.b. Provide instructional assistance in each classroom to Paraprofessio Each classroom has the support of a 6 hour aide.
assist with one on one instruction and small group
nals for
Juvenile Court School has 2 6 hour aides. Lower
support.
instructional enrollment has driven need for reduction of total aide
assistance
hours. Provision of aides has increased amount of
time students receive personalized small group or
(Total 5.38
individualized support.
FTE )
$29,097 Title
1A
$14,382 Title
1D
$61,972 LCFF/
S&C Object
(2.7 FTE in S
&C
$23,883 Title
IA
$29,893Title
ID
$65,533
LCFF S & C: Object 20003999
Object 5710
for Special Ed
Aide
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 64 of 147
59 of 113
X All
_ Other
7.c. Continue to use and evaluate the use of on-line
interventions and reporting systems, credit recovery and
acceleration resources (i.e, iPass, Aeries.net, ACHIEVE
3000, Odysseyware), as well as provide for other
requirements for increasing A-G course access.
Scope of
service:
X All
_Other
$2500 Title IA Staff has compared the benefits and challenges of
on-line applications for credit recovery and
$2050 LCFF instruction in A-g courses.
Base
$10,900
Lottery
Object 5801
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
8. Students will have opportunities for extended learning
time
$21,319
X All
_Other
See 8a
Opportunities have been provided for extended
learning time: Electives, Tutoring and summer
session. Offering SES tutoring via fair and mailers
was ineffective, 0 sign-ups. 1000% of students
participating in summer school has earned credits.
June 8, 2016
See 8a
Page 65 of 147
60 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
8.a. Extended learning time, including summer school in
2016, to provide opportunities for students to receive
academic support, including Supplemental Educational
Services and School Choice (15% set aside for SES) and
behavioral support.
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
Set asides:
$53,202
(SES) +
17,734
(choice) Title
IA ,Object:
5801
SES was offered via a letter and through a tutoring
fair in October. All families were sent flyers and
encouraged to attend. 0 students signed up fro the
service. 14 days of summer learning will be
provided in June 2016.
$0 were spent
on SES tutoring
or choice.
- $7463 out of
Base for
summer school.
cost for paras
+ teachers =
$7554 LCFF
S&C
Objects 10003000
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 66 of 147
61 of 113
X All
_ Other
8.b. Extended learning time for after school at Juvenile
X All
_Other
Inst Assts
151 hours of support was provided at Juvenile Court $2,418 Title I D.
School.
$2,827 LCFF
S&C
Object 20003999
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide - Juvenile Court School
Grades: All
X All
_Other
8.c. Extended learning time to provide opportunities for
$69,686 ASP Over 180 hours of extended learning time was
Grant
provided including band, film appreciation, art.
enrichment activities, including visual and performing arts.
Objects: 1000
±
June 8, 2016
$69686 ASP $
Page 67 of 147
62 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
9. Students will be exposed to a variety of technology.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
See 3 b and
9d
Students have access to chromebooks, IPads, and
desktops. Various applications for online
educational activities are avaialble.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
See 3b and 9d
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 68 of 147
63 of 113
9.a. Alignment of career coaching services with content
standards by providing content expert in the areas of
Career Technical Education and Instructional Technology
Support Hours to provide assistance and support in
program development (including on-line learning) and
implementation.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
See 3.b.and
9.d.
The Career Coach has been effective in connecting NEED $ from
students with work experience and career
Nancy
classes. Career coach has participated in
Program
collaboration for alignment of activities; participated
redesign with in the CTE Leadership Institute for furthering our
ROP
career endeavors. Instructional Technology support
hours have been embedded in the content coaching
days.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
9.b. Exploration and implementation of Advanced
Placement through on-line learning.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
Director No Teachers have examined on-line resources for
0
additional
advanced placement. Implementation with students
costs;
is minimal.
embedded in
work duties
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 69 of 147
64 of 113
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
9.c. Increase usage of ACHIEVE 3000, Odysseyware and See 7.c.
elimination of Accelerate Education, NearPod.
Usage of Achieve 3000 has incresed. Odysseware See 7.c.
usage has decreased. Accelerate Ed and Near Pod
licenses were not renewed.
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
9.d. Through enrollment in ROP courses of study and
$60,000
Career Choice Curriculum at the 9-10th Grade, students LCAP S&C
will participate in Career Pathways Instruction and engage Object 5801
in technology based instructional strategies.
9-10th grade students participated in Career Choice $16,800
Curricula while 11 11th-12th graders were enrolled dropped due to
in ROP courses.
enrollment; Title
1A
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 70 of 147
65 of 113
X All
_ Other
9.e. Incorporate recommendations from the technology
audit regarding automaticity of enrollment in online
licensing and student reporting systems such as
Aeries.net .
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
No cost, audit Technology audits led to auto-enrollment via Aeries
completed in and Google Domain.
14-15;
Director No
additional
costs;
embedded in
work duties
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
0
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 71 of 147
66 of 113
What changes in actions,
services, and expenditures
Monitoring of ILCP completion and review is necessary. Identification and development of an assessment plan
and packing guide are necessary. Monitoring of lessons for identification of Common Core Standards will be
necessary. Collaboration will fully include para-educators. Curriculum and coaching support hours/time will
emphasize monitoring and review of assessments. Training will need to inlcude and address NGSS.
Barriers such as inabillity to self-regulate, poor attendance and incarceration prevented some students from ROP
enrollment. While enrollment will still be available, it will be decreased due to lower enrollment.
Implementation of benchmark assessments will occur through assessment plan in 2016-2017.
Calibration training in the area of the Danielson Rubric will be included in training and collaboration.
Attendance at JCCSAC, ASCD, and CUE are recommended for next year.
Odysseyware LIcenses will be increased and implementation will be monitored more effectively in 2016-2017.
Original Goal
from prior year
LCAP:
Goal Applies to:
GOAL 2. Positive Behavior Intervention Strategies will be implemented in classrooms, _1 _2 _3 _4 _5 X 6 _7 _8 COE
reducing referrals and behavior reports by 50%, effectively increasing student¶s access only: _ 9 _ 10 Local:
to instructional minutes and increasing attendance to 90%.
Schools:
All programs
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 72 of 147
67 of 113
All
Expected Annual
10. Counseling. Maintain 300 hours of individual
Measurable
and group counseling, with access by 100% of
Outcomes:
students.
Actual Annual
Measurable Emphasis on relationships, behavior management
and development of the teacher's ability to monitor
Outcomes:
and engage students has been effective.
10 & 13. Health Consults. Maintain student access
to health support, with 10% or less of student
population utilizing on a daily basis
Over 630 hours of counseling was provided for
students in the area of substance abuse; self
regulation; choices; etc. Services have been
coordinated with individuals and in small groups.
Health consultations have had significant decline.
Less than 1 student a week has sought out the
office as a location for "escaping" the classroom.
Discipline refferals have declined by nearly 90%.
Less than 20 suspensions were issued, over a 90%
decrease. No arrests were made at school.
Attendance rate was 64%. Chronic truant
percentage was 55% a 20% decrease.
11. 12. & 13. Discipline referrals. Decrease
referrals by 50% of 2014-2015 #1029.
11. 12. & 13. Suspensions. Decrease suspensions
by 20% over 2014-2015: In school 652; Out of
school 499
11. 12. & 13. Arrests at School. Decrease Arrests
by 20% (2014-15: 15)
The school met FIT with 100% compliance in all
areas.
11. 12. & 13. Attendance rate. Increased
attendance by 5 % of 14-15 (71%)
11. 12. & 13. Chronic Absenteeism. Decrease
chronic absenteeism by 5% (2014-15 baseline 72%)
Pupil expulsion rate: N/A
Basic Services FIT report results
LCAP Year: 2015-16
Budgeted
Expenditures
10. Students will continue to have counseling services.
See 10 a
Estimated
Actual Annual
Expenditures
Counseling was provided via a social worker and a
sub-contract with Youth Violence Prevention
Council. 630 hours of support for 50 unduplicated
students.
June 8, 2016
See 10a
Page 73 of 147
68 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
10.a. Ensure adequate social and emotional support is
provided to students, including the availability of a
counseling services
Oasis/Oasis South
X All
_Other
Counseling
via YVPC
Over 630 service hours were provided to over 50
$18,000 in title
unduplicated students. Emphasis on self-regulation, 1 expenditures.
choices and alternatives to addiction were
$6,000 LCFF emphasized.
Base
$6,000 LCFF
S&C
Object: 5801
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 74 of 147
69 of 113
10.b. Delivering training aimed at improving staff
Included in
consistency in dealing with student behaviors and
1.b. and 6.a.
reinforcing purposeful relationships, (trauma informed
care, capturing kids hearts, Positive Behavior Intervention
Supports)
Capturing Kids Hearts. All staff attended. Supported $5500 FY Grant
via Foster Youth Grant.
Capturing Kids
Hearts
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
10.c. Provide health support services to students via onsite administrative/health clerk.
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
X All
_Other
1.18 FTE
Clerical
Nursing services were available on site for 36 of
0
days. Services included direct consultation with
students, coordinating Planned Parenthood training,
$41,827LCFF etc. Administrative Assistant was available to
BASE
address concerns not solved in the
classroom. Significantly lower enrollment eliminated
Object: 2000- the need to provide health clerk support. Work was
3999
distirbuted to the alternative education administrative
assistant under the guidance of the school nurse.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA WIde
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 75 of 147
70 of 113
X All
_ Other
10.d. On site nursing services
Scope of
service:
X All
_Other
$8,977 LCFF Provision of nurse support has been effective in
BASE
monitoring student health and compliance with
mandated health screenings. On site nursing was
Object: 5710 provided on 36 of days. Services included consults,
training and Professional Development.
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
$5604 base;
$1768 out of S
& C; 10003000 object
codes
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
11. Improved relationship between students, teachers and See 11 a - b
group homes, with greater consistency for students.
Suspensions and referrals declined significantly,
11 a - b
nearly 90%. Due to lower enrollment, it is difficult to
correlate to any specific strategy. My Student Survey
indicates a continuing need for teachers to enhance
student relationships.
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wde
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 76 of 147
71 of 113
X All
_ Other
11.a. Provide transition support to students via Career
Coordinator
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
X All
_Other
See 3.b. and
26.a.
Coordination between schools and in concurrent
See 3.band
enrollment has improved through engagement of the 26.a
career coordinator. Students have received support
in transition between schools through the Career
Coordinator.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 77 of 147
72 of 113
11.b. Conduct bi-monthly meetings with group home staff Admin Oasis
to review individual progress
1.2 FTE
Administrative
Costs
Appointments and communication with group home
staff has been at least weekly, including
covnersations with the home staff and the student
director, Chris Magera.
Coordination with Remi Vista via phone and
$37,291 Title conferences
IA
Admin Salaries
$28219 Title
1A;
$28219 Title 1D
$112878 Base
$119,585
LCFF BASE
$29,897 Title
ID
Object: 10003999
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
12. Improved relationships with and between students.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
See 12 a-b
Teachers have implemented Social Contracts and
See 12a -b
Restorative Practices; Social Groups were provided
via Youth VIolence Prevention Council.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
Oasis/Oasis South
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 78 of 147
73 of 113
X All
_ Other
12.a. Proact and Trauma Informed Care Training for
staff.
Scope of
service:
X All
_Other
Included in
6.a.
All staff attended the Bruce Perry Trauma Informed See 6a
Care training on January 4, 2016. ProAct is planned
for the beginning of the 16-17 school year.
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
12.b. Capturing Kids Hearts embedded in Professional
Development and minimum day schedule. Provision of
training for new administrator, as needed.
Scope of
service:
LEA WIde
X All
_Other
Included in
6.a.
All staff attended the Capturing Kids Hearts
Recharged session on April 4, 2016.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
Oasis/Oasis South
See 6a
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 79 of 147
74 of 113
X All
_ Other
13. Students will attend school more frequently
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
No additional See 13a-c;
cost.
Included in
teacher base
work year
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
13.a. Review best practices and assess current
strategies; update/revise as needed. Work to be
completed during collaboration meetings.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
No additional Best practices have been a part of weekly
cost.
collaboration and site based discussions.
Included in
teacher base
work year
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
Included in
teacher base
work year.
0
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 80 of 147
75 of 113
X All
_ Other
13.b. Due to relevance of the material, as well as a
decrease in class sizes, students will participate in ROP
courses that will both increase attendance and decrease
discipline referrals.
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
X All
_Other
9.d. above
ROP worked for about 11 students in our program.
It did not have a significant impact on attendance
and behavior.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
13.c. Students will be provided transportation to the
ROP/Oasis programs.
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis SOuth
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_Other
$51,096 Title I Transporation was provided for the first month. Less $9694
than 5 students were riding the bus and the service
Object 5710 was discontinued.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
See 9.d.
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 81 of 147
76 of 113
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
Counseling will continue to be provided. Training will be provided for teachers in identifying significant student
health concerns and means to document support provided. Improvement has been made in teacher capacity to
identify strategies for de-escalating and re-directing student behavior. Training is still needed for teachers in the
area of trauma informed teaching practices. Attendance is an area that will be addressed through systematic
reporting of absenteeism.
June 8, 2016
Page 82 of 147
77 of 113
Original Goal
from prior year
LCAP:
Goal Applies to:
GOAL 3. 80% or more of the students in the Alt. Ed Program for 90 days or more who _1 _2 _3 X 4 X 5 _6 _7 _8 COE
take the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) will achieve a passing score
(350) or higher.
Schools:
All programs
Grades: All
All
Expected Annual
CAHSEE prep courses will have 80% completion
Measurable
rates.
Outcomes:
Actual Annual
Measurable CAHSEE was not given due to mandated changes in
the assessment plan
Outcomes:
(CHRISTAL TO INSERT TABLE)
Graduation rates have not increased in the Pathways
program. The JCS has graduated 5 Students.
10% decrease in middle/high school drop out rates
utilizing 14-15 baseline.
Pathways drop-out rate is around 31%
10% increase in high school graduation rates utilizing
14-15 baseline.
Drop out rates reported for 15-16 have not been
calculated.
LCAP Year: 2015-16
14. More students will pass CAHSEE as a result of
CAHSEE prep course and summer 2016 summer
services, and enhanced teacher pedagogical skills (See
¶s 2-4).
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Budgeted
Expenditures
Estimated
Actual Annual
Expenditures
Included in
The exam was not given due to changes in
core services. mandates. Emphasis has been on achievment of
7.c.
state standards. Summer services were provided in
June 2016 and 100% of students enrolled earned
credits.
See core
services and 7c
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 83 of 147
78 of 113
X All
_ Other
14. a Teachers will utilize and monitor ACHIEVE
3000.
Scope of
service:
X All
_Other
Included in
Teachers are using Achieve 3000 for Lexile testing.
core services. 4 free webinars were provided. Data and
7.c.
achievement is monitored for provision of student
progress.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
X All
_Other
See 9d
Administration of CAHSEE was suspended. ROP
classes were offered and engagement was high for
participants.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
15. More students will pass CAHSEE as a result of
relevant instruction in ROP classes.
See 7.c.
See 9d
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 84 of 147
79 of 113
X All
_ Other
15.a. Monitor student attendance, credits and evaluate
students for AB167 and graduation requirements.
Communicate with outside agencies regarding student
status.
X All
_Other
Data Tech
(.75 FTE)
$6,661 Title
IA
$3,330 Title
ID
Monitoring of attendance and credits has decreased
chronic absenteeism, overall attendance rates have
not increased and more students have been
afforded the AB 167 option. Data technician has
provided weekly attendance reports. AB 167 letters
have been issued to 16 students. Information has
been provided to Probation and partner districts.
.75 FTE; $5624
Title 1A
$2812 Ttile 1 D
$9561 Base
$1687 S &C
$11,323 LCFF
BASE
.1 FTE Admin
Assistant
$1,998 LCFF
S&C
$6595 S & C
Object: 2000
±
.10 FTE
Admin Asst.
$5,394 S & C
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 85 of 147
80 of 113
X All
_ Other
15.b. Operate a county wide SARB Board and address
attendance issues with SCOE students
X All
_Other
.50 FTE
SARB
Specialist
SARB coordinator has organized 4 quarterly
meetings and attended local district SARB's. Letters
$28,011
and documentation have been submitted for
studetns in programs with poor attendance.
$29,969
LCFF BASE
Object: 2000
±
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
15.c. Health and nursing services
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
See 10.c, d. Nurse support was available for 36 of days. Health
and e. above support was available in classrooms and via
administrative assistants in offices.
June 8, 2016
Costs in 10 c.,
d. and e.
Page 86 of 147
81 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
15.d. Develop Site Based Coordinated strategies and
schedule for CAHSEE Preparation.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
Principal. No Not provided due to deletion of CAHSEE.
additional
costs
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
0
LEA WIde
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
15.e. Inform stakeholders of changes that develop in high Director No
school accountability and testing.
additional
costs
Teachers, parents and students were informed about In Core
the change in CAHSEE Administration as well as
program, 0
SBAC testing schedules.
additional $
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 87 of 147
82 of 113
X All
_ Other
15. f. Maintain foster/homeless youth program liaison
Scope of
service:
X All
_Other
Title I $11,652 Foster/homeless youth program liaison has been in
place and supporting review of AB 167 eligibility.
Object 10003999
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
$13,275 Title
1A
X All
_Other
The school is looking for alternative measures to indicate college and career readiness such as SBAC
performance levels and local benchmark progress. Representatives have attended the statewide focus forums on
alternative measures and information has been shared with teachers for input. Additional systems and
mechanisms for connecting students to adult education and credit recovery in an individualized setting have
been piloted. Completion of AB 167 review and analysis will be embedded at intake.
June 8, 2016
Page 88 of 147
83 of 113
Original Goal
from prior year
LCAP:
Goal Applies to:
GOAL 4. 100% percent of parents/caregivers and students will report having personal _1 _2 X 3 _4 X 5 _6 _7 _8 COE
contact with a staff member regarding the progress of their student towards academic only: _ 9 _ 10 Local:
and career goals of the student as measured by parent and student surveys.
Schools:
All programs
Grades: All
All
Expected Annual
16 . & 17. Survey
Measurable
Outcomes:
Baseline 2013-14 Responses
Actual Annual
Measurable Response Rates
Outcomes:
Parent Response Rate =
Total Responses: 57
Parent knowledge of career readiness
PARTICIPATION RATES
Parents knowledge of grad requirements
Parents 12/180 =
Student Response Rate = 71% (34/48 )
6.7%
Students 45/180 = 25%
Students knowledge of career readiness 15/34= 44%
*Knowledge of career readiness = 42%
Students knowledge of grad requirements 20/34=
59%
*Knowledge of grad requirements = 75%
College and Career resources
2014-15 Survey Response
13 Events; 10 Job Partners; 4 College Visits
Response Rate: Parents 19/212=9%
32/212=15%
Students
Job Readiness Course: Driver¶s Ed; Food cert
Knowledge of career readiness 27/51=49%
Students completing FAFSA- 2
Knowledge of grad requirements 38/51=69%
ACHIEVE 3000 LEXILE Assessment RESULTS
College and Career Resources 18 college and
career events held
PS 12/23 Pre/Post
+45 Lexile
PSN 5/33 Pre/Post
+13 Lexile
JCS 3/24 Pre/Post
+30 Lexile
% of students completing FAFSA ±
June 8, 2016
Page 89 of 147
84 of 113
**transiency makes solid pre/post minimal
50% of students and parents will participate in the
survey
Knowledge of career readiness will increase to 75%
over 2014-15 Baseline
Knowledge of graduation requirements will increase
to 85% over 2014-15 Baseline
18. College and Career Resources.
Increase college and career events by 10% over
2014-15 Baseline
Increase # of students completing the FAFSA by
50% over 2014-15 Baseline
In 15-16 a baseline assessment will be determined
utilizing ACHIEVE 3000 Lexile assessments for
determining college preparedness.
2014-2015 baseline # of students completing FAFSA
=0
LCAP Year: 2015-16
Budgeted
Expenditures
16. Students and parents will understand their own
academic performance in relation to goals, including
individuals with exceptional needs.
See 16 a-c
Estimated
Actual Annual
Expenditures
Staff has met with students to review Academic
Performance, the ILCP, etc. The practice is
inconsistent.
June 8, 2016
See 16 a-c
Page 90 of 147
85 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
16.a. Provide Parent Link and Aeries.net for parents
X All
_Other
$500 Title IA
Object: 5801
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Oasis/Oasis South
Parent Link and Aeries.net have been purchased.
$2500 Title 1
Staff are evaluating components for regular updates
to assure parents have current information.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
16.b. Parent/Career Coach to hold semi-annual meetings See 3.b.
with parents to review student opportunities available for above
college and career goals.
3 Achievement Nights were held in conjunction with See 3.b.
Parent Q&A sessions. In addition, teachers hosted
"Open House" events during the school day so that
parents could drop by classrooms.
June 8, 2016
Page 91 of 147
86 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
16.c. Bi-annual parent conference week established to
Part of regular
assure that teachers/parents are connecting regarding
teacher hours
progress towards completion of high school diploma,
completion of A-G requirements; ICLP¶s and opportunities No extra cost
for completing Financial Aide Applications FAFSA.
2 parent conference weeks were scheduled.
Participation was not very high. Teachers made
contact via phone and through Probation
Supervisors.
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
0
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
17. Students and parents will understand their own career See 17 a-b
goals and meet with staff regarding INDIVIDUALIZED
Learning and Career Plan and report cards)., including
Parent conferences were held, phone contacts
made, transcripts and progress reports
provided regarding student progress.
June 8, 2016
See 17 a-b
Page 92 of 147
87 of 113
Scope of
service:
LEA WIDE
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
17.a. Teachers will provide monthly updates and review of Part of regular This action was not embedded in collaboration as a 0
INDIVIDUALIZED Career & LEARNING PLAN during
teacher hours regular activity. Review of ILCP's was inconsistent.
collaboration.
No extra cost
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 93 of 147
88 of 113
17.b. Bi- annual Administrative review of
INDIVIDUALIZED Career & LEARNING PLAN
1.2 FTE
The ILCP's were reviewed by the administrator with See 11b
Administrative the intent of emphasizing teacher accountability and
Costs
participation in completion.
$37,291 Title
IA
$119,585
LCFF BASE
$29,897 Title
ID
Object: 10003999
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
18. Students will experience improved exposure to
community resources, including career opportunities
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
See 3 b
above
Students have been exposed to various resources
such as career fairs, SMART Center, College
Support, etc.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
LEA Wide
See 3. b.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 94 of 147
89 of 113
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
18.a. Engage students and their families in relevant
See 18 b
learning through internships, job placement and functional
exposure to careers by employing a Parent and Career
Coach to work during and after school hours, including
Students have been exposed to multiple work
experiences, volunteer opportunities, and job
shadows due to the coordination of the career
coach. 2 individuals with exceptional needs have
been in ROP work experiences.
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
18.b. Utilize Career Options Curriculum, College Options
and/or similar career education curriculum and provider to
access students and develop career and college
exposure.
See 18 b
X All
_Other
POINT OF
CONTACT:
Administrator
and Career
Coach
Career Options Curricula was implemented in the
See 26.a. and
9th-10th grade class. Students in 11th-12th grade
3.b.
had opportunities to engage in work experience,
ROP classes, career fairs and an online career class
with the career coach.
See 26.a. and
3.b.
June 8, 2016
Page 95 of 147
90 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
The program will develop a white paper to be included with the enrollment packet. The services of a career
coordinator are a continued need for assisting parents and students in developing their career and college
readiness and knowledge base. Systems for holding all staff accountable for completion of the ILCP will be
developed along with monitoring schedules. The addition of Curriculum/Assessment Coach for up to 14 days is
recommended for development of pacing and assessment plan. Systems will be created for recording
information about parent contacts. Administrative changes will be made based on lower enrollment.
June 8, 2016
Page 96 of 147
91 of 113
Original Goal
from prior year
LCAP:
Goal Applies to:
GOAL 5: 100% of students will explore career fields and have exposure to the
workplace and college as documented in INDIVIDUALIZED Career and LEARNING
PLAN or 10 year plans, and teacher lesson plans.
_1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 X 8 COE
Schools:
All Programs
Grades: All
All
Expected Annual
50% of student enrollment will have completed a
Measurable
career orientation course.
Outcomes:
Actual Annual
Measurable All students enrolled in Pathways Community school
have taken a career orientation course.
Outcomes:
20% increase in students participating in Experiential
Work Program.
4 students have participtaed in Experiential Work
Program
20% increase in students participating in College
Visits.
16 students participated in college visits; a 77%
increase over last year.
100% pass rates for students engaging in
certification classes.
All students participating in certification courses have
passed. 19 students took certification courses,
including food handlers and driver's education.
LCAP Year: 2015-16
19.a See Numbers 3, 17, 18 above.
Scope of
service:
Oasis
Budgeted
Expenditures
Estimated
Actual Annual
Expenditures
Cost included See numbers 3, 17 and 18.
in 1.a.
See 1.a.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 97 of 147
92 of 113
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
19.b Students attending the ROP class will complete ROP $60,000
course.
LCFF
Supp/Conc
Object 5801
17 students were enrolled in ROP Courses
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Oasis
See 19 d
6 students completed a full semester.
Students from Oasis South were also included in
ROP classes.
Grades: All
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
19.c All students will engage in Career Zone activities and See Goal 1
profiles, with 9th & 10th grade utilizing Career Choice
#6
Curricula.
$1,055 LCFF
S&C
9th and 10th graders were engaged in Career
Choice Curricula. Career Zone Activities and
profiles are embedded in the Google Career class
hosted by the Career Coach.
$330
LCFF/S&C
Object 4310
June 8, 2016
Page 98 of 147
93 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
X All
_Other
19.d Employability Day will be coordinated for provision of See Goal 1
Career Options.
#3. B.
Students were able to attend a Job Fair at the Red
Lion Hotel.
See Goal 1 #3
b.
Students enagged in the Job readiness elective
received new clothes for interviewing and
participated in mock interviews with local employers
who provided feedback to students on strengths and
areas of growth.
Scope of
service:
Oasis
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 99 of 147
94 of 113
19.e College Visits will be coordinated to 2 and 4 year
colleges.
$1,200 Title I
17 Students have visited Shasta College on 3
A
occasions and once to Chico State.
$800 Title 1
Object # 5801
Scope of
service:
Oasis
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
19. g Experiential Work Program options will be
expanded.
Scope of
service:
Oasis
Grades: All
X All
_Other
See Goal 1
Experiential Work opportunities have expanded to
See 3b
#3. B. $1,650 include Safe Haven Horse Rescue, Burrito Bandido,
LCFF Base
COE transportation, Girronda's, and COE IT
dpeartment.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
Oasis
Oasis/Oasis South
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 100 of 147
95 of 113
19. h Identify appropriate CTE training for certificated staff Title 1
and secure participation.
Scope of
service:
#7.c Career Coach participated in the Leadership
Development Institute offered by the CDE.
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
Grades: All
Scope of
service:
LEA Wide
X All
_Other
Goal 1 # 9.d
Two certification courses were offered, including
Food Handlers and Driver's Ed.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
19. i Certification classes such as Food Handlers, CPR,
Driver¶s Ed will be offered to students.
See 7. c.
Supported
through grant.
See 9.d.
LEA Wide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 101 of 147
96 of 113
Certification and Experiential Work Program courses will continue to be embedded in programming.
Outcomes and activities will be consolidated to prevent duplication; will be represented in 1 goal.
June 8, 2016
Page 102 of 147
97 of 113
Original Goal
from prior year
LCAP:
Goal Applies to:
_1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 _8 COE
GOAL 6. Countywide, SCOE will coordinate services to ensure that services for
expelled youth are provided by SCOE in cooperation with local districts with the goal of only: X 9 _ 10 Local:
decreasing expulsion and suspension and ensuring expelled students have appropriate
programs. (Expelled youth are included within the unduplicated counts of students
receiving services which are included above for students in SCOE programs.)
Schools:
Countywide
Grades: All
All
Expected Annual
Actual Annual
100% of 9-12th students expelled will be eligible to
Measurable
Measurable 100% of students who met the criteria of SARB and
be enrolled in SCOE alternative education programs.
expulsion were enrolled.
Outcomes:
Outcomes:
100% of 7-8th students expelled will be eligible to
enroll in inter-district programs per placement
agreements and notification to Countywide SARB.
100% of 7-8th grade students were enrolled in
district programs. Refinement of communications
necessary.
100% of LEAs participate in the process of
developing the plan.
100% of LEA's contributed to the process
documented by signed MOU's.
LCAP Year: 2015-16
Budgeted
Expenditures
20. Implement the 2015 developed expulsion plan.
Review the 2013 plan at a superintendent meeting and
monitor compliance throughout the year. Revise as
needed and gain approval of all LEAs.
Estimated
Actual Annual
Expenditures
To be
Expulsion plan was implemented per the revisions. See 11 b
completed by Document shared at September 2015 Chief School
Student
Administrator meeting. Plan reviewed quarterly by
Program
SARB Board. Plan posted on SCOE website.
Director as
part of
assigned
duties.
June 8, 2016
Page 103 of 147
98 of 113
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
21. Monitor the effectiveness of the plan and internally
review the plan for any modifications that are needed.
Scope of
service:
CountyWide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
To be
SARB chair has included plan in quarterly meetings. See 11 b
completed by Plan has been reviewed and revisions will be
Student
shared with stakeholders.
Program
Director as
part of
assigned
duties.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
Countywide
Countywide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 104 of 147
99 of 113
21.a. Meet with SARB Board, Probation, Juvenile Hall,
and related personnel to identify gaps in services in the
current plan.
Scope of
service:
Countywide
To be
Quarterly meetings have been held.
completed by
Student
Program
Director as
part of
assigned
duties.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
X All
_ Other
21.b. Revise the plan and distribute to all local Boards of
Education and designated Superintendents.
Scope of
service:
County Wide
Countywide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
To be
Expulsion plan has been revised to relfect changes
completed by in community school providers.
Student
Program
Director as
part of
assigned
duties.
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
See 11 b
See 11 b
County Wide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 105 of 147
100 of 113
X All
_ Other
Original Goal
from prior year
LCAP:
Goal Applies to:
X All
_Other
Communication processes will be refined. SCOE will not provide a classroom for SUHSD students. Revisions
will be made to the Expulsion Plan and distributed to districts.
GOAL 7: SCOE will coordinate services county-wide in accordance with the foster
youth grant and ED CODE and review the plan annually for changes.
_1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 _8 COE
only: _ 9 X 10 Local:
Schools:
Countywide
Grades: All
Foster Youth
June 8, 2016
Page 106 of 147
101 of 113
Expected Annual
30 foster youth will receive mentoring through YVPC
Measurable
Outcomes:
80% of Foster youth students will have a passing
grade of C µs or better in all of their classes
Actual Annual
Measurable
Outcomes:
Maintain attendance at Regional and County level
student focused meetings (SST and IEP¶s) at current
level 345
17 Foster Youth have received counseling to date.
82% of Foster Youth are passing classes with C's or
better.
Foster Youth staff are attending all meetings.
Calpads identifies total Alt Ed placements for K-12 at
14 to date 3/30/2016, a 36% decrease.
10% decrease in FY placement in alternative or
continuation schools (2013-14 18 total foster youth
attended an Alternative Educational or continuation
school setting in and out of Shasta County; 14-15
results pending June data)
SARBs to date = 8 representing a 66% reduction as
of 3/30/2016
20% reduction in foster youth in grades K-12 will
referred to SARB ± pending June Data)
Local policy, procedures and data infrastructure will
be completed and implemented
LCAP Year: 2015-16
Budgeted
Expenditures
22. Establish local policy/procedures and data
educational success, including efficient transfer of health
passport.
.60 FTE
Coordinator
$86,225
Foster Youth
Grant
Estimated
Actual Annual
Expenditures
A Foster Youth Coordinator has been employed and .5 FTE
vital to the success of developing infra-structure.
Coordinator $48262 FY
Grant
$12066 Title 1A
Object: 10003999
June 8, 2016
Page 107 of 147
102 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Grades: All
Countywide
Grades: All
_ All
--------------------------------------------------------------------X Foster Youth _ American Indian or Alaska
_ Other
X All
_Other
See 22
Collaboration with interagency partners via the
Breaking Barriers conference.
See 22
22.a. Work with CDE, districts and county child welfare
and probation agencies to obtain, share and analyze data
to accurately identify foster youth and track progress on
all required metrics.
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
Countywide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 108 of 147
103 of 113
22.b. Collaboratively develop and enter into MOUs with
probation, HHSA and district agencies to increase
graduation rates and reduce school transfer rates.
Scope of
service:
See 22
MOU/Contract in place
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Grades: All
Scope of
service:
Countywide
X All
_Other
See 22
9/23/16 Needs/Support Survey completed
See 22
3/25/16 10 New SW training informational
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
Countywide
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
23. Ensure foster youth liaisons (Ed Code 48853.5) and
youth.
See 22
Countywide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 109 of 147
104 of 113
23.a. Hire or assign, train and supervise sufficient liaison
staff and district level oversight staff to ensure district and
school site staff are informed about and implement all
laws and district policies affecting foster youth.
Scope of
service:
Included in
22.a.
Coorrdinator
duties
Foster Youth Liaison
Not yet hired due to funding allocations delay by
State
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Grades: All
1.

X All
_Other
See 22
afterschool and summer enrichment programs, and
extracurricular activities.
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Goals presented/discussed at following trainings:

See 22
9/23-24 FY Liaison Training
5/3/16 HS Training
2/16/16 Executive Advisory Committee
Transportation Policy written and supported
by Social Services
Communicated to Foster Youth Liaison 9/2324 and 5/3/2016
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
Countywide
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
23.b.
$0
Countywide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 110 of 147
105 of 113
_ All
_ Other
X All
_Other
24. Students will have a more coordinated delivery of
See 22
Coordination services and collaboration addressed
with interagency team (Social Services, Probation
and Mental Health and LEA) attending Foster Ed
Summit 4/2016 and Breaking Barriers Interagency
Team 4/20-21/2016.
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Grades: All
Countywide
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
24.a. Schedule, attend and document meetings for every
high school foster youth to assess academic progress
towards graduation
See 22
X All
_Other
.20 FTE
Admin Asst.
$13,215
Foster Youth
Grant
On-going STAR meetings 9 as of 3/30/16
$11, 621
Object: 2000 3999
June 8, 2016
Page 111 of 147
106 of 113
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Grades: All
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
24.b. Attend foster youth IEP¶s and SST meetings to
challenges
Countywide
X All
_Other
.35 FTE
Admin Asst.
$23,127
Foster Youth
Grant
Ongoing attendance at student IEP's and SST's.
$21,100
Object: 2000
±
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
Countywide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 112 of 147
107 of 113
24.c. Attend High Risk Team meetings and Critical Family .25 FTE
On-going attendance at High Risk and Critical
Team Meetings
Admin Asst. Family Team Meetings...
16,519 Foster
Youth Grant need #
$15,071
Object: 2000
±
Scope of
service:
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Grades: All
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
24.d. Update foster youth educational database
Countywide
X All
_Other
.20 FTE
Admin Asst.
$13,215
Foster Youth
Grant
Completed 350 educational records 12/2015
$12,057
Object: 2000 3999
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
Countywide
Grades: All
June 8, 2016
Page 113 of 147
108 of 113
_ All
_ Other
24.e. Attend intake staffing meetings, assist with
educational data entry
X All
_Other
.70 FTE
Admin Asst.
$51,041
Foster Youth
Grant
Ongoing attendance at intake staffing meetings.
$40,675
Object: 2000
±
Scope of
service:
Countywide
Scope of
service:
Grades: All
_ All
_ Other
Countywide
Grades: All
X All
_Other
June 8, 2016
Page 114 of 147
109 of 113
In reviewing our past progress with actions, services and expenditures, we will:
Include 9th and 10th grade foster youth in our STAR (Student Transcript and Academic Review) meetings in an
effort to increase our high school completion goal.
Collaborate with community agencies, LEA¶s, Community Colleges, CSU and UC systems and workforce
agencies, such as SMART Center, Workforce Investment Act in an effort to support Transitional programs and
services to foster youth
Support districts with appropriate information related to successful intervention strategies, specific to records
related to the history or on-going work with the foster child while maintaining confidentiality.
Section 3: Use of Supplemental and Concentration Grant funds and Proportionality
A. In the box below, identify the amount of funds in the LCAP year calculated on the basis of the number and concentration of low
income, foster youth, and English learner pupils as determined pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a)(5).
Describe how the LEA is expending these funds in the LCAP year. Include a description of, and justification for, the use of any funds in a
districtwide, schoolwide, countywide, or charterwide manner as specified in 5 CCR 15496.
For school districts with below 55 percent of enrollment of unduplicated pupils in the district or below 40 percent of enrollment of
unduplicated pupils at a schoolsite in the LCAP year, when using supplemental and concentration funds in a districtwide or schoolwide
manner, the school district must additionally describe how the services provided are the most effective use of funds to meet the
district͛s goals for unduplicated pupils in the state and any local priority areas. (See 5 CCR 15496(b) for guidance.)
Total amount of Supplemental and Concentration grant funds calculated:
123978
Background Information: Student programs offered by Shasta County Office of Education have been in declining enrollment for 3 years and
reorganized each year to meet needs of students. As a result, we have examined both our core and supplemental services and defined the
scope of each. Changes in include:
Reduction of .80 administration;
The majority of actions will be offered districtwide and will be applicable to all students. Because of the small enrollment within each school and
the large percentage of unduplicated students, it does not make sense to segregate the services to specific identified populations. Additionally,
as an alternative education service provider, all of the students we serve have extensive needs and will benefit from the services provided with
the supplemental and concentration funds.
June 8, 2016
Page 115 of 147
110 of 113
Supplemental and Concentration funds are being used to support students in several capacities. Funds will:
Provide additional paraprofessional training to insure they have the skills to meet the needs of the students
Provide additional paraprofessional support to allow for more individualized support for students
Provide a .50 Parent and Career Coach
Pay for student enrollment in the Regional Occupational Program
Pay for applications for credit acceleration and recovery
Provide for a portion of a staff member for attendance and data monitoring
The following description addresses core and supplemental:
CORE SERVICES
Administrator 1 per 300 students:
Clerical support: including data services 1 per 300 students
Teachers: 21 enrollment - 17 in seat
Facility expenses
Textbooks and supplies for core courses
SUPPLEMENTAL
Administrative services beyond core
Behavioral and Social-Emotional Support
Clerical support beyond core
Consultaiton services
Counseling
Curriculum Specialists and professional development
Instructional Assistants
June 8, 2016
Page 116 of 147
111 of 113
Instructional Services Coordinator to provide career support and family outreach
Nursing Consultations
Psychologist for non-special education services
Social worker
Textbooks and supplies for ROP courses
Transition service
B. In the box below, identify the percentage by which services for unduplicated pupils must be increased or improved as compared to the
services provided to all pupils in the LCAP year as calculated pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a).
Consistent with the requirements of 5 CCR 15496, demonstrate how the services provided in the LCAP year for low income pupils,
foster youth, and English learners provide for increased or improved services for these pupils in proportion to the increase in funding
provided for such pupils in that year as calculated pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a)(7). An LEA shall describe how the proportionality
percentage is met using a quantitative and/or qualitative description of the increased and/or improved services for unduplicated
pupils as compared to the services provided to all pupils.
2.27
%
Supplemental and concentration funds are being used to support students in lowering the student to staff ration. These services are particularly
needed for foster youth, students of poverty, special education and EL. Students in these categories have had less exposure to career activities
because of isolation in specialized programs. Research indicates they benefit from extended learning opportunities and counseling. We plan to
spend $123,978 on identified services which will meet our MPP requirement.
In addition to supplemental and concentration funds, we are using Title 1A and D funds to provide coordination, monitoring and training in the
area of foster and homeless youth,, addressing the needs of this unduplicated student group.
LOCAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN AND ANNUAL UPDATE APPENDIX
For the purposes of completing the LCAP in reference to the state priorities under Education Code sections 52060 and 52066, the
following shall apply:
June 8, 2016
Page 117 of 147
112 of 113
(a) ³Chronic absenteeism rate´shall be calculated as follows:
(1) The number of pupils with a primary, secondary, or short-term enrollment during the academic year (July 1 ±June 30) who are
chronically absent where ³chronic absentee´means a pupil who is absent 10 percent or more of the schooldays in the school
year when the total number of days a pupil is absent is divided by the total number of days the pupil is enrolled and school was
actually taught in the total number of days the pupil is enrolled and school was actually taught in the regular day schools of the
district, exclusive of Saturdays and Sundays.
(2) The unduplicated count of pupils with a primary, secondary, or short-term enrollment during the academic year (July 1 ±June
30).
(3) Divide (1) by (2).
(b) ³Middle School dropout rate´shall be calculated as set forth in California Code of Regulations, title 5, section 1039.1.
(c) ³High school dropout rate´shall be calculated as follows:
(1) The number of cohort members who dropout by the end of year 4 in the cohort where ³cohort´is defined as the number of firsttime grade 9 pupils in year 1 (starting cohort) plus pupils who transfer in, minus pupils who transfer out, emigrate, or die during
school years 1, 2, 3, and 4.
(2) The total number of cohort members.
(3) Divide (1) by (2).
(d) ³High school graduation rate´shall be calculated as follows:
(1) The number of cohort members who earned a regular high school diploma [or earned an adult education high school diploma or
passed the California High School Proficiency Exam] by the end of year 4 in the cohort where ³cohort´is defined as the number
of first-time grade 9 pupils in year 1 (starting cohort) plus pupils who transfer in, minus pupils who transfer out, emigrate, or die
during school years 1, 2, 3, and 4.
(2) The total number of cohort members.
(3) Divide (1) by (2).
(e) ³Suspension rate´shall be calculated as follows:
(1) The unduplicated count of pupils involved in one or more incidents for which the pupil was suspended during the academic year
June 8, 2016
Page 118 of 147
113 of 113
(July 1 ±June 30).
30).
(3) Divide (1) by (2).
(f) ³Expulsion rate´shall be calculated as follows:
(1) The unduplicated count of pupils involved in one or more incidents for which the pupil was expelled during the academic year
(July 1 ±June 30).
30).
(3) Divide (1) by (2).
June 8, 2016
Page 119 of 147
SHASTA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
BOARD AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
This form is due to the Superintendent’s Executive Assistant eight (8) calendar days prior to the Board meeting date
Board meeting date: 6-8-15
2016-17 Proposed Budget and Public Hearing
Agenda item topic:
De'An Chambless
Name of person requesting agenda item:
Name of person to attend Board meeting to address agenda item: Adam Hillman
Adam Hillman
Name of Cabinet level supervisor for this agenda item:
5-31-16
Date reviewed by Cabinet level supervisor:
Additional materials are provided with this form for the Board agenda packet:
Yes
✔
No
Type of agenda item (check one):
Action on Consent Agenda (these items are of routine nature or items for which no discussion is anticipated at the
meeting, the Board has the option to request that these items be discussed at the meeting before taking Action)
Action on Regular Agenda (these items are discussed by the Board at the meeting before taking Action)
✔ Discussion (these items are presented to the Board at the meeting and will be discussed)
Information (these items are not discussed at the meeting unless requested by the Board at the meeting)
Recognition (the person requesting to do a recognition will make arrangements for those being recognized to attend
the Board meeting)
Agenda Item Background/Description:
Ed Code requires the County Office to hold a public hearing to allow for comment on
the proposed budget along with a public hearing held for the Local Control
Accountability Plan. The public hearings must be held at a public meeting separate
from the board meeting in which action will be taken to approve the budget and LCAP.
The proposed budget for each fund is summarized on the attached forms. In addition,
we have included a detail of the proposed General Fund Ending Fund Balance
amounts and a multiyear projection. We will review our key budget assumptions at the
6-8-16 board meeting. The final budget will be presented for action at the 6-22-16
board meeting along with the budget summary book providing more detailed budget
information.
The following areas are to be completed for Action agenda items only:
Analysis:
Recommendation:
June 8, 2016
Page 120 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 121 of 147
July 1 Budget
County School Service Fund
Unrestricted and Restricted
Expenditures by Object
Shasta County
45 10454 0000000
Form 01
2015-16 Estimated Actuals
Description
Resource Codes
Object
Codes
Unrestricted
(A)
Restricted
(B)
2016-17 Budget
Total Fund
col. A + B
(C)
Unrestricted
(D)
Restricted
(E)
Total Fund
col. D + E
(F)
% Diff
Column
C&F
A. REVENUES
1) LCFF Sources
8010-8099
6,995,079.00
0.00
6,995,079.00
6,744,928.00
0.00
6,744,928.00
-3.6%
2) Federal Revenue
8100-8299
35,977.00
2,643,430.00
2,679,407.00
0.00
2,599,628.00
2,599,628.00
-3.0%
3) Other State Revenue
8300-8599
981,906.00
6,249,296.00
7,231,202.00
51,683.00
6,933,952.00
6,985,635.00
-3.4%
4) Other Local Revenue
8600-8799
5,358,670.00
2,843,914.00
8,202,584.00
5,370,195.00
3,410,271.00
8,780,466.00
7.0%
13,371,632.00
11,736,640.00
25,108,272.00
12,166,806.00
12,943,851.00
25,110,657.00
0.0%
5) TOTAL, REVENUES
B. EXPENDITURES
1) Certificated Salaries
1000-1999
1,346,121.00
3,036,251.00
4,382,372.00
1,241,989.00
3,211,194.00
4,453,183.00
1.6%
2) Classified Salaries
2000-2999
5,399,756.00
2,588,011.00
7,987,767.00
5,752,539.00
3,030,066.00
8,782,605.00
10.0%
3) Employee Benefits
3000-3999
2,561,653.00
1,906,823.00
4,468,476.00
2,793,349.00
2,341,045.00
5,134,394.00
14.9%
4) Books and Supplies
4000-4999
1,126,477.00
592,218.00
1,718,695.00
929,694.00
409,704.00
1,339,398.00
-22.1%
5) Services and Other Operating Expenditures
5000-5999
2,532,106.00
3,257,161.00
5,789,267.00
2,433,118.00
3,509,460.00
5,942,578.00
2.6%
6) Capital Outlay
6000-6999
1,231,961.00
36,740.00
1,268,701.00
78,849.00
650,000.00
728,849.00
-42.6%
7) Other Outgo (excluding Transfers of Indirect
Costs)
7100-7299
7400-7499
6,564.00
0.00
6,564.00
6,564.00
0.00
6,564.00
0.0%
8) Other Outgo - Transfers of Indirect Costs
7300-7399
9) TOTAL, EXPENDITURES
(1,656,695.00)
12,547,943.00
C. EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES BEFORE OTHER
FINANCING SOURCES AND USES (A5 - B9)
823,689.00
674,161.00
12,091,365.00
(354,725.00)
(982,534.00)
(1,793,011.00)
24,639,308.00
11,443,091.00
468,964.00
723,715.00
734,534.00
13,886,003.00
(942,152.00)
(1,058,477.00)
7.7%
25,329,094.00
2.8%
(218,437.00)
-146.6%
D. OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/USES
1) Interfund Transfers
a) Transfers In
8900-8929
117,923.00
0.00
117,923.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-100.0%
b) Transfers Out
7600-7629
150,000.00
0.00
150,000.00
324,693.00
11,201.00
335,894.00
123.9%
8930-8979
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7630-7699
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2) Other Sources/Uses
a) Sources
b) Uses
3) Contributions
4) TOTAL, OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/USES
California Dept of Education
SACS Financial Reporting Software - 2016.1.0
File: fund-a (Rev 03/22/2016)
8980-8999
(371,375.00)
371,375.00
(403,452.00)
371,375.00
June 8, 2016
Page 1
0.00
(32,077.00)
(1,003,375.00)
1,003,375.00
(1,328,068.00)
992,174.00
0.00
(335,894.00)
0.0%
947.1%
Page 122 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
July 1 Budget
County School Service Fund
Unrestricted and Restricted
Shasta County
45 10454 0000000
Form 01
2015-16 Estimated Actuals
Description
Resource Codes
Object
Codes
E. NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND
BALANCE (C + D4)
Unrestricted
(A)
Restricted
(B)
2016-17 Budget
Total Fund
col. A + B
(C)
Unrestricted
(D)
(604,353.00)
Restricted
(E)
50,022.00
Total Fund
col. D + E
(F)
(554,331.00)
% Diff
Column
C&F
420,237.00
16,650.00
436,887.00
-226.9%
9791
7,911,081.00
711,896.00
8,622,977.00
8,331,318.00
728,546.00
9,059,864.00
5.1%
9793
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7,911,081.00
711,896.00
8,622,977.00
8,331,318.00
728,546.00
9,059,864.00
5.1%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7,911,081.00
711,896.00
8,622,977.00
8,331,318.00
728,546.00
9,059,864.00
5.1%
8,331,318.00
728,546.00
9,059,864.00
7,726,965.00
778,568.00
8,505,533.00
-6.1%
9711
18,375.00
0.00
18,375.00
18,375.00
0.00
18,375.00
0.0%
Stores
9712
155,000.00
0.00
155,000.00
155,000.00
0.00
155,000.00
0.0%
Prepaid Expenditures
9713
100,000.00
0.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
0.00
100,000.00
0.0%
All Others
9719
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Restricted
9740
0.00
728,546.00
728,546.00
0.00
778,568.00
778,568.00
6.9%
c) Committed
Stabilization Arrangements
9750
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9760
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9780
6,613,943.00
0.00
6,613,943.00
5,983,590.00
0.00
5,983,590.00
-9.5%
Reserve for Economic Uncertainties
9789
1,144,000.00
0.00
1,144,000.00
1,170,000.00
0.00
1,170,000.00
2.3%
Unassigned/Unappropriated Amount
9790
300,000.00
0.00
300,000.00
300,000.00
0.00
300,000.00
0.0%
F. FUND BALANCE, RESERVES
1) Beginning Fund Balance
a) As of July 1 - Unaudited
b) Audit Adjustments
c) As of July 1 - Audited (F1a + F1b)
d) Other Restatements
9795
e) Adjusted Beginning Balance (F1c + F1d)
2) Ending Balance, June 30 (E + F1e)
Components of Ending Fund Balance
a) Nonspendable
Revolving Cash
Other Commitments
d) Assigned
Other Assignments
e) Unassigned/unappropriated
File: fund-a (Rev 03/22/2016)
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Page 123 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
SHASTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
Estimated
Actuals
6/30/16
Ending Fund Balance
LEGALLY RESTRICTED:
AltEd - Restricted Lottery
Educator Effectiveness
Locally restricted programs
Medi-Cal
Prop 39 Energy Efficiency
Nutrition Services
SELPA & Special Ed programs
TOTAL LEGALLY RESTRICTED
TOTAL NONSPENDABLE
(revolving cash, inventory, prepaids)
TOTAL ASSIGNED FOR ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY
(includes $400,000 additional reserve)
Student ADA Based Programs
AltEd - Unrestricted Funds
SpecEd - Unrestricted Funds
$
Adopted
Budget
6/30/17
25,042 $
21,957
43,792
166,802
53,238
60,587
357,128
728,546
25,023
10,757
48,893
221,397
53,238
30,970
388,290
778,568
273,375
273,375
1,153,000
1,170,000
Subtotal
359,152
23,890
383,042
344,923
23,682
368,605
Subtotal
79,863
9,195
34,600
110,934
19,746
75,680
164,942
23,758
518,718
79,863
7,795
102,930
21,440
41,063
81,909
9,829
344,829
Subtotal
1,005,292
2,000,000
3,005,292
355,292
2,000,000
2,355,292
Subtotal
429,568
102,647
532,215
400,000
62,362
462,362
Subtotal
100,000
235,000
700,000
1,130,676
2,165,676
100,000
250,000
700,000
1,402,502
2,452,502
TOTAL BOARD ASSIGNMENTS
6,604,943
5,983,590
UNASSIGNED/UNAPPROPRIATED
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
300,000
9,059,864 $
300,000
8,505,533
SCOE Internal Programs / Donated Funds
Career Pathways
Donated Funds / Student Scholarships
Latieze Funds
Project Share
STEM
Supplemental Educational Services
Vehicle Maintenance Equipment Fund
WES and Need Camp
Facility Needs
Deferred Maintenance Projects
Facility Improvements / Repairs
Early Childhood Services
ECS: Projects / Facilities
Nutrition services
Other Board Goals
AB1200 Fiscal Oversight
Technology Equipment Replacement
Retiree insurance obligation
Future Board Priorities
$
June 8, 2016
Page 124 of 147
2016-17 Adopted Budget
2016-17 Adopted Budget
Multiyear Projection
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
Unrestricted
Restricted
2017-18 Projection
Total
Unrestricted
Restricted
2018-19 Projection
Total
Unrestricted
Restricted
Total
8,331,318
728,546
9,059,864
7,726,965
778,568
8,505,533
7,600,187
787,438
8,387,625
6,744,928
51,683
5,370,195
(1,003,375)
11,163,431
2,599,628
6,933,952
3,410,271
1,003,375
13,947,226
6,744,928
2,599,628
6,985,635
8,780,466
25,110,657
6,807,060
51,683
5,370,195
(353,375)
11,875,563
2,599,628
6,933,952
3,517,227
353,375
13,404,182
6,807,060
2,599,628
6,985,635
8,887,422
25,279,745
6,870,696
51,683
5,370,195
(383,375)
11,909,199
2,599,628
6,933,952
3,607,349
383,375
13,524,304
6,870,696
2,599,628
6,985,635
8,977,544
25,433,503
1,241,989
5,752,539
2,793,349
9,787,877
929,694
2,433,118
78,849
6,564
(1,793,011)
100,000
224,693
11,767,784
3,211,194
3,030,066
2,341,045
8,582,305
409,704
3,509,460
650,000
734,534
11,201
13,897,204
4,453,183
8,782,605
5,134,394
18,370,182
1,339,398
5,942,578
728,849
6,564
(1,058,477)
111,201
224,693
25,664,988
1,256,893
5,925,113
2,930,428
10,112,434
904,694
2,268,118
78,849
6,564
(1,793,011)
100,000
324,693
12,002,341
3,249,728
3,154,299
2,459,417
8,863,444
409,704
3,376,429
734,534
11,201
13,395,312
4,506,621
9,079,412
5,389,845
18,975,878
1,314,398
5,644,547
78,849
6,564
(1,058,477)
111,201
324,693
25,397,653
1,271,976
6,073,241
3,069,129
10,414,346
904,694
2,248,118
78,849
6,564
(1,793,011)
100,000
424,693
12,384,253
3,288,725
3,233,156
2,566,821
9,088,702
409,704
3,271,315
734,534
11,201
13,515,456
4,560,701
9,306,397
5,635,950
19,503,048
1,314,398
5,519,433
78,849
6,564
(1,058,477)
111,201
424,693
25,899,709
(604,353)
50,022
(554,331)
(126,778)
8,870
(117,908)
(475,054)
8,849
(466,206)
ENDING FUND BALANCE
7,726,965
778,568
8,505,533
7,600,187
787,438
8,387,625
7,125,133
796,287
7,921,420
NonSpendable - Rev Cash/Prepaids/Stores
Legally Restricted
Board Assigned
Reserve for Economic Uncertainty
UnAssigned
Total
273,375
5,983,590
1,170,000
300,000
7,726,965
778,568
778,568
273,375
778,568
5,983,590
1,170,000
300,000
8,505,533
273,375
5,864,812
1,162,000
300,000
7,600,187
787,438
787,438
273,375
787,438
5,864,812
1,162,000
300,000
8,387,625
273,375
5,374,758
1,177,000
300,000
7,125,133
796,287
796,287
273,375
796,287
5,374,758
1,177,000
300,000
7,921,420
REVENUES
LCFF Revenues
Federal Revenues
Other State Revenues
Other Local Revenues
Interfund Transfers In
Other Sources
Contributions
TOTAL REVENUES
8010 - 8099
8100 - 8299
8300 - 8599
8600 - 8799
8910 - 8929
8930 - 8979
8980 - 8999
EXPENDITURES
Certificated Salaries
1000 - 1999
Classified Salaries
2000 - 2999
Employee Benefits
3000 - 3999
Total Salaries & Benefits
Books and Supplies
4000 - 4999
Services, Other Operating Expenses
5000 - 5999
Capital Outlay
6000 - 6599
Other Outgo
7100-7299, 7400-7499
Direct Support / Indirect Costs
7300 - 7399
Interfund Transfers Out - Transp Equip.
7619
Interfund Transfer to ECS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE
O:\_INTERNAL\_SCOE BUDGETS\2016-17\16-17 Adopted\MYP 16-17 OB
June 8, 2016
Page 125 of 147
5/31/2016
June 8, 2016
Page 126 of 147
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Charter Schools Special Revenue Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
45 10454 0000000
Form 09
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
A. REVENUES
1) LCFF Sources
8010-8099
996,760.00
998,222.00
0.1%
2) Federal Revenue
8100-8299
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8300-8599
16,005.00
73,287.00
357.9%
8600-8799
0.00
0.00
0.0%
1,012,765.00
1,071,509.00
5.8%
5) TOTAL, REVENUES
B. EXPENDITURES
1000-1999
477,926.00
441,109.00
-7.7%
2000-2999
69,303.00
113,813.00
64.2%
3000-3999
154,426.00
191,912.00
24.3%
4000-4999
34,000.00
28,000.00
-17.6%
5000-5999
179,983.00
211,909.00
17.7%
6) Capital Outlay
6000-6999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Costs)
7100-7299,
7400-7499
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7300-7399
0.00
0.00
0.0%
915,638.00
986,743.00
7.8%
97,127.00
84,766.00
-12.7%
a) Transfers In
8900-8929
0.00
11,201.00
New
b) Transfers Out
7600-7629
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8930-8979
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7630-7699
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8980-8999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
11,201.00
New
a) Sources
b) Uses
3) Contributions
Shasta County Board
File: fund-b (Rev 03/08/2016)
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 1
Page 127 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Charter Schools Special Revenue Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
BALANCE (C + D4)
45 10454 0000000
Form 09
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
97,127.00
95,967.00
-1.2%
9791
0.00
97,127.00
New
9793
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
97,127.00
New
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
97,127.00
New
97,127.00
193,094.00
98.8%
9711
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Stores
9712
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9713
0.00
0.00
0.0%
All Others
9719
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Restricted
9740
3,359.00
7,491.00
123.0%
c) Committed
9750
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9760
0.00
0.00
0.0%
d) Assigned
Other Assignments
9780
93,768.00
185,603.00
97.9%
e) Unassigned/Unappropriated
9789
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9790
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9795
a) Nonspendable
Revolving Cash
Other Commitments
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Page 128 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
June 8, 2016
Page 129 of 147
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Child Development Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
45 10454 0000000
Form 12
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
A. REVENUES
1) LCFF Sources
8010-8099
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2) Federal Revenue
8100-8299
3,950,467.00
4,254,479.00
7.7%
8300-8599
8,311,373.00
8,916,049.00
7.3%
8600-8799
2,461,497.00
2,361,765.00
-4.1%
14,723,337.00
15,532,293.00
5.5%
5) TOTAL, REVENUES
B. EXPENDITURES
1000-1999
992,648.00
1,119,197.00
12.7%
2000-2999
2,057,754.00
2,132,421.00
3.6%
3000-3999
1,158,381.00
1,260,680.00
8.8%
4000-4999
282,861.00
296,667.00
4.9%
5000-5999
9,348,480.00
9,900,082.00
5.9%
6) Capital Outlay
6000-6999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Costs)
7100-7299,
7400-7499
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7300-7399
982,534.00
1,058,477.00
7.7%
14,822,658.00
15,767,524.00
6.4%
(99,321.00)
(235,231.00)
136.8%
a) Transfers In
8900-8929
0.00
224,693.00
New
b) Transfers Out
7600-7629
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8930-8979
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7630-7699
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8980-8999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
224,693.00
New
a) Sources
b) Uses
3) Contributions
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 1
Page 130 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Child Development Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
BALANCE (C + D4)
45 10454 0000000
Form 12
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
(99,321.00)
(10,538.00)
-89.4%
9791
284,650.00
185,329.00
-34.9%
9793
0.00
0.00
0.0%
284,650.00
185,329.00
-34.9%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
284,650.00
185,329.00
-34.9%
185,329.00
174,791.00
-5.7%
9711
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Stores
9712
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9713
0.00
0.00
0.0%
All Others
9719
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Restricted
9740
33,562.00
33,562.00
0.0%
c) Committed
9750
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9760
0.00
0.00
0.0%
d) Assigned
Other Assignments
9780
151,767.00
141,229.00
-6.9%
9789
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9790
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9795
a) Nonspendable
Revolving Cash
Other Commitments
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Page 131 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
EARLY CHILDHOOD SERVICES
2016-17 ADOPTED BUDGET
Stages
2, 3 & CAPP
REVENUES
Federal Revenues
FTE's
Stage 1
CalWORKS
FTE's
Instructional
Programs
FTE's
Nutrition
LIA & Homes
FTE's
Non-Direct
Services
FTE's
All Other
Awards
Combined
FTE's
TOTAL
Funding
8100 - 8299
2,430,596.00
0.00
229,332.00
1,377,487.00
217,064.00
0.00
4,254,479.00
Other State Revenues
8300 - 8599
4,653,697.00
0.00
2,589,646.00
48,425.00
1,558,335.00
65,946.00
8,916,049.00
Other Local Revenues
8600 - 8799
8910 - 8929
8910 - 8929
8980 - 8990
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
224,693.00
0.00
0.00
20,605.00
0.00
0.00
7,345.00
307,051.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
34,109.00
0.00
0.00
(7,345.00)
2,361,765.00
224,693.00
0.00
0.00
7,084,293.00
2,000,000.00
3,043,671.00
1,453,862.00
2,082,450.00
92,710.00
15,756,986.00
Interfund Trnfs In-ECS Contrb
Interfund Trnfs In-Brd Desgn Contrib
Intrafund Contribution
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
Certificated Salaries
Classified Salaries
FTE's
1000 - 1999
19,187.00
0.2
18,989.00
0.6
739,435.00
22.1
0.00
0.0
341,586.00
6.6
0.00
0.0
1,119,197.00
29.4
2000 - 2999
296,192.00
6.4
430,732.00
8.3
880,581.00
29.8
127,001.00
2.2
382,758.00
6.8
15,157.00
0.2
2,132,421.00
53.6
Employee Benefits
3000 - 3999
134,877.00
180,720.00
541,459.00
62,009.00
271,059.00
70,556.00
1,260,680.00
Books and Supplies
4000 - 4999
13,000.00
6,036.00
40,553.00
1,731.00
230,219.00
5,128.00
296,667.00
5,844,541.00
1,150,000.00
0.00
1,236,122.00
0.00
0.00
8,230,663.00
0.00
0.00
Provider Payments-Child Care and
5805 - 5819
Meals
Support Internal Programs - within
5710
ECS
Support External Programs - within GF
5750
- ECS Reserves
Support External Programs - within GF
5750
- Rents & Leases
Support Ext Pgrms-within GF-Rents
57XX
Rec'd,Copier Chrgs,Fld Trips,Grph
Maint and Operations - C.U.s
5759
Per Meal Chargeback
5766
185,615.00
(28,512.00)
(146,570.00)
0.00
(10,533.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12,600.00
0.00
105,654.00
0.00
1,800.00
0.00
120,054.00
0.00
38,401.00
6,656.00
1,668.00
1,121.00
250.00
48,096.00
22,579.00
11,372.00
29,663.00
1,692.00
22,580.00
0.00
87,886.00
0.00
0.00
1,938.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,938.00
Vended Meals
5101/5801
0.00
0.00
146,540.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
146,540.00
Other Services
5000 - 5999
30,940.00
27,124.00
509,399.00
12,582.00
675,156.00
9,704.00
1,264,905.00
Capital Outlay
6000 - 6599
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Indirect
7300 - 7399
524,762.00
165,138.00
188,363.00
11,057.00
166,704.00
2,453.00
1,058,477.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES/FTE's
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN
FUND BALANCE
BEGINNING BALANCE
ENDING BALANCE
7,084,293.00
6.5
2,000,000.00
8.9
3,043,671.00
51.9
1,453,862.00
2.2
2,082,450.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
21,391.00
21,391.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12,171.00
12,171.00
June 8, 2016
13.4
103,248.00
0.2
15,767,524.00
(10,538.00)
(10,538.00)
151,767.00
141,229.00
185,329.00
174,791.00
Page 132 of 147
83.0
June 8, 2016
Page 133 of 147
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Special Education Pass-Through Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
45 10454 0000000
Form 10
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
A. REVENUES
1) LCFF Sources
8010-8099
1,810,333.00
1,858,303.00
2.6%
2) Federal Revenue
8100-8299
4,993,395.00
5,270,307.00
5.5%
8300-8599
11,009,773.00
10,541,625.00
-4.3%
8600-8799
29,000.00
29,000.00
0.0%
17,842,501.00
17,699,235.00
-0.8%
5) TOTAL, REVENUES
B. EXPENDITURES
1000-1999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2000-2999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
3000-3999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
4000-4999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
5000-5999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
6) Capital Outlay
6000-6999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Costs)
7100-7299,
7400-7499
17,877,903.00
17,740,669.00
-0.8%
7300-7399
0.00
0.00
0.0%
17,877,903.00
17,740,669.00
-0.8%
(35,402.00)
(41,434.00)
17.0%
a) Transfers In
8900-8929
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Transfers Out
7600-7629
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8930-8979
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7630-7699
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8980-8999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
a) Sources
b) Uses
3) Contributions
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 1
Page 134 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Special Education Pass-Through Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
BALANCE (C + D4)
45 10454 0000000
Form 10
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
(35,402.00)
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
(41,434.00)
17.0%
9791
5,811,363.00
5,775,961.00
-0.6%
9793
0.00
0.00
0.0%
5,811,363.00
5,775,961.00
-0.6%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
5,811,363.00
5,775,961.00
-0.6%
5,775,961.00
5,734,527.00
-0.7%
9711
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Stores
9712
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9713
0.00
0.00
0.0%
All Others
9719
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Restricted
9740
5,775,961.00
5,734,527.00
-0.7%
c) Committed
9750
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9760
0.00
0.00
0.0%
d) Assigned
Other Assignments
9780
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9789
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9790
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9795
a) Nonspendable
Revolving Cash
Other Commitments
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Page 135 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:44 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Pupil Transportation Equipment Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
45 10454 0000000
Form 15
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
A. REVENUES
1) LCFF Sources
8010-8099
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2) Federal Revenue
8100-8299
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8300-8599
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8600-8799
100.00
100.00
0.0%
100.00
100.00
0.0%
5) TOTAL, REVENUES
B. EXPENDITURES
1000-1999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2000-2999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
3000-3999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
4000-4999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
5000-5999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
6) Capital Outlay
6000-6999
142,252.00
28,000.00
-80.3%
Costs)
7100-7299,
7400-7499
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7300-7399
0.00
0.00
0.0%
142,252.00
28,000.00
-80.3%
(142,152.00)
(27,900.00)
-80.4%
a) Transfers In
8900-8929
150,000.00
100,000.00
-33.3%
b) Transfers Out
7600-7629
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8930-8979
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7630-7699
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8980-8999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
150,000.00
100,000.00
-33.3%
a) Sources
b) Uses
3) Contributions
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 1
Page 136 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:45 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Pupil Transportation Equipment Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
BALANCE (C + D4)
45 10454 0000000
Form 15
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
7,848.00
72,100.00
818.7%
9791
93,593.00
101,441.00
8.4%
9793
0.00
0.00
0.0%
93,593.00
101,441.00
8.4%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
93,593.00
101,441.00
8.4%
101,441.00
173,541.00
71.1%
9711
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Stores
9712
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9713
0.00
0.00
0.0%
All Others
9719
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Restricted
9740
0.00
0.00
0.0%
c) Committed
9750
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9760
0.00
0.00
0.0%
d) Assigned
Other Assignments
9780
101,441.00
173,541.00
71.1%
9789
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9790
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9795
a) Nonspendable
Revolving Cash
Other Commitments
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Page 137 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:45 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Forest Reserve Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
45 10454 0000000
Form 16
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
A. REVENUES
1) LCFF Sources
8010-8099
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2) Federal Revenue
8100-8299
786,153.00
0.00
-100.0%
8300-8599
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8600-8799
0.00
0.00
0.0%
786,153.00
0.00
-100.0%
5) TOTAL, REVENUES
B. EXPENDITURES
1000-1999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2000-2999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
3000-3999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
4000-4999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
5000-5999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
6) Capital Outlay
6000-6999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Costs)
7100-7299,
7400-7499
668,230.00
0.00
-100.0%
7300-7399
0.00
0.00
0.0%
668,230.00
0.00
-100.0%
117,923.00
0.00
-100.0%
a) Transfers In
8900-8929
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Transfers Out
7600-7629
117,923.00
0.00
-100.0%
8930-8979
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7630-7699
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8980-8999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
-100.0%
a) Sources
b) Uses
3) Contributions
Shasta County Board
of Education
(117,923.00)
June 8, 2016
Page 1
Page 138 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:45 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Forest Reserve Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
BALANCE (C + D4)
45 10454 0000000
Form 16
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9791
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9793
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9711
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Stores
9712
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9713
0.00
0.00
0.0%
All Others
9719
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Restricted
9740
0.00
0.00
0.0%
c) Committed
9750
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9760
0.00
0.00
0.0%
d) Assigned
Other Assignments
9780
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9789
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9790
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9795
a) Nonspendable
Revolving Cash
Other Commitments
Shasta County Board
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Page 139 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:45 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Capital Facilities Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
45 10454 0000000
Form 25
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
A. REVENUES
1) LCFF Sources
8010-8099
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2) Federal Revenue
8100-8299
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8300-8599
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8600-8799
81,000.00
81,000.00
0.0%
81,000.00
81,000.00
0.0%
5) TOTAL, REVENUES
B. EXPENDITURES
1000-1999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
2000-2999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
3000-3999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
4000-4999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
5000-5999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
6) Capital Outlay
6000-6999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Costs)
7100-7299,
7400-7499
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7300-7399
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
81,000.00
81,000.00
0.0%
a) Transfers In
8900-8929
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Transfers Out
7600-7629
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8930-8979
0.00
0.00
0.0%
7630-7699
0.00
0.00
0.0%
8980-8999
0.00
0.00
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
a) Sources
b) Uses
3) Contributions
Shasta County Board
File: fund-d (Rev 02/02/2016)
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 1
Page 140 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:45 PM
Shasta County
Description
July 1 Budget
Capital Facilities Fund
Resource Codes
Object Codes
BALANCE (C + D4)
45 10454 0000000
Form 25
2015-16
Estimated Actuals
2016-17
Budget
Percent
Difference
81,000.00
81,000.00
0.0%
9791
49,801.00
130,801.00
162.6%
9793
0.00
0.00
0.0%
49,801.00
130,801.00
162.6%
0.00
0.00
0.0%
49,801.00
130,801.00
162.6%
130,801.00
211,801.00
61.9%
9711
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Stores
9712
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9713
0.00
0.00
0.0%
All Others
9719
0.00
0.00
0.0%
b) Restricted
9740
0.00
0.00
0.0%
c) Committed
9750
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9760
0.00
0.00
0.0%
d) Assigned
Other Assignments
9780
130,801.00
211,801.00
61.9%
9789
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9790
0.00
0.00
0.0%
9795
a) Nonspendable
Revolving Cash
Other Commitments
Shasta County Board
File: fund-d (Rev 02/02/2016)
of Education
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Page 141 of 147
Printed: 5/31/2016 2:45 PM
June 8, 2016
Page 142 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 143 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 144 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 145 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 146 of 147
June 8, 2016
Page 147 of 147